Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Gross-Neveu-Yukawa SO(2) and SO(3) tensorial criticality

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coupling an SO(3) symmetric traceless tensor to Dirac fermions yields a stable quantum critical fixed point for every number of flavors, defining a universality class with no vector analogue.

desk verdict A careful two-loop RG paper: the N=3 tensor GNY fixed point is genuinely new within the epsilon expansion, but the 'any Nf at D=3' conclusion is an extrapolation the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16842 v5 pith:2AC4QEJW submitted 2024-11-25 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechhep-th

SangEun Han , Shouryya Ray , Igor F. Herbut This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechhep-th
keywords Gross-Neveu-Yukawatensororderparameterquantumcriticalityrenormalizationgroupspin-orbitalliquiduniaxialnematicchiralXYmodelcriticalexponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies what happens at a quantum phase transition when the order parameter is a real symmetric traceless matrix transforming under SO(2) or SO(3), coupled to a variable number of two-component Dirac fermions. It claims that for SO(3) this tensor Gross-Neveu-Yukawa theory—a relativistic field theory of Dirac fermions coupled to a bosonic order parameter—has a stable critical fixed point for any number of fermion flavors, and that the transition belongs to a new universality class (a set of critical exponents shared by microscopically different systems) with no vector equivalent; for SO(2) the theory reduces to the chiral XY model. The authors compute the anomalous dimensions, the correlation-length exponent, and the mass-gap ratio between boson and fermion masses to second order in $\epsilon=4-D$, and show that symmetry-allowed sextic terms select a uniaxial nematic ground state with a fully gapped fermion spectrum. A sympathetic reader would care because these exponents are proposed as fingerprints for transitions out of fractionalized spin-orbital liquids, where the order parameter is a composite of emergent Majorana fermions.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the real symmetric traceless matrix $S$ transforming under SO(N), together with the identity $\frac{1}{\bar N^2}(\mathrm{Tr}[S^2])^2=\frac{2}{\bar N^2}\mathrm{Tr}[S^4]=(\sum_i\phi_i^2)^2$, valid for $N=2,3$. This identity collapses the two quartic self-interactions ('trace' and 'double-trace') into a single coupling $\lambda$, which is why the bosonic sector resembles an SO(Ns) vector theory with $N_s=\frac12(N-1)(N+2)$ and why a stable fixed point can exist for all $N_f$. The argument runs on two-loop $\beta$ functions obtained by projecting the general scalar-fermion $\beta$ functions of Ref. [33] onto this one-coupling subspace, and on the one-loop flow of the two independent sextic couplings; the negative fixed-point value of the coupling $\kappa_2$ that multiplies $(\mathrm{Tr}[S^3])^2$ decides that the ground state is the uniaxial nematic.

