Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.00857 v3 pith:2IHPF2K4 submitted 2021-10-02 cs.LG cs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CY
keywords learningfederatedfairfedacrossdatadifferentfairnessgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training ML models which are fair across different demographic groups is of critical importance due to the increased integration of ML in crucial decision-making scenarios such as healthcare and recruitment. Federated learning has been viewed as a promising solution for collaboratively training machine learning models among multiple parties while maintaining the privacy of their local data. However, federated learning also poses new challenges in mitigating the potential bias against certain populations (e.g., demographic groups), as this typically requires centralized access to the sensitive information (e.g., race, gender) of each datapoint. Motivated by the importance and challenges of group fairness in federated learning, in this work, we propose FairFed, a novel algorithm for fairness-aware aggregation to enhance group fairness in federated learning. Our proposed approach is server-side and agnostic to the applied local debiasing thus allowing for flexible use of different local debiasing methods across clients. We evaluate FairFed empirically versus common baselines for fair ML and federated learning, and demonstrate that it provides fairer models particularly under highly heterogeneous data distributions across clients. We also demonstrate the benefits of FairFed in scenarios involving naturally distributed real-life data collected from different geographical locations or departments within an organization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fairness in Federated Learning: Fairness for Whom?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A critical review of 121 federated learning fairness papers identifies five recurring pitfalls and proposes a harm-centered, lifecycle-based framework.

Pith tools