Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Synthetic frequency-controlled gene circuits unlock expanded cellular states

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Frequency-modulated gene circuits, built from a wave-converter/threshold-filter/integrator architecture, reach roughly twice the two-gene expression states and 3.5 times the three-gene states of amplitude-only control, the paper reports.

desk verdict A solid theory paper with a genuinely useful platform; the headline state-expansion claim is real in the model but not yet experimentally proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17158 v1 pith:2BF67KRF submitted 2024-11-26 physics.bio-ph q-bio.MN

Rongrong Zhang , Shengjie Wan , Jiarui Xiong , Lei Ni , Ye Li , Yajia Huang , Bing Li , Mei Li
show 2 more authors
Shuai Yang Fan Jin
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phq-bio.MN
keywords Frequency-modulatedgenecircuitsDynamicsignalprocessingTime-resolvedbiologicalcontrolAutomatedcharacterizationExpandedstateSyntheticbiologyOptogeneticsHigh-passlow-passfiltering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to establish that frequency, not just intensity, can serve as an independent control variable in engineered gene circuits. It introduces a Time-Resolved Gene Circuit (TRGC) built around a Frequency-Amplitude Converter (FAC): light pulses are first shaped into sawtooth cAMP waves, then passed through a Vfr-based threshold filter, then integrated into steady protein output. The authors derive a closed-form expression for the output and predict that the same circuit can act as a high-pass or low-pass filter, with the regime boundary set by $D = 3s^{*2}$. In two-gene and three-gene systems driven by a single input, they report that frequency variation raises the number of accessible expression states from 19 to 38 and from 27 to 95, respectively. If correct, this gives synthetic biologists a simple, scalable way to coordinate many genes through one dynamic signal without adding many genetic parts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the three-module Frequency-Amplitude Converter (FAC), implemented as the Time-Resolved Gene Circuit (TRGC) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a Wave Converter (M1, bPAC and CpdA) turns light pulses into a sawtooth cAMP waveform; a Thresholding Filter (M2, Vfr binding) acts as the frequency-selective step; and an Integrator (M3, promoter-driven protein production) averages the filtered signal into steady output. The whole derivation works because the three modules operate on separated timescales, $T_{c2}\ll T_{c1}\ll T_{c3}$, so each stage can be analyzed independently and then combined into the closed-form output expression. The threshold value $s^*$ and the resulting phase boundary $D=3s^{*2}$ are what let the same architecture switch between high-pass and low-pass behavior.