What would settle it

A Monte Carlo or conformal-bootstrap determination of the SO(3) tensor Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model at $N_f=1$ in $D=3$ that found a first-order transition, or exponents clearly outside $\eta_\psi\approx0.312$, $\eta_\phi\approx0.373$, and $\nu^{-1}\approx1.042$, would falsify the central claim; so would an experiment at the spin-orbital-liquid transition that found gapless fermionic excitations in the ordered phase instead of the predicted full gap.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the SO(3)-invariant Gross-Neveu-Yukawa theory for a real symmetric traceless tensor order parameter has a critical fixed point for every flavor number $N_f$, and that this fixed point is genuinely tensorial rather than a disguised vector theory. Up to quartic terms the bosonic action is equivalent to an SO(5) vector model, because the trace and double-trace self-interactions are proportional for $N=3$; the two-loop renormalization-group calculation shows that once fermions are coupled, the fixed-point values $\alpha_g^*$ and $\lambda^*$ remain positive for all $N_f$, so the transition is continuous. The same calculation yields the anomalous dimensions $\eta_\psi$ and $\eta_\phi$, the inverse correlation-length exponent $\nu^{-1}$, and the mass-gap ratio to order $\epsilon^2$. The paper also shows that the leading sextic interaction that breaks the accidental SO(5) symmetry down to SO(3) has a negative fixed-point value, which forces the ordered ground state to be a uniaxial nematic with $S\propto\mathrm{diag}(1,1,-2)$ and opens a full gap in the fermion spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the fixed point found in the expansion in $\epsilon=4-D$ remains stable and physically relevant when $\epsilon=1$, i.e., in three dimensions, for every number of fermion flavors; the paper itself flags possible positive stability eigenvalues at larger $\epsilon$ and defers that check to resummation, numerics, and experiment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $N=2$, the theory is the chiral XY model, and the paper's exponents agree with existing four-loop results at $N_f=1/2$ and $2$, giving a check on the method.
  • For $N=3$ and one fermion flavor, the predicted exponents at $\epsilon=1$ are $\eta_\psi\approx0.312$, $\eta_\phi\approx0.373$, and $\nu^{-1}\approx1.042$; observation of these values at a spin-orbital-liquid transition would confirm the new tensorial class.
  • In the ordered phase of the $N=3$ theory the fermion spectrum is fully gapped with one mass twice the other, whereas the vector SO(3) Gross-Neveu-Yukawa theory is not fully gapped; this is a qualitative distinction experiments can look for.
  • The mass-gap ratio approaches 4 for large $N_f$ in $N=2$ but 6 in $N=3$ (using the heaviest fermion mass), so the two tensor theories remain distinguishable even in the large-flavor limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism that reduces two quartic couplings to one for $N=2,3$ may occur in other low-rank representations where symmetry forces a single quartic invariant, so the paper's recipe could yield additional genuinely tensorial universality classes that exist for all flavor numbers.
  • The selection of the uniaxial nematic ground state rests on the sign of the sextic coupling at one loop; a two-loop computation of the sextic beta functions could test whether that sign is stable, since the fermion-induced terms enter at order $\epsilon^3$.
  • Because the ordered phase is fully gapped, the low-energy physics is purely bosonic; thermodynamic or spectroscopic signatures tied to the predicted correlation-length exponent could distinguish this class from vector Gross-Neveu-Yukawa transitions in frustrated magnets.
  • The paper leaves the stability of the fixed point at $\epsilon=1$ unresolved for some $N_f$; a resummed or numerical stability map as a function of $N_f$ would decide whether the 'all $N_f$' claim survives outside the small-$\epsilon$ regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies relativistic Gross-Neveu-Yukawa field theories with SO(2)- and SO(3)-invariant rank-two symmetric traceless tensor order parameters coupled to N_f flavors of two-component Dirac fermions. Using two-loop renormalization group equations in D = 4 - epsilon, projected from the generic results of Ref. [33] and cross-checked with the package RGBeta and an independent evaluation, the authors find interacting fixed points for N = 2 and N = 3. They argue that N = 2 is equivalent to the chiral XY model, while N = 3 defines a new universality class distinct from the vector SO(5) Gross-Neveu-Yukawa theory. They compute anomalous dimensions, correlation-length exponent, and mass-gap ratios to order epsilon^2, and discuss the role of sextic terms in selecting a uniaxial nematic ground state. The central claim is that the N = 3 theory has a stable critical fixed point and a continuous transition for any number of fermion flavors.

