Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

Compact $cs\bar{s}\bar{s}$ Tetraquarks in the Charm--Strange Sector: Mass Spectra, Rearrangement Decays and Regge Trajectories with $D_s$ Threshold Inputs

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-20 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Compact cs s-bar s-bar tetraquarks form axial diquark-antidiquark states whose masses and decays are predicted by a Cornell potential tuned to the Ds spectrum.

desk verdict Standard diquark model for cs s-bar s-bar tetraquarks with direct Ds potential transfer, but color factors likely need rescaling. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.18075 v1 pith:2KLDIIU5 submitted 2026-05-18 hep-ph

Chetan Lodha , Ajay Kumar Rai This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords tetraquarksdiquark-antidiquarkCornellpotentialrearrangementdecaysReggetrajectoriesopencharmhiddenstrangenessDsmesons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper models the cs bar s bar s tetraquark as a compact bound state of a charm-strange diquark and a strange-antistrange antidiquark. It computes the mass spectrum in both semi-relativistic and non-relativistic versions of a Cornell potential whose parameters are fixed by reproducing the known Ds meson spectrum. Pauli symmetry forces the antidiquark to be axial-vector for the lowest states, and the calculation yields concrete predictions for rearrangement decays into Ds star eta, Ds star eta prime and Ds star phi pairs via spin-color recoupling. Orbital and radial Regge trajectories are built to organize the excited states. A sympathetic reader would care because the results supply specific mass and decay targets for experiments looking for exotic open-charm states that also carry hidden strangeness.

What carries the argument

Axial-vector diquark-antidiquark configuration [cs][bar s bar s] treated in the Cornell potential framework, with color and spin symmetries used to generate the spectrum and to obtain decay amplitudes through Fierz recoupling.

What would settle it

A measured mass or decay branching ratio for a narrow resonance in the Ds eta or Ds phi invariant-mass spectrum that lies well outside the range predicted for the ground-state multiplet would directly test whether the potential calibrated on two-quark mesons applies to this configuration.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that the cs bar s bar s system forms compact tetraquarks in the bar 3-3 and 6-bar 6 color configurations, with the bar s bar s antidiquark restricted to an axial-vector state by Pauli symmetry, and that the same Cornell potential calibrated on conventional Ds mesons yields reliable masses, threshold structures, rearrangement decay widths to Ds star eta, eta prime and phi modes, and Regge trajectories for the J^P = 0^+, 1^+, 2^+ multiplet.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that the exotic four-quark cs bar s bar s state can be described by the identical Cornell potential parameters fitted to ordinary Ds mesons without extra corrections arising from its multi-quark nature.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. This paper presents a spectroscopy study of compact cs s-bar s-bar tetraquarks modeled as axial-vector diquark-antidiquark systems [cs][s-bar s-bar]. Mass spectra are computed in a Cornell-potential framework for both semi-relativistic and non-relativistic treatments, with separate analysis of 3-bar-3 and 6-6-bar color configurations. Rearrangement decays to Ds(*) eta, Ds(*) eta', and Ds(*) phi modes are formulated via spin-color Fierz recoupling and normalized with QCD sum-rule amplitudes. Orbital and radial Regge trajectories are constructed, with parameters calibrated on the conventional Ds meson spectrum to provide a phenomenological basis for identifying such states in hidden-strangeness open-charm final states.

Significance. If the results hold after addressing parameter transfer issues, the work supplies a dedicated framework for tetraquark candidates in open-charm hidden-strangeness channels, extending potential-model techniques to exotic configurations and offering testable mass and decay predictions benchmarked against Ds thresholds.

major comments (1)
  1. Model section / Cornell potential application: The same V(r) = -α/r + σ r calibrated on Ds mesons is applied directly to the [cs][s-bar s-bar] tetraquark without rescaling for the different color factors (1/2 for 3-bar-3 or -1/6 for 6-6-bar versus 4/3 for mesons). This unadjusted extrapolation is load-bearing for the quoted mass spectra, threshold structures, and rearrangement decay widths, as the string tension and Coulomb strength should be modified for the exotic configuration.
minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract and introduction: Clarify whether the Pauli symmetry restrictions on the [s-bar s-bar] antidiquark are enforced at the wave-function level or only at the level of allowed J^P multiplets.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below and are committed to improving the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Model section / Cornell potential application: The same V(r) = -α/r + σ r calibrated on Ds mesons is applied directly to the [cs][s-bar s-bar] tetraquark without rescaling for the different color factors (1/2 for 3-bar-3 or -1/6 for 6-6-bar versus 4/3 for mesons). This unadjusted extrapolation is load-bearing for the quoted mass spectra, threshold structures, and rearrangement decay widths, as the string tension and Coulomb strength should be modified for the exotic configuration.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this crucial point regarding the color structure in the potential. In our model, the Cornell potential parameters were fitted to the conventional Ds meson spectrum, which corresponds to a color factor of 4/3. For the tetraquark treated as a diquark-antidiquark system, the effective color factors are indeed different: approximately 1/2 for the 3-bar-3 configuration and -1/6 for the 6-6-bar configuration. We acknowledge that directly transferring the unrescaled potential represents an approximation that may affect the absolute mass values and derived quantities. However, since the parameters are phenomenological and the focus is on relative spectra and trajectories, this choice was made to maintain consistency with the threshold inputs. To strengthen the analysis, we will revise the manuscript to explicitly include the color-factor rescaling in the potential for each configuration. This will involve multiplying the Coulomb and linear terms by the appropriate factors, recomputing the mass spectra for both semi-relativistic and non-relativistic cases, and updating the Regge trajectories and decay width estimates. A new paragraph will be added in the model section to discuss the color factors and justify the rescaling procedure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Ds calibration used for extrapolation to distinct tetraquark system