What would settle it

Grow a TRGC strain with light pulses of fixed duty cycle and scan frequency while measuring both the instantaneous Vfr-driven promoter activity and steady output; if the promoter response lags the cAMP wave by a time comparable to the period, or if Vfr is found to regulate cpdA or bPAC expression, the predicted high-pass and low-pass curves and the $D=3s^{*2}$ boundary should fail in vivo.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that true frequency modulation is a distinct information-encoding channel for synthetic circuits and that the Time-Resolved Gene Circuit realizes it. The Frequency-Amplitude Converter splits input processing into a Wave Converter (M1) that converts square light pulses into sawtooth cAMP oscillations with peak and trough levels $s_H$ and $s_L$; a Thresholding Filter (M2) whose Hill-type activation function has threshold $s^* = 1/\sqrt{3(\lambda+1)\alpha}$; and an Integrator (M3) that time-averages promoter activity. The steady-state output factorizes as $\bar{y} = y^*(D + G)$, separating a pure amplitude response $y^*$, a duty-cycle term $D$, and a frequency-dependent term $G$, which is what lets one architecture implement both high-pass and low-pass filtering. Experimentally, the paper reports that frequency modulation expands the reachable expression-state grid from 19 to 38 states for two genes and from 27 to 95 for three genes, using an automated continuous-culture platform that keeps cell growth state stable.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the three modules act on well-separated timescales, with the Vfr threshold filter responding instantly to cAMP, the cAMP wave converter operating on an intermediate timescale, and the output integrator averaging slowly, and with no feedback from the output back into the earlier modules, so if these timescales overlap in the real bacterium or Vfr feeds back onto cAMP production or degradation, the closed-form solutions and the $D=3s^{*2}$ boundary need not hold in vivo.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single light input controlling several genes can encode extra information in pulse frequency, expanding two-gene expression states from 19 to 38 and three-gene states from 27 to 95 under the paper's 0.1 resolution grid.
  • The same circuit can act as a tunable high-pass or low-pass filter, with the boundary between regimes set by the simple relation $D = 3s^{*2}$ between duty cycle and threshold.
  • Frequency response can be tuned at two levels at once: molecular parameters ($\alpha,\lambda$) set the operating point, while light intensity, duty cycle, and frequency adjust the response online, with high-pass configurations giving larger frequency discrimination than low-pass ones.
  • Because the expansion grows with the number of regulated genes, frequency control becomes more valuable as the network gets larger, offering a path to coordinate many genes from a single dynamic input.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to transplant the same frequency-to-amplitude conversion into other organisms using any fast reversible activator paired with a slow output protein, since only the timescale ordering matters, not the specific cAMP/Vfr chemistry.
  • The reported state counts depend on the chosen 0.1 discretization grid, so the durable statement is the ratio of expansion (about 2-fold for two genes, 3.5-fold for three), not the absolute numbers.
  • Because frequency and intensity are independent input dimensions, frequency control could in principle be layered onto existing amplitude-based circuits to send two signals through one channel, a multiplexing use the paper does not demonstrate.
  • The $D=3s^{*2}$ boundary doubles as a practical design rule: flipping the duty cycle should flip a low-pass circuit into a high-pass one without rebuilding molecular parts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Time-Resolved Gene Circuit (TRGC) architecture, built on a Frequency-Amplitude Converter (FAC), to implement frequency-modulated gene expression in engineered bacteria. The theoretical core is an analytical solution (Eq. 6) for the steady-state output of a three-module system comprising a wave converter, a Hill-type thresholding filter, and an integrator, which is decomposed into amplitude, duty-cycle, and frequency components (Eqs. 8-10). The authors derive a phase boundary D = 3s*^2 separating high-pass and low-pass regimes, validate the analytical model against CRN simulations (R^2 = 0.992), and report an automated platform that supports frequency-response characterization of 29 engineered P. aeruginosa strains. The final section claims that frequency modulation expands the accessible multi-gene expression state space from 19 to 38 states in two-gene systems and from 27 to 95 states in three-gene systems, thereby reaching states 'unreachable through conventional amplitude modulation.'

