Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 73 references

Effective mass density for wave propagation in periodic layered media in the elasto-acoustic transition

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives an analytical, shear-modulus-dependent effective mass density for a periodic two-layer elastic medium and shows that, in pass bands, it tends to the anisotropic acoustic effective density as shear vanishes, while band…

desk verdict Solid extension to the periodic case with a genuinely new mu-dependent effective density, but the domain-of-validity and acoustic-limit claims are overbroad and need qualification. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07072 v1 pith:2C2VU556 submitted 2026-08-07 math-ph cond-mat.mtrl-scimath.MP

Gabriel Núñez , William J. Parnell , Raphaël C. Assier This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phcond-mat.mtrl-scimath.MP MSC 74J2074Q1535B27
keywords effectivemassdensityBlochwavenumbertransfermatrixperiodiclayeredmediaelasto-acoustictransitionexceptionalpointsmu-gapsanisotropic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to resolve a mismatch: in a layered medium the effective mass density is isotropic in elasticity and anisotropic in acoustics, yet the standard elastic expression does not depend on the shear modulus, so taking the no-shear limit gives no information. It combines the transfer matrix method with Bloch's theorem to obtain the Bloch wavenumber of a periodic two-layer medium, and from it derives an explicit shear-modulus-dependent effective density in the direction parallel to the layers. The central conclusion is that, in the pass bands where the Bloch wavenumber is real, this effective density approaches the acoustic anisotropic values as the shear modulus tends to zero. The paper also shows that the approach to that limit is obstructed by shear-wave band gaps in shear-modulus space, exceptional points, and avoided crossings, which leave intervals where the effective density is complex, negative, or incidence-angle-dependent. A sympathetic reader should therefore read the acoustic limit as a pass-band-filtered statement, not as an unfiltered limit.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the compressional Bloch wavenumber $K_p = \ln(\gamma_p)/(ih)$, computed from the eigenvalues $\gamma$ of the $4\times 4$ symplectic transfer matrix for the two-layer unit cell. The eigenvalues come in reciprocal pairs, so $\eta_p$ and $\eta_s = \gamma + 1/\gamma$ determine pass bands when $|\eta|<2$, $\mu$-gaps when $|\eta|>2$, and exceptional points when the two pairs coalesce. Converting $K_p$ into an effective phase speed and an effective propagation angle via Snell's law, and comparing with the phase speed of a medium with anisotropic density, yields Eq. (4.21), the formula whose behaviour carries the whole paper.

What would settle it

Evaluate Eq. (4.21) on a sequence of shear moduli tending to zero that lies entirely inside pass bands; the central claim fails if $\rho_x^{\rm eff}$ does not converge to $1/(\phi/\rho_1 + (1-\phi)/\rho_2)$. A complementary check is to compute transmission through a finite stack of several thousand unit cells in a narrow pass band and compare the density extracted from the scattering coefficients with Eq. (4.21) at the same parameters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in Eq. (4.21), is that for a periodic two-layer elastic medium with identical Lamé parameters in both layers, low-frequency oblique incidence, and perfect contact, the x-component of the effective mass density is a closed-form function of the shear modulus obtained by matching the anisotropic elastic phase-speed relation to the compressional Bloch wavenumber. The formula reproduces the isotropic elastic result $\rho_x^{\rm eff} = \phi\rho_1 + (1-\phi)\rho_2$ when $\mu$ is comparable to $\lambda$, and it approaches the acoustic harmonic average $1/\rho_x^{\rm eff} = \phi/\rho_1 + (1-\phi)/\rho_2$ along pass-band sequences as $\mu \to 0$, while $\rho_z^{\rm eff}$ stays at the arithmetic average for all $\mu$. The paper explicitly notes that the analytic $\mu \to 0$ limit cannot be taken because $\mu$-gaps, exceptional-point gaps, and avoided-crossing neighbourhoods accumulate as $\mu$ tends to zero; the acoustic limit is therefore a statement about the dominant pass-band behaviour, not a limit in the ordinary sense.

