Flavour from Fractal Mass Chains

Aadarsh Singh; Alejandro Ibarra; Sudhir K Vempati

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Flavour from Fractal Mass Chains

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Three fermion generations arise from a Sierpinski-triangle mass chain.

desk verdict A novel but presently invalid derivation: the mass matrix in Eq. (4) does not follow from the Lagrangian in Eq. (3), so the three-zero-mode result is not tied to the fractal geometry as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04811 v2 pith:2BHKP6EH submitted 2025-09-05 hep-ph hep-th

Alejandro Ibarra , Aadarsh Singh , Sudhir K Vempati This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-th

keywords Sierpinskitrianglefractaltheoryspacefermiongenerationsflavourpuzzlemasschainsclockworkmechanismleptonmassesandmixingzeromodes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the three generations of Standard Model fermions are a geometric consequence of the flavour sector: place fermions on a mass-link network shaped like a Sierpinski triangle, repeat the pattern three times, and the resulting Dirac mass matrix has exactly three zero modes. These zero modes are identified with the three generations, and once the heavier modes are integrated out the surviving couplings form effective $3\times3$ Yukawa matrices. With only a few $\mathcal{O}(1)$ parameters, random scans find points that reproduce the measured charged-lepton mass ratios, the neutrino mass hierarchies, and the observed lepton mixing angles inside the experimental $3\sigma$ regions. If the construction is right, the same self-similar geometry explains why there are three families and why their masses are so different, and it offers a route to quark masses as well.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Sierpinski-triangle theory space: a graph generated from a triangular kernel by inserting one new vertex on every edge at each iteration, with left- and right-handed fermions on the vertices and mass terms on the edges. The Hamiltonian is $H_{ij}=a_i\delta_{ij}+q_{ij}(1-\delta_{ij})$, and the decisive choice is the factorised, clockwork-like coupling $q_{ij}=f^{i-j}$; the appendix's rank-preserving rescaling corollaries show that this choice guarantees exactly three localised zero modes at three decorations. The Higgs is localised on three selected sites, which reduces the flavour parameters to one Yukawa constant per sector, and the pseudoinverse projects out the 12 heavy modes to yield the effective $3\times3$ Yukawa matrices for the surviving generations.