Significance. If fully substantiated, the work would be a meaningful advance in synthetic biology: it provides a tractable analytical framework for frequency-to-amplitude conversion, demonstrates high-pass and low-pass filtering in engineered bacteria, and introduces an automated experimental platform that is valuable for dynamic circuit characterization. The analytical derivation is internally coherent, as checked against the CRN simulations, and the authors explicitly acknowledge that their grid-based state counting is a qualitative measure limited by cellular noise. However, the headline claim about expanded cellular states rests on model-based counting using parameters fitted to the same experimental data, not on direct measurements of reachable states, and the paper does not experimentally compare amplitude-modulation-only versus frequency-modulation state sets. This gap prevents the central claim, as currently stated, from being accepted as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Frequency Signal Control Expands Multi-gene Expression State Combinations (Fig. 4b-e)] The central claim that frequency modulation expands accessible states from 19 to 38 (two genes) and from 27 to 95 (three genes) is not supported by direct experimental measurement. These counts are produced by fitting Eq. 6 to experimental response curves (Data Analysis and Supplementary Note 11 state that parameters such as lambda and gamma are determined by fitting), then binning the fitted curves on a grid with an arbitrarily chosen discretization epsilon = 0.1. The main text itself calls this grid-based quantification 'primarily a qualitative measure.' Moreover, Fig. 4d and Fig. 4e display fitting curves through the data rather than independently resolved state measurements, and no experiment maps the state set reachable by amplitude modulation alone for comparison. Therefore the words 'unreachable through conventional amplitude modulation' are not experimentally demonstrated; the paper should either provide a direct experimental comparison of AM-reachable and FM-reachable states, or substantially reframe the claim as a model-based prediction.
  2. [Theoretical Modeling and Analysis of TRGC (Eqs. 4-6, 9)] The closed-form solution and the derived phase boundary D = 3s*^2 depend on the strict temporal decoupling assumption Tc2 << Tc1 << Tc3, with the thresholding filter responding instantaneously and the integrator averaging with no feedback. The manuscript relies on literature timescales for these estimates but does not report direct measurements of Tc1, Tc2, and Tc3 in the engineered P. aeruginosa strains, nor does it test whether Vfr regulates cpdA or bPAC expression, which would introduce feedback and break the modular decomposition. If these timescales are not sufficiently separated in vivo, Eq. 6 and the phase boundary would not describe the actual circuit. The authors should provide experimental evidence for the timescale hierarchy (for example, direct measurements of cAMP waveform shape and Vfr-promoter response kinetics) or explicitly bound the parameter region in which the analytical solution remains valid.
  3. [Fig. 3k and Supplementary Note 11] The reported correlation between theory and experiment (R^2 = 0.986 in Fig. 3k) is weakened by the fact that the model parameters are fitted to the same experimental data that are then compared with the model. This is not an independent validation of predictive power; it shows internal consistency of the fitting procedure. The authors should either use held-out data (e.g., fitting on a subset of strains or frequencies and predicting the rest), or state clearly which parameters were free and which were fixed a priori for each comparison.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] There is a typo: 'frequency-dependent r esponses' should be 'frequency-dependent responses.'
  2. [Introduction (FAC architecture paragraph)] The sentence 'the F AC creates bridges the gap' contains a verb error; it should be 'the FAC bridges the gap' or 'creates a bridge across the gap.'
  3. [Methods (Construction of Bacterial Strains)] The word 'surcose' should be 'sucrose' in the plasmid loss step.
  4. [Fig. 2b caption] The caption has an unclosed parenthesis: 'Blue regions indicate high-pass behavior (YHF > YLF, while red regions...' should be 'YHF > YLF), while red regions...'.
  5. [Fig. 4b-c captions] The caption of Fig. 4c states that the color gradient represents a transition from amplitude-only (blue) to frequency-modulated (red) states, but the text in the main body and Fig. 4b use blue for amplitude-modulation states and red for additional frequency-modulation states; the color semantics should be described consistently.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Experimental validation of the state-space expansion reduces to fitting Eq. 6 to the measured response curves; the central 'unreachable states' claim is not independently measured.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods, Data Analysis; Fig. 3k caption]
    "By plotting the output values Y against variable frequencies and fitting them with an analytical formula, we can determine the parameters ,such as λ, γ, and others that need to be fitted in the system. Detailed data fitting procedures are provided in the Supplementary Note 11."

    The 'theoretical predictions' in Fig. 3f and Fig. 3k are curves from Eq. 6 with λ, γ, and other parameters fitted to the same measured Y-versus-frequency data. The reported correlation R2 = 0.986 in Fig. 3k is thus a goodness-of-fit of the calibrated analytical formula, not an out-of-sample predictive test. Presenting this fit-based agreement as 'validating the broad applicability of the theoretical framework' renames curve fitting as prediction; the match is forced by construction because the parameters were optimized against those exact measurements.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Frequency Signal Control Expands Multi-gene Expression State Combinations'; Fig. 4d/e]
    "Using the same color mapping scheme as in our theoretical analysis, the experimental results demonstrated clear state space expansion through frequency modulation in both two- and three-dimensional cases, confirming our theoretical predictions (Supplementary Note 14)."

