pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20375 · v2 · pith:2GINRVLSnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.CY

Organizing in the Digital Age: Understanding Community, Challenges, and Consequences in Digitally-facilitated Labor Organizing

Frederick Reiber , Alishah Chator , Dana Calacci , Allison McDonald This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.CY
keywords labor organizingdigital platformsunion activityqualitative interviewsinformation overloadtrust buildingsecurity practicesremote coordination
0
0 comments X

The pith

Digital tools let dispersed workers organize unions but add hurdles in security, information overload, and building trust.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how labor unions rely on text-based platforms such as Discord, WhatsApp, and Slack to connect members across distances and time. Interviews with 17 organizers and workers show these tools support real organizing gains while creating technical and social problems that require new skills. A reader would care because most contemporary work is scattered, so the methods unions use to coordinate now shape whether workers can act collectively on wages and conditions. The study maps the specific frictions that arise when organizing moves online and links them to larger patterns in digital group work.

Core claim

Although digital tools are integral to contemporary labor successes, they also introduce new complexities such as navigating technical security, managing information overload, and building trust and consensus.

What carries the argument

Seventeen qualitative interviews that surface both technical and social obstacles in the use of text-based platforms for union activity.

If this is right

  • Organizers must treat platform security as a routine part of planning campaigns.
  • Groups need explicit tactics for handling high volumes of messages without losing focus.
  • Reaching agreement online requires deliberate steps that differ from in-person meetings.
  • Success in recent labor actions depends in part on how well these digital frictions are handled.
  • Insights apply to any union or worker group that coordinates across locations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Training programs for new organizers could include modules on secure and efficient use of group chat tools.
  • Similar frictions may appear in other distributed activist or volunteer efforts that rely on the same platforms.
  • Designers of communication apps might add features that reduce overload or make consensus steps more visible.
  • Legal or platform-policy changes around encryption and data access could directly affect how organizing happens.

Load-bearing premise

The issues described by these seventeen interviewees capture the main patterns that occur whenever labor organizing uses digital tools.

What would settle it

A broader survey or set of observations across many unions that finds digital platforms create no distinctive security, overload, or trust problems beyond those already present in face-to-face organizing.

read the original abstract

The contemporary American labor force is highly dispersed, necessitating the use of digital communication tools to bridge spatial and temporal gaps in union organizing. This study provides an in-depth analysis of how workers within various labor unions utilize digital, text-based communication platforms -- including Discord, WhatsApp, and Slack -- for labor organizing. Through 17 qualitative interviews, we examine the challenges and opportunities presented by digital organizing, identifying both technical and social obstacles. Our findings reveal that although digital tools are integral to contemporary labor successes, they also introduce new complexities, such as navigating technical security, managing information overload, and building trust and consensus. Based on these insights, we draw connections to broader understandings of digital organizing and the role of digital tools in unions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents a qualitative study based on 17 interviews with workers from various U.S. labor unions. It examines the use of digital text-based platforms (Discord, WhatsApp, Slack) for organizing dispersed workforces and concludes that these tools are integral to recent labor successes while also creating new challenges around technical security, information overload, and building trust/consensus; the authors connect these findings to broader research on digital organizing.

Significance. If the sample and analysis can be shown to support broader claims, the work would add nuanced, interview-based evidence on the dual role of digital tools in contemporary union activity, a topic of growing interest in HCI and labor studies. The in-depth qualitative approach is well-suited to surfacing social and technical frictions that quantitative metrics often miss.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: the manuscript provides no details on participant recruitment, selection criteria, demographics, or the coding/analysis procedure used on the 17 interviews. Because the central claim—that digital tools introduce specific, generalizable complexities in labor organizing—rests on the interviewed sample being representative of diverse unions, contexts, and outcomes, the absence of this information is load-bearing and prevents assessment of selection bias or scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and recommendation. We address the sole major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: the manuscript provides no details on participant recruitment, selection criteria, demographics, or the coding/analysis procedure used on the 17 interviews. Because the central claim—that digital tools introduce specific, generalizable complexities in labor organizing—rests on the interviewed sample being representative of diverse unions, contexts, and outcomes, the absence of this information is load-bearing and prevents assessment of selection bias or scope.

