Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 84 references

Quantum Contextual Hypergraphs, Operators, Inequalities, and Applications in Higher Dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The standard α ≤ α* inequality fails as a contextuality test under quantum measurement statistics; the postprocessed inequality α < α*_p = l replaces it, and contextual hypergraphs can be generated in any dimension up to 32.

desk verdict Useful new KS-set data and a plausible upscaling method, but the paper's central inequality claim is a mislabeled LP feasible point, not a violation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09637 v1 pith:2BVRCTLI submitted 2025-01-16 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

Mladen Pavicic This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phmath-phmath.MP MSC 81P1305C6590C05 PACS 03.65.Ta03.67.Dd
keywords quantumcontextualityKochen–Speckersetsnon-Kochen–SpeckerMMPhypergraphsfractionalindependencenumberinequalitiesdimensionalupscalinghigher-dimensionalHilbertspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a bid to reset the standard way of certifying quantum contextuality and to make contextual state sets available in arbitrary dimensions. Its central claim is that the widely used inequality $\alpha(H) \le \alpha^*(H)$ — comparing the independence number of a contextuality hypergraph with its fractional independence number — is not a reliable test for contextuality once actual quantum measurement statistics are taken into account: under the paper's Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate, each of the $n$ vertices of a measured hyperedge is detected with probability $1/n$, so the relevant sum is $k/n$, which can exceed $\alpha$ (the 4-dim 25-15 example has $\alpha = 7$ while $\alpha^* = 25/4 = 6.25$). The paper replaces it with the postprocessed inequality $\alpha < \alpha^*_p$, where $\alpha^*_p$ equals the number of hyperedges $l$, a consequence of the hypergraph handshake lemma, and argues that this, together with the v- and e-inequalities, reliably separates contextual from noncontextual hypergraphs. It also claims to generate Kochen–Specker and non-Kochen–Specker hypergraphs — MMPHs, connected hypergraphs whose hyperedges contain at most $n$ mutually orthogonal vectors — in any dimension by methods whose complexity does not grow with dimension, with new examples up to dimension 32, and sketches applications in quantum key distribution, oblivious communication, Hadamard-matrix construction, and stabilizer operations. If right, the paper reshapes which inequalities are cited as contextuality certificates and supplies scalable higher-dimensional state sets, the raw material for proposed quantum communication and computation advantages.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the MMP hypergraph (McKay–Megill–Pavičić hypergraph): a connected hypergraph of dimension $n$ in which each hyperedge contains at most $n$ vertices, vertices represent quantum states or vectors, and hyperedges represent sets of mutually orthogonal vectors serving as measurement contexts. Two numbers do the work in the inequality argument: the independence number $\alpha(H)$ — the largest set of vertices no two of which share a hyperedge, equal to the paper's maximal classical vertex index — and the fractional independence number $\alpha^*(H)$, the optimum of a linear program maximizing the sum of vertex weights subject to each hyperedge summing to at most 1. The paper's new object is the postprocessed fractional independence number $\alpha^*_p$, in which each vertex contributes its multiplicity $m(v)$ divided by $n$; the vertex-hyperedge lemma (a hypergraph handshake lemma) forces $\sum_v m(v)/n = l$, the number of hyperedges, and this identity converts the unreliable bound $\alpha \le \alpha^*$ into the reliable bound $\alpha < \alpha^*_p = l$. The generation machinery is a family of eight methods M1–M8, most prominently M1 (exhaustive enumeration of mutually orthogonal $n$-tuples from simple vector components) and M8 (dimensional upscaling by concatenating lower-dimensional KS sets with zero padding, whose complexity does not scale with dimension). The Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate — uniform exit probability $1/n$ per port — is the bridge from linear programming to quantum measurement statistics.

What would settle it

Measure the exit statistics of a Stern–Gerlach-type device for a definite preparation: send spin-1 atoms prepared in the $|S_z = 0\rangle$ (or any fixed) state through the apparatus and count detections at the three output ports; the rates are 0, 1, and 0 (up to experimental error), not 1/3 each, directly contradicting the postulate that drives $\alpha^* = k/n$. Equivalently, compute the fractional-independence LP for the 25-15 hypergraph using actually measured per-vertex probabilities of its given coordinatization rather than uniform $1/n$, and check whether $\alpha \le \alpha^*$ holds; if it does, the claimed violation is an artifact of the uniformity assumption, not a property of quantum measurements.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery, stated on its own terms, is that quantum measurement statistics break the $\alpha$-inequality and that a postprocessed statistic restores a reliable test. Under the Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate II.11 — an unknown pure state exits any gate (hyperedge) with equal probability $1/n$ through each of its $n$ ports — the fractional independence number $\alpha^*(H)$ of an $n$-dim $k$-$l$ MMPH becomes $k/n$ under raw data statistics. The paper exhibits MMPHs for which $k/n$ is strictly smaller than the independence number $\alpha$: the 4-dim non-KS NBMMPH 25-15 with $\alpha = 7 > \alpha^* = 25/4 = 6.25$, and even the noncontextual BMMPH 9-3 with $\alpha = 3 > \alpha^* = 9/4 = 2.25$ — so the inequality $\alpha \le \alpha^*$, long asserted as a noncontextuality inequality, is not a reliable discriminator of contextuality. The replacement is the postprocessed quantum fractional independence number $\alpha^*_p$, which counts each vertex with its multiplicity: summing $m(v)/n$ over vertices gives exactly $l$ by the vertex-hyperedge lemma, so the inequality $\alpha < \alpha^*_p = l$ is a form of the v-inequality and, the paper argues, a genuine noncontextuality inequality. On the generation side, the paper claims that by combining lower-dimensional KS MMPHs padded with zeros in new dimensions (method M8) and by filtering masters built from simple vector components (method M1), one obtains KS and non-KS MMPHs in all dimensions with minimal critical size fluctuating between 8 and 16 hyperedges, and it presents new critical examples in dimensions 27 and 32.

