Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

"I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.05856 v1 pith:2CD4FMQB submitted 2022-12-12 cs.CL

"I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data

classification cs.CL
keywords earlyadopterschatgptuserssentimentstechnologytopictopics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models have recently attracted significant attention due to their impressive performance on a variety of tasks. ChatGPT developed by OpenAI is one such implementation of a large, pre-trained language model that has gained immense popularity among early adopters, where certain users go to the extent of characterizing it as a disruptive technology in many domains. Understanding such early adopters' sentiments is important because it can provide insights into the potential success or failure of the technology, as well as its strengths and weaknesses. In this paper, we conduct a mixed-method study using 10,732 tweets from early ChatGPT users. We first use topic modelling to identify the main topics and then perform an in-depth qualitative sentiment analysis of each topic. Our results show that the majority of the early adopters have expressed overwhelmingly positive sentiments related to topics such as Disruptions to software development, Entertainment and exercising creativity. Only a limited percentage of users expressed concerns about issues such as the potential for misuse of ChatGPT, especially regarding topics such as Impact on educational aspects. We discuss these findings by providing specific examples for each topic and then detail implications related to addressing these concerns for both researchers and users.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AgenticVM: Agentic AI for Adaptive Software Vulnerability Management

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AgenticVM reduces vulnerability scanner alerts by up to 98% and predicts missing CVSS attributes with 89.3% accuracy using a multi-agent LLM framework integrated with security tools and public databases.

  2. Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models in Healthcare

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Domain-specific models like ChatDoctor excel at medically accurate and contextually reliable text while general-purpose models like Grok and LLaMA perform better on structured medical question-answering tasks.