Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 70 references

Gaia-XP metallicities over-predict iron abundance for cool metal-rich giants by 0.16±0.02 dex, and the same high-resolution survey confirms 25 nearby ultra-metal-rich stars.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 09:24 UTC pith:2EYKOJDU

load-bearing objection This paper is worth engaging: it gives the first high-resolution test of Gaia XP metallicities at the extreme metal-rich tail, and the sign of the giant overprediction is probably right, but the 0.16 dex magnitude should be read as provisional until the cool-giant abundance scale is pinned down. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27328 v1 pith:2EYKOJDU submitted 2026-07-29 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM

PANTERA. I. Hunting for the Most Metal-Rich Stars in the Solar Neighborhood with High-Resolution Spectroscopy

Serat M. Saad , D. M. Rowan , K. Z. Stanek , Ilya Ilyin , Benjamin J. Fulton , Howard Isaacson , Jessica Lu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
keywords stellar abundancesmetal-rich starsGaia XP metallicitieshigh-resolution spectroscopyequivalent widthsgalaxy chemical evolutionsolar neighborhoodradial migration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

PANTERA is a high-resolution spectroscopic survey of the most metal-rich stars near the Sun; this first paper reports iron abundances for 56 stars selected from the data-driven Gaia-XP photometric metallicity catalog. The paper's central claim is that the XP metallicities carry a type-dependent zero-point error at the metal-rich end: they agree with high-resolution iron abundances for dwarfs (0.00±0.01 dex) but run 0.07±0.02 dex high for subgiants and 0.16±0.02 dex high for cool giants, with the offset following stellar type rather than telescope. A second claim is that 25 of the 56 stars are ultra-metal-rich at [Fe/H] > 0.4, the most iron-rich reaching +0.58. If these claims hold, the 175-million-star XP catalog needs a temperature/gravity-dependent correction before extreme-metallicity populations are mapped from it, and the confirmed ultra-metal-rich stars become a scarce local laboratory for planet formation, giant-branch mass loss, and migration studies.

Core claim

The authors establish—on 62 high-resolution spectra of 56 stars, cross-checked with benchmark stars, duplicate observations, a second synthesis code, and an independent equivalent-width measurement—that Gaia-XP metallicities over-predict [Fe/H] for part of the sample. The offset grows with evolution: dwarfs 0.00±0.01 dex, subgiants -0.07±0.02 dex, cool giants -0.16±0.02 dex. The authors argue the dwarf agreement cannot validate the XP dwarf scale because selecting at high XP admits upward-scattered values; a forward model sets a ~0.1 dex floor on the offset for all types. Since the floor is constant, the giant-dwarf difference is intrinsic. The proposed cause is the strong blue line blanketi

What carries the argument

The central object is the comparison of iron abundances extracted from high-resolution spectra with the data-driven XP metallicities, split by evolutionary state. The abundance measurement uses a classical equivalent-width analysis where effective temperature comes from photometry and surface gravity from parallax—deliberately independent of Gaia's astrophysical-parameter models—and where microturbulence is set by requiring iron abundances to show no trend with reduced equivalent width, using only FeI lines below a 120 mÅ cap set by benchmark recovery. The explanatory mechanism for the offset is the strong blue line blanketing of cool metal-rich giants: molecular bands plus dense metal lines

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cool-giant iron abundances from capped FeI lines, photometric temperatures, and parallax gravities are the true [Fe/H]; if the true giant abundances are higher, the claimed 0.16 dex Gaia-XP over-prediction shrinks.