Load-bearing premise

The Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate — that an unknown pure state exits through each port of a measurement gate with equal probability $1/n$ — is the load-bearing premise, and it is not derived from quantum mechanics; for a prepared state the exit probabilities follow the state's amplitudes, so the equality $\alpha^* = k/n$, and hence the claimed violation of the $\alpha$-inequality, holds only under this assumed uniformity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $\alpha$-inequality $\alpha \le \alpha^*$ should not be used to certify contextuality: under the paper's measurement statistics it is violated not only by contextual NBMMPHs but also by the noncontextual BMMPH 9-3, so a violation of it proves nothing about contextuality.
  • The reliable discriminators become the v-inequality, the e-inequality $l_{cM} < l$, and the postprocessed inequality $\alpha < \alpha^*_p = l$; all contextual MMPHs fail the 0-1 assignment rules that these inequalities encode.
  • Contextual sets can be produced in any dimension by dimensional upscaling, with minimal critical size fluctuating in a narrow band (8–9 hyperedges for non-KS, 9–16 for KS) rather than growing with the dimension.
  • Higher-dimensional MMPHs supply concrete resource states: the 32-dim 144-11 set gives an eavesdropper-guessing probability below $3 \times 10^{-17}$ in the proposed large-alphabet protocol, and star-like KS hypergraphs determine the elements of S-Hadamard matrices in any even dimension.
  • Stabilizer-operation graphs can be translated into non-KS MMPHs and reduced to smaller critical KS MMPHs, offering a route to simpler stabilizer circuits and error-correction codes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The claimed failure of the $\alpha$-inequality is driven entirely by the uniformity postulate; for prepared (known) states the exit probabilities are $|\langle v|\psi\rangle|^2$ and need not be $1/n$, so the statement that quantum measurements break $\alpha \le \alpha^*$ is only as general as the postulate's domain of unknown states.
  • A direct experimental test would measure detection statistics for the 9-3 BMMPH and the 25-15 non-KS MMPH under definite preparations: if $\alpha \le \alpha^*$ is restored under state-dependent probabilities, the discriminator claim becomes a statement about ensemble preparation, not about contextuality per se.
  • The paper concedes that its maximal classical vertex indices come from randomized searches without backtracking, so slightly larger $\alpha$ values might appear with more runs; because larger $\alpha$ only widens the claimed violations ($\alpha > k/n$), this admitted uncertainty actually points in the direction of the paper's conclusion.
  • The large-alphabet protocol's advantage is argued against an eavesdropper who knows only the uniform exit statistics; an extended adversarial model in which Eve knows Alice's actual prepared states may erase the claimed advantage, since the protocol's secrecy appears to rest on the uniformity postulate rather than on contextuality itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: The paper's discovery, stated on its own terms, is that quantum measurement statistics break the $\alpha$-inequality and that a postprocessed statistic restores a reliable test. Under the Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate II.11 — an unknown pure state exits any gate (hyperedge) with equal probability $1/n$ through each of its $n$ ports — the fractional independence number $\alpha^*(H)$ of an $n$-dim

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops hypergraph (MMPH) representations of Kochen–Specker and non-Kochen–Specker contextual sets, presents generation methods M1–M8, catalogs examples in dimensions 3–32, and proposes applications in quantum communication and computation. Its central theoretical claim is that the fractional-independence α-inequality α(H) ≤ α*(H) fails under quantum measurements, and that new 'postprocessed' statistics yield a reliable discriminator α < α*_p = l.

Significance. If the inequality analysis were correct, the paper would substantially change how contextuality is quantified and would supply a scalable toolkit for higher-dimensional KS sets. The paper's strengths are its computational generation methods, the explicit coordinatizations and strings in the appendix, and the reproducible catalog of MMPHs in dimensions up to 32. However, the central inequality-based claims are not sound, and the proposed new discriminator is tautological; the useful computational content does not rescue the advertised theoretical message.

