REVIEW 9 cited by
CMB: A Comprehensive Medical Benchmark in Chinese
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a possibility to make a great breakthrough in medicine. The establishment of a standardized medical benchmark becomes a fundamental cornerstone to measure progression. However, medical environments in different regions have their local characteristics, e.g., the ubiquity and significance of traditional Chinese medicine within China. Therefore, merely translating English-based medical evaluation may result in \textit{contextual incongruities} to a local region. To solve the issue, we propose a localized medical benchmark called CMB, a Comprehensive Medical Benchmark in Chinese, designed and rooted entirely within the native Chinese linguistic and cultural framework. While traditional Chinese medicine is integral to this evaluation, it does not constitute its entirety. Using this benchmark, we have evaluated several prominent large-scale LLMs, including ChatGPT, GPT-4, dedicated Chinese LLMs, and LLMs specialized in the medical domain. We hope this benchmark provide first-hand experience in existing LLMs for medicine and also facilitate the widespread adoption and enhancement of medical LLMs within China. Our data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/CMB.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
MedRealMM: A Real-World Multimodal Benchmark for Chinese Online Medical Consultation
On a new benchmark of 5,620 real multimodal online consultations, top LLMs trail the original physicians mainly because they trigger more unsafe or unsupported negative criteria.
-
MTCMB: A Multi-Task Benchmark Framework for Evaluating LLMs on Knowledge, Reasoning, and Safety in Traditional Chinese Medicine
MTCMB is a 12-dataset benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Traditional Chinese Medicine knowledge, reasoning, and safety, with results showing models still fail at clinical reasoning and safe prescriptions.
-
ClinBench-HPB: A Clinical Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases
A new benchmark covering all ICD-10 HPB disease categories shows that LLMs, including specialized medical models, perform far worse on real clinical cases than on exam-style questions.
-
DiagnosisArena: Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning for Large Language Models
DiagnosisArena, a 1,113-case benchmark from top journals, shows state-of-the-art LLMs achieve at most 51% top-1 diagnostic accuracy, far below clinical-level competence.
-
OphthBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Chinese Ophthalmology
OphthBench is a new 591-question Chinese ophthalmology benchmark on which 39 LLMs score around 70% (after normalization), showing a clear gap between current models and clinical readiness.
-
ChiMed 2.0: Advancing Chinese Medical Dataset in Facilitating Large Language Modeling
ChiMed 2.0 is a 204.4M-character Chinese medical dataset spanning pretraining, SFT, and preference data that yields small gains on CMMLU and CEval medical subsets.
-
Enterprise Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark
A 14-task enterprise LLM benchmark built mostly from GPT-4o-generated labels and scored by GPT-4o-as-judge shows open-source models closing the reasoning gap, but the dataset is not public and the evaluation is partly...
-
Synergizing RAG and Reasoning: A Systematic Review
A taxonomy and practical guide for combining retrieval-augmented generation with multi-step reasoning in LLMs, based on a review of recent methods, evaluation gaps, costs, and future directions.
-
Developer Challenges on Large Language Models: A Study of Stack Overflow and OpenAI Developer Forum Posts
A BERTopic analysis of 8,593 Stack Overflow posts and 26,474 OpenAI Developer Forum posts yields 9 and 17 LLM developer challenge topics, with API usage dominant and high unresolved rates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.