What would settle it

Measure the same cool metal-rich giants with an independent iron-abundance method that does not rely on the 120 mÅ cap—full-spectrum synthesis of weak FeI and FeII lines with asteroseismic surface gravities and non-LTE corrections. If those abundances come out about 0.16 dex higher than the paper's values, the XP over-prediction is an artifact of the abundance scale; if they match the paper's values, the Gaia-XP bias stands.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The Gaia-XP metallicity scale has a type-dependent systematic error at the metal-rich end; metal-rich giant samples built from it will mix in stars ~0.1–0.2 dex less metal-rich than their XP labels and need a Teff/logg-dependent correction.
  • The 25 confirmed ultra-metal-rich stars become anchor objects for the planet–metallicity relation above [Fe/H] ≈ +0.3 and for testing red-giant mass loss at extreme metallicity.
  • The near-zero dwarf offset does not certify the XP dwarf scale; a selection floor near 0.1 dex may conceal a modest intrinsic under-prediction, so wider XP-range dwarf samples are needed to pin the dwarf relation directly.
  • The microturbulence treatment of cool metal-rich giants in large survey analyses needs re-examination: fitted values that fall with metallicity can systematically raise reported iron abundances, and a 1.0 km/s instead of 1.5 km/s microturbulence moves a benchmark giant from +0.25 to +0.49 dex.
  • Any claimed spatial overdensity of extremely metal-rich giants selected from XP metallicities should be re-tested with this correction before being interpreted chemically or dynamically.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the XP bias is real, it probably contaminates not only XP-selected giant samples but also the training-label side of the photometric metallicities; comparing the same stars against non-LTE/3D model abundances would isolate how much of the residual excitation/ionization imbalance reflects atmosphere physics rather than a true abundance-scale offset.
  • The paper leaves ages as the decisive next step: with ages for the 25 ultra-metal-rich stars, one could test whether the high-metallicity tail is an old, vertically heated population or contains recent migrators, and whether the most iron-rich dwarfs have the multi-gigayear ages claimed for super-metal-rich stars.
  • A concrete, testable extension of the blanketing explanation is to generate synthetic BP/RP spectra from the adopted model atmospheres at [Fe/H] ~ +0.4 and see whether they reproduce the observed blue-flux depression of cool giants; this would separate continuum blanketing from label inheritance in the XP error.
  • The cap test implies the strongest iron lines in cool metal-rich giants are dangerous to include in abundance fits; this suggests published high-resolution abundances of such stars that do not use a cap may be biased low, which would change the interpretation of existing metal-rich giant samples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents the first results of the PANTERA program: high-resolution spectroscopy (PEPSI, APF/Levy, Keck/HIRES) of 56 stars selected as metal-rich from Gaia DR3 XP spectrophotometric metallicities. Iron abundances are derived from a classical equivalent-width analysis with photometric Teff and parallax-based logg, validated against two benchmark stars, cross-instrument pairs, a second synthesis code (MOOG vs Korg), and an independent EW fitter. The central claims are (i) that Gaia-XP metallicities over-predict [Fe/H] by 0.16±0.02 dex for cool giants, with a type-dependent trend (dwarfs 0.00±0.01, subgiants -0.07±0.02), and (ii) that 25 of the 56 stars are ultra-metal-rich ([Fe/H]>+0.4), reaching +0.58. The over-prediction is attributed to blue line blanketing in cool metal-rich giants and to APOGEE-based training labels in the XP catalog. The paper also presents a first kinematic analysis showing a thin-disk population.