major comments (3)
  1. [II.C, Defs. II.9–II.10 and Eq. (13)] The claimed violation of the α-inequality for 9-3 and 25-15 is an artifact of replacing the LP optimum in Def. II.9 by the raw-data sum k/n. In Eq. (13), α*(H) is equated with k/n, but Def. II.9 defines α* as the maximum of Σ x(v) over x(v) ∈ [0,1] with Σ_{v∈e} x(v) ≤ 1 for every hyperedge. The paper's own LP computation for 9-3 with free variables gives α* = 3 and α = 3, so Eq. (11) holds; the computation yielding 9/4 imposes the additional lower bounds x(v) ≥ 1/4, which are not part of Def. II.9. Since any 0/1 independent set is feasible for the LP, α ≤ α* is a theorem for every hypergraph, and a measurement protocol cannot invalidate it unless it changes the meaning of α*.
  2. [II.C, Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate II.11] The postulate that an unknown pure state exits through each port of a gate with equal probability 1/n is not a consequence of quantum mechanics. For a pure state |ψ⟩ measured in an orthonormal basis {|v_i⟩}, the probability of outcome i is |⟨v_i|ψ⟩|^2; this is 1/n only for special states and bases, and equals 1 for |ψ⟩ = |v_1⟩ in that basis and 0 for the other ports. The postulate is load-bearing: it is used to justify Eq. (13), the claimed α* values such as 9/4 and 25/4, and the assertion that α* computations are of linear complexity. Without it, the claimed violations of Eq. (11) do not follow.
  3. [II.C, Def. II.13, Eq. (14), Theorem II.14(b), Eq. (16)] The postprocessed quantum fractional independence number α*_p is defined in Eq. (14) as Σ_v m(v)/n = l. Hence the α*_p-inequality α < α*_p = l in Eq. (16) is not an independent contextuality witness; it is the handshake identity of Lemma II.4 together with the definition of α*_p. The paper acknowledges that Eq. (16) is 'another form of the v-inequality' (Eq. (8)), but the v-inequality itself, as stated in Lemma II.6, is not proved: the argument that 'the maximal number of hyperedges that contain 1 must be smaller than l' concerns hyperedge counts, while HI_cM in Eq. (8) is a vertex count. Thus the proposed 'reliable discriminator' is either tautological or unsupported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II.C, sentence after Eq. (16)] The phrase 'the α-inequality (Equations (11,16))' appears to be a typo; Eq. (16) is the α*_p-inequality, so the reference should probably be to Eqs. (11) and (15) or simply to Eq. (11).
  2. [Figure 5 caption] The caption states 'α = 7 > α* = 25/4 = 6.25'; this is an instance of the artifact described in major comment 1, since 25/4 is the value of the uniform feasible point under the lower-bound restriction, not the LP optimum of Def. II.9.
  3. [Tables I–IV and surrounding text] The table labels are inconsistent; the text refers to 'Table II D 1' and 'Tables II D 1–IV', which should be unified to stable table numbers.
  4. [Appendix A.2] The distribution of critical KS MMPHs would be much easier to read as a formatted table; the current line '9 (number of hyperedges, l) 18 (number of vertices, k) (1) (number of MMPHs)' is ambiguous.
  5. [II.E.1] The claim that Eve's probability of correctly guessing all states is less than 3 × 10^-17 for the 32-dim, 11-hyperedge MMPH is stated without derivation; if retained, it needs a calculation or a precise citation.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Central α-inequality critique is self-definitional: α* is redefined as the uniform-probability sum k/n (Eq. 13) rather than the LP maximum of Def. II.9, and the 'new' α*_p-inequality (Eq. 16) is explicitly another form of the v-inequality, which itself restates the definition of an NBMMPH.

  1. self definitional [Section II C, 9-3 LP calculation and Eq. (13); contrast with Def. II.9/II.10]
    "However, for x = p = 1/4, i.e., for quantum measurements, we obtain LP[... {{1/4,1},{1/4,1},{1/4,1},{1/4,1},{1/4,1},{1/4,1},{1/4,1},{1/4,1},{1/4,1}}]. Out: = {1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4}, i.e., α∗ = 9/4 = 2.25, which violates inequality (11). ... Under the raw data statistics (Definition II.12) assumption ..., the sum of all probabilities is ... k/n = α∗(k-l) = α∗(H). (13)"

    Definition II.9 defines α*(H) as the LP maximum over x(v) ∈ [0,1] with hyperedge sums at most 1, and the paper's own free-x LP for 9-3 returns α* = 3, so inequality (11) holds. The 'quantum measurement' LP instead adds lower bounds x_v ≥ 1/4, a constraint not present in Def. II.9; since every hyperedge of the n-dim hypergraph has n vertices, feasibility then forces x_v = 1/n exactly, making the optimum equal k/n by construction. Equation (13) then labels this forced uniform sum as α*(H). The reported violation α > α* is therefore not a consequence of the LP definition; it is manufactured by redefining α* as the raw-data probability sum.

  2. renaming known result [Section II C, Theorem II.14(b), Eqs. (14) and (16)]
    "Under the postprocessed data statistics (Definition II.13) assumption, i.e., under the assumption that every vertex v within an MMPH has m(v)/n probability of being detected, the sum of all probabilities, according to the vertex-hyperedge Lemma II.4, is ... l = α∗p(k-l) = α∗p(H) (14) ... Statement (b) implies that the α∗p-inequality ... HI_cM = α(H) < α∗p(H) = l = HI_q, (16) ... is another form of the v-inequality (Equation (8)) and that it is therefore a noncontextuality inequality and a reliable discriminator of contextual sets."