What would settle it

Run a global numerical scan over $f_L$, $f_E$, $f_N$ and the six Yukawa couplings in the ranges used in the paper, using the pseudoinverse formula (10) and the lepton mixing matrix formula (12), and demand that the resulting effective lepton Yukawa matrices simultaneously reproduce the three charged-lepton mass ratios, the two neutrino mass-squared differences for either ordering, and all three mixing angles inside their reported $3\sigma$ ranges; if no parameter point satisfies all of these at once, the paper's claim that the framework reproduces the measured lepton masses and mixing angles is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the number of generations can be an output of a geometry rather than an input. On the 15-site Sierpinski-triangle graph obtained from a triangular kernel by two further iterative transformations, the mass chains have three zero eigenvalues in both chirality sectors, so the low-energy spectrum automatically contains three massless families. The zero modes are localised for any $f\neq1$ when the link couplings take the factorised clockwork form $q_{ij}=f^{i-j}$; an appendix proves the null-space count is invariant under the element-wise rescaling that defines this form. The paper then uses the pseudoinverse to project out the 12 heavier modes, leaving a $3\times3$ Yukawa structure controlled by three $f$-parameters and $\mathcal{O}(1)$ couplings, and shows through random scans and explicit benchmarks that lepton masses, neutrino hierarchies, lepton mixing angles, and quark masses can fall in the observed ranges.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the underlying network of Standard Model fermion mass terms is a Sierpinski-triangle fractal with exactly three decorated iterations, with couplings locked to the factorised clockwork pattern $q_{ij}=f^{i-j}$; neither the geometry nor the coupling pattern is derived from a deeper principle, and the identification of the three mathematical zero modes with the three observed generations is assumed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In this construction, three decorated iterations give exactly three zero modes, so the generation number is tied to the fractal's iteration count rather than added by hand.
The measured hierarchy $m_\tau \gg m_\mu \gg m_e$ and the neutrino mass-squared differences for normal or inverted ordering can be accommodated within the model's parameter space, as shown by scan points that land in the experimental regions.
Lepton mixing angles emerge from the overlaps of the localised zero modes with the Higgs sites, and random $\mathcal{O}(1)$ parameters produce points inside the $3\sigma$ regions for both mass orderings.
The same fractal mass-chain mechanism extends to quarks, with explicit parameter choices reproducing down-type and up-type quark masses from roughly 2 MeV to 172 GeV.
The framework assumes Dirac neutrinos, and the unwanted chiral zero modes can be made heavy by a dark Higgs or projected out with discrete symmetries, so the low-energy spectrum can remain purely Standard Model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A sharper test would be a single global fit that fixes $f_L$, $f_E$, $f_N$ and the Yukawa couplings at one point and checks all three lepton mass ratios, both neutrino mass splittings, and all three mixing angles simultaneously; the paper's separate scatter plots do not show that the intersection of all constraints is non-empty.
One could classify other self-similar graphs, such as Sierpinski carpets or hexagonal variants, by the nullity of their mass chains; if many three-iteration fractals also give exactly three zero modes, the specific choice of the triangle would be less compelling as an explanation of the generation number.
The exact factorised pattern $q_{ij}=f^{i-j}$ is delicate, since generic $\mathcal{O}(1)$ deformations lift the zero modes; a more fundamental theory would therefore have to explain why the clockwork pattern is exact, and the masses of the 12 heavy fractal modes would be a testable signature.
If the framework is taken literally, the heavy fractal modes should have masses clustered near multiples of the light mass scale times powers of $f$, and they could be searched for as exotic charged and neutral leptons; their production rates depend on overlap factors that the paper does not quantify.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The central derivation doesn't hold together as printed. Eq. (3) lists mass-chain terms coupling site 1 to sites 7 and 8, site 2 to 10 and 11, and so on. Eq. (4), which is supposed to be the resulting Dirac mass matrix, has zeros at exactly those positions and instead has non-zero couplings at (1,2), (1,3), (2,4), (2,5), and other pairs that never appear in Eq. (3). The graph described by Eq. (3) has roughly 27 undirected edges; the support of Eq. (4) is a different graph. I checked that the zero-mode vectors in Eqs. (5)-(6) do annihilate M0, so the linear algebra is internally consistent. But these vectors are null vectors of a matrix that has not been shown to be the mass matrix of the Sierpinski chain model defined in the text. That is a load-bearing internal inconsistency, not a cosmetic typo.

What is genuinely new is the idea of putting deconstruction/clockwork mass chains on a Sierpinski-like graph and using the zero-mode count to explain why there are three generations. I have not seen that combination before. The explicit 15x15 matrix and null vectors make the construction checkable, and the effective 3x3 Yukawa derivation via the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse is a reasonable tool. The appendix lemma is fine as a statement about rank-preserving row scalings, but it does not prove the three-zero-mode property for this graph.

The other soft spots are real but secondary. The 'prediction' of three generations is partly an input: choose three iterations of a fractal and you get three zero modes. The lepton fit is a random scan, not a statistical fit; it shows the model can accommodate the observed values for some parameter choices, which is proof-of-concept but not a prediction. The quark example is hand-picked. And the text says q_ij = f^{i-j} while the matrix actually uses f^{j-i}, which is a smaller but still confusing index convention error.

Bottom line: this is not publishable as written because the central claim is not derived. But the idea is concrete enough that I would not simply desk-reject it. If the authors can make the graph/matrix match and prove the zero-mode count for the actual Sierpinski graph, the paper could become worth serious attention. A referee with a sharp eye could also quickly confirm whether the mismatch is fixable or fatal.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that the Standard Model flavour structure is determined by mass chains on a Sierpinski-triangle theory space. A 15-site Lagrangian is written down, the resulting Dirac mass matrix is claimed to have three zero modes, and these are identified with the three fermion generations. The effective 3x3 Yukawa couplings are then obtained via a Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse, and random scans over the model parameters are used to argue that the lepton masses and mixing angles can be accommodated, with a brief quark-sector example. The central conceptual proposal is original, and the paper contains explicit zero-mode vectors and a concrete numerical procedure. However, as written, the mass matrix used for the zero-mode analysis is not the mass matrix of the stated Lagrangian, and the proof in Appendix A does not establish that the Sierpinski geometry produces a three-dimensional kernel. These issues undermine the central claim.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would offer a genuinely new mechanism for the existence of three generations, with a geometric principle replacing the usual ad hoc repetition of Standard Model fermions. The proposal is therefore worth taking seriously: the zero-mode expressions in Eqs. (5)-(6) and the pseudoinverse reduction in Eq. (10) are concrete and testable in principle. The credit for the work lies in the originality of the idea and in the explicit nature of the construction. That said, significance is contingent on the derivation being internally consistent, and the current manuscript does not provide that consistency. The number of generations is effectively selected by the choice of three iterations and by the factorized f-ansatz, and the phenomenological claim rests on scatter plots rather than a quantitative fit.