    Authors: We agree that the Methods section is insufficiently detailed and that this information is necessary for readers to assess sample scope, potential biases, and the basis for our claims. The current version prioritizes findings over procedural transparency. In revision we will expand the Methods section with: recruitment approach (union contacts and snowball sampling), selection criteria (active participants in digital organizing efforts), available demographics (while preserving confidentiality), and analysis procedure (thematic coding with iterative codebook development and team discussion for consistency). We will also clarify the intended scope of our claims to avoid overgeneralization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in qualitative interview analysis

full rationale

The paper is a qualitative study drawing findings directly from 17 interviews on digital tools in labor organizing. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided abstract or described structure. Claims about opportunities and challenges are presented as outcomes of the interview data without reduction to inputs by construction or imported uniqueness theorems. The derivation chain consists of empirical observation and thematic analysis, which is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical qualitative study; the central claims rest on standard assumptions about interview data rather than mathematical derivations or new postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Insights drawn from a sample of 17 qualitative interviews can be generalized to identify key technical and social challenges in digitally-facilitated labor organizing.
    The paper's conclusions about complexities and opportunities depend on this premise regarding sample sufficiency and representativeness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5663 in / 1031 out tokens · 29816 ms · 2026-06-26T15:46:23.858689+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Born, and René Torenvlied

    Agnes Akkerman, Marieke J. Born, and René Torenvlied. 2013. Solidarity, Strikes, and Scabs: How Participation Norms Affect Union Members’ Willingness to Strike.Work and Occupations40, 3 (Aug. 2013), 250–280. doi:10.1177/ 0730888413481481 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    2013

  2. [2]

    Le Dantec

    Mariam Asad and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2015. Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1694–1703. doi:10.1145/2675133.2675156

    work page doi:10.1145/2675133.2675156 2015

  3. [3]

    James B. Atleson. 1994. Law and Union Power: Thoughts on the United States and Canada Commentary.Buffalo Law Review42, 2 (1994), 463–500. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/buflr42&i=471

    1994

  4. [4]

    Tim Bash. 2024. Letter Carriers Convention Shapes Up to Be Open Bargaining Showdown. https://labornotes.org/ blogs/2024/07/letter-carriers-convention-shapes-be-open-bargaining-showdown

    2024

  5. [5]

    Bennett and Bruce E

    James T. Bennett and Bruce E. Kaufman. 2007.What Do Unions Do? A Twenty-Year Perspective. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, England, UK

    2007

  6. [6]

    Annette Bernhardt, Lisa Kresge, and Reem Suleiman. 2023. The Data-Driven Workplace and the Case for Worker Technology Rights.ILR Review76, 1 (Jan. 2023), 3–29. doi:10.1177/00197939221131558 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 10, No. 6, Article CSCW133. Publication date: October 2026. Understanding Community, Challenge...

    work page doi:10.1177/00197939221131558 2023

  7. [7]

    Alpkan Birelma. 2023. Militant minority at work: a successful case of unionisation of garment workers in Istanbul. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d’études du développement44, 1 (Jan. 2023), 113–130. doi:10.1080/02255189.2022.2100748 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2022.2100748

    work page doi:10.1080/02255189.2022.2100748 2023

  8. [8]

    Pernille Bjørn, Morten Esbensen, Rasmus Eskild Jensen, and Stina Matthiesen. 2014. Does Distance Still Matter? Revisiting the CSCW Fundamentals on Distributed Collaboration.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.21, 5 (Nov. 2014), 27:1–27:26. doi:10.1145/2670534

    work page doi:10.1145/2670534 2014

  9. [9]

    Eric Blanc. 2018. The Strike Is On. https://jacobin.com/2018/03/west-virginia-teachers-strike-activist-interview

    2018

  10. [10]

    Eric Blanc. 2024. The Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee: A New Model for Worker-Led Organizing.New Labor Forum33, 3 (Sept. 2024), 56–63. doi:10.1177/10957960241276508 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    work page doi:10.1177/10957960241276508 2024

