Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Can a "Hidden Variable'' Quantum Theory Evade the "No-Cloning" Theorem?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0510039 v1 pith:2GSVVZBM submitted 2005-10-06 quant-ph

Can a "Hidden Variable'' Quantum Theory Evade the "No-Cloning" Theorem?

classification quant-ph
keywords hiddenno-cloningtheoremsuperluminalthenansweraspectsbelong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

If YES, then we can look forward to physical realization of superluminal communication, as the original considerations of the ``no-cloning'' theorem were motivated in part as an explanation of why certain schemes for superluminal signaling cannot work. If NO, then it would seem that some aspects of the ``hidden'' variables must be ``intrinsically hidden'', i.e., ``unknowable'', such that ``hidden-variable'' theories belong more to the ``idealist'' than to the ``realist'' school of thought. I pose this question without proposing a definite answer. I am unaware of any commentary on this topic during these 23 years since the formulation of the ``no-cloning'' theorem, but I would be pleased to be enlightened by more knowledgeable readers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.