Significance. If established, the N = 3 result would be a genuinely new tensorial Gross-Neveu-Yukawa universality class, with predictions relevant to fractionalized spin-orbital liquids and to the proposal in Ref. [32]. The manuscript has several positive features: the fixed-point couplings and critical exponents are given in closed form for all N_f; the two-loop beta functions are cross-checked against an independent evaluation and RGBeta; and the N = 2 reduction to the chiral XY model provides a nontrivial consistency check against the literature. The main weakness is that the headline claim of a continuous transition for any N_f at D = 3 relies on setting epsilon = 1 in a two-loop epsilon expansion, and the paper itself states that the stability matrices can develop positive eigenvalues for larger epsilon depending on N_f. The fixed-point stability at the physical dimension is therefore not yet demonstrated, and the conclusion goes beyond what the calculation shown supports.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, paragraph after Fig. 2] The sentence that the stability matrices 'have negative eigenvalues for small ϵ but also can have positive eigenvalues for larger values of ϵ depending on Nf' directly concerns the paper's central claim. The abstract and conclusions assert a continuous phase transition for any Nf, and the numerical results in Figs. 2-4 and Eqs. (36)-(47) are all evaluated at ϵ = 1. If a stability eigenvalue changes sign before ϵ reaches 1 for some Nf, the fixed point is not a critical fixed point at D = 3 within this approximation. The manuscript does not provide the two-loop stability matrix or its eigenvalues as functions of Nf and ϵ. This is a load-bearing step: either the eigenvalue analysis (or a controlled resummation) should be supplied, or the claim must be restricted to the small-ϵ regime and the phrase 'for any value of Nf' appropriately qualified.
  2. [Abstract and Section VI] The concluding statement that the N = 3 theory represents 'one, and to the best of our knowledge only, example of distinctly tensorial quantum criticality which exists for all numbers of fermion flavors' overstates the evidence presented. The existence statement is non-perturbative, whereas the calculation is a two-loop epsilon expansion whose convergence and stability at ϵ = 1 are explicitly deferred to future resummation, numerics, and experiments. The claim should be rephrased as holding within the two-loop epsilon expansion, or the authors should provide the missing stability analysis at ϵ = 1 before making the stronger existence claim.
  3. [Section IV, Eqs. (17), (24), (25)] The sextic couplings are described as 'irrelevant at the non-interacting fixed point for small ϵ,' but at the physical dimension D = 3 (ϵ = 1) their engineering dimension vanishes, so they are marginal rather than irrelevant. The fixed-point values in Eqs. (24)-(25) are one-loop results of order ϵ^3, and no stability analysis of the κ-flows is given. Since the negative sign of κ2* is used to select the uniaxial nematic ground state and thereby to determine the fermion mass spectrum used in the mass-gap ratio, this part of the argument also depends on the ε → 1 extrapolation. The authors should either provide additional support for the sign of κ2* at ε = 1 or phrase the ground-state selection as a leading-order epsilon-expansion result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are typos in the abstract ('the the anomalous dimensions') and in the Introduction ('stable critical fixed fixed point').
  2. [Section III, Eq. (9)] The displayed one-loop coefficient of α_g^* for N = 3 appears as 3/[4(Nf + 2)], which is inconsistent with the one-loop beta function in Eq. (5) and with the later Eq. (22); it should be 4/[3(Nf + 2)]. Please correct the typesetting.
  3. [Section III, Eqs. (5)-(6)] The notation in the beta functions is hard to parse in the typeset text, especially the terms involving 'αgλ2' and 'α2gλ'. Please ensure all powers and products are displayed unambiguously.
  4. [Section V.B] The choice of the heaviest fermion mass m_{ψ,b} in the mass-gap ratio is not justified beyond a parenthetical statement. Please state the convention explicitly and note how the ratio would differ if the lighter fermion mass m_{ψ,a} were used (the factor of 4 is mentioned, but the convention should be clearer).
  5. [Section III and Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'The fixed point values are positive... They are positive' is repetitive, and the text 'To elaborate, we get the beta functions...' is vague about the actual projection procedure; a short description of how the JOS results are projected onto this field content would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central two-loop fixed-point calculation is an independent projection of externally derived beta functions, solved analytically and cross-checked, with self-citations serving only as background and corroboration.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at its core. The two-loop beta functions in Eqs. (5) and (6) are obtained by projecting the generic MS-scheme results of Jack-Osborn-Steudtner [33] onto the SO(N) tensor model, with an independent evaluation and a cross-check against the RGBeta package [34]. The fixed-point couplings are then solved analytically from the condition d(alpha_g, lambda)/dl = 0, not fitted to any target data. The critical exponents in Sec. V are derived by substituting these solved couplings into standard expressions for anomalous dimensions and the correlation-length exponent. Self-citations to the authors' earlier works [30] and [32] are present, but they motivate the model, state the contrasting N>3 behavior, and corroborate the uniaxial-nematic ground state; none of the displayed formulas for N=2,3 reduce by construction to those earlier results. The identity in Eq. (2) that reduces two quartic couplings to one is an algebraic property of traceless symmetric tensors, not an imported assumption. The paper explicitly flags the limitation that stability eigenvalues may become positive for larger epsilon depending on Nf and defers to resummation, numerics, and experiments; this is an extrapolation concern about the epsilon=1 regime, not circularity. No fitted input is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: epsilon is the standard expansion parameter and Nf is external; fixed-point couplings are solved, not fitted. The central claim rests on external beta functions [33], the projection identity Eq. (2), and the extrapolation of the epsilon expansion to D=3, each listed as an axiom. No new particles or mediators are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The generic two-loop beta functions of Jack, Osborn, and Steudtner [33] are correct and their projection onto the single quartic coupling of this model is faithful.
    The RG equations (5)-(6) are taken from the generic results of [33] and checked against RGBeta [34]; no independent derivation is shown in the paper.
  • domain assumption The epsilon expansion near D=4-epsilon remains valid at epsilon=1 in D=3.
    Used for all numerical exponents and for the claim that the theory is critical for any Nf; Sec. III states stability can fail for larger epsilon and calls for resummation, numerics, and experiments.
  • standard math The traceless symmetric tensor identities in Eq. (2) reduce the two quartic couplings to one for N=2,3.
    Algebraic identity, load-bearing for the bosonic sector being O(Ns)-like at quartic order.
  • domain assumption The Clifford algebra dimension d_gamma cancels in final physical expressions.
    Assumed in Sec. II for the analytic continuation to arbitrary dimensions; not demonstrated in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gross-Neveu-Yukawa SO(2) and SO(3) tensorial criticality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2AC4QEJW