  11. [11]

    Eric Blanc. 2024. Worker-to-Worker Organizing Goes Viral.New Labor Forum33, 1 (Jan. 2024), 77–83. doi:10.1177/ 10957960231220914 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    2024

  12. [12]

    2025.We Are the Union: How Worker-to-Worker Organizing Is Revitalizing Labor and Winning Big

    Eric Blanc. 2025.We Are the Union: How Worker-to-Worker Organizing Is Revitalizing Labor and Winning Big. Univ of California Press, Oakland, CA, USA. Google-Books-ID: Us0uEQAAQBAJ

    2025

  13. [13]

    Tiziano Bonini, Emiliano Treré, Zizheng Yu, Swati Singh, Daniele Cargnelutti, and Francisco Javier López-Ferrández

  14. [14]

    2024), 554–571

    Cooperative affordances: How instant messaging apps afford learning, resistance and solidarity among food delivery workers.Convergence30, 1 (Feb. 2024), 554–571. doi:10.1177/13548565231153505 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    work page doi:10.1177/13548565231153505 2024

  15. [15]

    Alexandra Bradbury. 2014. How to Be a Staffer in a Democratic Union. https://labornotes.org/2014/06/how-be-staffer- democratic-union

    2014

  16. [16]

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Re- search in Psychology3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    work page doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 2006

  17. [17]

    Keith Brown and Jane Slaughter. 2024. UAW Reformers Muster Forces to Hold Bosses to Their Word. https: //labornotes.org/2024/10/uaw-reformers-muster-forces-hold-bosses-their-word

    2024

  18. [18]

    Dan Calacci. 2022. Organizing in the End of Employment: Information Sharing, Data Stewardship, and Digital Workerism. InProceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (CHIWORK ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. doi:10.1145/3533406.3533424

    work page doi:10.1145/3533406.3533424 2022

  19. [19]

    Dan Calacci and Alex Pentland. 2022. Bargaining with the Black-Box: Designing and Deploying Worker-Centric Tools to Audit Algorithmic Management.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 428:1–428:24. doi:10.1145/3570601

    work page doi:10.1145/3570601 2022

  20. [20]

    Dana Calacci, Varun Nagaraj Rao, Samantha Dalal, Catherine Di, Kok-Wei Pua, Andrew Schwartz, Danny Spitzberg, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2025. FairFare: A Tool for Crowdsourcing Rideshare Data to Empower Labor Organizers. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.11273 arXiv:2502.11273 [cs]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.11273 2025

  21. [21]

    David Camfield. 2013. What is Trade Union Bureaucracy? A Theoretical Account.Alternate Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Research24, 1 (2013), 133–152. https://alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/article/view/19221

    2013

  22. [22]

    Gino Canella. 2023. Networked Unionism: Reframing the Labour Movement and Starbucks Workers United’s Hybrid Organising Practices.tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society21, 1 (Jan. 2023), 1–17. doi:10.31269/triplec.v21i1.1358

    work page doi:10.31269/triplec.v21i1.1358 2023

  23. [23]

    Bia Carneiro and Hermes Augusto Costa. 2022. Digital unionism as a renewal strategy? Social media use by trade union confederations.Journal of Industrial Relations64, 1 (Feb. 2022), 26–51. doi:10.1177/0022185620979337 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    work page doi:10.1177/0022185620979337 2022

  24. [24]

    Gary Chaison. 2002. Information technology: The threat to unions.Journal of Labor Research23, 2 (June 2002), 249–259. doi:10.1007/s12122-002-1005-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s12122-002-1005-7 2002

  25. [25]

    Shreya Chowdhary, Anna Kawakami, Mary L Gray, Jina Suh, Alexandra Olteanu, and Koustuv Saha. 2023. Can Workers Meaningfully Consent to Workplace Wellbeing Technologies?. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 569–582. doi:10.1145/3593013.3594023

    work page doi:10.1145/3593013.3594023 2023

  26. [26]

