pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.02005 · v1 · pith:2M7V2JORnew · submitted 2025-11-03 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Renormalisation

Leonardo Di Giustino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords renormalisationQCDrenormalisation groupgauge theoriesscale settingoptimisationperturbative calculations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Renormalisation in QCD benefits from optimisation procedures that address the scale setting problem.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts with a pedagogical explanation of renormalisation to remove divergences in quantum field theory calculations. It then introduces the renormalisation group and its equations that govern scale dependence. Focusing on gauge theories such as QCD, it summarises current methods and specifically illustrates ways to optimise the choice of the renormalisation scale. A reader would care because this choice directly impacts the accuracy and reliability of theoretical predictions for high-energy physics experiments.

Core claim

Renormalisation allows finite results in gauge theory calculations by absorbing infinities into parameters, and in QCD the scale setting problem can be tackled with optimisation procedures that lead to reduced theoretical uncertainties in perturbative expansions.

What carries the argument

Optimisation procedures for the renormalisation scale setting problem in QCD

Load-bearing premise

Readers possess prior knowledge of quantum field theory and gauge theories to follow the advanced discussion without basic re-derivations.

What would settle it

If applying the illustrated optimisation procedures to a well-measured QCD process results in predictions that deviate more from data than conventional scale choices, the value of these procedures would be questioned.

read the original abstract

We give an introduction to renormalisation, focusing first on a pedagogical description of fundamental concepts of the procedure and its features, then we introduce the renormalisation group and its equations. We discuss then the case of gauge theories such as QCD summarising the current state of the art. We introduce the renormalisation scale setting problem in QCD and we give an illustration of the possible optimisation procedures currently in use.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a pedagogical introduction to renormalisation in quantum field theory. It begins with fundamental concepts and features of the renormalisation procedure, then introduces the renormalisation group and its equations. The discussion turns to gauge theories such as QCD, summarising the current state of the art, before introducing the renormalisation scale setting problem in QCD and illustrating possible optimisation procedures currently in use.

Significance. If the summaries and illustrations are accurate and clearly presented, the review could serve as a helpful entry point for graduate students and researchers working on QCD phenomenology. Its emphasis on practical scale-setting optimisation methods addresses a recurring issue in precision calculations, and the pedagogical framing is a positive feature for the target audience.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the phrase 'possible optimisation procedures currently in use' is vague; naming the specific methods illustrated (e.g., BLM, PMS, or others) would improve reader orientation without lengthening the abstract.
  2. Introduction: adding a brief paragraph outline of the subsequent sections would help readers navigate the pedagogical structure described in the abstract.
  3. QCD section: the summary of the 'current state of the art' should cite the most recent higher-order results or scheme comparisons to ensure the review remains up to date.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The review is intended as a pedagogical introduction to renormalisation, the renormalisation group, and practical scale-setting methods in QCD. We will incorporate any minor improvements suggested in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pedagogical review of established results

full rationale

The paper is explicitly positioned as an introduction and summary of existing concepts, RG equations, and scale-setting methods in QCD. It draws on standard, externally established literature without introducing new derivations, predictions, or parameter fits that could reduce to the paper's own inputs. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns; all content is self-contained against prior benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper drawing on established quantum field theory; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors themselves.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard quantum field theory and gauge invariance framework
    The discussion of QCD and renormalisation assumes the conventional QFT setup without re-deriving it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1105 out tokens · 51583 ms · 2026-05-21T20:19:44.997786+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 140 canonical work pages · 52 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Paul A. M. Dirac, The Lagrangian in quantum mechanics, Ph ys. Z. Sowjetunion 3 (1933) 64–72

    work page 1933

  2. [2]

    R. P . Feynman, Space-time approach to nonrelativistic q uantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20 (1948) 367–387, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys. 20.367

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 1948

  3. [3]

    Schwinger, The Theory of quantized fields

    Julian S. Schwinger, The Theory of quantized fields. 1., P hys. Rev. 82 (1951) 914–927, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.82.914

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.82.914 1951

  4. [4]

    Jean Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory and critical phen omena, Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys. 113 (2002) 1–1054

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Itzykson, J

    C. Itzykson, J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, Internat ional Series In Pure and Applied Physics, McGraw-Hill, New Y ork 1980, ISBN 978-0-486-44568-7