major comments (4)

[Section 2, Eqs. (3) and (4)] The Lagrangian (3) and the mass matrix (4) are inconsistent. Equation (3) contains terms L1 q17 R7, L1 q18 R8, L2 q2,10 R10, L2 q2,11 R11, L7 q7,9 R9, and L8 q8,9 R9, but the corresponding entries in M0 are zero: row 1 has non-zero entries only in columns 1-3, row 2 has no entries in columns 10 or 11, and rows 7 and 8 have no entry in column 9. Conversely, M0 contains non-zero entries such as (1,2), (1,3), (2,4), (2,5), (3,5), (3,6), and (4,5) that have no counterpart in Eq. (3). The edge sets also disagree at the level of counting: Eq. (3) lists 27 undirected edges, whereas two iterations of the stated replacement rule on a triangle yield 15 vertices and 12 edges. The zero-mode vectors in Eq. (5) do annihilate M0, but M0 is not the mass matrix derived from the Lagrangian. The central claim that the Sierpinski-like geometry produces three zero modes is therefore not established by the manuscript as written.
[Section 2, Eq. (4) and surrounding text] The text states that q_{i,j}=f^{i-j} has been assumed, but the entries of M0 correspond to f^{j-i}. For example, M_{1,2}=f, whereas the stated convention would give q_{1,2}=f^{-1}. The same reversed convention appears throughout the matrix. Since the localization of the zero modes and the exponential hierarchies depend on the sign of the exponent, this is not a purely cosmetic issue; the convention must be fixed and consistently used in the matrix, in Eq. (A1), and in the formulas for the effective Yukawa couplings.
[Appendix A] Appendix A does not provide the proof claimed in the main text. The transformation B_{ij}=A_{ij}/f^{i-j} is a similarity transformation, B = D^{-1} A D with D = diag(f^1, f^2, ...), so rank(B)=rank(A) by construction. The corollaries show that any nullity already present in A is preserved, but they do not compute the nullity of the Sierpinski graph mass matrix or show that it is three. The paper never specifies which matrix A is being used, nor does it derive the three-dimensional kernel from the geometry and the number of iterations. The three zero modes are therefore an input to the argument rather than an output. This is a load-bearing gap in the derivation of the three-generation claim.
[Section 3, Eqs. (7)-(12) and Figs. 3-4] The abstract and text state that the framework reproduces the measured lepton masses and mixing angles with very few parameters, but the quantitative support is a random scan over nine continuous parameters (f_L, f_E, f_N and six Yukawa couplings) over [0.1,10], with results shown only as scatter regions in Figs. 3 and 4. There is no goodness-of-fit measure, no best-fit point, no statement of how many scan points satisfy all observables simultaneously, and no discussion of the Dirac CP phase. The phenomenological claim is therefore not quantitatively demonstrated, even setting aside the inconsistency between Eqs. (3) and (4).

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (10)] The 3x3 matrix in Eq. (10) is typeset in a way that makes the individual entries very difficult to read; please reformat it as a standard matrix with clearly separated entries.
[Abstract and Section 2] The counting of iterations is inconsistent: the abstract refers to three decorations, while Section 2 says that starting from the kernel lattice, two further iterative transformations are considered. Please clarify whether the kernel triangle is counted as the first iteration.
[Section 2] The sentence 'in the limit q_{i,j} not equal to 0, there are three zero modes' is misleading, since generic non-zero q_{i,j} would break the symmetry completely; the zero modes appear for the special factorized form q_{i,j}=f^{i-j}. Please rephrase to distinguish the generic case from the special ansatz.
[Section 3] The paper moves from the lepton discussion to the quark-sector example without a section heading; adding a heading would improve the structure.
[Throughout] There are encoding artifacts in the text, such as 'Sierpi´ nski', and the spelling of the name varies; please clean these up in the final version.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The three-generation 'prediction' is an input: the model chooses three decorations and a mass matrix M0 whose nullity is three, while M0 is not shown to follow from the stated Sierpinski Lagrangian.

fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Conclusions (Section 4)]
"The fermion mass chains on a Sierpinski-like geometry with three decorations (iterations) lead to three zero modes, which can be identified with the three generations of the Standard Model. ... For concreteness, we have chosen the Sierpinski Triangle with up to three iterations ... This naturally leads to three zero modes, which we identify with the three generations of the Standard Model."

The only mechanism that fixes the number of zero modes to three is the explicit choice of three decorations/iterations; no independent argument fixes the decoration count before comparison with experiment. The claimed derivation of three generations is therefore the input 'three decorations' restated: the observation (three generations) is used to select the model parameter (three iterations), and the same observation is then presented as an output. This is a fitted input renamed as a prediction rather than an emergent consequence.
self definitional [Section 2, Eqs. (3) and (4)]
"The Lagrangian explicitly reads: LS = Lkin − ... + m( L1 q1,7 R7 + L1 q1,8 R8 + ... ) + h.c., (3) ... This Lagrangian leads to a Dirac mass matrix of the following form, where we have assumed for simplicity mi = 2m and qi,j = f^{i−j}: M0 = ... (4)."

Setting qi,j = f^{i−j} in Eq. (3) puts non-zero entries at (1,7), (1,8), etc., whereas the displayed M0 has row 1 non-zero only in columns 1–3 and contains many entries with no counterpart in Eq. (3). The null vectors in Eq. (5) annihilate this hand-written M0, not the matrix defined by the stated Sierpinski graph. The three zero modes are therefore properties of the matrix written down in Eq. (4) by construction, not consequences of the fractal geometry; the central claim is circular. Appendix A only proves that an arbitrary matrix A and its f-scaling have the same nullity, but does not establish that the Eq. (3) graph has nullity three.

1 more flagged steps

other [Section 3, Figs. 3 and 4]
"Fig. 3 shows a scatter plot of mixing angles for a random scan of the model parameters fL, fE, fN, ye1, ye2, ye3, yν1, yν2, yν3 within the range [0.1, 10]. ... Clearly, the model can accommodate sizable leptonic mixing angles."

The claimed reproduction of lepton masses and mixing angles is an existence statement obtained by scanning nine continuous parameters over a wide range, not a derivation from fixed first-principles inputs. The experimental values are used to select the scanned points, and the same values are then quoted as being reproduced. This is parameter fitting presented as model success rather than an independent prediction.

full rationale

The central claim that the Sierpinski-like geometry produces three generations is not independently derived. Three enters the model twice: the number of decorations/iterations is chosen to be three, and the mass matrix whose nullity is exhibited (Eq. 4) is not the matrix that follows from the stated Lagrangian (Eq. 3), since the non-zero support of the two objects disagrees. Consequently the three zero modes are built into the input data rather than emerging from the fractal. The appendix scaling lemma is mathematically correct but only shows that rank/nullity are preserved under the exponential rescaling; it does not prove that the Sierpinski graph in Eq. (3) has nullity three. The self-citation [38] is not load-bearing because the corollary is proved in the text. The lepton mass and mixing 'reproduction' is a scan over nine free parameters, so it is model fitting rather than a predicted outcome. These features make the main result forced by construction, corresponding to a circularity score of 8.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. The fractal theory space is a model construction, not a physical entity. All free parameters are fitted or scanned to data, and the axioms are either standard math or ad hoc model-building assumptions.