    Miranda Cross. 2024. Stopping the Spying: US Labor Unions’ Responses to Electronic Surveillance at Work. doi:10. 2139/ssrn.4784029

    2024

  27. [27]

    Ralph Darlington and Martin Upchurch. 2012. A reappraisal of the rank-and-file versus bureaucracy debate.Capital & Class36, 1 (Feb. 2012), 77–95. doi:10.1177/0309816811430369 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    work page doi:10.1177/0309816811430369 2012

  28. [28]

    W. J. Diamond and R. B. Freeman. 2002. Will Unionism Prosper in Cyberspace? The Promise of the Internet for Employee Organization.British Journal of Industrial Relations40, 3 (2002), 569–596. doi:10.1111/1467-8543.00247 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-8543.00247

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-8543.00247 2002

  29. [29]

    Niels van Doorn. 2020. At what price? Labour politics and calculative power struggles in on-demand food delivery. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation14 (Jan. 2020), 136–149. doi:10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0136 Publisher: Pluto Journals. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 10, No. 6, Article CSCW133. Publication date: October 2026. CSCW133:26 ...

    work page doi:10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0136 2020

  30. [30]

    1988.Work-oriented design of computer artifacts

    Pelle Ehn. 1988.Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Ph. D. Dissertation. Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences., Umeå, Sweden. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-62913 Publisher: Arbetslivscentrum

    1988

  31. [31]

    Mike Elk. 2018. Wave of teachers’ wildcat strikes spreads to Oklahoma and Kentucky. https://www.theguardian.com/us- news/2018/apr/02/teachers-wildcat-strikes-oklahoma-kentucky-west-virginia

    2018

  32. [32]

    John-Paul Ferguson. 2008. The Eyes of the Needles: A Sequential Model of Union Organizing Drives, 1999–2004.ILR Review62, 1 (Oct. 2008), 3–21. doi:10.1177/001979390806200101 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    work page doi:10.1177/001979390806200101 2008

  33. [33]

    Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , year =

    Sarah E. Fox, Vera Khovanskaya, Clara Crivellaro, Niloufar Salehi, Lynn Dombrowski, Chinmay Kulkarni, Lilly Irani, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2020. Worker-Centered Design: Expanding HCI Methods for Supporting Labor. InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY...

    work page doi:10.1145/3334480.3375157 2020

  34. [34]

    Charlotte Garden. 2018. Labor Organizing in the Age of Surveillance.Saint Louis University Law Journal63, 1 (Jan. 2018), 55. https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol63/iss1/5

    2018

  35. [35]

    Julie M É Garneau, Sara Pérez-Lauzon, and Christian Lévesque. 2023. Digitalisation of work in aerospace manufacturing: expanding union frames and repertoires of action in Belgium, Canada and Denmark.Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research29, 1 (Feb. 2023), 139–154. doi:10.1177/10242589221146876 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    work page doi:10.1177/10242589221146876 2023

  36. [36]

    Torsten Geelan. 2021. Introduction to the Special Issue - The internet, social media and trade union revitalization: Still behind the digital curve or catching up?New Technology, Work and Employment36, 2 (2021), 123–139. doi:10.1111/ ntwe.12205 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ntwe.12205

    work page doi:10.1111/ntwe.12205 2021

  37. [37]

    Sucheta Ghoshal and Amy Bruckman. 2019. The Role of Social Computing Technologies in Grassroots Movement Building.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.26, 3 (June 2019), 18:1–18:36. doi:10.1145/3318140

    work page doi:10.1145/3318140 2019

  38. [38]

    Sucheta Ghoshal, Rishma Mendhekar, and Amy Bruckman. 2020. Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology Practice. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.4, CSCW1 (May 2020), 54:1–54:28. doi:10.1145/3392862

    work page doi:10.1145/3392862 2020

  39. [39]

    Le Dantec, Carl Disalvo, Lilly Irani, and Amy Bruckman

    Sucheta Ghoshal, Andrea Grimes Parker, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Carl Disalvo, Lilly Irani, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Design and the Politics of Collaboration: A Grassroots Perspective. InCompanion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ’19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New Yor...