Significance. If the central quantitative claim holds, the paper delivers an important calibration point for the 175-million-star Gaia-XP metallicity catalog at its metal-rich end, with direct implications for studies of the inner disk, radial migration, and extremely metal-rich populations such as the Galactic-center 'knot'. The paper is also valuable for providing a well-characterized sample of ultra-metal-rich stars for follow-up, and for its open release of equivalent widths, abundances, and alternative cap choices. The validation strategy is a genuine strength: benchmarks, cross-instrument agreement, a second synthesis code, and an independent EW measurement give the reader multiple external anchors, and the authors are transparent about selection biases and internal diagnostics. However, the load-bearing claim — the 0.16 dex cool-giant over-prediction — depends on a cool-giant abundance scale that the paper itself shows to carry ~0.1–0.2 dex of undocumented systematic freedom.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.7, §3.8, §3.9, §5.1] The magnitude of the central result — the 0.16±0.02 dex XP over-prediction for cool giants — is not robust against documented systematic choices in the adopted Fe I scale. Section 3.7 reports that moving the EW cap from 120 to 100 mÅ changes giant abundances by up to 0.09 dex; Section 3.8 shows that the 100 mÅ cap recovers the μ Leo benchmark to +0.250 versus +0.231 for the adopted 120 mÅ cap. Section 3.9 states that removing the residual excitation slope in cool giants would require Teff >200 K above the photometric values, which shifts Fe I by ~0.06 dex at the stated 0.03 dex/100 K sensitivity. Section 3.6 adds an unapplied positive Fe I NLTE correction of +0.03 to +0.05 dex. Taken together, these shifts (~+0.18 dex) are comparable to the claimed offset. The paper's statement in §5.1 that 'the alternatives would lower the giant abundances and enlarge the XP over-prediction' is incomple
  2. [§3.9] The cool giants show a mean Fe I–Fe II difference of +0.16 dex. The paper attributes this entirely to blended Fe II lines, 3D and NLTE effects, and keeps the Fe I scale. This is an assumption, not a demonstrated result: the few Fe II lines are not individually shown to be systematically blended, and a +0.16 dex imbalance of either sign is a first-order uncertainty in the Fe I zero point. If Fe I is biased high, the true XP offset could be larger; if the Fe I scale is biased low (e.g., from the cap or Teff), the offset could vanish. Because [Fe/H] is based on the Fe I lines, the internal inconsistency leaves the cool-giant scale unverified at the ~0.16 dex level. A quantitative line-by-line synthesis of the Fe II features, or a differential analysis against an independent cool-giant benchmark with a different method, is needed to support the adopted zero point.
  3. [§3.6] The unapplied Fe I NLTE correction of +0.03 to +0.05 dex is of the same order as the internal error budget and is not included in the quoted uncertainties of Table 4 or in the error budget of §3.7. The paper correctly notes that the sign of the NLTE correction would worsen the Fe I–Fe II imbalance, but this makes it even more important to propagate the correction as a systematic. If the adopted scale is meant to be LTE, the systematic should be listed alongside the cap and Teff terms; if the scale is meant to represent true iron abundance, the correction should be applied. Either way, the current presentation understates the giant systematic uncertainty.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.4] The text repeats nearly the same sentence about stronger lines constraining the microturbulence in two consecutive paragraphs ('The stronger lines, up to about 120 mÅ...' and 'The partly saturated lines below the cap...'). Remove or merge for clarity.
  2. [Table 4] The columns N_Fe and Δion are not defined in the caption. N_Fe presumably is the number of Fe I lines entering the solution and Δion is [Fe II/H]−[Fe I/H], but the reader should not have to infer this. Add explicit definitions and state the sign convention.
  3. [§3.2] The phrase 'a mass of order 1 M_sun' appears twice in the same paragraph. Also, 'order 1M_sun' should use a non-breaking space and consistent solar symbol formatting.
  4. [Figure 9] The caption calls both references 'metal-poor', but one has [M/H]≃−0.7, which is only mildly subsolar. Use 'lower-metallicity reference' for that panel to avoid overstatement.
  5. [§2.1] The selection queries in Appendix A are helpful, but the condition 'ipd_frac_multi_peak <= 2' appears as 'ipd frac multi peak≤2' in the text. Use consistent formatting for all astrometric quality cuts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Gaia-XP comparison and UMR sample are measured against an externally anchored high-resolution abundance scale.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not circular. The Gaia-XP comparison is made against [Fe/H] values derived from an equivalent-width analysis with Teff taken from photometry and logg from the Gaia parallax, both external to the abundance solution and independent of the XP metallicities under test (Section 3.2). The abundance scale is anchored by Gaia benchmark stars, cross-instrument agreement, a second synthesis code (MOOG), and an independent equivalent-width measurement; these are executed checks rather than imported conclusions. The selection bias that affects the dwarf comparison is explicitly modeled and acknowledged, and the claim that the dwarf agreement is not a confirmation of the XP dwarf scale is stated in the paper itself (Section 5.3). The cool-giant offset is sensitive to the equivalent-width cap and other systematic choices, as the skeptic notes, but those are accuracy/correctness concerns, not circularity: the paper does not fit the XP offset and then report it as a prediction, nor does it define any target quantity in terms of the input catalog. The only self-citations are to instrument/software references (e.g., Ting et al. 2025 includes author Saad; Griffith et al. 2026 includes author Ilyin), and these are not load-bearing because the relevant checks are performed directly in this work rather than accepted on the authority of the citations. Accordingly, no step of the derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central offsets rest on (i) an LTE/1D MARCS abundance scale for cool metal-rich giants in which FeI lines below a 120 mÅ cap are trusted over FeII and over uncapped solutions; (ii) a photometric Teff scale assumed uniform at supersolar metallicity; (iii) a forward model of the Eddington selection floor with assumed XP scatter and metallicity-function slope; and (iv) a specific attribution of APOGEE-vs-GALAH differences to fitted microturbulence. These are domain assumptions, not fitted to the target data, but they carry the 0.16 dex magnitude.