    The experimental 'state space expansion' in Fig. 4d/e is generated by fitting the analytical formula to the measured normalized expression curves (Methods: 'fitting them with an analytical formula') and then mapping those fitted curves onto the same epsilon = 0.1 grid used to define the theoretical counts. Consequently, the 'confirmation' reduces to the fitted model reproducing the data used to fit it, and the model's own grid-traversal is then reported as an experimentally demonstrated expansion. No amplitude-modulation-only state set was experimentally mapped, so the abstract's claim that frequency modulation accesses states 'unreachable through conventional amplitude modulation' is not independently tested.

full rationale

The core analytical derivation (Eqs. 1-10) is self-contained: it follows from the stated time-scale hierarchy Tc2 << Tc1 << Tc3, the Hill-type thresholding function, and the integration over one period, and it is internally cross-checked against the chemical reaction network simulation with R2 = 0.992. The phase boundary D = 3s*^2 is derived from the model's own inflection-point analysis, not imported from a self-citation. There is no load-bearing self-citation: references to the authors' prior work are for medium recipes, microscopy, and methodological details, not for the central uniqueness or correctness claims. The circularity lies specifically in the experimental validation loop: the text states that λ, γ, and other parameters are obtained by fitting the analytical formula to the measured Y-versus-frequency curves, and then the same fitted curves are presented as 'theoretical predictions' that validate the model (Fig. 3f,k) and as evidence for the expanded multi-gene state space (Fig. 4d,e). The state-count expansion from 19 to 38 and from 27 to 95 is a property of Eq. 6 evaluated on an arbitrarily chosen epsilon = 0.1 grid; the paper itself concedes this metric 'serves primarily as a qualitative measure.' Thus the headline biological claim that FM circuits access states unreachable by AM is supported by a fitted model rather than by independent, held-out experimental accessibility measurements. This is partial circularity: the theory is internally coherent, but the experimental 'predictions' reduce to goodness-of-fit of the same calibrated equation, warranting a score of 6 rather than 0 or 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model rests on standard mass-action and Hill kinetics plus assumptions of timescale separation, negligible basal expression, and no feedback. No new physical entity is introduced; the architecture names TRGC and FAC are design labels, not new entities. The empirical content is carried largely by fitted parameters alpha, lambda, and gamma, and the state-counting claim depends on an arbitrary resolution epsilon=0.1.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha (alpha) = fitted per strain (specific values in Supplementary Tables)
    Ratio of max cAMP (k/gamma) to dissociation constant K1; determines the Hill response and is fitted to frequency-response data (Data Analysis, Supp Note 11).
  • lambda (lambda) = fitted per strain and promoter
    Relative Vfr abundance [Vfr]0/K2; set by engineered CpdA/Vfr expression and fitted from experimental frequency curves.
  • gamma (gamma) = fitted per strain (example labels: 2.3e-3 and 3.6e-3 s-1)
    cAMP hydrolysis rate; fitted from frequency-response curves and sets the frequency scaling of the model.
  • epsilon (epsilon) = 0.1
    Discretization resolution used to count accessible expression states; arbitrary and directly controls the reported counts (19 vs 38, 27 vs 95).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Strict timescale separation Tc2 << Tc1 << Tc3
    Needed to treat M2 as instantaneous and M3 as a pure integrator; stated before Eq 4 and Eq 5 in the Main text.
  • domain assumption Hill-type cooperative activation with Hill coefficient 2 (Eq 4)
    cAMP-Vfr binding and Vfr-cAMP promoter activation are modeled as two sequential cooperative processes; no alternative kinetics are considered.
  • domain assumption Negligible basal expression of regulated promoters
    Stated before Eq 5; the integrator output is assumed zero when the threshold filter is off.
  • domain assumption Deterministic mass-action dynamics with no noise and no feedback
    Both the CRN and the analytical ODE ignore stochasticity and gene-product feedback (Methods, Computational Model).
  • domain assumption Steady periodic state is reached and integration over one period is sufficient
    Eq 5 averages over a single period assuming a stable periodic oscillatory state and no transient drift.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Synthetic frequency-controlled gene circuits unlock expanded cellular states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2BF67KRF