full rationale

The derivation calibrates the Cornell potential on the conventional Ds meson spectrum as an input sector and then solves the Schrödinger or semi-relativistic equation for the separate [cs][s-bar s-bar] tetraquark configurations in 3-bar-3 and 6-6-bar color channels. The resulting mass spectra, rearrangement decay widths (normalized via independent QCD sum-rule amplitudes), and Regge trajectories are therefore predictions for the exotic system rather than quantities that reduce by construction to the Ds fit. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain appears in the abstract or model description; the color-factor rescaling issue is a modeling assumption, not a circular reduction. The framework remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central results rest on standard quark-model assumptions plus parameters fitted to the conventional Ds spectrum; no machine-checked proofs or independent data releases are indicated.

free parameters (2)
  • Cornell potential parameters
    Fitted or adjusted using the Ds meson spectrum as calibration sector for both semi-relativistic and non-relativistic treatments.
  • Decay amplitude normalizations
    Normalized using two-point and three-point QCD-sum-rule amplitudes for the rearrangement modes.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Tetraquarks can be modeled as compact axial diquark-antidiquark systems with color configurations 3-bar-3 and 6-6-bar.
    Invoked in the modeling of the cs s-bar s-bar state and Pauli symmetry restrictions on the antidiquark.
  • domain assumption The Cornell potential framework calibrated on ordinary mesons applies to exotic tetraquarks without major additional corrections.
    Used to compute the spectrum and Regge trajectories.
invented entities (1)
  • cs s-bar s-bar tetraquark states with specific J^P quantum numbers
    purpose: To provide candidate resonances in hidden-strangeness open-charm channels.
    Postulated within the diquark-antidiquark picture; no independent falsifiable evidence supplied beyond the model itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Compact $cs\bar{s}\bar{s}$ Tetraquarks in the Charm--Strange Sector: Mass Spectra, Rearrangement Decays and Regge Trajectories with $D_s$ Threshold Inputs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2KLDIIU5

@misc{pith2026260518075,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Compact $cs\bars\bars$ Tetraquarks in the Charm--Strange Sector: Mass Spectra, Rearrangement Decays and Regge Trajectories with $D_s$ Threshold Inputs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2KLDIIU5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.18075}
}
abstract

This work presents a spectroscopy-focused study of the compact open-charm, multi-strange tetraquark configuration \(cs\bar{s}\bar{s}\), modeled as an axial diquark-antidiquark system \([cs][\bar{s}\bar{s}]\). The conventional \(D_s\) meson spectrum is retained as a calibration sector for the model parameters and as a reference for the dominant two-meson thresholds; however, the primary emphasis is placed on the mass spectrum, threshold structure, rearrangement decay mechanisms, and Regge systematics of the \(cs\bar{s}\bar{s}\) tetraquark. The spectrum is computed within a Cornell-potential framework using both semi-relativistic and non-relativistic treatments, with the \(\bar{\mathbf{3}}-\mathbf{3}\) and \(\mathbf{6}-\bar{\mathbf{6}}\) color configurations analyzed separately. Owing to the presence of two identical strange antiquarks, Pauli symmetry imposes restrictions on the \([\bar{s}\bar{s}]\) antidiquark, favoring axial-vector building blocks as the natural low-lying degrees of freedom for the \(J^P=0^+,1^+,2^+\) tetraquark multiplet. The strong-decay sector is formulated in terms of the rearrangement topology \(cs\bar{s}\bar{s}\rightarrow(c\bar{s})(s\bar{s})\), with the \(D_s^{(*)}\eta\), \(D_s^{(*)}\eta'\), and \(D_s^{(*)}\phi\) modes identified through spin-color Fierz recoupling and normalized using two-point and three-point QCD-sum-rule amplitudes. Orbital and radial Regge trajectories are constructed to characterize the excitation patterns of the compact tetraquark and to benchmark them against the calibrated \(D_s\) spectrum. This framework provides a dedicated phenomenological basis for identifying \(cs\bar{s}\bar{s}\) candidates in hidden-strangeness open-charm final states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18075 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Orbital Regge trajectories in the (L, M2 ) plane for the Ds meson family in the non-relativistic and semi-relativistic schemes for S = 0 and S = 1. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Radial Regge trajectories in the (n, M2 ) plane for the Ds meson family in the non-relativistic and semi-relativistic schemes for S = 0 and S = 1. (a) NR, S = 0 (b) NR, S = 1 (c) NR, S = 2 (d) SR, S = 0 (e) SR, S = 1 (f) SR, S = 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Orbital Regge trajectories in the (L, M2 ) plane for the Tcss¯s¯ tetraquark in the 3¯−3 configuration. The first row shows the non-relativistic results and the second row shows the semi-relativistic results for S = 0, 1, 2. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Radial Regge trajectories in the (n, M2 ) plane for the Tcss¯s¯ tetraquark in the 3¯−3 configuration. The first row shows the non-relativistic results and the second row shows the semi-relativistic results for S = 0, 1, 2. (a) NR, S = 0 (b) NR, S = 1 (c) NR, S = 2 (d) …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Orbital Regge trajectories in the (L, M2 ) plane for the Tcss¯s¯ tetraquark in the 6−6¯ configuration. The first row shows the non-relativistic results and the second row shows the semi-relativistic results for S = 0, 1, 2. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Radial Regge trajectories in the (n, M2 ) plane for the Tcss¯s¯ tetraquark in the 6−6¯ configuration. The first row shows the non-relativistic results and the second row shows the semi-relativistic results for S = 0, 1, 2. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Semi-relativistic form-factor comparison plots for the pseudoscalar, vector, scalar, axial-vector, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Semi-relativistic differential decay-width distributions for electron and muon final states across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. $\lambda$, $\rho$, and $\sigma$ Regge trajectories for the quadruply heavy pentaquark $bb\bar{u}cc$ in the diquark-triquark picture