free parameters (4)
  • Per-star microturbulence v_mic = 1.20-1.86 km/s (median 1.26 dwarfs, 1.46 subgiants, 1.58 giants)
    Fitted by bisection to zero the slope of FeI abundance vs reduced equivalent width. It directly affects [Fe/H] at the ~0.1 dex level, and the cool giants have few weak lines to anchor it.
  • Assumed stellar mass M=1 Msun = ~1 Msun
    Used to convert parallax + Teff to logg. A 20% mass error changes logg by 0.08 dex, which propagates into the abundance scale for all stars.
  • Equivalent-width cap at 120 mÅ = 120 mÅ
    Chosen from benchmark μLeo recovery tests; moving the cap from 100 to 120 mÅ changes giant abundances by up to 0.09 dex and is the largest systematic affecting the giant XP offset.
  • Model-atmosphere metallicity [M/H]=+0.3 = +0.3 dex
    Fixed grid value used for all EW-to-abundance conversions, close to the derived sample metallicity; a different grid choice would shift the zero point slightly.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption 1D LTE MARCS model atmospheres are adequate for cool metal-rich giants; FeI lines below 120 mÅ give the true iron abundance while the +0.16 dex FeI/FeII offset is a model-atmosphere/non-LTE/FeII-blend artifact.
    Invoked in Sections 3.5 and 3.9 to base [Fe/H] on FeI despite the ionization imbalance and residual excitation slope.
  • domain assumption The photometric Teff scale (Mucciarelli et al. 2021; González Hernández & Bonifacio 2009) is accurate and uniform across giants, subgiants, and dwarfs at supersolar metallicity; the GSP-Phot reddening correction is small and type-independent.
    Section 3.2; a type-dependent Teff error could mimic or hide the type-dependent XP offset.
  • domain assumption The selection-bias floor model: XP scatter σ≈0.1 dex and the metal-rich metallicity function with e-folding ≈0.1 dex give a ~0.1 dex Eddington floor that is the same for all stellar types.
    Section 5.3; if XP scatter is larger for giants than dwarfs, part of the giant-dwarf offset difference is a selection artifact.
  • domain assumption APOGEE DR17's fitted microturbulence is unphysically low for cool metal-rich giants, biasing its [Fe/H] high relative to GALAH, and this bias is inherited by the XP training labels.
    Section 5.2; the APOGEE-vs-GALAH comparison supports this, but GALAH is not independently certified at these parameters.
  • domain assumption The two Gaia FGK benchmark stars (μLeo and μAra) are sufficient anchors for the cool-giant and dwarf abundance scales, and their reference abundances are correct.
    Sections 3.7-3.8; only two benchmarks, one giant and one dwarf, anchor the full Teff-logg range.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 24822 in / 15897 out tokens · 145856 ms · 2026-08-01T09:24:38.697843+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present PANTERA (Project for Astrophysical Nucleosynthesis and Targeted Exploration of metal-Rich Abundances), a high-resolution spectroscopic survey of the most metal-rich stars in the solar neighborhood. In this first paper, we report iron abundances for 56 metal-rich stars, selected from Gaia DR3 XP spectrophotometric metallicities. These targets were observed with the PEPSI spectrograph on the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT), the Levy spectrograph on the Automated Planet Finder (APF) telescope, and the HIRES spectrograph on the Keck telescope. We measure [Fe/H] from an equivalent-width analysis of iron lines, with the effective temperature taken from photometry and the surface gravity from the Gaia parallax. We verify our measurement using Gaia benchmark stars, observing some sources with more than one spectrograph, using a second synthesis code, and an independent equivalent-width measurement. We find that the Gaia-XP metallicities over-predict [Fe/H] for part of our sample: they are consistent for the dwarfs, though a selection bias limits what the dwarf agreement can show, and reach $0.16\pm0.02$ dex for the cool giants. We attribute the over-prediction in part to the strong blue line blanketing of the cool metal-rich giants and to the survey labels on which the XP metallicities were trained. We also found 25 of the 56 stars to be ultra-metal-rich ([Fe/H] $> 0.4$), with the most iron-rich stars reaching [Fe/H]$=+0.58$. We discuss the implications of our result on studying metal-rich populations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27328 by Benjamin J. Fulton, D. M. Rowan, Howard Isaacson, Ilya Ilyin, Jessica Lu, K. Z. Stanek, Serat M. Saad.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Gaia color-magnitude diagram (MG vs. BP − RP) of the 56 observed targets, colored by evolutionary type, on a background of a random nearby Gaia field sam￾ple (grey). The targets span the warm dwarfs, the subgiant branch, and the red giant branch. As expected, the metal￾rich targets appear redder than the Solar-metallicity popu￾lation. with high-resolution spectroscopy is needed before the XP metal-rich can… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Three representative warm metal-rich dwarfs, one observed with each of the three spectrographs (PEPSI, APF, HIRES), in a 50 ˚A window rich in iron lines, offset vertically for clarity. The three stars have similar stellar parameters, listed for each spectrum, and the iron lines from our line list (dotted) line up across the instruments, which shows that the three reductions place the same lines on a common… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The 56 PANTERA targets in the Teff –log g plane, colored by the derived [Fe/H] and marked by instrument. The two Gaia FGK benchmark stars used for validation (µ Leo, µ Ara; stars) span the parameter range of the sam￾ple, which runs from cool giants to warm dwarfs. to interferometric and (V − Ks) infrared-flux tempera￾tures; and we also adopt their inverse-variance weighted mean. Each relation reproduces th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of the equivalent-width measurement for the Fe II λ6149.3 and Fe I λ6151.6 lines on representative spectra from the three spectrographs. In each panel the dashed line marks the normalized continuum, the colored curve is the single￾Gaussian fit, and the shaded area is the measured equivalent width. The APF and HIRES panels show the same star, the bright standard HD 19373, which is not part of the sc… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two dwarfs with two different metallicity values in the sample, with nearly identical parameters: [Fe/H] = +0.36 at Teff ≃ 5640 K and log g ≃ 4.30 (grey) against [Fe/H] = +0.54 at Teff ≃ 5690 K and log g ≃ 4.35 (blue), both observed with PEPSI. Each panel is centered on one of the measured Fe I lines, with the spectra placed on a common wavelength and continuum scale. The shaded area marks the extra absorp… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: metallicity distribution of all 56 PANTERA stars, comparing the Gaia-XP values they were selected on (grey) with our spectroscopic [Fe/H] (black). The spectroscopic distribution is broader than the narrow XP band near +0.4, with a median at the same value and a tail toward lower abundances that belongs to the cool giants. A total of 25 of the 56 stars lie above the UMR threshold (dotted line). Right:… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Difference between the spectroscopic [Fe/H] and the Gaia-XP [M/H] as a function of Teff , colored by evolu￾tionary type and marked by instrument. The mean offset is 0.00 ± 0.01 dex for the dwarfs, −0.07 ± 0.02 dex for the sub￾giants, and −0.16±0.02 dex for the cool giants, and the three instruments overlap within each type, so the over-prediction by Gaia XP depends on the stellar type rather than on the sp… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Gaia XP test of the blanketing origin of the over-prediction at fixed metallicity contrast. Each column compares a metal-rich target (red) with a metal-poor reference (blue) spanning ∼ 1.2 dex difference in metallicity between them, for giants (∼ 4460 K, left) and dwarfs (∼ 5500 K, right). The targets are a giant (Gaia DR3 4591824513402826112; [Fe/H] = +0.10, XP [M/H] = +0.39), for which the Fe I and Fe II… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The metal-rich giant scale, tested with the 6286 cool giants (4200 < Teff < 5000 K, 2.0 < log g < 3.6) measured by both APOGEE DR17 and GALAH DR3, matched by Gaia source identifier and restricted to clean quality flags in both surveys. Left: the difference between the APOGEE and GALAH iron abundances against the mean of the two, with grey points for the individual stars, the running median in blue, and bo… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The Gaia-XP (blue) and Gaia RVS GSP-Spec (orange) metallicities of the PANTERA stars against our spectroscopic [Fe/H]. Circles, squares, and triangles mark dwarfs, subgiants, and giants. For the dwarfs both products scatter about the one-to-one line, while for the cool giants the XP values pack near +0.4 and the RVS values fall between the XP values and our scale. uncertainty near 0.1 dex, so a cut at a h… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Galactic kinematics of the 56 PANTERA targets. Orbits and actions are computed in the MWPotential2014 model with galpy (Bovy 2015), adopting R0 = 8.122 kpc, Vc = 229 km s−1 , and the solar motion of Sch¨onrich et al. (2010), with actions from the St¨ackel approximation. The local comparison sample is drawn from Gaia DR3 (non-null radial velocity, RUWE < 1.4, parallax signal-to-noise above five) and resamp… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Robust Data-driven Metallicities for 175 Million Stars from Gaia XP Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acd53e , archivePrefix =. 2302.02611 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    The Extremely Metal-rich Knot of Stars at the Heart of the Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7aee , archivePrefix =. 2406.01706 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Insights from super-metal-rich stars: Is the Milky Way bar young?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348365 , archivePrefix =. 2311.16993 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Abundance Gradients and the Formation of the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/321427 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0102134 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Analysis of old very metal rich stars in the solar neighbourhood. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016056 , archivePrefix =. 1109.6304 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    The Gaia-ESO Survey: Old super-metal-rich visitors from the inner Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243667 , archivePrefix =. 2210.08510 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , keywords =