@misc{pith2026241117158,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Synthetic frequency-controlled gene circuits unlock expanded cellular states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2BF67KRF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17158}
}
read the original abstract

Natural biological systems process environmental information through both amplitude and frequency-modulated signals, yet engineered biological circuits have largely relied on amplitude-based regulation alone. Despite the prevalence of frequency-encoded signals in natural systems, fundamental challenges in designing and implementing frequency-responsive gene circuits have limited their development in synthetic biology. Here we present a Time-Resolved Gene Circuit (TRGC) architecture that enables frequency-to-amplitude signal conversion in engineered biological systems. Through systematic analysis, we establish a theoretical framework that guides the design of synthetic circuits capable of distinct frequency-dependent responses, implementing both high-pass and low-pass filtering behaviors. To enable rigorous characterization of these dynamic circuits, we developed a high-throughput automated platform that ensures stable and reproducible measurements of frequency-dependent r esponses across diverse conditions. Using this platform, we demonstrate that these frequency-modulated circuits can access cellular states unreachable through conventional amplitude modulation, significantly expanding the controllable gene expression space in multi-gene systems. Our results show that frequency modulation expands the range of achievable expression patterns when controlling multiple genes through a single input, demonstrating a new paradigm for engineering cellular behaviors. This work establishes frequency modulation as a powerful strategy for expanding the capabilities of engineered biological systems and enhancing cellular response to dynamic signals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17158 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Frequency-Amplitude Converter (FAC) architecture and implementation in syn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Theoretical framework and validation of the Time-Resolved Gene Circuit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. High-throughput automated platform enables systematic characterization of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frequency modulation expands accessible gene expression state combinations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 19(12), 2145–2176 (1931)

    Roder, H.: Amplitude, phase, and frequency modulation. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 19(12), 2145–2176 (1931)

    work page 1931

  2. [2]

    Nature structural & molecular biology 19(1), 31–39 (2012)

    Hao, N., O’shea, E.K.: Signal-dependent dynamics of transcription factor translocation controls gene expression. Nature structural & molecular biology 19(1), 31–39 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Cell 152(5), 945–956 (2013)

    Purvis, J.E., Lahav, G.: Encoding and decoding cellular information through signaling dynamics. Cell 152(5), 945–956 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Development 146(12), 170977 (2019)

    Li, P., Elowitz, M.B.: Communication codes in developmental signaling pathways. Development 146(12), 170977 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Nature 455(7212), 485–490 (2008)

    Cai, L., Dalal, C.K., Elowitz, M.B.: Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation. Nature 455(7212), 485–490 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    science 333(6047), 1244–1248 (2011) 23

    Nandagopal, N., Elowitz, M.B.: Synthetic biology: integrated gene circuits. science 333(6047), 1244–1248 (2011) 23

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Science 342(6163), 1193–1200 (2013)

    Levine, J.H., Lin, Y., Elowitz, M.B.: Functional roles of pulsing in genetic circuits. Science 342(6163), 1193–1200 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 1–3 (2024)

    Luo, N., Zhao, G., Liu, C.: Quantitative synthetic biology. Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 1–3 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    PLoS computational biology11(6), 1004222 (2015)

    Micali, G., Aquino, G., Richards, D.M., Endres, R.G.: Accurate encoding and decoding by single cells: amplitude versus frequency modulation. PLoS computational biology11(6), 1004222 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    NPJ Systems Biology and Applications 10(1), 86 (2024)