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    Peskin, Daniel V

    Michael E. Peskin, Daniel V . Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley , Reading, USA 1995, ISBN 978-0-201- 50397-5, 978-0-429-50355-9, 978-0-429-49417-8, doi: 10.1201/9780429503559

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995

  7. [7]

    Steven Weinberg, High-energy behavior in quantum field t heory, Phys. Rev. 118 (1960) 838–849, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.118.838

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.118.838 1960

  8. [8]

    Collins, Renormalization : An Introduction to Re normalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator -Product Expansion, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, vol

    John C. Collins, Renormalization : An Introduction to Re normalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator -Product Expansion, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, vol. 26, Cam bridge University Press, Cambridge 1984, ISBN 978-0-521-3 1177-9, 978-0-511-86739-2, 978-1-009-40180-7, 978-1-009-40176 -0, 978-1-009-40179-1, doi:10.1017/9781009401807

    work page doi:10.1017/9781009401807 1984

  9. [9]

    T a-Pei [0000-0002-1137-0969] Cheng, Ling-Fong [0000- 0002-8035-3329] Li, Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Ph ysics, Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, UK 1984, ISBN 978-0-19-851961-4, 97 8-0-19-851961-4

    work page 1984

  10. [10]

    Pauli, F

    W. Pauli, F . Villars, On the Invariant regularization i n relativistic quantum theory , Rev. Mod. Phys. 21 (1949) 434 –444, doi: 10.1103/ RevModPhys.21.434

    work page 1949

  11. [11]

    Wilson, Confinement of Quarks, Phys

    Kenneth G. Wilson, Confinement of Quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 2445–2459, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2445 1974

  12. [12]

    K. G. Wilson, Quarks: From Paradox to Myth, Subnucl. Ser . 13 (1977) 13–32

    work page 1977

  13. [13]

    Gerard ’t Hooft, M. J. G. Veltman, Regularization and Re normalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 44 (1972) 189–2 13, doi: 10.1016/ 0550-3213(72)90279-9

    work page 1972

  14. [14]

    J. F . Ashmore, A Method of Gauge Invariant Regularizati on, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4 (1972) 289–290, doi: 10.1007/BF02824407

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02824407 1972

  15. [15]

    G. M. Cicuta, E. Montaldi, Analytic renormalization vi a continuous space dimension, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4 (1972) 329– 332, doi: 10.1007/ BF02756527

    work page 1972

  16. [16]

    C. G. Bollini, J. J. Giambiagi, Dimensional Renormaliz ation: The Number of Dimensions as a Regularizing Parameter , Nuovo Cim. B 12 (1972) 20–26, doi: 10.1007/BF02895558

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02895558 1972

  17. [19]

    Callan, Jr., Broken scale invariance in scala r field theory, Phys

    Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Broken scale invariance in scala r field theory, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1541–1547, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1541

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.2.1541 1970

  18. [20]

    Symanzik, Small distance behavior analysis and Wils on expansion, Commun

    K. Symanzik, Small distance behavior analysis and Wils on expansion, Commun. Math. Phys. 23 (1971) 49–86, doi: 10.1007/BF01877596. Renormalisation 25

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01877596 1971

  19. [21]

    N. N. Bogoliubov, O. S. Parasiuk, On the Multiplication of the causal function in the quantum theory of fields, Acta Ma th. 97 (1957) 227–266, doi: 10.1007/BF02392399

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02392399 1957

  20. [22]

    Klaus Hepp, Proof of the Bogolyubov-Parasiuk theorem o n renormalization, Commun. Math. Phys. 2 (1966) 301–326, do i:10.1007/ BF01773358

    work page 1966

  21. [23]

    Deser, Marc T

    Stanley D. Deser, Marc T . Grisaru, Hugh Pendleton (Eds. ), Proceedings, 13th Brandeis University Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, Lectures On Elementary Particles and Quantum Field Theory: Waltham, MA, USA, June 15 - July 24 1970, MIT , Cambridge, MA, U SA 1970

    work page 1970

  22. [24]

    Coleman, David J

    Sidney R. Coleman, David J. Gross, Price of asymptotic f reedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 851–854, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.851

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.31.851 1973

  23. [25]

    Emmy Noether, Invariant Variation Problems, Gott. Nac hr. 1918 (1918) 235–257, doi: 10.1080/00411457108231446, physics/0503066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1080/00411457108231446 1918

  24. [26]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet, R. Stora, Renormalization of the Ab elian Higgs-Kibble Model, Commun. Math. Phys. 42 (1975) 127 –162, doi: 10.1007/BF01614158