    α*_p is defined by Eq. (14) to equal l, the number of hyperedges, via the handshake identity Σ m(v)/n = l from Lemma II.4. The inequality α(H) < l is exactly the v-inequality HI_cM < HI_q = l of Eq. (8), and Lemma II.6 derives that inequality directly from the definition of an NBMMPH: no 0/1 assignment can put a 1 in every hyperedge. Thus the 'postprocessed quantum fractional independence number inequality' is not a new contextuality witness; it is the defining condition of the input class NBMMPH under a new name. The paper explicitly acknowledges that Eq. (16) is another form of Eq. (8), so the claimed reliable discriminator reduces to the input by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim about the α-inequality is not an LP-derived or empirical result but is built into the definitions. Def. II.9/II.10 define α* as the LP maximum over x(v) ∈ [0,1]; the paper's own unconstrained computation on 9-3 gives α* = 3 and satisfies Eq. (11). The alleged violation comes from adding lower bounds x_v ≥ 1/4 (imported from Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate II.11) and then writing Eq. (13), α* = k/n; with hyperedges of size n the constraints force the uniform point, so the inequality failure is an artifact of the added constraint rather than a property of the stated LP. The second discriminator, α*_p, is defined in Eq. (14) as l, and Eq. (16) is admitted to be 'another form of the v-inequality', which in turn is just the definition of an NBMMPH (Lemma II.6). These two reductions bear directly on the paper's advertised contribution of 'reliable discriminators'. By contrast, the hypergraph generation methods M1-M8, the new 27- and 32-dimensional examples, and the proposed application protocols are largely independent computational and constructive work, and the numerous self-citations there function as ordinary background references rather than as a forced derivation chain. Overall, the contextuality-discriminator claim is forced by definition, but substantial non-circular content remains, giving score 7 rather than 8-10.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on the Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate and on definitional equivalences rather than on fitted parameters. No free parameters are fitted, but the 'postprocessed statistics' involve an unproven assumption about equal probabilities.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Quantum Indeterminacy Postulate II.11: unknown pure states exit a gate through each of n ports with equal probability 1/n.
    Invoked in Section II.C to set x(v)=1/n and derive α*=k/n; not derived from QM and generally false for non-uniform states.
  • domain assumption Every vertex's detection probability within a hyperedge is 1/κ(j) after postprocessing (Definition II.13).
    Underlies the postprocessed statistics and the identity α*_p = l; it is a modeling choice, not a theorem.
  • standard math Kochen-Specker theorem (existence of KS sets) is accepted as known.
    Used throughout; cited as reference [1,3,51,52].
  • domain assumption All hyperedges in the 'filled' MMPHs contain n vertices and correspond to orthogonal bases.
    Definition I.14 and coordinatization assumptions; needed for the vertex-hyperedge lemma.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Contextual Hypergraphs, Operators, Inequalities, and Applications in Higher Dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2BVRCTLI

@misc{pith2026250109637,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Contextual Hypergraphs, Operators, Inequalities, and Applications in Higher Dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2BVRCTLI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09637}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum contextuality plays a significant role in supporting quantum computation and quantum information theory. The key tools for this are the Kochen--Specker and non-Kochen--Specker contextual sets. Traditionally, their representation has been predominantly operator-based, mainly focusing on specific constructs in dimensions ranging from three to eight. However, nearly all of these constructs can be represented as low-dimensional hypergraphs. This study demonstrates how to generate contextual hypergraphs in any dimension using various methods, particularly those that do not scale in complexity with increasing dimensions. Furthermore, we introduce innovative examples of hypergraphs extending to dimension 32. Our methodology reveals the intricate structural properties of hypergraphs, enabling precise quantifications of contextuality of implemented sets. Additionally, we investigate several promising applications of hypergraphs in quantum communication and quantum computation, paving the way for future breakthroughs in the field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09637 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Obtaining non-KS MMPHs via three different methods (c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. TIF diagrams according to figures from [40] (except ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. BMMPH 9-3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. 4-dim non-KS NBMMPH 25-15, a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. 3-dim MMPHs. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. 4-dim NBMMPHs. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Stern–Gerlach [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The 22-11 obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Star-like [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [61]

    Experimentally Testable State-Independe nt Quantum Contextuality

    Cabello, A. Experimentally Testable State-Independe nt Quantum Contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 210401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.210401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.210401 2008

  2. [1]

    On Bell Non-Locality without Prob abilities: More Curious Geometry

    Zimba, J.; Penrose, R. On Bell Non-Locality without Prob abilities: More Curious Geometry. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 1993, 24, 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(93)90061-NGet

    work page doi:10.1016/0039-3681(93)90061-nget 1993

  3. [2]

    Matsuno, S. The Construction of Kochen–Specker Noncolo urable Sets in Higher-Dimensional Space from Corresponding Sets in Lower Dimension: Modification of Cabello, Estebaranz and Garc´ ıa- Alcaine’s Method. J. Phys. A 2007, 40, 9507–9513. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/31/024

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/31/024 2007

  4. [3]

    Quantum Contextuality

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M. Quantum Contextuality. Quantum 2023, 7, 953. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-03-17-953

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-17-953 2023

  5. [4]

    Non-Kochen-Specker Contextuality

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M. Non-Kochen-Specker Contextuality. Entropy 2023, 25, 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081117

    work page doi:10.3390/e25081117 2023

  6. [5]

    Feasible Kochen-Specker Experiment with Single Particles

    Simon, C.; ˙Zukowski, M.; Weinfurter, H.; Zeilinger, A. Feasible Kochen-Specker Experiment with Single Particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 1783–1786. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1783

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.1783

  7. [6]

    Experiments towards Falsification of Noncontextual Hidden Variables

    Michler, M.; Weinfurter, H.; ˙Zukowski, M. Experiments towards Falsification of Noncontextual Hidden Variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 5457–5461. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5457

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.5457

  8. [7]

    S tate-Independent Quan- tum Contextuality with Single Photons

    Amselem, E.; R˚ admark, M.; Bourennane, M.; Cabello, A. S tate-Independent Quan- tum Contextuality with Single Photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 160405. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.160405

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.160405 2009

Show all 84 references
  1. [8]

    Experimental Demonstration of Quantum Contextuality with NonentangledPhotons

    Liu, B.H.; Huang, Y.F.; Gong, Y.X.; Sun, F.W.; Zhang, Y.S .; Li, C.F.; Guo, G.C. Experimental Demonstration of Quantum Contextuality with NonentangledPhotons. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 80, 044101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.044101

    2009 doi

  2. [9]

    Ex- perimental Implementation of a Kochen-Specker Set of Quantum Tests

    D’Ambrosio, V.; Herbauts, I.; Amselem, E.; Nagali, E.; B ourennane, M.; Sciarrino, F.; Cabello, A. Ex- perimental Implementation of a Kochen-Specker Set of Quantum Tests. Phys. Rev. X 2013, 3, 011012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.011012