    PEPSI: The high-resolution \'e chelle spectrograph and polarimeter for the Large Binocular Telescope. Astronomische Nachrichten , keywords =. doi:10.1002/asna.201512172 , archivePrefix =. 1505.06492 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    KORG: A Modern 1D LTE Spectral Synthesis Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acaaad , archivePrefix =. 2211.00029 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Korg: Fitting, Model Atmosphere Interpolation, and Brackett Lines. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad19cc , archivePrefix =. 2310.19823 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars. I. Methods and general properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 , archivePrefix =. 0805.0554 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Metallicity. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322440 , archivePrefix =. 1309.1099 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Effective temperatures and surface gravities. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526319 , archivePrefix =. 1506.06095 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    High resolution spectral library

    The Gaia FGK benchmark stars. High resolution spectral library. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323153 , archivePrefix =. 1403.3090 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [15]

    1D spectroscopic stellar parameters

    Non-LTE line formation of Fe in late-type stars - II. 1D spectroscopic stellar parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21686.x , archivePrefix =. 1207.2454 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2012

  15. [16]

    3D non-LTE analysis of metal-poor stars

    Non-LTE line formation of Fe in late-type stars - III. 3D non-LTE analysis of metal-poor stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2077 , archivePrefix =. 1608.06390 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [17]

    PEPSI deep spectra. II. Gaia benchmark stars and other M-K standards. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731633 , archivePrefix =. 1712.06967 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [18]

    , keywords =

    A new implementation of the infrared flux method using the 2MASS catalogue. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810904 , archivePrefix =. 0901.3034 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [19]

    Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII , year = 1994, editor =

    HIRES: the high-resolution echelle spectrometer on the Keck 10-m Telescope. Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII , year = 1994, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.176725 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/12.176725 1994

  19. [20]