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01614158 1975

  25. [27]

    John Clive Ward, An Identity in Quantum Electrodynamic s, Phys. Rev. 78 (1950) 182, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.78.182

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.78.182 1950

  26. [28]

    T akahashi, On the generalized Ward identity, Nuovo C im

    Y . T akahashi, On the generalized Ward identity, Nuovo C im. 6 (1957) 371, doi: 10.1007/BF02832514

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02832514 1957

  27. [29]

    Renormalization of the Vector Current in QED

    John C. Collins, Aneesh V . Manohar, Mark B. Wise, Renorm alization of the vector current in QED, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 105019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.105019, hep-th/0512187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.105019 2006

  28. [30]

    2011 , PAGES =

    Aneesh V . Manohar, Introduction to Effective Field The ories (2018), doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198855743.003.0002, 1804.05863

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198855743.003.0002 2018

  29. [31]

    Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electro dynamics, Phys

    Stephen L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electro dynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426–2438, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.177.2426

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.177.2426 1969

  30. [32]

    J. S. Bell, R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0 →γγin the σmodel, Nuovo Cim. A 60 (1969) 47–61, doi: 10.1007/BF02823296

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02823296 1969

  31. [33]

    Gross, R

    David J. Gross, R. Jackiw, Effect of anomalies on quasir enormalizable theories, Phys. Rev. D 6 (1972) 477–493, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.6. 477

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.6 1972

  32. [34]

    Glashow, Gauge theories with out anomalies, Phys

    Howard Georgi, Sheldon L. Glashow, Gauge theories with out anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 6 (1972) 429, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.6.429

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.6.429 1972

  33. [35]

    Keith Ellis, W

    R. Keith Ellis, W. James Stirling, QCD and collider phys ics, in: 1989 CERN-JINR School of Physics 1990

    work page 1989

  34. [36]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, Four-loop renormalization of QCD: Ful l set of renormalization constants and anomalous dimension s, Nucl. Phys. B 710 (2005) 499–510, doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.011, hep-ph/0405193

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.011 2005

  35. [37]

    Gerard ’t Hooft, Dimensional regularization and the re normalization group, Nucl. Phys. B 61 (1973) 455–468, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(73) 90376-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73 1973

  36. [38]

    Steven Weinberg, New approach to the renormalization g roup, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 3497–3509, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.3497

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.8.3497 1973

  37. [39]

    Bardeen, A

    William A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, D. W. Duke, T . Muta, Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond the Leading Order in Asymptoti cally Free Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 3998, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3998

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.3998 1978

  38. [40]

    A. A. Slavnov, Ward Identities in Gauge Theories, Theor . Math. Phys. 10 (1972) 99–107, doi: 10.1007/BF01090719

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01090719 1972

  39. [41]

    J. C. T aylor, Ward Identities and Charge Renormalizati on of the Y ang-Mills Field, Nucl. Phys. B 33 (1971) 436–444, d oi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(71)90297-5

    work page 1971

  40. [42]

    Gross, Frank Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys

    David J. Gross, Frank Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1343– 1346, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.30.1343

    work page 1973

  41. [44]

    Caswell, Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to T wo Loop Order, Phys

    William E. Caswell, Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to T wo Loop Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 2 44, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.33.244

    work page 1974

  42. [45]

    D. R. T . Jones, T wo Loop Diagrams in Y ang-Mills Theory, N ucl. Phys. B 75 (1974) 531, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(74)90093-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90093-5 1974

  43. [46]

    Egorian, O

    E. Egorian, O. V . T arasov, T wo Loop Renormalization of the QCD in an Arbitrary Gauge, T eor. Mat. Fiz. 41 (1979) 26–32

    work page 1979

  44. [48]

    S. A. Larin, J. A. M. Vermaseren, The Three loop QCD Beta f unction and anomalous dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 303 (1993) 3 34–336, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91441-O , hep-ph/9302208

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91441-o 1993

  45. [49]

    The four-loop beta-function in Quantum Chromodynamics

    T . van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren, S. A. Larin, The Fo ur loop beta function in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett . B 400 (1997) 379–384, doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00370-5 , hep-ph/9701390

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00370-5 1997

  46. [50]

    P . A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. K ¨ uhn, Five-Loop Run ning of the QCD Coupling Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (8) (2 017) 082002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.082002, 1606.08659

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.082002

  47. [51]

    Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys

    S. Navas, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of partic le physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  48. [52]

    Oleg Antipin, Francesco Sannino, Conformal Window 2.0 : The large N f safe story, Phys. Rev. D 97 (11) (2018) 116007, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.116007, 1709.02354

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [53]

    Brodsky , Guy F

    Alexandre Deur, Stanley J. Brodsky , Guy F . de T eramond, The QCD Running Coupling, Nucl. Phys. 90 (2016) 1, doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2016. 04.003, 1604.08082

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016 2016

  50. [54]

    P . A. Zyla, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Parti cle Physics, PTEP 2020 (8) (2020) 083C01, doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptaa104

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa104 2020

  51. [55]

    Zaks, On the Phase Structure of Vector-Lik e Gauge Theories with Massless Fermions, Nucl

    T om Banks, A. Zaks, On the Phase Structure of Vector-Lik e Gauge Theories with Massless Fermions, Nucl. Phys. B 196 (1 982) 189–204, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90035-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90035-9

  52. [56]

    Einan Gardi, Georges Grunberg, Marek Karliner, Can the QCD running coupling have a causal analyticity structure?, JHEP 07 (1998) 007, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/07/007, hep-ph/9806462

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/07/007 1998

  53. [57]

    Leonardo Di Giustino, Francesco Sannino, Sheng-Quan W ang, Xing-Gang Wu, Thrust distribution for 3-jet productio n from e+e −annihi- lation within the QCD conformal window and in QED, Phys. Lett . B 823 (2021) 136728, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136728, 2104.12132

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136728 2021

  54. [58]

    Scheme-Independent Calculations of Physical Quantities in an ${\cal N}=1$ Supersymmetric Gauge Theory

    Thomas A. Ryttov, Robert Shrock, Scheme-independent c alculations of physical quantities in an N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 96 (10) (2017) 105018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.105018, 1706.06422

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.105018 2017

  55. [59]

    J. L. Basdevant, The Pade approximation and its physica l applications, Fortsch. Phys. 20 (1972) 283–331, doi: 10.1002/prop.19720200502

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.19720200502 1972

  56. [60]

    Samuel, G

    Mark A. Samuel, G. Li, Eric Steinfelds, Estimating pert urbative coefficients in quantum field theory using Pade appr oximants. 2., Phys. Lett. B 323 (1994) 188, doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90290-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90290-9 1994

  57. [61]

    Comparison of the Pade Approximation Method to Perturbative QCD Calculations

    Mark A. Samuel, John R. Ellis, Marek Karliner, Comparis on of the Pade approximation method to perturbative QCD calc ulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 4380–4383, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4380, hep-ph/9503411

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4380 1995

  58. [62]

    B. A. Kniehl, A. V . Kotikov, A. I. Onishchenko, O. L. Vere tin, Strong-coupling constant with flavor thresholds at five loops in the anti-MS scheme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 042001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.042001, hep-ph/0607202

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.042001 2006

  59. [63]

    P . A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. K ¨ uhn, Five-loop fer mion anomalous dimension for a general gauge group from four -loop massless propagators, JHEP 04 (2017) 119, doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2017)119, 1702.01458

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2017)119 2017

  60. [64]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, G. Falcioni, F . Herzog, J. A. M. Vermase ren, Five-loop renormalisation of QCD in covariant gauges, JHEP 10 (2017) 179, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)179, [Addendum: JHEP 12, 006 (2017)], 1709.08541. 26 Renormalisation

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)179 2017

  61. [65]

    Thomas Luthe, Andreas Maier, Peter Marquard, Y ork Schr oder, Complete renormalization of QCD at five loops, JHEP 03 ( 2017) 020, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)020, 1701.07068

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2017)020 2017

  62. [66]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, S. A. Larin, T . van Ritbergen, The 4- loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass, Phys. Lett. B 405 (1997) 327–333, doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00660-6 , hep-ph/9703284

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00660-6 1997

  63. [67]

    Is there a Landau Pole Problem in QED?