    2013 doi

  3. [10]

    Experimental Test of the Kochen-Specker Theorem with Single Photons

    Huang, Y.F.; Li, C.F.; Zhang, Y.S.; Pan, J.W.; Guo, G.C. Experimental Test of the Kochen-Specker Theorem with Single Photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 250401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.250401

    2003 doi

  4. [11]

    Experimental Non-Classicality of an Indivisible Quantu m System

    Lapkiewicz, R.; Li, P.; Schaeff, C.; Langford, N.K.; Ram elow, S.; Wie´ sniak, M.; Zeilinger, A. Experimental Non-Classicality of an Indivisible Quantu m System. Nat. 2011, 474, 490–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10119

    2011 doi

  5. [12]

    State- Independent Experimental Test of Quantum Contextuality in an Indivisible System

    Zu, C.; Wang, Y.X.; Deng, D.L.; Chang, X.Y.; Liu, K.; Hou , P.Y.; Yang, H.X.; Duan, L.M. State- Independent Experimental Test of Quantum Contextuality in an Indivisible System. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 150401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.150401

    2012 doi

  6. [13]

    Xavier, G.B.; Lima, G.; Cabello, A

    Ca˜ nas, G.; Etcheverry, S.; G´ omez, E.S.; Saavedra, C. ; Xavier, G.B.; Lima, G.; Cabello, A. Ex- perimental Implementation of an Eight-Dimensional Kochen -Specker Set and Observation of Its Connection with the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger Theorem . Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 0121...

    2014 doi

  7. [14]

    Applying the Simplest Kochen-Specker Set for Quantum Inf ormation Processing

    Ca˜ nas, G.; Arias, M.; Etcheverry, S.; G´ omez, E.S.; Cabello, A.; Saavedra, C.; Xavier, G.B.; Lima, G. Applying the Simplest Kochen-Specker Set for Quantum Inf ormation Processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 090404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.090404. 34

    2014 doi

  8. [15]

    Realization of the Contextuality- Nonlocality Tradeoff with a Qubit-Qutrit Photon Pair

    Zhan, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sanders, B.C.; Xu e, P. Realization of the Contextuality- Nonlocality Tradeoff with a Qubit-Qutrit Photon Pair. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 090401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.090401

    2016 doi

  9. [16]

    Experimental Cont extuality in Classical Light

    Li, T.; Zeng1, Q.; Song, X.; Zhang, X. Experimental Cont extuality in Classical Light. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44467. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44467

    2017 doi

  10. [17]

    State-In dependent Contextuality in Classical Light

    Li, T.; Zeng, Q.; Zhang, X.; Chen, T.; Zhang, X. State-In dependent Contextuality in Classical Light. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17038. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51250-5

    2019 doi

  11. [18]

    Classical Physics and the Boun ds of Quantum Correlations

    Frustaglia, D.; Baltan´ as, J.P.; Vel´ azquez-Ahumada, M.C.; Fern´ andez-Prieto, A.; Lujambio, A.; Losada, V.; Freire, M.J.; Cabello, A. Classical Physics and the Boun ds of Quantum Correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 250404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.250404

    2016 doi

  12. [19]

    Experimental Test of Contextuality in Quantum and Classical Systems

    Zhang, A.; Xu, H.; Xie, J.; Zhang, H.; Smith, B.J.; Kim, M .S.; Zhang, L. Experimental Test of Contextuality in Quantum and Classical Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 122, 080401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080401

    2004 doi

  13. [20]

    Quantum Contex- tuality in a Single-Neutron Optical Experiment

    Hasegawa, Y.; Loidl, R.; Badurek, G.; Baron, M.; Rauch, H. Quantum Contex- tuality in a Single-Neutron Optical Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102006, 97, 230401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.230401

    doi

  14. [21]

    Propos ed Experiment for Test- ing Quantum Contextuality with Neutrons

    Cabello, A.; Filipp, S.; Rauch, H.; Hasegawa, Y. Propos ed Experiment for Test- ing Quantum Contextuality with Neutrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 130404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.130404

    2008 doi

  15. [22]

    Experimen- tal Test of Quantum Contextuality in Neutron Interferometr y

    Bartosik, H.; Klepp, J.; Schmitzer, C.; Sponar, S.; Cab ello, A.; Rauch, H.; Hasegawa, Y. Experimen- tal Test of Quantum Contextuality in Neutron Interferometr y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 040403. https://doi.org/0.1103/PhysRevLett.103.040403

    2009

  16. [23]

    State-Independent Experimental Test of Quantum Conte xtuality

    Kirchmair, G.; Z¨ ahringer, F.; Gerritsma, R.; Kleinmann, M.; G¨ uhne, O.; Cabello, A.; Blatt, R.; Roos, C.F. State-Independent Experimental Test of Quantum Conte xtuality. Nat. 2009, 460, 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08172

    2009 doi

  17. [24]

    Testing Contextuality on Quantum Ensembles with One Clean Qubit

    Moussa, O.; Ryan, C.A.; Cory, D.G.; Laflamme, R. Testing Contextuality on Quantum Ensembles with One Clean Qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 160501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.160501

    2010 doi

  18. [25]

    Mondal, M.; Wallraff, A.; Goodenough, K.; Wehner, S.; Juliusson, K.; Langford, N.K.; et al

    Jerger, M.; Reshitnyk, Y.; Oppliger, M.; Potoˇ cnik, A. ; Mondal, M.; Wallraff, A.; Goodenough, K.; Wehner, S.; Juliusson, K.; Langford, N.K.; et al. Contextua lity without Nonlocality in a Supercon- ducting Quantum System. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12930. https://doi.org/10.1038/n...

