REVIEW 1 cited by
Lower bounds for trace reconstruction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In the trace reconstruction problem, an unknown bit string ${\bf x}\in\{0,1 \}^n$ is sent through a deletion channel where each bit is deleted independently with some probability $q\in(0,1)$, yielding a contracted string $\widetilde{\bf x}$. How many i.i.d.\ samples of $\widetilde{\bf x}$ are needed to reconstruct $\bf x$ with high probability? We prove that there exist ${\bf x},{\bf y} \in\{0,1 \}^n$ such that at least $c\, n^{5/4}/\sqrt{\log n}$ traces are required to distinguish between ${\bf x}$ and ${\bf y}$ for some absolute constant $c$, improving the previous lower bound of $c\,n$. Furthermore, our result improves the previously known lower bound for reconstruction of random strings from $c \log^2 n$ to $c \log^{9/4}n/\sqrt{\log \log n} $.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Generalized Trace Reconstruction Problem: Recovering a String of Probabilities
Worst-case probability strings require e^{Ω(√n)} traces to distinguish under deletions, while random probability strings are recoverable to ℓ1 error ε with poly(n,1/ε) traces.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.