Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Lower bounds for trace reconstruction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.02336 v2 pith:2IAHOWVN submitted 2018-08-04 math.PR cs.CCcs.ITmath.ITmath.STstat.TH

classification math.PRcs.CCcs.ITmath.ITmath.STstat.TH
keywords lowerreconstructionboundprobabilitysomesqrtstringtrace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In the trace reconstruction problem, an unknown bit string ${\bf x}\in\{0,1 \}^n$ is sent through a deletion channel where each bit is deleted independently with some probability $q\in(0,1)$, yielding a contracted string $\widetilde{\bf x}$. How many i.i.d.\ samples of $\widetilde{\bf x}$ are needed to reconstruct $\bf x$ with high probability? We prove that there exist ${\bf x},{\bf y} \in\{0,1 \}^n$ such that at least $c\, n^{5/4}/\sqrt{\log n}$ traces are required to distinguish between ${\bf x}$ and ${\bf y}$ for some absolute constant $c$, improving the previous lower bound of $c\,n$. Furthermore, our result improves the previously known lower bound for reconstruction of random strings from $c \log^2 n$ to $c \log^{9/4}n/\sqrt{\log \log n} $.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Generalized Trace Reconstruction Problem: Recovering a String of Probabilities

    cs.DS 2024-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Worst-case probability strings require e^{Ω(√n)} traces to distinguish under deletions, while random probability strings are recoverable to ℓ1 error ε with poly(n,1/ε) traces.

Pith tools