    2016 doi

  19. [26]

    Hybrid Ququart-Encoded Quantum Cryptography Protected by Kochen-Specker Contextuality

    Cabello, A.; D’Ambrosio, V.; Nagali, E.; Sciarrino, F. Hybrid Ququart-Encoded Quantum Cryptography Protected by Kochen-Specker Contextuality. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 84, 030302(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.030302

    2011 doi

  20. [27]

    Kochen-Specker Theorem as a Precondition fo r Secure Quantum Key Distribution

    Nagata, K. Kochen-Specker Theorem as a Precondition fo r Secure Quantum Key Distribution. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 72, 012325 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012325

    2005 doi

  21. [28]

    State Independent Contextuality Advances One-Way Commu- nication

    Saha, D.; Horodecki, P.; Paw/suppress lowski, M. State Independent Contextuality Advances One-Way Commu- nication. New J. Phys. 2019, 21, 093057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab4149

    2019 doi

  22. [29]

    Conte xtuality Supplies the ‘Magic’ for Quantum Computation

    Howard, M.; Wallman, J.; Veitech, V.; Emerson, J. Conte xtuality Supplies the ‘Magic’ for Quantum Computation. Nat. 2014, 510, 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13460

    2014 doi

  23. [30]

    Powered by Magic

    Bartlett, S.D. Powered by Magic. Nat. 2014, 510, 345–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13504

    2014 doi

  24. [31]

    Fundame ntal Monogamy Rela- tion between Contextuality and Nonlocality

    Kurzy´ nski, P.; Cabello, A.; Kaszlikowski, D. Fundame ntal Monogamy Rela- tion between Contextuality and Nonlocality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 100401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.100401

    2014 doi

  25. [32]

    Measurement Incompatibility an d Steering Are Necessary and Sufficient for Operational Contextuality

    Tavakoli, A.; Uola, R. Measurement Incompatibility an d Steering Are Necessary and Sufficient for Operational Contextuality. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 013011. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013011

    2020 doi

  26. [33]

    Kochen-Specker Sets and Generalized Orthoarguesian Equations

    Megill, N.D.; Paviˇ ci´ c, M. Kochen-Specker Sets and Generalized Orthoarguesian Equations. Ann. Henri Poinc. 2011, 12, 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-011-0109-0

    2011 doi

  27. [34]

    Simple Test for Hidden Variables in Spin-1 Systems

    Klyachko, A.A.; Can, M.A.; Binicio˘ glu, S.; Shumovsky, A.S. Simple Test for Hidden Variables in Spin-1 Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 020403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.020403

    2008 doi

  28. [35]

    State-Independent Proof of Kochen-Spe cker Theorem with 13 Rays

    Yu, S.; Oh, C.H. State-Independent Proof of Kochen-Spe cker Theorem with 13 Rays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 030402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.030402. 35

    2012 doi

  29. [36]

    A Kochen–Sp ecker Inequality from a SIC

    Bengtsson, I.; Blanchfield, K.; Cabello, A. A Kochen–Sp ecker Inequality from a SIC. Phys. Lett. A 2012, 376, 374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2011.12.011

    2012 doi

  30. [37]

    State-independent conte xtuality sets for a qutrit

    Xu, Z.P.; Chen, J.L.; Su, H.Y. State-independent conte xtuality sets for a qutrit. Phys. Lett. A 2015, 379, 1868–1870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.04.024

    2015 doi

  31. [38]

    Necessary and Sufficient C ondition for State- Independent Contextual Measurement Scenarios

    Ramanathan, R.; Horodecki, P. Necessary and Sufficient C ondition for State- Independent Contextual Measurement Scenarios. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 040404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.040404

    2014 doi

  32. [39]

    Necessary and S ufficient Condition for Quantum State-Independent Contextuality

    Cabello, A.; Kleinmann, M.; Budroni, C. Necessary and S ufficient Condition for Quantum State-Independent Contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 114, 250402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.250402

    2014 doi

  33. [40]

    Min imal True-Implies-False and True-Implies-True Sets of Propositions in Noncontextual Hidden-Variable The ories

    Cabello, A.; Portillo, J.R.; Sol´ ıs, A.; Svozil, K. Min imal True-Implies-False and True-Implies-True Sets of Propositions in Noncontextual Hidden-Variable The ories. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 012106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012106

    2018 doi

  34. [41]

    Extensions of Hardy-Type True-Implies-Fal se Gadgets to Classically Obtain Indistinguisha- bility

    Svozil, K. Extensions of Hardy-Type True-Implies-Fal se Gadgets to Classically Obtain Indistinguisha- bility. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 103, 022204. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.022204

    2021 doi

  35. [42]

    Graphs and Hypergraphs; North-Holland Mathematical Library, North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1973; Volume 6

    Berge, C. Graphs and Hypergraphs; North-Holland Mathematical Library, North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1973; Volume 6

    1973

  36. [43]

    Hypergraphs: Combinatorics of Finite Sets ; North-Holland Mathematical Library, North- Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989; Volume 45

    Berge, C. Hypergraphs: Combinatorics of Finite Sets ; North-Holland Mathematical Library, North- Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989; Volume 45

    1989

  37. [44]

    Hypergraph Theory: An Introduction ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013

    Bretto, A. Hypergraph Theory: An Introduction ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00080-0

    2013 doi

  38. [45]

    Introduction to Graph and Hypergraph Theory ; Nova Science: New York, NY, USA, 2009