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    Regge relations for bbūcc in the diquark-triquark picture give four trajectory series with M∼x^{2/3} or √x behavior plus spin-averaged mass estimates for λ, ρ1, ρ2 and σ excitations.

  2. A Unified Study of Hidden-Charm and Hidden-Bottom Mesons

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A common screened-potential and QCD sum-rule framework yields consistent spectra, E1/M1 widths, Regge slopes, decay constants and finite-spectrum thermal indicators for c¯c and b¯b mesons.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 104 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Gell-Mann ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3 journal journal Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, “A schematic model of baryons and mesons,” Phys. Lett.8, 214–215 (1964), doi:10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3. 36

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-9163(64)92001-3 1964

  2. [2]

    An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1,

    G. Zweig, “An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1,” CERN- TH-401 (1964)

    work page 1964

  3. [3]

    Review of particle physics

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.3, 030001 (2024) and 2025 update, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  4. [4]

    Multiquark hadrons. I. Phenomenology ofQ2 ¯Q2 mesons,

    R. L. Jaffe, “Multiquark hadrons. I. Phenomenology ofQ2 ¯Q2 mesons,” Phys. Rev. D15, 267 (1977), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.267

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.267 1977

  5. [5]

    Multiquark hadrons. II. Methods,

    R. L. Jaffe, “Multiquark hadrons. II. Methods,” Phys. Rev. D15, 281 (1977), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.281

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.281 1977

  6. [6]

    Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B+ -> K+ pi+pi- J/psi decays

    S.-K. Choiet al.[Belle], “Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B±→K±π+π−J/ψdecays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0309032, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262001

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.262001 2003

  7. [7]

    Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e- to pi+pi-J/psi at \sqrt{s}=4.26 GeV

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII], “Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e−→ π+π−J/ψat√s = 4.26GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 252001 (2013), arXiv:1303.5949 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252001

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.252001 2013

  8. [8]

    Observation of the resonant character of the $Z(4430)^-$ state

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of the resonant character of theZ(4430)−state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.112, no.22, 222002 (2014), arXiv:1404.1903 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.222002

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.222002 2014

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    Observation of new resonances decaying toJ/ψK+ and J/ψϕ,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of new resonances decaying toJ/ψK+ and J/ψϕ,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, no.8, 082001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01803 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.082001

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Model-independent study of structure inB+→D+D−K+ decays,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Model-independent study of structure inB+→D+D−K+ decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 242001 (2020), arXiv:2009.00025 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.242001

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Amplitude analysis of theB+→D+D−K+ decay,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Amplitude analysis of theB+→D+D−K+ decay,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.11, 112003 (2020), arXiv:2009.00026 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.112003

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Hadronic molecules,

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B.-S. Zou, “Hadronic molecules,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90, no.1, 015004 (2018), arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004

    2018 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    Hybrids, tetraquarks, pentaquarks, doubly heavy baryons, and quarkonia in Born–Oppenheimer effective theory,

    M. Berwein, N. Brambilla, A. Mohapatra and A. Vairo, “Hybrids, tetraquarks, pentaquarks, doubly heavy baryons, and quarkonia in Born–Oppenheimer effective theory,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.9, 094040 (2024), arXiv:2408.04719 [hep-ph], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094040

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Observation of a narrow meson decaying toD+ sπ0 at a mass of 2.32 GeV/c2,

    B. Aubertet al.[BaBar], “Observation of a narrow meson decaying toD+ sπ0 at a mass of 2.32 GeV/c2,” Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 242001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0304021, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.242001