@misc{pith2026241116842,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gross-Neveu-Yukawa SO(2) and SO(3) tensorial criticality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2AC4QEJW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16842}
}
abstract

We investigate the relativistic SO(2)- and SO(3)-invariant Gross-Neveu-Yukawa field theories for real, rank-two, symmetric, traceless tensor order parameters coupled to $N_{\text{f}}$ flavors of two-component Dirac fermions. These field theories arise as an effective description of fractionalized spin-orbital liquids. The two theories are the simplest and special cases of the more general class of field theories with SO($N$) symmetric tensor order parameter coupled to Dirac fermions, in which the symmetry is low enough to allow only one, and not the usual two quartic self-interaction terms. Using two-loop renormalization group near the upper critical dimension, we demonstrate that the theory exhibits a new critical fixed point for $N=3$ and the concomitant continuous phase transition for any value of $N_{\text{f}}$. For $N=2$ the theory is equivalent to the chiral XY model. We discuss the crucial role of the symmetry-allowed sextic self-interactions in the selection of the ground state configuration in the case of SO(3). The universal quantities such as the the anomalous dimensions of order parameters and fermions, the correlation length exponent, and the mass gap ratio between order parameter and fermion masses are computed up to $\epsilon^{2}$ order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16842 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams illustrating loop corrections up to two-loop order for order parameter self-energy (a–d), fermion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Stable interacting fixed point values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Critical exponents for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Mass gap ratio between boson and fermion masses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    This has been automatized to two-loop order in the pack- age RGBeta [34]

    are in fact not independent but related to each other by (possibly intricate) symmetry relations, and therefore in projecting them on to physically meaningful couplings. This has been automatized to two-loop order in the pack- age RGBeta [34]. We have also evaluated the (univer- sal) two-loop beta-functions ourselves, and found them to agree fully with th...

    work page

  2. [32]

    that the critical exponents of the tensor version of Gross-Neveu-SO(3) theory hence presents an additional, independent set of fingerprints of the same Majorana fermions. Providing theoretical predictions for these ex- ponents, as we do here beyond the leading quantum cor- rections, is hence also relevant to the study of fractional- ized phases of matter,...

    work page

  3. [1]

    We therefore choose this branch

    Both solutions are interacting, but only λ∗ 1 > 0 is stable. We therefore choose this branch. The equa- tion for (α∗ g,n, λ∗ n) is found by inserting the ( α∗ g,k, λ∗ k)k<n into the fixed-point equation and comparing coefficients at O(ϵn+1). The equation is always linear in ( α∗ g,n, λ∗ n) (with the equation for α∗ g,n in fact independent of λ∗ n). Hence,...

