Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

What do Shannon-type Inequalities, Submodular Width, and Disjunctive Datalog have to do with one another?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1612.02503 v5 pith:27Y6TSPY submitted 2016-12-08 cs.DB cs.DScs.ITmath.IT

What do Shannon-type Inequalities, Submodular Width, and Disjunctive Datalog have to do with one another?

classification cs.DB cs.DScs.ITmath.IT
keywords boundsinequalitiesdatalogdisjunctiveresultswidthalgorithmsbound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent works on bounding the output size of a conjunctive query with functional dependencies and degree constraints have shown a deep connection between fundamental questions in information theory and database theory. We prove analogous output bounds for disjunctive datalog rules, and answer several open questions regarding the tightness and looseness of these bounds along the way. Our bounds are intimately related to Shannon-type information inequalities. We devise the notion of a "proof sequence" of a specific class of Shannon-type information inequalities called "Shannon flow inequalities". We then show how such a proof sequence can be interpreted as symbolic instructions guiding an algorithm called "PANDA", which answers disjunctive datalog rules within the time that the size bound predicted. We show that PANDA can be used as a black-box to devise algorithms matching precisely the fractional hypertree width and the submodular width runtimes for aggregate and conjunctive queries with functional dependencies and degree constraints. Our results improve upon known results in three ways. First, our bounds and algorithms are for the much more general class of disjunctive datalog rules, of which conjunctive queries are a special case. Second, the runtime of PANDA matches precisely the submodular width bound, while the previous algorithm by Marx has a runtime that is polynomial in this bound. Third, our bounds and algorithms work for queries with input cardinality bounds, functional dependencies, and degree constraints. Overall, our results show a deep connection between three seemingly unrelated lines of research; and, our results on proof sequences for Shannon flow inequalities might be of independent interest.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PANDAExpress: a Simpler and Faster PANDA Algorithm

    cs.DB 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    PANDAExpress proves a new output-size bound for disjunctive datalog rules and uses dynamic arbitrary hyperplane cuts to eliminate polylog factors from PANDA's runtime while matching specialized algorithms.

  2. Lexicographic Direct Access with Functional Dependencies

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Lexicographic direct access under functional dependencies is characterized: unary FDs are tight via reordered extensions, general FDs have a PANDA/polymatroid-based algorithm and color-number lower bounds that meet ex...

  3. Query Optimization and Evaluation via Information Theory: A Tutorial

    cs.DB 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The PANDA framework derives information-theoretically tight upper bounds on intermediate relation cardinalities to both cost and construct query plans for conjunctive queries, matching or subsuming specialized algorit...