    2003 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46 GeV/c2 decaying to D∗+ s π0 and confirmation of theD∗ sJ(2317)state,

    D. Bessonet al.[CLEO], “Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46 GeV/c2 decaying to D∗+ s π0 and confirmation of theD∗ sJ(2317)state,” Phys. Rev. D68, 032002 (2003); Erratum: Phys. Rev. D75, 119908 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0305100, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.032002

    2003 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    Observation of theDsJ(2317)and DsJ(2457)in B decays,

    P. Krokovnyet al.[Belle], “Observation of theDsJ(2317)and DsJ(2457)in B decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262002 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0308019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262002

    2003 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics,

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, “Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D32, 189–231 (1985), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.189

    1985 doi

  10. [18]

    Strong and radiative decays of the D∗ s0(2317)meson in theDK-molecule picture,

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij and Y.-L. Ma, “Strong and radiative decays of the D∗ s0(2317)meson in theDK-molecule picture,” Phys. Rev. D76, 014005 (2007), arXiv:0705.0254 [hep-ph], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.014005. 37

    2007 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Coupled-channelDπ, Dηand Ds ¯K scattering from lattice QCD,

    G. Moir, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, C. E. Thomas and D. J. Wilson, “Coupled-channelDπ, Dηand Ds ¯K scattering from lattice QCD,” JHEP10, 011 (2016), arXiv:1607.07093 [hep-lat], doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2016)011

    2016 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Observation of theT∗ cs0(2870)0 in theB→DD0K0 S decay,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of theT∗ cs0(2870)0 in theB→DD0K0 S decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, no.10, 101901 (2025), arXiv:2411.19781 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.101901

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    Excited Heavy-Light Systems and Hadronic Transitions,

    M. Di Pierro and E. Eichten, “Excited Heavy-Light Systems and Hadronic Transitions,” Phys. Rev. D64, 114004 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0104208, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.114004

    2001 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Heavy-light meson spectroscopy and Regge trajectories in the relativistic quark model,

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, “Heavy-light meson spectroscopy and Regge trajectories in the relativistic quark model,” Eur. Phys. J. C66, 197–206 (2010), arXiv:0910.5612 [hep-ph], doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1233-6

    2010 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Spectroscopy and decay properties of theDs meson,

    N. Devlani and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopy and decay properties of theDs meson,” Phys. Rev. D84, 074030 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.074030

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    Excited state mass spectra, decay properties and Regge trajec- tories of charm and charm-strange mesons,

    V. Kher, N. Devlani and A. K. Rai, “Excited state mass spectra, decay properties and Regge trajec- tories of charm and charm-strange mesons,” Chin. Phys. C41, no.7, 073101 (2017), arXiv:1704.00439 [hep-ph], doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/7/073101

    2017 doi arXiv

  17. [26]

    Spectroscopy and decay properties of theD meson,

    N. Devlani and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopy and decay properties of theD meson,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52, 2196–2208 (2013), doi:10.1007/s10773-013-1494-6

    2013 doi

  18. [27]

    Chiral multiplets of heavy-light mesons,

    W. A. Bardeen, E. J. Eichten and C. T. Hill, “Chiral multiplets of heavy-light mesons,” Phys. Rev. D68, 054024 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305049, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.054024

    2003 doi arXiv

  19. [28]

    On heavy-light meson resonances and chiral symmetry,

    E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, “On heavy-light meson resonances and chiral symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B582, 39–48 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307133, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.118

    2004 doi arXiv

  20. [29]

    ObservedDs(2317)and tentative D(2100−2300)as the charmed cousins of the light scalar nonet,

    E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, “ObservedDs(2317)and tentative D(2100−2300)as the charmed cousins of the light scalar nonet,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 012003 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305035, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.012003

    2003 doi arXiv

  21. [30]

    D∗ s0(2317)Meson and D-Meson-Kaon Scattering from Lattice QCD,

    D. Mohler, C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, S. Prelovsek and R. M. Woloshyn, “D∗ s0(2317)Meson and D-Meson-Kaon Scattering from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, no.22, 222001 (2013), arXiv:1308.3175 [hep-lat], doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.222001

    2013 doi arXiv

  22. [31]

    Ds mesons withDK and D∗K scattering near threshold,

    C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek and R. M. Woloshyn, “Ds mesons withDK and D∗K scattering near threshold,” Phys. Rev. D90, no.3, 034510 (2014), arXiv:1403.8103 [hep-lat], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.034510

    2014 doi arXiv

  23. [32]

    Masses of heavy tetraquarks in the relativistic quark model,

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, “Masses of heavy tetraquarks in the relativistic quark model,” Eur. Phys. J. C67, 513–524 (2010), arXiv:0910.5612 [hep-ph], doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010- 1297-8

    2010 doi arXiv

  24. [33]

    QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations,” Nucl. Phys. B147, 385–447 (1979), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90022-1

    1979 doi

  25. [34]

    QCD and resonance physics. Applications,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and resonance physics. Applications,” Nucl. Phys. B147, 448–518 (1979), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90023-3. 38

