Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Why Are You Weird? Infusing Interpretability in Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.06858 v1 pith:2DEPLIQJ submitted 2021-12-13 cs.LG

Why Are You Weird? Infusing Interpretability in Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detection

classification cs.LG
keywords anomalydetectionalgorithmsmethodexamplesexplanationforestidentifying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Anomaly detection is concerned with identifying examples in a dataset that do not conform to the expected behaviour. While a vast amount of anomaly detection algorithms exist, little attention has been paid to explaining why these algorithms flag certain examples as anomalies. However, such an explanation could be extremely useful to anyone interpreting the algorithms' output. This paper develops a method to explain the anomaly predictions of the state-of-the-art Isolation Forest anomaly detection algorithm. The method outputs an explanation vector that captures how important each attribute of an example is to identifying it as anomalous. A thorough experimental evaluation on both synthetic and real-world datasets shows that our method is more accurate and more efficient than most contemporary state-of-the-art explainability methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.