Load-bearing premise

The acoustic-limit conclusion depends on discarding every interval of shear modulus where the Bloch wavenumber is complex or the effective density is angle-dependent, and these intervals accumulate as the shear modulus tends to zero; without that filtering, the limit is not defined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any incident angle inside a pass band, the effective density from Eq. (4.21) is independent of angle to within about 0.1%, and much less in the interior of pass bands.
  • The elastic effective density is not necessarily isotropic: at finite small $\mu$ it becomes anisotropic before reaching the acoustic values.
  • Outside the $\mu$-gaps, the analytical formula agrees with a dynamic self-consistent calculation for 5000 unit cells, and it explains why the self-consistent method fails to converge inside the gaps.
  • The widths of $\mu$-gaps and adjacent pass bands both shrink as $\mu \to 0$, but pass bands are on average about 18 times wider, so pass-band behaviour dominates.
  • Inside $\mu$-P-gaps and exceptional-point gaps the effective density can become complex or negative, so no effective medium description exists in those intervals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the $\mu$-gaps accumulate near $\mu=0$, the phrase 'tends to' should be read as convergence along pass-band sequences; the paper's own analysis suggests an unfiltered limit does not exist.
  • The same transfer-matrix construction should extend to anisotropic or slightly viscoelastic layers; a testable prediction is that small material damping smooths the singularities near exceptional-point gaps and restores a well-defined effective density across the transition.
  • The coexistence of acoustic-like pass bands with evanescent $\mu$-intervals suggests that a complete homogenised description of the elasto-acoustic transition should carry extra bookkeeping for forbidden intervals, not just a single effective density.
  • The angle-dependence of the exceptional points could be exploited experimentally: tuning the incidence angle moves the exceptional points in $\mu$-space, which changes where the effective density breaks down.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a shear-modulus-dependent effective mass density for a periodic two-layer elastic medium by combining a transfer-matrix analysis with Bloch's theorem. It recovers the classical anisotropic acoustic effective density and the isotropic elastic effective density in the low-frequency regime, obtains Eq. (4.21) as an analytical expression for the effective density rho_x^eff, and studies the associated mu-gaps, exceptional points, and avoided crossings. A comparison with a 5000-cell self-consistent calculation is used to validate the expression in pass bands.