    1979 doi

  26. [35]

    Analysis of theTc¯s(2900)and related tetraquark states with the QCD sum rules,

    X.-S. Yang, Q. Xin and Z.-G. Wang, “Analysis of theTc¯s(2900)and related tetraquark states with the QCD sum rules,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A38, 2350056 (2023), arXiv:2302.01718 [hep-ph], doi:10.1142/S0217751X23500562

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    Spectrum of the molecular tetraquarks: Unraveling the Tcs0(2900)and Ta c¯s0(2900),

    B. Wang, K. Chen, L. Meng and S.-L. Zhu, “Spectrum of the molecular tetraquarks: Unraveling the Tcs0(2900)and Ta c¯s0(2900),” Phys. Rev. D109, 034027 (2024), arXiv:2309.02191 [hep-ph], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.034027

    2024 doi

  28. [37]

    Chiral SU(3) quark model study of tetraquark states: cn¯n¯s/cs¯s¯s,

    H.-X. Zhang, W.-L. Wang and Z.-Y. Zhang, “Chiral SU(3) quark model study of tetraquark states: cn¯n¯s/cs¯s¯s,” Commun. Theor. Phys.49, 414–420 (2008), arXiv:hep-ph/0607207, doi:10.1088/0253- 6102/49/2/35

    2008 doi arXiv

  29. [38]

    Spectroscopy of all charm tetraquark states,

    R. Tiwari, D. P. Rathaud and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopy of all charm tetraquark states,” Indian J. Phys.97, 943–954 (2023), doi:10.1007/s12648-022-02427-8

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    Mass spectra and decay properties of hidden charm-hidden strange tetraquarkstates,

    R. Tiwari and A. K. Rai, “Mass spectra and decay properties of hidden charm-hidden strange tetraquarkstates,” FewBodySyst.64, no.2, 20(2023), arXiv:2206.04478[hep-ph], doi:10.1007/s00601- 023-01805-0

    2023 doi

  31. [40]

    Mass spectra and decay properties of all-light tetraquark states,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Mass spectra and decay properties of all-light tetraquark states,” Few Body Syst.65, no.4, 99 (2024), arXiv:2410.14246 [hep-ph], doi:10.1007/s00601-024-01968-4

    2024 doi

  32. [41]

    Spectroscopy and decay properties of light-strange tetraquark states,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopy and decay properties of light-strange tetraquark states,” Indian J. Phys.99, 3055–3081 (2025), arXiv:2412.05874 [hep-ph], doi:10.1007/s12648-024-03524-6

    2025 doi

  33. [43]

    Spectroscopy and decay properties of open-charm tetraquarks in the diquark–antidiquark picture,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopy and decay properties of open-charm tetraquarks in the diquark–antidiquark picture,” 2024

    2024

  34. [44]

    Bound states of quarks,

    W. Lucha, F. F. Schoberl and D. Gromes, “Bound states of quarks,” Phys. Rept.200, 127–240 (1991), doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90001-3

    1991 doi

  35. [45]

    Spin-dependent potentials from lattice QCD,

    Y. Koma and M. Koma, “Spin-dependent potentials from lattice QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B769, 79–107 (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0609078, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.01.033

    2007 doi arXiv

  36. [46]

    Nonperturbative determination of the QCD potential atO(1/m),

    Y. Koma, M. Koma and H. Wittig, “Nonperturbative determination of the QCD potential atO(1/m),” PoSLATTICE2012, 140 (2012), arXiv:1211.6795 [hep-lat], doi:10.22323/1.164.0140

    2012 doi arXiv

  37. [47]

    Interpreting charm-strange mesons with a screened potential model,

    V. Patel, K. Gandhi and A. K. Rai, “Interpreting charm-strange mesons with a screened potential model,” Few Body Syst.62, 68 (2021), doi:10.1007/s00601-021-01651-y

    2021 doi

  38. [48]

    Mass spectra and strong decays of charmed and charmed-strange mesons,

    R.-H. Ni, Q. Li and X.-H. Zhong, “Mass spectra and strong decays of charmed and charmed-strange mesons,” Phys. Rev. D105, 056006 (2022), arXiv:2110.05024 [hep-ph], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.056006

    2022 doi

  39. [49]

    Properties of excited charm and charm-strange mesons,

    S. Godfrey and K. Moats, “Properties of excited charm and charm-strange mesons,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 034035 (2016), arXiv:1510.08305 [hep-ph], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.034035

    2016 doi arXiv

  40. [50]

    Relativistic flux-tube model predictions from charmed mesons to double- charmed baryons,

    P. Jakhad and A. K. Rai, “Relativistic flux-tube model predictions from charmed mesons to double- charmed baryons,” Phys. Rev. D113, 054046 (2026), arXiv:2509.24772 [hep-ph], doi:10.1103/bkwy- 5hr9. 39

    2026 doi

  41. [51]

    Multiquark resonances,

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni and A. D. Polosa, “Multiquark resonances,” Phys. Rept.668, 1–97 (2017), arXiv:1611.07920 [hep-ph], doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002

