Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Review on Large Language Models for Visual Analytics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.15176 v1 pith:2FRMZ6JO submitted 2025-03-19 cs.HC cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.HCcs.CLcs.CV
keywords languageanalyticsvisualllmsmodelsnaturalreviewintegration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with visual analytics, addressing their foundational concepts, capabilities, and wide-ranging applications. It begins by outlining the theoretical underpinnings of visual analytics and the transformative potential of LLMs, specifically focusing on their roles in natural language understanding, natural language generation, dialogue systems, and text-to-media transformations. The review further investigates how the synergy between LLMs and visual analytics enhances data interpretation, visualization techniques, and interactive exploration capabilities. Key tools and platforms including LIDA, Chat2VIS, Julius AI, and Zoho Analytics, along with specialized multimodal models such as ChartLlama and CharXIV, are critically evaluated. The paper discusses their functionalities, strengths, and limitations in supporting data exploration, visualization enhancement, automated reporting, and insight extraction. The taxonomy of LLM tasks, ranging from natural language understanding (NLU), natural language generation (NLG), to dialogue systems and text-to-media transformations, is systematically explored. This review provides a SWOT analysis of integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with visual analytics, highlighting strengths like accessibility and flexibility, weaknesses such as computational demands and biases, opportunities in multimodal integration and user collaboration, and threats including privacy concerns and skill degradation. It emphasizes addressing ethical considerations and methodological improvements for effective integration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ManiScope: LLM-Assisted Visual Analytics of Cryptocurrency Manipulation Risk

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM co-analyst plus coordinated crypto views can reduce manual evidence-seeking and organize manipulation-risk findings around user hypotheses in a 12-person practitioner study.

  2. ShapeTalk: Combining Natural Language and Sketch for Time-Series Pattern Querying

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ShapeTalk coordinates an LLM-based natural-language parser and a sketch-based matcher for iterative, cross-modal time-series pattern search, translating free-form text into editable shape-feature constraints.

Pith tools