Significance. If the main claims are taken in the qualified sense advocated in Sections 4.3 and 4.4, the paper provides a useful analytical bridge between elastic and acoustic effective descriptions. The transfer-matrix/Bloch derivation is transparent, the low-frequency eigenvalue formulas in Appendix C are checkable, and the comparison with the dynamic self-consistent method in Figure 17 is a meaningful internal consistency check. The paper is also commendably explicit about the intervals in which an effective density cannot be defined. The two overclaims identified below concern the stated domain of validity of Eq. (4.21) and the status of the mu-to-0 limit, and they should be corrected before publication.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5 / Section 4.3] The Conclusion states that Eq. (4.21) is valid "over the entire range of values of mu where the Bloch wavenumber for compressional waves is real." This is contradicted by Section 4.3, where avoided-crossing neighbourhoods are excluded from the admissible domain even though K_p is real there (see Figure 14 and the text following Eq. (4.24)). The domain of validity should be restated as real-K_p values outside EP gaps, mu-P-gaps, and AC neighbourhoods, or a precise characterisation of the excluded set should be given.
  2. [Section 4.4 / Figure 18] The statement that rho_x^eff "tends to" the acoustic geometric average rho_g is not a limit in the standard sense. As the paper itself acknowledges, the analytic mu-to-0 limit "cannot be taken" because mu-gaps, EP gaps, mu-P-gaps, and avoided-crossing neighbourhoods accumulate at mu = 0; Figure 18b is obtained by sampling pass bands and discarding all excluded intervals. The claim should be reformulated as a pass-band-filtered statement, specifying the filter (for example, evaluation along pass-band midpoints) and ideally supplemented by a quantitative convergence statement.
  3. [Eq. (4.21)] Equation (4.21) is derived by equating the Bloch phase speed to the phase speed of a homogeneous anisotropic medium. For this procedure to define an intrinsic effective density, the resulting rho_x^eff must be independent of the incidence angle. The paper demonstrates this numerically in pass bands (Figure 16b), but the main-result statement in Section 5 does not mention this restriction. The authors should state explicitly that angle-independence is part of the definition or add a condition excluding incidence-angle-dependent regimes.
  4. [Appendix C] The low-frequency eigenvalue approximations in Eqs. (C.10)-(C.13) are stated without derivation. Since these formulas underpin the effective-density results in Eqs. (4.8), (4.13), (4.17), and (4.20), a derivation or a precise reference for the approximation should be included, or at least the leading-order error should be quantified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4.12)] In Eq. (4.12), the definition rho_a = phi*rho_1 + (1-phi) is missing the factor rho_2; it should read phi*rho_1 + (1-phi)*rho_2.
  2. [Eq. (4.19)] In Eq. (4.19), the subscript p in phi_gamma_p appears to be a typo: the expression is derived from the shear wavenumber k_s and should be phi_gamma_s.
  3. [Section 3.1] The notation gamma_1^* = 1/gamma_1 is used for reciprocal pairs, but the asterisk conventionally denotes complex conjugation; these two notions coincide only when |gamma| = 1. The notation should be clarified.
  4. [Figure 16] The figure axis labels should specify clearly that the horizontal axis is mu/lambda, as in the caption, to avoid confusion with dimensional mu.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: effective density is derived by inverting Bloch phase speed and matched against external acoustic/elastic limits.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The effective density is not fitted to data: it is obtained by inverting the relation between phase speed and density for an equivalent anisotropic medium, as stated in Section 4 ('The effective density is then obtained by choosing ρ_x and ρ_z such that the phase speed of the equivalent medium matches the effective phase speed calculated from the Bloch wavenumber'), using Bloch eigenvalues computed from the transfer matrix. The acoustic results (4.8), (4.13) and elastic results (4.17), (4.20) emerge from low-frequency eigenvalue expansions and reproduce the externally established layered-media values of Schoenberg and Sen [17] and Postma [20], so they are benchmarked rather than assumed. Equation (4.21) is an algebraic solution of c_p(ρ_x,ρ_z) = c_peff using the anisotropic phase speed (2.23); the μ→0 pass-band limit follows because the compressional Bloch phase speed tends to the acoustic phase speed, not because the acoustic density is imposed as an input. The only self-citations are to the authors' prior paper [21] for the anisotropic phase-speed formulas and for the self-consistent numerical validation; these are parameter-free expressions derivable from the Navier equation and do not assume the target acoustic-limit result, so they constitute independent support rather than circularity. The paper's own caveats — that the analytic μ→0 limit cannot be taken (Section 4.4) and that effective properties cannot be defined around avoided crossings even where K_p is real (Section 4.3) — are domain-of-validity limitations and at most weaken the stated conclusion; they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard transfer-matrix and Bloch machinery plus several domain assumptions: low-frequency homogenization, the existence of an equivalent anisotropic-density medium, equal stiffness across layers, the anisotropic-density phase speed formulas from the authors' prior work, and eigenvector-based branch labeling. No parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical entities are introduced. The most fragile assumptions are the pass-band filtering used for the acoustic limit and the reliance on self-cited phase speed formulas.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Wavelength is much larger than the unit cell, so k1a << 1 and k2b << 1 for the compressional waves used to define the effective density.
    Section 4 states this assumption before deriving the low-frequency eigenvalue approximations in Appendix C; it is needed for the Bloch phase to be interpreted as the phase of a homogenized medium.
  • domain assumption The periodic layered medium can be represented at low frequency by a homogeneous medium with an anisotropic mass density tensor and the same scalar bulk modulus (acoustics) or Lamé parameters (elasticity).
    Section 4 sets up an equivalent medium with unknown rho_x and rho_z and equates its phase speed to the Bloch phase speed; this is the core modeling premise of the effective density.
  • domain assumption Both layers share the same Lamé parameters (lambda1=lambda2, mu1=mu2) and the same acoustic bulk modulus (K1=K2).
    Section 4 imposes this; it restricts the derivation, though the authors argue via [21] that different stiffnesses give the same effective density because the low-frequency effective description is unique.
  • domain assumption The phase speed formulas (2.23)-(2.24) for a homogeneous elastic medium with anisotropic mass density are correct.
    These formulas are taken from the authors' previous paper [21] and are used in Eq (4.21) to solve for rho_x^eff; they are not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Compressional and shear Bloch branches can be labeled by comparing eigenvector components (|u_z| vs |u_x| and |sigma_zz| vs |sigma_xz|).
    Section 3.1 assigns eigenvalues to modes this way; this labeling becomes unreliable near exceptional points and avoided crossings, so those regions are excluded from the effective-density analysis.
  • domain assumption Considering different elastic constants between layers leads to the same effective density as identical constants, and the self-consistent zero-reflection condition matches the Bloch-derived density.
    Section 4 and Section 4.4 rely on [21,22] for these equivalences; they are used to justify the restricted layer model and the numerical validation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective mass density for wave propagation in periodic layered media in the elasto-acoustic transition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2C2VU556