    2017 doi arXiv

  42. [52]

    A non-relativistic model for the[cc][¯c¯c]tetraquark,

    V. R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra, “A non-relativistic model for the[cc][¯c¯c]tetraquark,” Chin. Phys. C43, 013105 (2019), arXiv:1706.07553 [hep-ph], doi:10.1088/1674-1137/43/1/013105

    2019 doi arXiv

  43. [53]

    Spectroscopy of the all-charm tetraquark,

    V. R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra, “Spectroscopy of the all-charm tetraquark,” 2016

    2016

  44. [54]

    Diquark deuteron, tetrons and heavy baryons,

    S. Fredriksson, M. Jandel and T. I. Larsson, “Diquark deuteron, tetrons and heavy baryons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1135 (1981), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.1135

    1981 doi

  45. [55]

    J. K. Chen, J. Q. Xie, X. Feng and H. Song, Eur. Phys. J. C (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023- 12329-6

    2023 doi

  46. [56]

    J. K. Chen, X. Feng and J. Q. Xie, JHEP10, 052 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)052

    2023 doi

  47. [57]

    Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of charm tetraquark systems,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of charm tetraquark systems,” 2024

    2024

  48. [58]

    Singly heavy tetraquark resonant states with multiple strange quarks,

    X.-H. Zheng, Y. Ma and S.-L. Zhu, “Singly heavy tetraquark resonant states with multiple strange quarks,” arXiv:2510.01505 [hep-ph]

  49. [59]

    Lodha and A

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, Eur. Phys. J. Plus139, 663 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05461-z

    2024 doi

  50. [60]

    Regge, Nuovo Cim.14, 951-976 (1959) doi:10.1007/BF02728177

    T. Regge, Nuovo Cim.14, 951-976 (1959) doi:10.1007/BF02728177

    1959 doi

  51. [61]

    G. F. Chew and S. C. Frautschi, Phys. Rev. Lett.8, 41-44 (1962) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.8.41

    1962 doi

  52. [62]

    P. D. B. Collins, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977)

    1977

  53. [63]

    Tang and J

    A. Tang and J. W. Norbury, Phys. Rev. D62, 016006 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.016006 [arXiv:hep-ph/0004078 [hep-ph]]

    2000 doi arXiv

  54. [64]

    Selem and F

    A. Selem and F. Wilczek, [arXiv:hep-ph/0602128 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  55. [65]

    Oudichhya, K

    J. Oudichhya, K. Gandhi and A. K. Rai, Phys. Rev. D108, no.1, 014034 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.014034

    2023 doi

  56. [66]

    Oudichhya and A

    J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, no.28, 2443004 (2024) doi:10.1142/S0217751X24430048

    2024 doi

  57. [67]

    Oudichhya and A

    J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 123 (2023) doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01024-5

    2023 doi

  58. [68]

    Oudichhya and A

    J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, Eur. Phys. J. A60, 125 (2024) doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01344-0

    2024 doi

  59. [69]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.2, 141 (2018) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 018-5640-4 [arXiv:1801.03925 [hep-ph]]

    2018 doi arXiv

  60. [70]

    H. X. Chen, Chin. Phys. C44, no.11, 114003 (2020) doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abae4b [arXiv:1910.03269 [hep-ph]]

    2020 doi

  61. [71]

    Probing scalar mesons in semileptonic decays ofDs and Bs,

    F. De Fazio and M. R. Pennington, “Probing scalar mesons in semileptonic decays ofDs and Bs,” Phys. Lett. B521, 15–21 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0104289, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01172-5

    2001 doi arXiv

  62. [72]

    SemileptonicDs decays in a constituent quark model,

    C. Aydin and A. H. Yilmaz, “SemileptonicDs decays in a constituent quark model,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20, 771–784 (2005)

    2005

  63. [73]

    Semileptonic decays of charmed-strange mesons,

    S. Kazemi and N. Ghahramany, “Semileptonic decays of charmed-strange mesons,” 2017. 40

    2017

  64. [74]

    Branching ratios forDs semileptonic decays toηandη′,

    F. De Fazio and M. R. Pennington, “Branching ratios forDs semileptonic decays toηandη′,” JHEP 07, 051 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0006007, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/07/051

    2000 doi arXiv

  65. [75]

    Semileptonic decays ofD andDs mesons in the relativistic quark model,

    S.-Y. Yu, X.-W. Kang and V. O. Galkin, “Semileptonic decays ofD andDs mesons in the relativistic quark model,” Front. Phys.18, 64301 (2023)

    2023

  66. [76]

    Direct CP violation in charm decays,

    I. Bediaga and J. H. Miranda, “Direct CP violation in charm decays,” Phys. Rev. D70, 094025 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0406339, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.094025

    2004 doi arXiv

  67. [77]

    Exploring charm bound states: Mass spectra and decay behavior of mesons and tetraquarks,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Exploring charm bound states: Mass spectra and decay behavior of mesons and tetraquarks,” arXiv:2505.22393 [hep-ph]

  68. [78]