free parameters (4)

f_L, f_E, f_N = not fixed; scanned in [0.1, 10]
Exponent parameters for the mass-chain couplings in the lepton sector; chosen by random scan to match mixing angles and mass ratios.
Yukawa couplings y_i^e, y_i^nu = not fixed; scanned, with example values in quark sector
Couplings of the Higgs to the three localized site pairs; scanned to accommodate lepton data and hand-picked for the quark example.
f_Q, f_D, f_U = 1.57, 0.215, 0.27 in the quark example
Parameters in the quark-sector demo chosen to reproduce quark masses.
mass scale m = 2m on diagonal
Overall mass scale, not fitted to data but sets the absolute fermion mass scale; effectively a free parameter.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper The theory space underlying the Standard Model is a Sierpinski-like fractal geometry with three iterations (15 sites).
This geometry is chosen because it yields three zero modes; no independent motivation from a deeper theory is given.
ad hoc to paper The mass-chain couplings take the factorized form q_{ij}=f^{i-j} (or f^{j-i} as used in the matrix).
This ansatz is assumed so that the zero modes localize; the paper states this choice without derivation.
domain assumption The Higgs field couples with equal strength at all sites, and then is localized at sites 4, 9, 13.
Used to derive the effective 3x3 Yukawa matrix; the localization is a model-building choice.
domain assumption The heavy modes can be integrated out using the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse with corrections O(v/m) small.
Approximation invoked to obtain the effective Yukawa couplings.
ad hoc to paper The zero modes of the mass matrix are identified with the SM generations.
Central identification; it is an assumption that these mathematical zero modes correspond to physical generations.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flavour from Fractal Mass Chains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2BHKP6EH

@misc{pith2026250904811,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flavour from Fractal Mass Chains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2BHKP6EH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04811}
}

read the original abstract

We explore the possibility that the underlying flavour structure of the Standard Model could be determined by mass chains on a fractal geometry. We consider, as an example, the theory space on a Sierpinski-like geometry. The fermion mass chains on a Sierpinski-like geometry with three decorations (iterations) lead to three zero modes, which can be identified with the three generations of the Standard Model. This framework also reproduces the measured charged and neutral lepton masses and mixing angles with very few parameters. We also briefly discuss the possible extension to the quark sector.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04811 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: Left and Right 0-mode components on the Sierpi´nski Fractal Graph for f = 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3: Leptonic mixing angles from a random scan of the parameters of the model (for details, see the main [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Mass hierarchies in the charged lepton sector (left panel) and in the neutrino sector (middle and right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[1]

Such a successive repetition of generations in general implies complex Yukawa matrices, which lead to CP violation

Introduction -One of the major mysteries of the Standard Model of Particle Physics is the replication of the fundamental spin-1/2 fermions in three generations, with identical quantum numbers under the gauge symmetryG SM =SU(3) c×SU(2) L×U(1) Y , but differing only in their mass. Such a successive repetition of generations in general implies complex Yukaw...

work page
[2]

This leads to non-trivial patterns in their couplings to the Higgs

flavour from the Sierpinski triangle -We will consider deconstruction-like [23–25] mass chains [26– 29] on the Sierpinski geometry, with Zero modes localised at different sites on this geometry. This leads to non-trivial patterns in their couplings to the Higgs. The Sierpinski triangle has been thoroughly studied as an archetype of a fractal,i.e.the repet...

arXiv 2025
[3]

Modular symmetry, twisted sectors and flavour

Thomas Dent. Modular symmetry, twisted sectors and flavour. InString Phenomenology, pages 43–46. World Scientific, 2003

work page 2003
[4]

Theoretical aspects of some physics beyond standard models

Conclusions&Outlook -Fractal geometry is widely observed in Nature, where intricate patterns and self-similarity emerge across multiple scales.[17]. In this letter, we have constructed a theory of flavour based on the mass chains on fractal geometry. For concreteness, we have chosen the Sierpinski Triangle with up to three iterations (the first iteration ...

work page 2022
[5]

Hierarchy of quark masses, cabibbo angles and cp violation.Nuclear Physics B, 147(3-4):277–298, 1979

Colin D Froggatt and Holger Bech Nielsen. Hierarchy of quark masses, cabibbo angles and cp violation.Nuclear Physics B, 147(3-4):277–298, 1979

work page 1979
[6]

Fermion masses and anti-grand unification.Physics Letters B, 385(1-4):150–158, 1996

CD Froggatt, Holger Bech Nielsen, and Douglas J Smith. Fermion masses and anti-grand unification.Physics Letters B, 385(1-4):150–158, 1996

work page 1996
[7]

Lepton masses and mixing from modular s4 symmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 939:292–307, 2019

JT Penedo and ST Petcov. Lepton masses and mixing from modular s4 symmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 939:292–307, 2019

work page 2019
[8]

Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing, a4 and the modular symmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 741(1-2):215–235, 2006

Guido Altarelli and Ferruccio Feruglio. Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing, a4 and the modular symmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 741(1-2):215–235, 2006

work page 2006

Show all 48 references

[9]

A4 family symmetry and quark–lepton unification.Physics Letters B, 645(4):351–357, 2007

Stephen F King and Michal Malinsk` y. A4 family symmetry and quark–lepton unification.Physics Letters B, 645(4):351–357, 2007

2007
[10]

Are neutrino masses modular forms? InFrom My Vast Repertoire

Ferruccio Feruglio. Are neutrino masses modular forms? InFrom My Vast Repertoire. . . Guido Altarelli’s Legacy, pages 227–266. World Scientific, 2019

2019
[11]

In this work, we propose a novel approach to the flavour puzzle that simultaneously addresses the longstand- ing mystery of the existence of three generations

(a summary of various approaches can be found in [12–16]). In this work, we propose a novel approach to the flavour puzzle that simultaneously addresses the longstand- ing mystery of the existence of three generations. We argue that the number of generations may originate from...
[12]

A note on the predictions of models with modular flavor symmetries.Phys

Mu-Chun Chen, Sa´ ul Ramos-S´ anchez, and Michael Ratz. A note on the predictions of models with modular flavor symmetries.Phys. Lett. B, 801:135153, 2020

2020
[13]

Quasi–eclectic modular flavor symmetries.Phys

Mu-Chun Chen, Victor Knapp-Perez, Mario Ramos-Hamud, Saul Ramos-Sanchez, Michael Ratz, and Shreya Shukla. Quasi–eclectic modular flavor symmetries.Phys. Lett. B, 824:136843, 2022

2022
[14]

Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry.Reports on Progress in Physics, 87(8):084201, 2024

Gui-Jun Ding and Stephen F King. Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry.Reports on Progress in Physics, 87(8):084201, 2024

2024
[15]

Flavor patterns of fundamental particles from quantum entanglement? arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.23343, 2024

Jesse Thaler and Sokratis Trifinopoulos. Flavor patterns of fundamental particles from quantum entanglement? arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.23343, 2024

2024 arXiv
[16]

K. S. Babu. TASI Lectures on Flavor Physics. InTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: The Dawn of the LHC Era, pages 49–123, 2010

2010
[17]

Lepton flavor symmetries.Rev

Ferruccio Feruglio and Andrea Romanino. Lepton flavor symmetries.Rev. Mod. Phys., 93(1):015007, 2021

2021
[18]

Quark and lepton masses.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20755, 2025

Ferruccio Feruglio and Saul Ramos-Sanchez. Quark and lepton masses.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20755, 2025

2025 arXiv
[19]

Natural neutrino mass hierarchy in a theory of gauge flavour deconstruction.arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2506, 2025

Mario Fern´ andez Navarro, Stephen F King, and Avelino Vicente. Natural neutrino mass hierarchy in a theory of gauge flavour deconstruction.arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2506, 2025

2025
[20]

Recent progress in flavor model building.Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 75, 2024

Wolfgang Altmannshofer and Admir Greljo. Recent progress in flavor model building.Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 75, 2024

2024
[21]

Scaling range and cutoffs in empirical fractals.Physical Review E, 56(3):2817, 1997

Ofer Malcai, Daniel A Lidar, Ofer Biham, and David Avnir. Scaling range and cutoffs in empirical fractals.Physical Review E, 56(3):2817, 1997

1997
[22]

Emergence of fractal geometries in the evolution of a metabolic enzyme.Nature, pages 1–7, 2024

Franziska L Sendker, Yat Kei Lo, Thomas Heimerl, Stefan Bohn, Louise J Persson, Christopher-Nils Mais, Wiktoria Sadowska, Nicole Paczia, Eva Nußbaum, Mar´ ıa del Carmen S´ anchez Olmos, et al. Emergence of fractal geometries in the evolution of a metabolic enzyme.Nature, pages...