    work page

  4. [2]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena: Fifth Edition (Oxford University Press, 2021)

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena: Fifth Edition (Oxford University Press, 2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [3]

    Rosenstein, B

    B. Rosenstein, B. J. Warr, and S. H. Park, Four-fermion theory is renormalizable in 2+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1433 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [4]

    D. J. Gross and A. Neveu, Dynamical symmetry breaking in asymptotically free field theories, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3235 (1974)

    1974

  7. [5]

    Gracey, Computation of β′(gc) at O(1/ N 2) in the O(N ) Gross-Neveu model in arbitrary dimensions, In- ternational Journal of Modern Physics A 09, 567 (1994)

    J. Gracey, Computation of β′(gc) at O(1/ N 2) in the O(N ) Gross-Neveu model in arbitrary dimensions, In- ternational Journal of Modern Physics A 09, 567 (1994)

    work page 1994

  8. [6]

    Gracey, Computation of critical exponent η at O(1/N 3) in the four-Fermi model in arbitrary dimen- sions, International Journal of Modern Physics A 09, 727 (1994)

    J. Gracey, Computation of critical exponent η at O(1/N 3) in the four-Fermi model in arbitrary dimen- sions, International Journal of Modern Physics A 09, 727 (1994)

    work page 1994

Show all 41 references
  1. [7]

    A. N. Vasil’ev, S. ´E. Derkachev, N. A. Kivel’, and A. S. Stepanenko, The 1/n expansion in the Gross-Neveu model: Conformal bootstrap calculation of the index η in order 1/n3, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 94, 127 (1993)

    1993

  2. [8]

    Zinn-Justin, Four-fermion interaction near four dimen- sions, Nuclear Physics B 367, 105 (1991)

    J. Zinn-Justin, Four-fermion interaction near four dimen- sions, Nuclear Physics B 367, 105 (1991)

    1991

  3. [9]

    I. F. Herbut, Interactions and Phase Transitions on Graphene’s Honeycomb Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146401 (2006)

    2006

  4. [10]

    R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Gross-Neveu- Yukawa archipelago, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 36 (2023)

    2023

  5. [11]

    I. F. Herbut, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and O. Vafek, Relativistic Mott criticality in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 80, 075432 (2009)

    2009

  6. [12]

    B. Roy, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and I. F. Herbut, Quantum supercon- ducting criticality in graphene and topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 87, 041401 (2013); Erratum: Quantum superconducting criticality in graphene and topological insulators [phys. rev. b 87, 041401(r) (2013)], Phys...

    2013

  7. [13]

    I. F. Herbut, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and B. Roy, Theory of interacting electrons on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085116 (2009)

    2009

  8. [14]

    Ihrig, L

    B. Ihrig, L. N. Mihaila, and M. M. Scherer, Critical be- havior of Dirac fermions from perturbative renormaliza- tion, Phys. Rev. B 98, 125109 (2018)

    2018

  9. [15]

    Vojta, Y

    M. Vojta, Y. Zhang, and S. Sachdev, Renormalization group analysis of quantum critical points in d-wave su- perconductors, International Journal of Modern Physics B 14, 3719 (2000)

    2000

  10. [16]

    N. Zerf, L. N. Mihaila, P. Marquard, I. F. Herbut, and M. M. Scherer, Four-loop critical exponents for the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa models, Phys. Rev. D 96, 096010 (2017)

    2017

  11. [17]

    Schwab, L

    J. Schwab, L. Janssen, K. Sun, Z. Y. Meng, I. F. Herbut, M. Vojta, and F. F. Assaad, Nematic Quantum Criti- cality in Dirac Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 157203 (2022)

    2022

  12. [18]

    M. M. Scherer and I. F. Herbut, Gauge-field-assisted Kekul´ e quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. B 94, 205136 (2016)

    2016

  13. [19]

    Huh and S

    Y. Huh and S. Sachdev, Renormalization group theory of nematic ordering in d-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 78, 064512 (2008)

    2008

  14. [20]

    I. F. Herbut, Wilson-Fisher Fixed Points in the Pres- ence of Dirac Fermions, in 50 Years of the Renormaliza- tion Group , edited by A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, D. A. Huse, and L. Radzihovsky (World Scientific, 2024) 10 Chap. 21, pp. 347–362; Wilson-fisher fixed points in th...