    Szischik, C.L., Reves Szemere, J., Balderrama, R., Vega, C., Ventura, A.C.: Transient frequency preference responses in cell signaling systems. NPJ Systems Biology and Applications 10(1), 86 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Trends in Endocrinol- ogy & Metabolism 3(5), 183–190 (1992)

    Brabant, G., Prank, K., Schofl, C.: Pulsatile patterns in hormone secretion. Trends in Endocrinol- ogy & Metabolism 3(5), 183–190 (1992)

    1992

  4. [12]

    Cell systems 6(4), 409–423 (2018)

    Li, C., Cesbron, F., Oehler, M., Brunner, M., H¨ ofer, T.: Frequency modulation of transcriptional bursting enables sensitive and rapid gene regulation. Cell systems 6(4), 409–423 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Current opinion in genetics & development 20(6), 684–693 (2010)

    Behar, M., Hoffmann, A.: Understanding the temporal codes of intra-cellular signals. Current opinion in genetics & development 20(6), 684–693 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    science 334(6054), 366–369 (2011)

    Locke, J.C., Young, J.W., Fontes, M., Jim´ enez, M.J.H., Elowitz, M.B.: Stochastic pulse regulation in bacterial stress response. science 334(6054), 366–369 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Science signaling 1(51), 54–54 (2008)

    Crabtree, G.R., Graef, I.A.: Bursting into the nucleus. Science signaling 1(51), 54–54 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Annual Review of Biochemistry 90(1), 221–244 (2021)

    English, M.A., Gayet, R.V., Collins, J.J.: Designing biological circuits: synthetic biology within the operon model and beyond. Annual Review of Biochemistry 90(1), 221–244 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 11(6), 393–403 (2010)

    Lim, W.A.: Designing customized cell signalling circuits. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 11(6), 393–403 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Nature Reviews Genetics 10(12), 859–871 (2009)

    Mukherji, S., Van Oudenaarden, A.: Synthetic biology: understanding biological design from synthetic circuits. Nature Reviews Genetics 10(12), 859–871 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    Nature chemical biology 17(7), 817–827 (2021) 24

    Romano, E., Baumschlager, A., Akmeric, E.B., Palanisamy, N., Houmani, M., Schmidt, G., ¨Ozt¨ urk, M.A., Ernst, L., Khammash, M., Di Ventura, B.: Engineering arac to make it responsive to light instead of arabinose. Nature chemical biology 17(7), 817–827 (2021) 24

    2021

  12. [20]

    Advanced biology 5(5), 2000256 (2021)

    Baumschlager, A., Khammash, M.: Synthetic biological approaches for optogenetics and tools for transcriptional light-control in bacteria. Advanced biology 5(5), 2000256 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Nature 403(6767), 339–342 (2000)

    Gardner, T.S., Cantor, C.R., Collins, J.J.: Construction of a genetic toggle switch in escherichia coli. Nature 403(6767), 339–342 (2000)

    2000

  14. [22]

    Nature 456(7221), 516–519 (2008)

    Stricker, J., Cookson, S., Bennett, M.R., Mather, W.H., Tsimring, L.S., Hasty, J.: A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator. Nature 456(7221), 516–519 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Nature 403(6767), 335–338 (2000)

    Elowitz, M.B., Leibler, S.: A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403(6767), 335–338 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    Nature protocols 17(4), 1097–1113 (2022)

    Jones, T.S., Oliveira, S.M., Myers, C.J., Voigt, C.A., Densmore, D.: Genetic circuit design automation with cello 2.0. Nature protocols 17(4), 1097–1113 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Nature 491(7423), 249–253 (2012)

    Moon, T.S., Lou, C., Tamsir, A., Stanton, B.C., Voigt, C.A.: Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells. Nature 491(7423), 249–253 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 9(10), 770–780 (2008)

    Karlebach, G., Shamir, R.: Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 9(10), 770–780 (2008)

    2008

  19. [27]

    Journal of molecular biology 425(22), 4161–4166 (2013)