    Excited state mass spectra of singly charmed mesons,

    Z. Shah, K. Thakkar and A. K. Rai, “Excited state mass spectra of singly charmed mesons,” 2014

    2014

  69. [79]

    Precision measurements of D+ s →ηe+νe and D+ s →η′e+νe,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Precision measurements of D+ s →ηe+νe and D+ s →η′e+νe,” Phys. Rev. D108, 092003 (2023), arXiv:2306.05194 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.092003

    2023 doi

  70. [80]

    Measurements of the branching fractions of semileptonic D+ s decays viae+e−→D∗+ s D∗− s ,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Measurements of the branching fractions of semileptonic D+ s decays viae+e−→D∗+ s D∗− s ,” Phys. Rev. D110, 072017 (2024), arXiv:2406.01332 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.072017

    2024 doi

  71. [81]

    ObservationofD+ s →η′µ+νµ, precisiontest oflepton flavor universality withD+ s →η(′)ℓ+νℓ, and first measurements ofD+ s →η(′)µ+νµdecay dynamics,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIIICollaboration], “ObservationofD+ s →η′µ+νµ, precisiontest oflepton flavor universality withD+ s →η(′)ℓ+νℓ, and first measurements ofD+ s →η(′)µ+νµdecay dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 091802 (2024), arXiv:2307.12852 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.091802

    2024 doi

  72. [82]

    Absolute branching fraction measurements for ex- clusive Ds semileptonic decays,

    J. Yeltonet al.[CLEO Collaboration], “Absolute branching fraction measurements for ex- clusive Ds semileptonic decays,” Phys. Rev. D80, 052007 (2009), arXiv:0903.0601 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.052007

    2009 doi arXiv

  73. [83]

    ExclusiveDs semileptonic branch- ing fraction measurements,

    J. Hietala, D. Cronin-Hennessy, T. Pedlar and I. Shipsey, “ExclusiveDs semileptonic branch- ing fraction measurements,” Phys. Rev. D92, no.1, 012009 (2015), arXiv:1505.04205 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.012009

    2015 doi arXiv

  74. [84]

    Studies of the decayD+ s →K+K−µ+νµ,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Studies of the decayD+ s →K+K−µ+νµ,” JHEP12, 072 (2023), arXiv:2307.03024 [hep-ex], doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)072

    2023 doi

  75. [85]

    Improved measurement of the semileptonic decay D+ s →K0e+νe,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Improved measurement of the semileptonic decay D+ s →K0e+νe,” Phys. Rev. D110, 052012 (2024), arXiv:2406.19190 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.052012

    2024 doi

  76. [86]

    Study of the decayD+ s →K+K−e+νe,

    B. Aubertet al.[BABAR Collaboration], “Study of the decayD+ s →K+K−e+νe,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 051101 (2008), arXiv:0807.1599 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.051101

    2008 doi arXiv

  77. [87]

    Study of the semileptonic decayD+ s →f0(980)e+νe and implications forBs→J/ψf0,

    K. M. Ecklundet al.[CLEO Collaboration], “Study of the semileptonic decayD+ s →f0(980)e+νe and implications forBs→J/ψf0,” Phys. Rev. D80, 052009 (2009), arXiv:0907.3201 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.052009

    2009 doi arXiv

  78. [88]

    Measurement of absolute branching fractions ofD+ s hadronic decays,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Measurement of absolute branching fractions ofD+ s hadronic decays,” JHEP05, 335 (2024), arXiv:2403.19256 [hep-ex], doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)335

    2024 doi

  79. [89]

    Improved measurement of absolute hadronic branch- ing fractions of the D+ s meson,

    P. U. E. Onyisiet al.[CLEO Collaboration], “Improved measurement of absolute hadronic branch- ing fractions of the D+ s meson,” Phys. Rev. D88, 032009 (2013), arXiv:1306.5363 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.032009. 41

    2013 doi arXiv

  80. [90]

    Measurements of branching fractions of leptonic and hadronic D+ s meson decays and extraction of theD+ s meson decay constant,

    A. Zupancet al.[Belle Collaboration], “Measurements of branching fractions of leptonic and hadronic D+ s meson decays and extraction of theD+ s meson decay constant,” JHEP09, 139 (2013), arXiv:1307.6240 [hep-ex], doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)139

    2013 doi arXiv

  81. [91]

    Measurements of D meson decays to two pseudoscalar mesons,

    H. Mendezet al.[CLEO Collaboration], “Measurements of D meson decays to two pseudoscalar mesons,” Phys. Rev. D81, 052013 (2010), arXiv:0906.3198 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.052013

    2010 doi arXiv

  82. [92]

    Measurement of the branching ratios for the decays of D+ s to ηπ+, η′π+, ηρ+, and η′ρ+,

    C. P. Jessopet al.[CLEO Collaboration], “Measurement of the branching ratios for the decays of D+ s to ηπ+, η′π+, ηρ+, and η′ρ+,” Phys. Rev. D58, 052002 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9801010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.052002

    1998 doi arXiv

  83. [93]