@misc{pith2026260807072,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective mass density for wave propagation in periodic layered media in the elasto-acoustic transition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2C2VU556}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07072}
}
abstract

This article investigates the effective mass density for acoustic and elastic wave propagation in layered media, with emphasis on its transition between these regimes. Conventionally, it is possible to recover the governing equations of acoustics from those of elasticity via the no-shear limit. However, when considering an effective medium, the anisotropic effective mass density typically obtained for acoustics differs from the isotropic one found in elasticity. Furthermore, direct investigation of this limit is hindered by the fact that the effective mass density is independent of the shear modulus $\mu$. To tackle this problem, a transfer matrix approach is combined with Bloch's theorem to derive the effective wavenumber for a periodic material whose unit cell consists of two layers with different densities. The effective mass density is obtained analytically from the wavenumber, allowing for its evaluation in both regimes. Moreover, for the first time, a description of the transition from isotropic elastic to anisotropic acoustic effective density in a periodic layered medium is provided. Additionally, the existence of band structure in $\mu$-space is demonstrated, along with exceptional points, where compressional and shear modes coalesce and waves become evanescent, which heavily affects the behaviour of the effective density in the elasto-acoustic transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07072 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphical representation of acoustic wave propagation in a layer of material placed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graphical representation of acoustic wave propagation in two-layered material for transfer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Graphical representation of elastic wave propagation in a layer of material placed between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of the eigenvalues associated with both compressional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Absolute value of the displacement in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of the eigenvalues associated with both compressional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Absolute value of the displacement in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dispersion diagram, i.e., real part (a) and imaginary (b) parts of the Bloch wavenumber [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Real part (a) and imaginary (b) parts of the Bloch wavenumber for both compressional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Dispersion curves for both compressional and shear waves against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Dispersion curves for both compressional and shear waves against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Location in µ-space of EPs, right-hand side of µ-gap (a), avoided crossing, and left-hand side of µ-P-gap (b) as a function of the angle θp1 for BGIIa-type µ-gap. figures illustrate the behaviour of the Bloch wavenumber at each side of this type of µ-gap [PITH_FULL_I…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Dispersion curves for both compressional and shear waves against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Dispersion curves for both compressional and shear waves against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Location in µ-space of EPs, right-hand side of µ-gap (a), and left-hand side of µ-gap (b) as a function of the angle θp1 for BGIIb-type µ-gap. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (a) Effective density ρxeff as a function of µ/λ when µ → 0 (acoustic limit) for different incident angles and (b) relative error for ρxeff between the different incident angles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Elasticity to acoustics transition: effective density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: (a) µ-width of band gap (green line) and of the next pass band (blue line) for the first 200 band gaps in the medium. (b) effective density ρxeff as a function of µ/λ when µ → 0 excluding µ-gaps. 5 Conclusions This work presented the derivation of the effective mass d…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    N´ u˜ nez, W

    G. N´ u˜ nez, W. J. Parnell, and R. C. Assier. Effective mass density for wave propaga- tion in layered media: a study of the elastic/acoustic transition.Proc. R. Soc. A., 481(2318):20250162, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    Sanchez-Palencia.Homogenization method for the study of composite media, volume 985, pages 192–214

    E. Sanchez-Palencia.Homogenization method for the study of composite media, volume 985, pages 192–214. Springer, Berlin, 1983

    work page 1983

  3. [2]

    J. L. Auriault. Heterogeneous medium. is an equivalent macroscopic description possible? Int. J. Eng. Sci., 29(7):785–795, 1991

    work page 1991

  4. [3]

    W. S. Ament. Sound propagation in gross mixtures.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 25(4):638–641, 1953

    work page 1953

  5. [4]

    G. T. Kuster and M. Nafi Toks¨ oz. Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two-phase media: Part i. theoretical formulations.Geophysics, 39(5):587–606, 1974

    work page 1974

  6. [5]

    J. G. Berryman. Long-wavelength propagation in composite elastic media i. spherical inclu- sions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68(6):1809–1819, 1980

    work page 1980

  7. [6]

    J. Mei, Z. Liu, W. Wen, and P. Sheng. Effective dynamic mass density of composites.Phys. Rev. B, 76(13):134205, 2007. 36

    work page 2007

  8. [7]