    work page doi:10.1145/3311957.3359438 2019

  40. [40]

    Goldberg

    Michael J. Goldberg. 2000. An overview and assessment of the law regulating internal union affairs.Journal of Labor Research21, 1 (March 2000), 15–36. doi:10.1007/s12122-000-1002-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s12122-000-1002-7 2000

  41. [41]

    Anne-marie Greene, John Hogan, and Margaret Grieco. 2003. Commentary: E-collectivism and distributed discourse: new opportunities for trade union democracy.Industrial Relations Journal34, 4 (2003), 282–289. doi:10.1111/1468- 2338.00275 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1468-2338.00275

    work page doi:10.1111/1468- 2003

  42. [42]

    Anne-marie Greene and Gill Kirton. 2003. Possibilities for remote participation in trade unions: mobilising women activists.Industrial Relations Journal34, 4 (2003), 319–333. doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00278 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1468-2338.00278

    work page doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00278 2003

  43. [43]

    Michael Grinthal. 2011. Power With: Practice Models for Social Justice Lawyering.University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change15 (2011), 25. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hybrid15&id=27& div=&collection=

    2011

  44. [44]

    2024.Prisms of the People: Power & Organizing in Twenty- First-Century America

    Hahrie Han, Elizabeth McKenna, and Michelle Oyakawa. 2024.Prisms of the People: Power & Organizing in Twenty- First-Century America. University of Chicago Press. Google-Books-ID: r_syEAAAQBAJ

    2024

  45. [45]

    Marc-Antonin Hennebert, Vincent Pasquier, and Christian Lévesque. 2021. What do unions do. . . with digital technolo- gies? An affordance approach.New Technology, Work and Employment36, 2 (2021), 177–200. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12187 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ntwe.12187

    work page doi:10.1111/ntwe.12187 2021

  46. [46]

    Andy Hodder and David Houghton. 2015. Union use of social media: a study of the University and College Union on Twitter.New Technology, Work and Employment30, 3 (Nov. 2015), 173–189. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12055 Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    work page doi:10.1111/ntwe.12055 2015

  47. [47]

    Houghton

    Andy Hodder and David J. Houghton. 2020. Unions, social media and young workers—evidence from the UK.New Technology, Work and Employment35, 1 (2020), 40–59. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12154 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ntwe.12154

    work page doi:10.1111/ntwe.12154 2020

  48. [48]

    Gallup Inc. 2022. U.S. Approval of Labor Unions at Highest Point Since 1965. https://news.gallup.com/poll/398303/ approval-labor-unions-highest-point-1965.aspx Section: Politics

    2022

  49. [49]

    Irani and M

    Lilly C. Irani and M. Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 611–620. doi:10.1145/2470654.2470742

    work page doi:10.1145/2470654.2470742 2013

  50. [50]

    Irani and M

    Lilly C. Irani and M. Six Silberman. 2016. Stories We Tell About Labor: Turkopticon and the Trouble with "Design". In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4573–4586. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858592 Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 10, No. 6, Articl...

    work page doi:10.1145/2858036.2858592 2016

  51. [51]

    Kang and Sarah E

    Esther Y. Kang and Sarah E. Fox. 2022. Stories from the Frontline: Recuperating Essential Worker Accounts of AI Integration. InProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 58–70. doi:10.1145/3532106.3533564

    work page doi:10.1145/3532106.3533564 2022

  52. [52]

    Sayash Kapoor, Matthew Sun, Mona Wang, Klaudia Jazwinska, and Elizabeth Anne Watkins. 2022. Weaving Privacy and Power: On the Privacy Practices of Labor Organizers in the U.S. Technology Industry.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 473:1–473:33. doi:10.1145/3555574

    work page doi:10.1145/3555574 2022

  53. [53]

    Kellogg, Melissa A

    Katherine C. Kellogg, Melissa A. Valentine, and Angèle Christin. 2020. Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control.Academy of Management Annals14, 1 (Jan. 2020), 366–410. doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 Publisher: Academy of Management AnnalsBriarcliff Manor, NY

    work page doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 2020

  54. [54]