    Davidson, E.A., Basu, A.S., Bayer, T.S.: Programming microbes using pulse width modulation of optical signals. Journal of molecular biology 425(22), 4161–4166 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Nature communications 9(1), 3521 (2018)

    Benzinger, D., Khammash, M.: Pulsatile inputs achieve tunable attenuation of gene expression variability and graded multi-gene regulation. Nature communications 9(1), 3521 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Cell Systems 13(5), 353–364 (2022)

    Benzinger, D., Ovinnikov, S., Khammash, M.: Synthetic gene networks recapitulate dynamic signal decoding and differential gene expression. Cell Systems 13(5), 353–364 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Cell systems 13(2), 131–142 (2022)

    Ravindran, P.T., McFann, S., Thornton, R.H., Toettcher, J.E.: A synthetic gene circuit for imaging-free detection of signaling pulses. Cell systems 13(2), 131–142 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Nature Communications 13(1), 2772 (2022)

    Bettenworth, V., Vliet, S., Turkowyd, B., Bamberger, A., Wendt, H., McIntosh, M., Steinchen, W., Endesfelder, U., Becker, A.: Frequency modulation of a bacterial quorum sensing response. Nature Communications 13(1), 2772 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Molecular cell 49(2), 249–261 (2013) 25

    Albeck, J.G., Mills, G.B., Brugge, J.S.: Frequency-modulated pulses of erk activity transmit quantitative proliferation signals. Molecular cell 49(2), 249–261 (2013) 25

    2013

  25. [33]

    Current opinion in genetics & development 20(6), 670–676 (2010)

    Paszek, P., Jackson, D.A., White, M.R.: Oscillatory control of signalling molecules. Current opinion in genetics & development 20(6), 670–676 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    Nature 386(6627) (1997)

    Berridge, M.J.: The am and fm of calcium signalling. Nature 386(6627) (1997)

    1997

  27. [35]

    Mlife 2(4), 450–461 (2023)

    Zhang, R., Huang, Y., Li, M., Wang, L., Li, B., Xia, A., Li, Y., Yang, S., Jin, F.: High-throughput, microscopy-based screening and quantification of genetic elements. Mlife 2(4), 450–461 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Current Opinion in Biotechnology 83, 102974 (2023)

    Delvigne, F., Martinez, J.A.: Advances in automated and reactive flow cytometry for synthetic biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 83, 102974 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 51, 039 (2024)

    Foncillas, R.P., Magnusson, S., Al-Rudainy, B., Wallberg, O., Gorwa-Grauslund, M.F., Car- lquist, M.: Automated yeast cultivation control using a biosensor and flow cytometry. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 51, 039 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Journal of The Royal Society Interface 13(120), 20160380 (2016)

    Del Vecchio, D., Dy, A.J., Qian, Y.: Control theory meets synthetic biology. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 13(120), 20160380 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Nature Reviews Genetics 6(6), 451–464 (2005)

    Kaern, M., Elston, T.C., Blake, W.J., Collins, J.J.: Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nature Reviews Genetics 6(6), 451–464 (2005)

    2005

  32. [40]

    Mazzocca, M., Colombo, E., Callegari, A., Mazza, D.: Transcription factor binding kinetics and transcriptional bursting: What do we really know? Current Opinion in Structural Biology 71, 239–248 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 286(2), 1181–1188 (2011)

    Stierl, M., Stumpf, P., Udwari, D., Gueta, R., Hagedorn, R., Losi, A., G¨ artner, W., Petereit, L., Efetova, M., Schwarzel, M., et al.: Light modulation of cellular camp by a small bacterial photoactivated adenylyl cyclase, bpac, of the soil bacterium Beggiatoa. Journal of Bio...