    M. M. Alam, V. J. Pinfield, F. Luppe, and P. Marechal. Effective dynamic properties of random complex media with spherical particles.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 145(6):3727, 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 73 references
  1. [8]

    W. T. Thomson. Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid medium.J. Appl. Phys., 21(2):89–93, 1950

    1950

  2. [9]

    Graff.Wave Motion in Elastic Solids

    K.F. Graff.Wave Motion in Elastic Solids. Dover Publications, New York, 1991. Originally published: Oxford University Press, 1975

    1991

  3. [10]

    Brekhovskikh.Waves in layered media

    L. Brekhovskikh.Waves in layered media. Academic Press, New York, USA, 2nd edition, 1980

    1980

  4. [11]

    G. B. Whitham.Linear and nonlinear waves. John Wiley & Sons, 1999. Originally published: Wiley, New York, 1974

    1999

  5. [12]

    L. E. Kinsler, A. R. Frey, A. B. Coppens, and J. V. Sanders.Fundamentals of Acoustics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 4th edition, 2000

    2000

  6. [13]

    D. T. Blackstock.Fundamentals of Physical Acoustics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000

    2000

  7. [14]

    Anselmet and P.-O

    F. Anselmet and P.-O. Mattei.Acoustics, Aeroacoustics and Vibrations. ISTE Ltd, London, 2016

    2016

  8. [15]

    Royer and T

    D. Royer and T. Valier-Brasier.Elastic waves in solids, volume 1: Propagation. ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, London, 2022

    2022

  9. [16]

    Wei.Theory of Elastic Waves

    P. Wei.Theory of Elastic Waves. Springer Nature, Singapore, 1st edition, 2023

    2023

  10. [17]

    Schoenberg and P

    M. Schoenberg and P. N. Sen. Properties of a periodically stratified acoustic half-space and its relation to a biot fluid.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 73(1):61–67, 1983

    1983

  11. [18]

    Fish and W

    J. Fish and W. Chen. Higher-order homogenization of initial/boundary-value problem.J. Eng. Mech., 127(12):1223–1230, 2001

    2001

  12. [19]

    I. V. Andrianov, V. I. Bolshakov, V. V. Danishevs’kyy, and D. Weichert. Higher order asymp- totic homogenization and wave propagation in periodic composite materials.Proc. R. Soc. A., 464(2093):1181–1201, 2008

    2008

  13. [20]

    G. W. Postma. Wave propagation in a stratified medium.Geophysics, 20(4):780–806, 1955

    1955

  14. [22]

    R.-B. Yang. A dynamic generalized self-consistent model for wave propagation in particulate composites.J. Appl. Mech., 70(4):575–582, 2003

    2003

  15. [23]

    D. L. Folds and C. D. Loggins. Transmission and reflection of ultrasonic waves in layered media.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 62(5):1102–1109, 1977

    1977

  16. [24]

    K. P. Scharnhorst. Properties of acoustic and electromagnetic transmission coefficients and transfer matrices of multilayered plates.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 74(6):1883–1886, 1983. 37

    1983

  17. [25]

    Brouard, D

    B. Brouard, D. Lafarge, and J. F. Allard. A general method of modelling sound propagation in layered media.J. Sound Vib., 183(1):129–142, 1995

    1995

  18. [26]

    D. J. Mead. Wave propagation in continuous periodic structures: research contributions from southamptom, 1964-1995.J. Sound Vib., 190(3):495–524, 1996

    1964

  19. [27]

    J. F. Allard and N. Atalla.Propagation of Sound in Porous Media: Modelling Sound Absorbing Materials. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2009

    2009

  20. [28]

    Jim´ enez, O

    N. Jim´ enez, O. Umnova, and J.-P. Groby.Acoustic Waves in Periodic Structures, Metama- terials, and Porous Media: From Fundamentals to Industrial Applications. Springer Nature, Cham, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Brillouin.Wave Propagation in Periodic Structures: Electric Filters and Crystal Lattices

    L. Brillouin.Wave Propagation in Periodic Structures: Electric Filters and Crystal Lattices. Dover Publications, New York, 2nd edition, 1953

    1953

  22. [30]

    Sigalas, M

    M. Sigalas, M. S. Kushwaha, E. N. Economou, M. Kafesaki, I. E. Psarobas, and W. Steurer. Classical vibrational modes in phononic lattices: theory and experiment.Z. Kristallogr., 220(9-10):765–809, 2005

    2005

  23. [31]