    M. Gockeler, R. Horsley , V . Linke, Paul E. L. Rakow, G. Sc hierholz, H. Stuben, Is there a Landau pole problem in QED?, P hys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4119–4122, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4119, hep-th/9712244

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.4119 1998

  64. [68]

    S. A. Larin, T . van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren, The La rge quark mass expansion of Gamma (Z0 — > hadrons) and Gamma (tau- — > tau-neutrino + hadrons) in the order alpha-s**3, Nucl. Phys . B 438 (1995) 278–306, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(94)00574-X , hep-ph/9411260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00574-x 1995

  65. [69]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, Bernd A. Kniehl, M. Steinhauser, Stron g Coupling Constant with Flavor Thresholds at Four Loops in t he Modified Minimal- Subtraction Scheme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 2184–2187, d oi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2184, hep-ph/9706430

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.2184 1997

  66. [70]

    Light-Front Holographic QCD and Emerging Confinement

    Stanley J. Brodsky , Guy F . de T eramond, Hans Gunter Dosc h, Joshua Erlich, Light-Front Holographic QCD and Emerging Confinement, Phys. Rept. 584 (2015) 1–105, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.05.001, 1407.8131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.05.001 2015

  67. [71]

    Quantum Chromodyna mics

    G. ’t Hooft, Can We Make Sense Out of “Quantum Chromodyna mics”?, Springer US, Boston, MA, ISBN 978-1-4684-0991-8 19 79 pp. 943–982, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0991-8 17, URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0991-8_17

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0991-8

  68. [72]

    A. L. Kataev, V . S. Molokoedov, Fourth-order QCD renorm alization group quantities in the V scheme and the relation o f the βfunction to the Gell-Mann–Low function in QED, Phys. Rev. D 92 (5) (2015) 054008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.054008, 1507.03547

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.054008 2015

  69. [73]

    Gonsalves, The Renormal ization Prescription Dependence of the QCD Coupling Consta nt, Phys

    William Celmaster, Richard J. Gonsalves, The Renormal ization Prescription Dependence of the QCD Coupling Consta nt, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 1420, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.20.1420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.1420 1979

  70. [74]

    Gonsalves, QCD Perturba tion Expansions in a Coupling Constant Renormalized by Mome ntum Space Subtraction, Phys

    William Celmaster, Richard J. Gonsalves, QCD Perturba tion Expansions in a Coupling Constant Renormalized by Mome ntum Space Subtraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 1435, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1435

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.42.1435 1979

  71. [75]

    Artefacts and <A2> power corrections : revisiting the MOM Z_psi and Z_V

    Philippe Boucaud, F . de Soto, J. P . Leroy , A. Le Y aouanc, J. Micheli, H. Moutarde, O. Pene, J. Rodriguez-Quintero, Ar tefacts and < A**2 > power corrections: Revisiting the MOM Z psi (p**2) and Z(V), Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 034505, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.034505, hep-lat/0504017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.034505 2006

  72. [76]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, A. Retey , Three loop three linear verti ces and four loop similar to MOM beta functions in massless QC D (2000), hep-ph/0007088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  73. [77]

    Thomas Appelquist, Michael Dine, I. J. Muzinich, The St atic Potential in Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 69 ( 1977) 231–236, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90651-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90651-7 1977

  74. [78]

    Fischler, Quark - anti-Quark Potential in QCD, Nucl

    W. Fischler, Quark - anti-Quark Potential in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 129 (1977) 157–174, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(77)90026-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90026-8 1977

  75. [79]

    Markus Peter, The Static quark - anti-quark potential i n QCD to three loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 602–605, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 78.602, hep-ph/9610209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett 1997

  76. [80]

    Y ork Schroder, The Static potential in QCD to two loops, Phys. Lett. B 447 (1999) 321–326, doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00010-6 , hep-ph/9812205

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00010-6 1999

  77. [81]

    Fermionic contributions to the three-loop static potential

    Alexander V . Smirnov, Vladimir A. Smirnov, Matthias St einhauser, Fermionic contributions to the three-loop stat ic potential, Phys. Lett. B 668 (2008) 293–298, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.070, 0809.1927

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.070 2008

  78. [82]

    Three-loop static potential

    Alexander V . Smirnov, Vladimir A. Smirnov, Matthias St einhauser, Three-loop static potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1 04 (2010) 112002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.112002, 0911.4742

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.112002 2010

  79. [83]

    Static QCD potential at three-loop order

    C. Anzai, Y . Kiyo, Y . Sumino, Static QCD potential at thr ee-loop order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 112003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104. 112003, 0911.4335

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104 2010

  80. [84]

    Johannes Bl ¨ umlein, Deep-inelastic scattering: What do we know?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39 (09n10) (2024) 2441004, do i:10.1142/ S0217751X24410045, 2306.01362

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.