    2011

  34. [42]

    Chemical Society Reviews 44(21), 7465–7483 (2015)

    Roekel, H.W., Rosier, B.J., Meijer, L.H., Hilbers, P.A., Markvoort, A.J., Huck, W.T., Greef, T.F.: Programmable chemical reaction networks: emulating regulatory functions in living cells using a bottom-up approach. Chemical Society Reviews 44(21), 7465–7483 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Nature methods 11(5), 508–520 (2014)

    Brophy, J.A., Voigt, C.A.: Principles of genetic circuit design. Nature methods 11(5), 508–520 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Current Opinion in Systems Biology 37, 100487 26 (2024)

    Kwon, K.K., Lee, J., Kim, H., Lee, D.-H., Lee, S.-G.: Advancing high-throughput screening systems for synthetic biology and biofoundry. Current Opinion in Systems Biology 37, 100487 26 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Statistical Science, 247–277 (2012)

    Gneiting, T., ˇSevˇ c ´ ıkov´ a, H., Percival, D.B.: Estimators of fractal dimension: Assessing the roughness of time series and spatial data. Statistical Science, 247–277 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    PLoS computational biology 5(12), 1000626 (2009)

    Mar, J.C., Quackenbush, J.: Decomposition of gene expression state space trajectories. PLoS computational biology 5(12), 1000626 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Nature biotechnol- ogy 27(12), 1139–1150 (2009)

    Lu, T.K., Khalil, A.S., Collins, J.J.: Next-generation synthetic gene networks. Nature biotechnol- ogy 27(12), 1139–1150 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    BMC systems biology 8, 1–15 (2014)

    Chuang, C.-H., Lin, C.-L.: Synthesizing genetic sequential logic circuit with clock pulse generator. BMC systems biology 8, 1–15 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Cell systems 6(4), 508– 520 (2018)

    Tomazou, M., Barahona, M., Polizzi, K.M., Stan, G.-B.: Computational re-design of synthetic genetic oscillators for independent amplitude and frequency modulation. Cell systems 6(4), 508– 520 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 9(4), 023978 (2017)

    Appleton, E., Madsen, C., Roehner, N., Densmore, D.: Design automation in synthetic biology. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 9(4), 023978 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Science 336(6087), 1440–1444 (2012)

    Purvis, J.E., Karhohs, K.W., Mock, C., Batchelor, E., Loewer, A., Lahav, G.: p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science 336(6087), 1440–1444 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    Science 342(6163), 1203–1208 (2013)

    Imayoshi, I., Isomura, A., Harima, Y., Kawaguchi, K., Kori, H., Miyachi, H., Fujiwara, T., Ishi- date, F., Kageyama, R.: Oscillatory control of factors determining multipotency and fate in mouse neural progenitors. Science 342(6163), 1203–1208 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    Nature 466(7303), 267– 271 (2010)

    Tay, S., Hughey, J.J., Lee, T.K., Lipniacki, T., Quake, S.R., Covert, M.W.: Single-cell nf- κb dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 466(7303), 267– 271 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    Nature 467(7312), 167–173 (2010)

    Eldar, A., Elowitz, M.B.: Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467(7312), 167–173 (2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04988 (2024) 27

    Xiong, J., Wang, L., Lin, J., Ni, L., Zhang, R., Yang, S., Huang, Y., Chu, J., Jin, F.: Optimal frequency in second messenger signaling quantifying camp information transmission in bacteria. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04988 (2024) 27

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    IScience 6, 222–231 (2018)

    Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Pi, Y., Gu, T., Song, L., Wang, Y., Ji, Q.: Crispr/cas9-based genome editing in pseudomonas aeruginosa and cytidine deaminase-mediated base editing in pseudomonas species. IScience 6, 222–231 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    National Science Review 10(5), 031 (2023) 28 Freq

    Fu, S., Zhang, R., Gao, Y., Xiong, J., Li, Y., Pu, L., Xia, A., Jin, F.: Programming the lifestyles of engineered bacteria for cancer therapy. National Science Review 10(5), 031 (2023) 28 Freq. input Amp. output Wave Converter [M1] Thresholding Filter [M2] Integrator [M3] Freq...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.