    J. Wen, G. Wang, D. Yu, H. Zhao, and Y. Liu. Theoretical and experimental investigation of flexural wave propagation in straight beams with periodic structures: Application to a vibration isolation structure.J. Appl. Phys., 97(11):114907, 2005

    2005

  24. [32]

    Srikantha Phani, J

    A. Srikantha Phani, J. Woodhouse, and N. A. Fleck. Wave propagation in two-dimensional periodic lattices.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 119(4):1995–2005, 2006

    1995

  25. [33]

    M. I. Hussein. Reduced bloch mode expansion for periodic media band structure calculations. Proc. R. Soc. A., 465(2109):2825–2848, 2009

    2009

  26. [34]

    Srikantha Phani

    A. Srikantha Phani. On elastic waves and related phenomena in lattice materials and struc- tures.AIP Adv., 1(4):041602, 2011

    2011

  27. [35]

    M. S. Kushwaha, P. Halevi, L. Dobrzynski, and B. Djafari-Rouhani. Acoustic band structure of periodic elastic composites.Phys. Rev. Lett., 71(13):2022–2025, 1993

    2022

  28. [36]

    M. S. Kushwaha, P. Halevi, G. Martinez, L. Dobrzynski, and B. Djafari-Rouhani. Theory of acoustic band structure of periodic elastic composites.Phys. Rev. B, Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 49(4):2313–2322, 1994

    1994

  29. [37]

    C. E. Bradley. Time harmonic acoustic bloch wave propagation in periodic waveguides. part i. theory.J. Acous. Soc. Am., 96(3):1844–1853, 1994

    1994

  30. [38]

    D. Yu, Y. Liu, H. Zhao, G. Wang, and J. Qiu. Flexural vibration band gaps in euler-bernoulli beams with locally resonant structures with two degrees of freedom.Physical Review B, 73(6):064301, 2006

    2006

  31. [39]

    Liu and M

    L. Liu and M. I. Hussein. Wave motion in periodic flexural beams and characterization of the transition between bragg scattering and local resonance.J. Appl. Mech., 79(1):011003–1 – 17, 2012. 38

    2012

  32. [40]

    G. Y. Zhang, X. L. Gao, J. E. Bishop, and H. E. Fang. Band gaps for elastic wave propaga- tion in a periodic composite beam structure incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects.Composite Structures, 189:263–272, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    C.-Y. Lee, M. J. Leamy, and J. H. Nadler. Frequency band structure and absorption predic- tions for multi-periodic acoustic composites.J. Sound Vib., 329(10):1809–1822, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    S. Lee, C. H. Ahn, and J. W. Lee. Vibro-acoustic metamaterial for longitudinal vibration suppression in a low frequency range.Int. J. Mech. Sci., 144:223–234, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    Esquivel-Sirvent and G

    R. Esquivel-Sirvent and G. H. Cocoletzi. Band structure for the propagation of elastic waves in superlattices.J. Acous. Soc. Am., 95(1):86–90, 1994

    1994

  36. [44]

    Cao and W

    W. Cao and W. Qi. Plane wave propagation in finite 2-2 composites.J. Appl. Phys., 78(7):4627–4632, 1995

    1995

  37. [45]

    M. I. Hussein, G. M. Hulbert, and R. A. Scott. Dispersive elastodynamics of 1d banded materials and structures: analysis.J. Sound Vib., 289(4-5):779–806, 2006

    2006

  38. [46]

    H. J. Lee, J. K. Lee, and Y. Y. Kim. Elastic metamaterial-based impedance-varying phononic bandgap structures for bandpass filters.J. Sound Vib., 353:58–74, 2015

    2015

  39. [47]

    Alizadeh and A

    V. Alizadeh and A. V. Amirkhizi. In-plane linear stress waves in layered media: I. non- hermitian degeneracies and modal chirality.Wave Motion, 139:103610, 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Kato.Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators

    T. Kato.Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2nd edition, 1995

    1995

  41. [49]

    W. D. Heiss and A. L. Sannino. Avoided level crossing and exceptional points.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 23:1167–1178, 1990

    1990

  42. [50]

    W. D. Heiss. Repulsion of resonance states and exceptional points.Phys. Rev. E, 61(1):929–932, 2000

    2000

  43. [51]

    Dembowski, H

    C. Dembowski, H. D. Gr¨ af, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter. Experimental observation of the topological structure of exceptional points.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(5):787–790, 2001

