Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Does RAG Really Perform Bad For Long-Context Processing?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11444 v1 pith:2CSSBT7Q submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords long-contextprocessingefficientretrievalcomputationllmsmethodsretrolm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The efficient processing of long context poses a serious challenge for large language models (LLMs). Recently, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising strategy for this problem, as it enables LLMs to make selective use of the long context for efficient computation. However, existing RAG approaches lag behind other long-context processing methods due to inherent limitations on inaccurate retrieval and fragmented contexts. To address these challenges, we introduce RetroLM, a novel RAG framework for long-context processing. Unlike traditional methods, RetroLM employs KV-level retrieval augmentation, where it partitions the LLM's KV cache into contiguous pages and retrieves the most crucial ones for efficient computation. This approach enhances robustness to retrieval inaccuracy, facilitates effective utilization of fragmented contexts, and saves the cost from repeated computation. Building on this framework, we further develop a specialized retriever for precise retrieval of critical pages and conduct unsupervised post-training to optimize the model's ability to leverage retrieved information. We conduct comprehensive evaluations with a variety of benchmarks, including LongBench, InfiniteBench, and RULER, where RetroLM significantly outperforms existing long-context LLMs and efficient long-context processing methods, particularly in tasks requiring intensive reasoning or extremely long-context comprehension.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DrugMCTS: a drug repurposing framework combining multi-agent, RAG and Monte Carlo Tree Search

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent, retrieval-augmented search framework lets a 7B language model outperform larger baselines on drug-target interaction prediction, but its headline recall relies on knowing the ground-truth output count.

  2. Cognitive Load-Aware Inference: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Optimizing the Token Economy of Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper claims that framing LLM inference as cognitive load management reduces token consumption without accuracy loss, but the evidence is under-powered and the 'emergent' decomposition is directly trained.

Pith tools