    , keywords =

    APF The Lick Observatory Automated Planet Finder. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/676120 , archivePrefix =. 1402.6684 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [21]

    , keywords =

    First large-scale spatial and velocity patterns of local metal-rich stars in the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556657 , archivePrefix =. 2509.17420 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  21. [22]

    , keywords =

    The dual origin of the Galactic thick disc and halo from the gas-rich Gaia-Enceladus Sausage merger. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2057 , archivePrefix =. 2001.06009 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [23]

    , keywords =

    Super Metal-rich Stars in the LAMOST Survey: A Test on Radial Migration. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab5283 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab5283

  23. [24]

    , keywords =

    High-Resolution Abundance Analysis of Very Metal-rich Stars in the Solar Neighborhood. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/118481 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9704220 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [25]

    Detailed abundance analysis of 8 super-metal-rich star candidates

    The nature of super-metal-rich stars. Detailed abundance analysis of 8 super-metal-rich star candidates. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000477 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000477

  25. [26]

    , keywords =

    White Dwarfs in NGC 6791: Avoiding the Helium Flash. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/496951 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0507297 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [27]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Evolution in NGC 6791: Mass Loss on the Red Giant Branch and the Formation of Low-Mass White Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/521922 , archivePrefix =. 0705.0977 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [28]

    Memoires of the Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege , keywords =

    Circumstellar absorption lines and mass loss from red giants. Memoires of the Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege , keywords =

  28. [29]

    , keywords =

    Mass-loss law for red giant stars in simple population globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab568 , archivePrefix =. 2102.12146 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [30]

    , keywords =

    A Super-solar Metallicity for Stars with Hot Rocky Exoplanets. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/187 , archivePrefix =. 1609.05898 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [31]

    The California-Kepler Survey. IV. Metal-rich Stars Host a Greater Diversity of Planets. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa54c , archivePrefix =. 1712.04042 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [32]

    Toward a Deterministic Model of Planetary Formation. II. The Formation and Retention of Gas Giant Planets around Stars with a Range of Metallicities. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/424830 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0408019 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [33]

    , keywords =

    Overabundance of -elements in exoplanet-hosting stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219564 , archivePrefix =. 1205.6670 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [34]

    Analysis of RVS spectra using the General Stellar Parametriser from spectroscopy

    Gaia Data Release 3. Analysis of RVS spectra using the General Stellar Parametriser from spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243750 , archivePrefix =. 2206.05541 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [35]

    , keywords =

    The Seventeenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: Complete Release of MaNGA, MaStar, and APOGEE-2 Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 , archivePrefix =. 2112.02026 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  35. [36]

    , keywords =

    Radial mixing in galactic discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05806.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0203510 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2002

  36. [37]

    , keywords =

    Riding the Spiral Waves: Implications of Stellar Migration for the Properties of Galactic Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/592231 , archivePrefix =. 0808.0206 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [38]

    , keywords =

    Chemical evolution with radial mixing. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14750.x , archivePrefix =. 0809.3006 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2009

  38. [39]

    , keywords =

    A New Mechanism for Radial Migration in Galactic Disks: Spiral-Bar Resonance Overlap. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/112 , archivePrefix =. 0911.1794 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [40]

    , keywords =

    The Chemical Evolution of the Galactic Disc from the Kinematics and Metallicities of Proper-Motion Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF00646341 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/bf00646341

  40. [41]

    , keywords =

    Measuring Radial Orbit Migration in the Galactic Disk. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadba5 , archivePrefix =. 1805.09198 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [42]

    , keywords =

    The rich are different: evidence from the RAVE survey for stellar radial migration. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2726 , archivePrefix =. 1412.5649 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [43]

    , keywords =

    Life in the fast lane: a direct view of the dynamics, formation, and evolution of the Milky Way's bar. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2891 , archivePrefix =. 1905.11404 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  43. [44]

    , keywords =

    Chemical Cartography with APOGEE: Metallicity Distribution Functions and the Chemical Structure of the Milky Way Disk. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/132 , archivePrefix =. 1503.02110 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [45]