    Voloshin, V.I. Introduction to Graph and Hypergraph Theory ; Nova Science: New York, NY, USA, 2009

    2009

  39. [46]

    Hypergraph Contextuality

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M. Hypergraph Contextuality. Entropy 2019, 21, 1107. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21111107

    2019 doi

  40. [47]

    Generation Kochen-Specker Contextual Sets in Higher Dimensions by Dimen- sional Upscaling Whose Complexity Does not Scale with Dimension and Their Application

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M.; Waegel, M. Generation Kochen-Specker Contextual Sets in Higher Dimensions by Dimen- sional Upscaling Whose Complexity Does not Scale with Dimension and Their Application. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 110, 012205. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.012205

    2024 doi

  41. [48]

    The Ellipsoid Method and Its Consequences in Combinatorial Optimization

    Gr¨ otschel, M.; Lov´ asz, L.; Schrijver, A. The Ellipsoid Method and Its Consequences in Combinatorial Optimization. Combinatorica 1981, 1, 169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02579273

    1981 doi

  42. [49]

    On Graph Approaches to Contextuality and Their Role in Quantum Theory ; SBMAC Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018

    Amaral, B.; Cunha, M.T. On Graph Approaches to Contextuality and Their Role in Quantum Theory ; SBMAC Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93827-1

    2018 doi

  43. [50]

    Automated Generation of Ar bitrarily Many Kochen-Specker and Other Contextual Sets in Odd Dimensional Hilbert Spaces

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M.; Megill, N.D. Automated Generation of Ar bitrarily Many Kochen-Specker and Other Contextual Sets in Odd Dimensional Hilbert Spaces. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 106, L060203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.L060203

    2022 doi

  44. [51]

    The problem of hidden variabl es in quantum mechanics

    Kochen, S.; Specker, E.P. The problem of hidden variabl es in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 1967, 17, 59–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24902153

    1967

  45. [52]

    Budroni, C.; Cabello, A.; G¨ uhne, O.; Kleinmann, M.; La rsson, J. ˚ A. Kochen-Specker Contextuality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2022, 94, 0450007. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045007

    2022 doi

  46. [53]

    Twin Inequality for Fully Contextual Quant um Correlations

    Cabello, A. Twin Inequality for Fully Contextual Quant um Correlations. Phys. Rev. A 2013, 87, 010104(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.010104

    2013 doi

  47. [54]

    Vector Generation of Quantum Contextual Sets in Even Dimensional Hilbert Spaces

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M.; Megill, N.D. Vector Generation of Quantum Contextual Sets in Even Dimensional Hilbert Spaces. Entropy 2018, 20, 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20120928

    2018 doi

  48. [55]

    Arbitrarily Exhaustive Hypergraph Gene ration of 4-, 6-, 8-, 16- , and 32-Dimensional Quantum Contextual Sets

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M. Arbitrarily Exhaustive Hypergraph Gene ration of 4-, 6-, 8-, 16- , and 32-Dimensional Quantum Contextual Sets. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 95, 062121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.062121

    2017 doi

  49. [56]

    Automated Generation of Kochen-Specker Sets

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M.; Waegel, M.; Megill, N.D.; Aravind, P. Automated Generation of Kochen-Specker Sets. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43009-9

    2019 doi

  50. [57]

    Bell-Kochen-Specke r Theorem for Any Finite Dimension n > 3

    Cabello, A.; Garc´ ıa-Alcaine, G. Bell-Kochen-Specke r Theorem for Any Finite Dimension n > 3. J. Phys. A 1996, 29, 1025. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/29/5/016

    1996 doi

  51. [58]

    Re cursive Proof of the Bell-Kochen- Specker Theorem in any Dimension n > 3

    Cabello, A.; Estebaranz, J.M.; Garc´ ıa-Alcaine, G. Re cursive Proof of the Bell-Kochen- Specker Theorem in any Dimension n > 3. Phys. Lett. A 2005, 339, 425–429. 36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.03.067

    2005 doi

  52. [59]

    Coexistence of Kochen-Specker ine qualities and noncontextuality inequalities

    Yu, X.D.; Tong, D.M. Coexistence of Kochen-Specker ine qualities and noncontextuality inequalities. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 010101(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.010101

    2014 doi

  53. [60]

    A Proof of the Kochen–Spe cker Theorem Can Always Be Converted to a State-Independent Noncontextuality Inequa lity

    Yu, X.D.; Guo, Y.Q.; Tong, D.M. A Proof of the Kochen–Spe cker Theorem Can Always Be Converted to a State-Independent Noncontextuality Inequa lity. New J. Phys. 2015, 17, 093001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/9/093001

    2015 doi

  54. [62]

    State-Indep endent Test of Quantum Con- textuality with Either Single Photons or Coherent Light

    Qu, D.; Wang, K.; Xiao, L.; Zhan, X.; Xue, P. State-Indep endent Test of Quantum Con- textuality with Either Single Photons or Coherent Light. NPJ Quantum Inf. 2021, 7, 154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00492-1

    2021 doi

  55. [63]

    Exercises in Graph Theory ; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998

    Melnikov, O.; Sarvanov, V.; Tysbkevich, R.; Yemeliche v, V.; Zverovich, I. Exercises in Graph Theory ; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1514-0

    1998 doi

  56. [64]

    The Rank of Contextuality

    Horodecki, K.; Zhou, J.; Stankiewicz, M.; Salazar, R.; Horodecki, P.; Raussendorf, R.; Horodecki, R.; Ramanathan, R.; Tyhurst, E. The Rank of Contextuality. New J. Phys., 2023, 25 , 073003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acdf78

