Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

From Text to Self: Users' Perceptions of Potential of AI on Interpersonal Communication and Self

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.03976 v3 pith:2K546WK2 submitted 2023-10-06 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CL
keywords communicationaimctoolsinterpersonalpotentialusersformalinformal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the rapidly evolving landscape of AI-mediated communication (AIMC), tools powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming integral to interpersonal communication. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a one-week diary and interview study to explore users' perceptions of these tools' ability to: 1) support interpersonal communication in the short-term, and 2) lead to potential long-term effects. Our findings indicate that participants view AIMC support favorably, citing benefits such as increased communication confidence, and finding precise language to express their thoughts, navigating linguistic and cultural barriers. However, the study also uncovers current limitations of AIMC tools, including verbosity, unnatural responses, and excessive emotional intensity. These shortcomings are further exacerbated by user concerns about inauthenticity and potential overreliance on the technology. Furthermore, we identified four key communication spaces delineated by communication stakes (high or low) and relationship dynamics (formal or informal) that differentially predict users' attitudes toward AIMC tools. Specifically, participants found the tool is more suitable for communicating in formal relationships than informal ones and more beneficial in high-stakes than low-stakes communication.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Toward Needs-Conscious Design: Co-Designing a Human-Centered Framework for AI-Mediated Communication

    cs.HC 2025-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A qualitative study with 27 participants defines Needs-Conscious Design and Empathy Fog, a framework for making AI-mediated communication preserve rather than obscure human effort and connection.

Pith tools