    2024

  15. [21]

    Braun, H

    J. Braun, H. Gies, and D. D. Scherer, Asymptotic safety: A simple example, Phys. Rev. D 83, 085012 (2011)

    2011

  16. [22]

    Torres, L

    E. Torres, L. Classen, I. F. Herbut, and M. M. Scherer, Fermion-induced quantum criticality with two length scales in Dirac systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 125137 (2018)

    2018

  17. [23]

    Han and I

    S.E. Han and I. F. Herbut, Spontaneous breaking of the SO(2N ) symmetry in the Gross-Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 096026 (2024)

    2024

  18. [24]

    Delfino, A

    F. Delfino, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Three- dimensional antiferromagnetic CP N −1 models, Phys. Rev. E 91, 052109 (2015)

    2015

  19. [25]

    I. F. Herbut and S. Mandal, SO(8) unification and the large-N theory of superconductor-insulator transition of two-dimensional Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 108, L161108 (2023)

    2023

  20. [26]

    Herbut, A Modern Approach to Critical Phenom- ena (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007)

    I. Herbut, A Modern Approach to Critical Phenom- ena (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007)

    2007

  21. [27]

    I. F. Herbut and M. M. Scherer, SO(4) multicriticality of two-dimensional Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115136 (2022)

    2022

  22. [28]

    Pelissetto, A

    A. Pelissetto, A. Tripodo, and E. Vicari, Criticality of O(N ) symmetric models in the presence of discrete gauge symmetries, Phys. Rev. E 97, 012123 (2018)

    2018

  23. [29]

    Uetrecht, I

    M. Uetrecht, I. F. Herbut, E. Stamou, and M. M. Scherer, Absence of SO(4) quantum criticality in Dirac semimet- als at two-loop order, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245130 (2023)

    2023

  24. [30]

    Han and I

    S.E. Han and I. F. Herbut, Gross-Neveu-Yukawa theory of SO(2 N ) → SO(N ) × SO(N ) spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125131 (2024)

    2024

  25. [31]

    H. Liu, E. Huffman, S. Chandrasekharan, and R. K. Kaul, Quantum Criticality of Antiferromagnetism and Superconductivity with Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 117202 (2022); Erratum: Quantum Criticality of An- tiferromagnetism and Superconductivity with Relativity [Phys. Rev. ...

    2022

  26. [34]

    U. F. P. Seifert, X.-Y. Dong, S. Chulliparambil, M. Vo- jta, H.-H. Tu, and L. Janssen, Fractionalized Fermionic Quantum Criticality in Spin-Orbital Mott Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 257202 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Ray, Unconventional Gross-Neveu quantum criticality: Interaction-induced SO(3)-biadjoint insulator and emer- gent SU(3) symmetry, Phys

    S. Ray, Unconventional Gross-Neveu quantum criticality: Interaction-induced SO(3)-biadjoint insulator and emer- gent SU(3) symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165137 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    I. Jack, H. Osborn, and T. Steudtner, Explorations in scalar fermion theories: β-functions, supersymmetry and fixed points, Journal of High Energy Physics 2024, 38 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    A. E. Thomsen, RGBeta: A Mathematica Package for the Evaluation of Renormalization Group β-Functions, arXiv:2101.08265 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Z. H. Liu, M. Vojta, F. F. Assaad, and L. Janssen, Criti- cal properties of metallic and deconfined quantum phase transitions in dirac systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125123 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Reehorst, M

    M. Reehorst, M. Refinetti, and A. Vichi, Bootstrapping traceless symmetric O(N ) scalars, SciPost Phys. 14, 068 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Boettcher and I

    I. Boettcher and I. F. Herbut, Unconventional Supercon- ductivity in Luttinger Semimetals: Theory of Complex Tensor Order and the Emergence of the Uniaxial Nematic State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 057002 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Han and E.-G

    S.E. Han and E.-G. Moon, Long-range Coulomb interac- tion effects on the topological phase transitions between semimetals and insulators, Phys. Rev. B 97, 241101 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.