    Vera Khovanskaya. 2023. The Cyberunion 20 Years Later.interactions30, 2 (Feb. 2023), 48–51. doi:10.1145/3583079

    work page doi:10.1145/3583079 2023

  55. [55]

    Vera Khovanskaya, Phoebe Sengers, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2020. Bottom-Up Organizing with Tools from On High: Understanding the Data Practices of Labor Organizers. InProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. doi:10.1145/3313831. 3376185

    work page doi:10.1145/3313831 2020

  56. [56]

    Margaret Levi, David Olson, Jon Agnone, and Devin Kelly. 2009. Union Democracy Reexamined.Politics & Society37, 2 (June 2009), 203–228. doi:10.1177/0032329209333925 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    work page doi:10.1177/0032329209333925 2009

  57. [57]

    David Linton. 1992. The Luddites: How did they get that bad reputation?Labor History33, 4 (Oct. 1992), 529–537. doi:10.1080/00236569200890281 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00236569200890281

    work page doi:10.1080/00236569200890281 1992

  58. [58]

    John Logan. 2002. Consultants, lawyers, and the ‘union free’ movement in the USA since the 1970s.Industrial Relations Journal33, 3 (2002), 197–214. doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00230 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1468-2338.00230

    work page doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00230 2002

  59. [59]

    John Logan. 2006. The Union Avoidance Industry in the United States.British Journal of Industrial Relations44, 4 (2006), 651–675. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00518.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467- 8543.2006.00518.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00518.x 2006

  60. [60]

    John Logan. 2021. Crushing Unions, by Any Means Necessary: How Amazon’s Blistering Anti-Union Campaign Won in Bessemer, Alabama.New Labor Forum30, 3 (Sept. 2021), 38–45. doi:10.1177/10957960211035082 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    work page doi:10.1177/10957960211035082 2021

  61. [61]

    John Logan. 2025. Corporate union busting in plain sight: How Amazon, Starbucks, and Trader Joe’s crushed dynamic grassroots worker organizing campaigns. https://www.epi.org/publication/corporate-union-busting/

    2025

  62. [62]

    2018.A History of America in Ten Strikes

    Erik Loomis. 2018.A History of America in Ten Strikes. The New Press. Google-Books-ID: kUNGDwAAQBAJ

    2018

  63. [63]

    Miguel Martínez Lucio, Steve Walker, and Pip Trevorrow. 2009. Making networks and (re)making trade union bureaucracy: a European-wide case study of trade union engagement with the Internet and networking. New Technology, Work and Employment24, 2 (2009), 115–130. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2009.00223.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/...

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1468-005x.2009.00223.x 2009

  64. [64]

    Aysha Bagchi and Erin Mansfield. 2025. Supreme Court lets Donald Trump fire independent board members – for now. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/04/09/donald-trump-supreme-court-nlrb-democrats/ 83012169007/

    2025

  65. [65]

    Miguel Martínez Lucio. 2003. New communication systems and trade union politics: a case study of Spanish trade unions and the role of the internet.Industrial Relations Journal34, 4 (2003), 334–347. doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00279 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1468-2338.00279

    work page doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00279 2003

  66. [66]

    Miguel Martínez Lucio and Steve Walker. 2005. The networked union? The internet as a challenge to trade union identity and roles.Critical perspectives on international business1, 2/3 (Jan. 2005), 137–154. doi:10.1108/17422040510595645 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited

    work page doi:10.1108/17422040510595645 2005

  67. [67]

    2016.No Shortcuts: Organizing for Power in the New Gilded Age

    Jane McAlevey. 2016.No Shortcuts: Organizing for Power in the New Gilded Age. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. Google-Books-ID: CNfeDAAAQBAJ

    2016

  68. [68]

    2020.A Collective Bargain: Unions, Organizing, and the Fight for Democracy

    Jane McAlevey. 2020.A Collective Bargain: Unions, Organizing, and the Fight for Democracy. HarperCollins, 195 Broadway, New York City, New York, United States. Google-Books-ID: TkKSDwAAQBAJ