2024
[23]

Hofstadter butterfly in graphene.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05821, 2022

Wei Yang and Guangyu Zhang. Hofstadter butterfly in graphene.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05821, 2022

2022 arXiv
[24]

Fractals and the quantum theory of spacetime.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 4(19):5047–5117, 1989

Laurent Nottale. Fractals and the quantum theory of spacetime.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 4(19):5047–5117, 1989

1989
[25]

Topological edge and corner states in bismuth fractal nanostructures.Nature Physics, pages 1–8, 2024

R Canyellas, Chen Liu, R Arouca, L Eek, Guanyong Wang, Yin Yin, Dandan Guan, Yaoyi Li, Shiyong Wang, Hao Zheng, et al. Topological edge and corner states in bismuth fractal nanostructures.Nature Physics, pages 1–8, 2024

2024
[26]

Fractal theory space: Spacetime of noninteger dimensionality.Physical Review D, 67(8):085004, 2003

Christopher T Hill. Fractal theory space: Spacetime of noninteger dimensionality.Physical Review D, 67(8):085004, 2003. 8

2003
[27]

Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction.Physics Letters B, 513(1-2):232–240, 2001

Nima Arkani-Hamed, Andrew G Cohen, and Howard Georgi. Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction.Physics Letters B, 513(1-2):232–240, 2001

2001
[28]

Gauge invariant effective lagrangian for kaluza-klein modes

Christopher T Hill, Stefan Pokorski, and Jing Wang. Gauge invariant effective lagrangian for kaluza-klein modes. Physical Review D, 64(10):105005, 2001

2001
[29]

Tools for deconstructing gauge theories in AdS(5).JHEP, 08:061, 2006

Jorge de Blas, Adam Falkowski, Manuel Perez-Victoria, and Stefan Pokorski. Tools for deconstructing gauge theories in AdS(5).JHEP, 08:061, 2006

2006
[30]

A clockwork theory.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(2):1–39, 2017

Gian F Giudice and Matthew McCullough. A clockwork theory.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(2):1–39, 2017

2017
[31]

Kaplan and Riccardo Rattazzi

David E. Kaplan and Riccardo Rattazzi. Large field excursions and approximate discrete symmetries from a clock- work axion.Phys. Rev. D, 93(8):085007, 2016

2016
[32]

Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry.JHEP, 01:149, 2016

Kiwoon Choi and Sang Hui Im. Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry.JHEP, 01:149, 2016

2016
[33]

Exponential hierarchies from anderson localization in theory space.Physical Review Letters, 120(22):221802, 2018

Nathaniel Craig and Dave Sutherland. Exponential hierarchies from anderson localization in theory space.Physical Review Letters, 120(22):221802, 2018

2018
[34]

Vertex-, edge-, and total-colorings of sierpi´ nski-like graphs.Discrete Mathematics, 309(6):1548–1556, 2009

Marko Jakovac and Sandi Klavˇ zar. Vertex-, edge-, and total-colorings of sierpi´ nski-like graphs.Discrete Mathematics, 309(6):1548–1556, 2009

2009
[35]

Another possibility is to use a discrete symmetry to project them out as happens in extra dimension theories with orbifold [39, 40]

The unphysical chiral zero modes can form the dark sector, which can be made heavy with a dark Higgs. Another possibility is to use a discrete symmetry to project them out as happens in extra dimension theories with orbifold [39, 40]
[36]

The fourteenth western meeting of the american mathematical society, 1920

Arnold Dresden. The fourteenth western meeting of the american mathematical society, 1920

1920
[37]

Application of calculus of matrices to method of least squares: with special reference to geodetic calculations.(No Title), 1951

Arne Bjerhammar. Application of calculus of matrices to method of least squares: with special reference to geodetic calculations.(No Title), 1951

1951
[38]

A generalized inverse for matrices

Roger Penrose. A generalized inverse for matrices. InMathematical proceedings of the Cambridge philosophical society, volume 51, pages 406–413. Cambridge University Press, 1955

1955
[39]

This can be achieved if: (a) the Higgs field is localised on three different sites akin to the extra-dimensional picture [41, 42] or (b) there are three Higgs fields localised at different sites as in three Higgs doublet models [43, 44]
[40]

Nufit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024(12):1–33, 2025

Ivan Esteban, MC Gonzalez-Garcia, Michele Maltoni, Ivan Martinez-Soler, Jo˜ ao Paulo Pinheiro, and Thomas Schwetz. Nufit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024(12):1–33, 2025

2024
[41]

Review of particle physics (2024)

Particle Data Group et al. Review of particle physics (2024). 2024

2024
[42]

