REVIEW 2 cited by
A Note on Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Lovelock Gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The Lovelock gravity consists of the dimensionally extended Euler densities. The geometry and horizon structure of black hole solutions could be quite complicated in this gravity, however, we find that some thermodynamic quantities of the black holes like the mass, Hawking temperature and entropy, have simple forms expressed in terms of horizon radius. The case with black hole horizon being a Ricci flat hypersurface is particularly simple. In that case the black holes are always thermodynamically stable with a positive heat capacity and their entropy still obeys the area formula, which is no longer valid for black holes with positive or negative constant curvature horizon hypersurface. In addition, for black holes in the gravity theory of Ricci scalar plus a $2n$-dimensional Euler density with a positive coefficient, thermodynamically stable small black holes always exist in $D=2n+1$ dimensions, which are absent in the case without the Euler density term, while the thermodynamic properties of the black hole solutions with the Euler density term are qualitatively similar to those of black holes without the Euler density term as $D>2n+1$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
D-dimensional black holes in extended Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Charged and rotating anti-de Sitter black hole solutions are constructed in extended Gauss-Bonnet gravity for dimensions three, four, five and higher.
-
Extended thermodynamical topology of black hole
The paper introduces a unified extended thermodynamical topology framework for black holes and claims a correspondence between zeros of higher-order vector fields and critical exponents.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.