    2001

  44. [52]

    Wu and Z.-G

    T.-T. Wu and Z.-G. Huang. Level repulsions of bulk acoustic waves in composite materials. Phys. Rev. B, 70(21):214304, 2004

    2004

  45. [53]

    A. P. Seyranian, O. N. Kirillov, and A. A. Mailybaev. Coupling of eigenvalues of complex matrices at diabolic and exceptional points.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 38(8):1723–1740, 2005

    2005

  46. [54]

    W. D. Heiss. The physics of exceptional points.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 45(44):444016, 2012

    2012

  47. [55]

    Lustig, G

    B. Lustig, G. Elbaz, A. Muhafra, and G. Shmuel. Anomalous energy transport in laminates with exceptional points.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 133:103719, 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    Christensen, M

    J. Christensen, M. Willatzen, V. R. Velasco, and M. H. Lu. Parity-time synthetic phononic media.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(20):207601, 2016. 39

    2016

  49. [57]

    Lu and A

    Y. Lu and A. Srivastava. Level repulsion and band sorting in phononic crystals.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 111:100–112, 2018

    2018

  50. [58]

    Xiong, W

    L. Xiong, W. Bi, and Y. Auregan. Fano resonance scatterings in waveguides with impedance boundary conditions.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 139(2):764–72, 2016

    2016

  51. [59]

    Xiong, B

    L. Xiong, B. Nennig, Y. Auregan, and W. Bi. Sound attenuation optimization using meta- porous materials tuned on exceptional points.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 142(4):2288, 2017

    2017

  52. [60]

    Nennig and E

    B. Nennig and E. Perrey-Debain. A high order continuation method to locate exceptional points and to compute puiseux series with applications to acoustic waveguides.J. Comput. Phys., 412:109425, 2020

    2020

  53. [61]

    J. B. Lawrie, B. Nennig, and E. Perrey-Debain. Analytic mode-matching for accurate handling of exceptional points in a lined acoustic waveguide.Proc. R. Soc. A, 478(2268):20220484, 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    Achilleos, G

    V. Achilleos, G. Theocharis, O. Richoux, and V. Pagneux. Non-hermitian acoustic metama- terials: Role of exceptional points in sound absorption.Phys. Rev. B, 95(14):144303, 2017

    2017

  55. [63]

    Wang and A

    W. Wang and A. V. Amirkhizi. Exceptional points and scattering of discrete mechanical metamaterials.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137(414), 2022

    2022

  56. [64]

    X. Zhu, H. Ramezani, C. Shi, J. Zhu, and X. Zhang. Pt-symmetric acoustics.Phys. Rev. X, 4(3):031042, 2014

    2014

  57. [65]

    Torrent and J

    D. Torrent and J. S´ anchez-Dehesa. Anisotropic mass density by two-dimensional acoustic metamaterials.New J. Phys., 10(2):023004, 2008

    2008

  58. [66]

    S. A. Cummer and D. Schurig. One path to acoustic cloaking.New J. Phys., 9(3):45–45, 2007

    2007

  59. [67]

    A. N. Norris. Acoustic cloaking theory.Proc. R. Soc. A, 464(2097):2411–2434, 2008

    2008

  60. [68]

    G. W. Milton, M. Briane, and J. R. Willis. On cloaking for elasticity and physical equations with a transformation invariant form.New J. Phys., 8(10):248–248, 2006

    2006

  61. [69]

    G. W. Milton and J. R. Willis. On modifications of newton’s second law and linear continuum elastodynamics.Proc. R. Soc. A., 463(2079):855–880, 2007

    2007

  62. [70]

    Jaberzadeh, B

    M. Jaberzadeh, B. Li, and K. T. Tan. Wave propagation in an elastic metamaterial with anisotropic effective mass density.Wave Motion, 89:131–141, 2019

    2019

  63. [71]

    Sang and E

    S. Sang and E. Sandgren. Study of in-plane wave propagation in 2-dimensional anisotropic elastic metamaterials.J. Vib. Eng. Technol., 7(1):63–72, 2019

    2019

  64. [72]

    X. Yang, Y. Chai, and Y. Li. Metamaterial with anisotropic mass density for full mode- converting transmission of elastic waves in the ultralow frequency range.AIP Adv., 11(12), 2021

    2021

  65. [73]

    G. E. Backus. Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering.J. Geophys. Res., 67(11):4427–4440, 1962. 40

    1962

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.