    A detailed elemental abundance study of 714 F and G dwarf stars in the solar neighbourhood

    Exploring the Milky Way stellar disk. A detailed elemental abundance study of 714 F and G dwarf stars in the solar neighbourhood. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 , archivePrefix =. 1309.2631 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [46]

    Age and helium content of the open cluster NGC 6791 from multiple eclipsing binary members. II. Age dependencies and new insights. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219196 , archivePrefix =. 1205.4071 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [47]

    , keywords =

    Asteroseismology of old open clusters with Kepler: direct estimate of the integrated red giant branch mass-loss in NGC 6791 and 6819. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19859.x , archivePrefix =. 1109.4376 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2011

  47. [48]

    , keywords =

    The Planet-Metallicity Correlation. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/428383 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/428383

  48. [49]

    , keywords =

    Parameters of 220 million stars from Gaia BP/RP spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1941 , archivePrefix =. 2303.03420 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [50]

    Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Photometry of 10 Million Stars from the First Two Years of TESS Full Frame Images: Part I. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e , archivePrefix =. 2011.06459 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [51]

    , keywords =

    The Chemical Composition of the Sun. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , archivePrefix =. 0909.0948 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  51. [52]

    The nitrogen abundance of the very metal-poor star HD 122563 , school =

  52. [53]

    2512.01270 , archivePrefix =

    Egent: An Autonomous Agent for Equivalent Width Measurement , journal =. 2512.01270 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [54]

    , keywords =

    The Milky Way bar and bulge revealed by APOGEE and Gaia EDR3. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039030 , archivePrefix =. 2007.12915 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [55]

    , keywords =

    Evidence for Corotation Origin of Super-metal-rich Stars in LAMOST-Gaia: Multiple Ridges with a Similar Slope in the versus L _ z Plane. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac898e , archivePrefix =. 2208.13353 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  55. [56]

    , keywords =

    The GALAH+ survey: Third data release. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1242 , archivePrefix =. 2011.02505 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [57]

    Untangling the Sources of Abundance Dispersion in Low-metallicity Stars. II. Neutron Capture Elements. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4e24 , archivePrefix =. 2512.02122 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  57. [58]

    , year = 2021, volume =

    Exploiting the Gaia EDR3 photometry to derive stellar temperatures. , year = 2021, volume =

    2021

  58. [59]

    , year = 2006, volume =

    The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). , year = 2006, volume =

    2006

  59. [60]

    The California Planet Survey. I. Four New Giant Exoplanets. , year = 2010, volume =

    2010

  60. [61]

    , year = 1913, volume =

    On a formula for correcting statistics for the effects of a known error of observation. , year = 1913, volume =

    1913

  61. [62]

    Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python

  62. [63]

    , keywords =

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , archivePrefix =. 1307.6212 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [64]

    , keywords =

    Checking It Twice: Using [C/N] Masses and Asteroseismic Masses as a Diagnostic of Mass Loss and Transfer on the Red Giant Branch. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae665d , archivePrefix =. 2601.10800 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  64. [65]

    , keywords =

    Evidence that Mass Loss on the Red Giant Branch Decreases with Metallicity. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade3c7 , archivePrefix =. 2505.12794 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  65. [66]

    Impact on spectral line formation and abundance analysis

    Three-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations of surface convection in red giant stars. Impact on spectral line formation and abundance analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066321 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0703652 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [67]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: Distances to 1.47 billion stars in Gaia EDR3 (Bailer-Jones+, 2021)

    2021

  67. [68]

    , year = 2015, volume =

    galpy: A python Library for Galactic Dynamics. , year = 2015, volume =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 2015

  68. [69]

    , year = 2010, month = apr, volume =

    Local kinematics and the local standard of rest. , year = 2010, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x , adsurl =

    arXiv 2010

  69. [70]

    , keywords =

    Three Super-Earths Orbiting HD 7924. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/175 , archivePrefix =. 1504.06629 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [71]

    , year = 2016, volume =

    ASPCAP: The APOGEE Stellar Parameter and Chemical Abundances Pipeline. , year = 2016, volume =

    2016