    2020

  69. [69]

    John McIlroy. 2014. Marxism and the Trade Unions: The Bureaucracy versus the Rank and File Debate Re- visited.Critique42, 4 (Oct. 2014), 497–526. doi:10.1080/03017605.2014.984493 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2014.984493

    work page doi:10.1080/03017605.2014.984493 2014

  70. [70]

    Oscar Molina, Florian Butollo, Csaba Makó, Alejandro Godino, Ursula Holtgrewe, Anna Illsoe, Sander Junte, Trine Pernille Larsen, Miklós Illésy, Jószef Pap, and Philip Wotschack. 2023. It takes two to code: a comparative analysis of collective bargaining and artificial intelligence.Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research29, 1 (Feb. 2023), 87–104. ...

    work page doi:10.1177/10242589231156515 2023

  71. [71]

    It Actually Doesn’t Feel Very Mutual:

    Tonya Nguyen, Darya Kaviani, and Niloufar Salehi. 2025. "It Actually Doesn’t Feel Very Mutual:" How Technology Impacts the Values of Mutual Aid Groups in Practice. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–18. doi:10.1145/3706598. Proc. ACM Hum.-Compu...

    work page doi:10.1145/3706598 2025

  72. [72]

    Gadi Nissim and Tomer Simon. 2021. The future of labor unions in the age of automation and at the dawn of AI. Technology in Society67 (Nov. 2021), 101732. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101732

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101732 2021

  73. [73]

    Patrick Oakford and Margaret Poydock. 2025. Trump is the biggest union-buster in U.S. history: More than 1 million federal workers’ collective bargaining rights are at risk. https://www.epi.org/blog/trump-is-the-biggest-union-buster- in-u-s-history-more-than-1-million-federal-workers-collective-bargaining-rights-are-at-risk/

    2025

  74. [74]

    Olson and Judith S

    Gary M. Olson and Judith S. Olson. 2000. Distance Matters.Human–Computer Interaction15, 2-3 (Sept. 2000), 139–178. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4

    work page doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1523_4 2000

  75. [75]

    Panagiotis Panagiotopoulos and Julie Barnett. 2015. Social Media in Union Communications: An International Study with UNI Global Union Affiliates.British Journal of Industrial Relations53, 3 (2015), 508–532. doi:10.1111/bjir.12060 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjir.12060

    work page doi:10.1111/bjir.12060 2015

  76. [76]

    Adam M Parker. 2022. Adapt or Resist? Unions and the Political Economy of Automation. https://gsipe-workshop. github.io/files/AMParker__Unions_and_the_Political_Economy_of_Automation_220829.pdf

    2022

  77. [77]

    Vincent Pasquier and Thibault Daudigeos. 2019. Democratic Organizations and Their Monstrous Digital Self: The Use of Facebook by a Labour Union.Academy of Management Proceedings2019, 1 (Aug. 2019), 14295. doi:10.5465/AMBPP. 2019.14295abstract Publisher: Academy of Management

    work page doi:10.5465/ambpp 2019

  78. [78]

    For Me, Data is Ammunition

    Lucy Pei, Uriel Serrano, and Roderic Crooks. 2024. "For Me, Data is Ammunition": Metaphors and Community Organizers’ Data Imaginaries. InCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW Companion ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 376–381. doi:10.1145/3678884.3681878

    work page doi:10.1145/3678884.3681878 2024

  79. [79]

    Frederick Reiber, Nathan Chan-Yeong Kim, Allison McDonald, and Dana Calacci. 2026. Surveillance, Spacing, Screaming and Scabbing: How Digital Technology Facilitates Union Busting. InProceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’26). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 906, 25 pages. doi:10.1...

    work page doi:10.1145/3772318.3791507 2026

  80. [80]

    Lyne Rhinehart. 2024. New data shows workers want unions – and we support them. http://blog.dol.gov/2024/10/25/ new-data-shows-workers-want-unions-and-we-support-them

    2024

Showing first 80 references.