Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bloch-type Domain Walls in Rhombohedral BaTiO3

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1208.4144 v1 pith:2ASCLVH3 submitted 2012-08-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.other

Bloch-type Domain Walls in Rhombohedral BaTiO3

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.other
keywords fdwsdegreebatio3isingrhombohedralblochbloch-typedomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric domain walls (FDWs) are usually considered to be of Ising type, but there have been suggestions in recent years that Bloch-type FDWs are also possible in some cases, e.g., in the rhombohedral phase of BaTiO3. The mechanically compatible and electrically neutral FDWs in rhombohedral BaTiO3 are of 71-degree, 109-degree, and 180-degree type. We have investigated these FDWs based both on first-principles calculations and on a Ginzburg-Landau-Devonshire (GLD) model [P. Marton, I. Rychetsky, and J. Hlinka, Phys. Rev. B 81, 144125 (2010)]. The results from both approaches confirm the Ising nature of the 71-degree FDW and the Bloch nature of the 180-degree FDW, and predict both Ising-type and Bloch-type FDWs are possible for the 109-degree case. Considering the relatively small rhombohedral strain in BaTiO3, the competition between the energies of Bloch and Ising FDWs can be discussed in terms of a picture in which a Bloch wall is regarded as being composed of a pair of smaller-angle Ising ones. A reduction by 40% in the parameters describing the gradient term in the GLD model brings it into better agreement with the first-principles results for detailed properties such as the energies and widths of the FDWs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.