Certain properties of indices-dependent element-wise transformed matrices.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09033, 2024

Aadarsh Singh. Certain properties of indices-dependent element-wise transformed matrices.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09033, 2024

2024 arXiv
[43]

An introduction to extra dimensions

Abdel P´ erez-Lorenzana. An introduction to extra dimensions. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 18, page 224. IOP Publishing, 2005

2005
[44]

Beyond the standard model.arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.04228, 2016

Csaba Cs´ aki and Philip Tanedo. Beyond the standard model.arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.04228, 2016

2016 arXiv
[45]

Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions.Physical Review D, 61(3):033005, 2000

Nima Arkani-Hamed and Martin Schmaltz. Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions.Physical Review D, 61(3):033005, 2000

2000
[46]

Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in super-kamiokande i-iv.Physical Review D, 97(7):072001, 2018

K Abe, C Bronner, Y Haga, Y Hayato, M Ikeda, K Iyogi, J Kameda, Y Kato, Y Kishimoto, Ll Marti, et al. Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in super-kamiokande i-iv.Physical Review D, 97(7):072001, 2018

2018
[47]

Resuscitation of the three-scalar doublet model with sponta- neous cp violation.Physics Letters B, 155(3):192–196, 1985

Gustavo Castello Branco, AJ Buras, and J-M G´ erard. Resuscitation of the three-scalar doublet model with sponta- neous cp violation.Physics Letters B, 155(3):192–196, 1985

1985
[48]

Higgs masses in the standard, multi-higgs and supersymmetric models.Annals of Physics, 148(1):95–134, 1983

Ricardo A Flores and Marc Sher. Higgs masses in the standard, multi-higgs and supersymmetric models.Annals of Physics, 148(1):95–134, 1983

1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Such a successive repetition of generations in general implies complex Yukawa matrices, which lead to CP violation

Introduction -One of the major mysteries of the Standard Model of Particle Physics is the replication of the fundamental spin-1/2 fermions in three generations, with identical quantum numbers under the gauge symmetryG SM =SU(3) c×SU(2) L×U(1) Y , but differing only in their mass. Such a successive repetition of generations in general implies complex Yukaw...

work page

[2] [2]

This leads to non-trivial patterns in their couplings to the Higgs

flavour from the Sierpinski triangle -We will consider deconstruction-like [23–25] mass chains [26– 29] on the Sierpinski geometry, with Zero modes localised at different sites on this geometry. This leads to non-trivial patterns in their couplings to the Higgs. The Sierpinski triangle has been thoroughly studied as an archetype of a fractal,i.e.the repet...

arXiv 2025

[3] [3]

Modular symmetry, twisted sectors and flavour

Thomas Dent. Modular symmetry, twisted sectors and flavour. InString Phenomenology, pages 43–46. World Scientific, 2003

work page 2003

[4] [4]

Theoretical aspects of some physics beyond standard models

Conclusions&Outlook -Fractal geometry is widely observed in Nature, where intricate patterns and self-similarity emerge across multiple scales.[17]. In this letter, we have constructed a theory of flavour based on the mass chains on fractal geometry. For concreteness, we have chosen the Sierpinski Triangle with up to three iterations (the first iteration ...

work page 2022

[5] [5]

Hierarchy of quark masses, cabibbo angles and cp violation.Nuclear Physics B, 147(3-4):277–298, 1979

Colin D Froggatt and Holger Bech Nielsen. Hierarchy of quark masses, cabibbo angles and cp violation.Nuclear Physics B, 147(3-4):277–298, 1979

work page 1979

[6] [6]

Fermion masses and anti-grand unification.Physics Letters B, 385(1-4):150–158, 1996

CD Froggatt, Holger Bech Nielsen, and Douglas J Smith. Fermion masses and anti-grand unification.Physics Letters B, 385(1-4):150–158, 1996

work page 1996

[7] [7]

Lepton masses and mixing from modular s4 symmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 939:292–307, 2019

JT Penedo and ST Petcov. Lepton masses and mixing from modular s4 symmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 939:292–307, 2019

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing, a4 and the modular symmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 741(1-2):215–235, 2006

Guido Altarelli and Ferruccio Feruglio. Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing, a4 and the modular symmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 741(1-2):215–235, 2006

work page 2006