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    Fractional Independence Number

    Weisstein, E.W. Fractional Independence Number. Math World—A Wolfram Web Resource. 2024. Available online: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/FractionalIndependenceNumber.html (accessed on 1 January 2025)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Graph-Theoretic Approach to Quantum Correlations

    Cabello, A.; Severini, S.; Winter, A. Graph-Theoretic Approach to Quantum Correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 040401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.040401

    2014 doi

  59. [67]

    The Feynman Lectures on Physics; Volume III

    Feynman, R.P.; Leighton, R.B.; Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics; Volume III. Quantum Mechanics; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA, 1965

    1965

  60. [68]

    Two Simple Proofs of the Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorem

    Peres, A. Two Simple Proofs of the Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorem. J. Phys. A 1991, 24, L175–L178. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/24/4/003

    1991 doi

  61. [69]

    Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorem for 20 Vect ors

    Kernaghan, M. Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorem for 20 Vect ors. J. Phys. A 1994, 27, L829–L830. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/27/21/007

    1994 doi

  62. [70]

    Be ll-Kochen-Specker Theorem: A Proof with 18 Vectors

    Cabello, A.; Estebaranz, J.M.; Garc´ ıa-Alcaine, G. Be ll-Kochen-Specker Theorem: A Proof with 18 Vectors. Phys. Lett. A 1996, 212, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(96)00134-X

    1996 doi

  63. [71]

    Vector Generation of Quantum Contextual Sets: QTech2018, Paris

    Paviˇ ci´ c, M. Vector Generation of Quantum Contextual Sets: QTech2018, Paris. EPJ Web Conf. 2019, 198, 00009. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201919800009; video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bw2vItz5trE (accessed on 1 January 2025)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Critical Noncolorings of th e 600-Cell Proving the Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorem

    Waegell, M.; Aravind, P.K. Critical Noncolorings of th e 600-Cell Proving the Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorem. J. Phys. A 2010, 43, 105304. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/10/105304

    2010 doi

  65. [73]

    Parity Proofs of the Kochen-Specker Theorem Based on 60 Complex Rays in Four Dimensions

    Waegell, M.; Aravind, P.K. Parity Proofs of the Kochen-Specker Theorem Based on 60 Complex Rays in Four Dimensions. J. Phys. A 2011, 44, 505303. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/50/505303

    2011 doi

  66. [74]

    Parity Proofs of the Kochen- Specker Theorem Based on 120-Cell

    Waegell, M.; Aravind, P.K. Parity Proofs of the Kochen- Specker Theorem Based on 120-Cell. Found. Phys. 2014, 44, 1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-014-9830-0

    2014 doi

  67. [75]

    Parity Proofs of the Kochen- Specker Theorem Based on the Lie Algebra E8

    Waegell, M.; Aravind, P.K. Parity Proofs of the Kochen- Specker Theorem Based on the Lie Algebra E8. J. Phys. A 2015, 48, 225301. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/48/22/225301

    2015 doi

  68. [76]

    Kochen-Specker sets in four-d imensional spaces

    Elford, B.; Lisonˇ ek, P. Kochen-Specker sets in four-d imensional spaces. arXiv 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.09443

    2020 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    Statistical Signatures of Quantum Conte xtuality

    Hofmann, H.F. Statistical Signatures of Quantum Conte xtuality. Entropy 2024, 26, 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26090725

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    Five-Qubit Contextuality, Nois e-Like Distribution of Distances Between Maximal Bases and Finite Geometry

    Planat, M.; Saniga, M. Five-Qubit Contextuality, Nois e-Like Distribution of Distances Between Maximal Bases and Finite Geometry. Phys. Lett. A 2012, 376, 3485–3490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2012.10.020

    2012 doi

  71. [79]

    Quantum Cryptog raphy Using Larger Alphabets

    Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H.; Tittel, W. Quantum Cryptog raphy Using Larger Alphabets. Phys. Rev. A 2000, 61, 062308. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062308

    2000 doi

  72. [80]

    Bertlmann’s Chocolate Balls and Quantum Typ e Cryptography

    Svozil, K. Bertlmann’s Chocolate Balls and Quantum Typ e Cryptography. In Proceedings of the Physics and Computation 2010; 3rd International Workshop; Luxor / Aswan, Egypt, Aug 30 - Sep 6; Guerra, H., Ed.; Department of Mathematics, University of Azores, Portugal, 2010; pp. 23...

    2010

  73. [81]

    Generation and Confir- mation of a (100 × 100)-Dimensional Entangled Quantum System

    Krenn, M.; Huber, M.; Fickler, R.; Lapkiewicz, R.; Rame low, S.; Zeilinger, A. Generation and Confir- mation of a (100 × 100)-Dimensional Entangled Quantum System. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6243–6247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402365111

    2014 doi

  74. [82]

    Stern-Gerlach Experiment with Higher Spins

    Tekin, B. Stern-Gerlach Experiment with Higher Spins. Eur. J. Phys. 2016, 37, 035401. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/3/035401

    2016 doi

  75. [83]

    Quantum Random Flip-Flop and Its Appli cations in Random Frequency Synthesis and True Random Number Generation

    Stipˇ cevi´ c, M. Quantum Random Flip-Flop and Its Appli cations in Random Frequency Synthesis and True Random Number Generation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2016, 87, 035113. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4943668

    2016 doi

  76. [84]

    Kochen-Specker sets and Hadamard matrice s

    Lisonˇ ek, P. Kochen-Specker sets and Hadamard matrice s. Theor. Comp. Sci. 2019, 800, 042101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.10.021

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.