    Measurement of the branching fractions of D+ s →η′X and D+ s →η′ρ+ in e+e−→D+ sD− s ,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Measurement of the branching fractions of D+ s →η′X and D+ s →η′ρ+ in e+e−→D+ sD− s ,” Phys. Lett. B750, 466–474 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.059

    2015 doi

  84. [94]

    Measurement of the B0 →D∗−D∗+ s and D+ s →ϕπ+ branching fractions,

    B. Aubertet al.[BABAR Collaboration], “Measurement of the B0 →D∗−D∗+ s and D+ s →ϕπ+ branching fractions,” Phys. Rev. D71, 091104 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0502041, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.091104

    2005 doi arXiv

  85. [95]

    Dalitz plot analysis ofD+ s →K+K−π+,

    R. E. Mitchellet al.[CLEO Collaboration], “Dalitz plot analysis ofD+ s →K+K−π+,” Phys. Rev. D79, 072008 (2009), arXiv:0903.1301 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.072008

    2009 doi arXiv

  86. [96]

    Dalitz plot analysis ofD+ s →K+K−π+,

    P. del Amo Sanchezet al.[BABAR Collaboration], “Dalitz plot analysis ofD+ s →K+K−π+,” Phys. Rev. D83, 052001 (2011), arXiv:1011.4190 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.052001

    2011 doi arXiv

  87. [97]

    Amplitude analysis and branching fraction measure- ment of D+ s →K−K+π+π0,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Amplitude analysis and branching fraction measure- ment of D+ s →K−K+π+π0,” Phys. Rev. D104, 032011 (2021), arXiv:2103.02482 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.032011

    2021 doi

  88. [98]

    Amplitude analysis and branching fraction mea- surement of the decay D+ s →K+π+π−,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Amplitude analysis and branching fraction mea- surement of the decay D+ s →K+π+π−,” JHEP08, 196 (2022), arXiv:2205.08844 [hep-ex], doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)196

    2022 doi

  89. [99]

    Amplitude analysis and branching fraction mea- surement of the decayD+ s →K+π+π−π0,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Amplitude analysis and branching fraction mea- surement of the decayD+ s →K+π+π−π0,” JHEP09, 242 (2022), arXiv:2205.13759 [hep-ex], doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)242

    2022 doi

  90. [100]

    Measurement of branching fractions andCP asymmetries for D+ s →K+(η,π0)and D+ s →π+(η,π0)decays at Belle,

    Y. Guanet al.[Belle Collaboration], “Measurement of branching fractions andCP asymmetries for D+ s →K+(η,π0)and D+ s →π+(η,π0)decays at Belle,” Phys. Rev. D103, 112005 (2021), arXiv:2103.09969 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.112005

    2021 doi

  91. [101]

    Measurement of branching fraction of D∗+ s → D+ sπ0 relative to D∗+ s →D+ sγ,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “Measurement of branching fraction of D∗+ s → D+ sπ0 relative to D∗+ s →D+ sγ,” Phys. Rev. D107, 032011 (2023), arXiv:2212.13361 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.032011

    2023 doi

  92. [102]

    Measurement of the branching ratiosΓ( D∗+ s → D+ sπ0)/Γ(D∗+ s →D+ sγ)andΓ( D∗0→D0π0)/Γ(D∗0→D0γ),

    B. Aubertet al.[BABAR Collaboration], “Measurement of the branching ratiosΓ( D∗+ s → D+ sπ0)/Γ(D∗+ s →D+ sγ)andΓ( D∗0→D0π0)/Γ(D∗0→D0γ),” Phys. Rev. D72, 091101 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0508039, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.091101

    2005 doi arXiv

  93. [103]

    Observation of the Dalitz decayD∗+ s →D+ se+e−,

    D. Cronin-Hennessyet al.[CLEO Collaboration], “Observation of the Dalitz decayD∗+ s →D+ se+e−,” Phys. Rev. D86, 072005 (2012), arXiv:1104.3265 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.072005. 42

    2012 doi arXiv

  94. [104]

    First experimental study of the purely lep- tonic decay D∗+ s →e+νe,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], “First experimental study of the purely lep- tonic decay D∗+ s →e+νe,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 141802 (2023), arXiv:2304.12159 [hep-ex], doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.141802

    2023 doi

  95. [105]

    Measurements of the branching ratiosΓ( D∗+ s → D+ sπ0)/Γ(D∗+ s →D+ sγ)andΓ( D∗0→D0π0)/Γ(D∗0→D0γ),

    J. Gronberget al.[CLEO Collaboration], “Measurements of the branching ratiosΓ( D∗+ s → D+ sπ0)/Γ(D∗+ s →D+ sγ)andΓ( D∗0→D0π0)/Γ(D∗0→D0γ),” Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3232–3235 (1995), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3232

    1995 doi

  96. [106]

    Observation ofe+e−→D± sD∗∓ s at√s = 4.14GeV,

    G. T. Blaylocket al.[Mark III Collaboration], “Observation ofe+e−→D± sD∗∓ s at√s = 4.14GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 2171–2174 (1987), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2171. 43

    1987 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 20, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.