Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 68 references

One-loop string corrections on a Z_L orbifold match twisted Bethe-ansatz predictions in three sectors, despite reduced supersymmetry.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 09:24 UTC pith:2NHXLQ7W

load-bearing objection Solid technical extension of the semiclassical string matching program to N=2 orbifolds, with real new one-loop results; the n≠0 Bethe vacuum premise is unvalidated and the abstract overstates the SU(3) match. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27327 v1 pith:2NHXLQ7W submitted 2026-07-29 hep-th

On quantum corrections to semiclassical strings on AdS₅times S⁵/mathbb{Z}_(L) orbifold backgrounds

Carlos Barredo Mart\'inez This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.Tq11.25.-w
keywords AdS/CFTorbifoldsemiclassical stringsBethe ansatzLandau-Lifshitzfractional windingN=2 quiverone-loop correction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that the AdS/CFT correspondence continues to hold at one-loop quantum order when the background is a Z_L orbifold of AdS5 x S5, a setup dual to a 4d N=2 quiver gauge theory with N=2 supersymmetry rather than maximal N=4. The author computes the leading large-charge quantum correction to the energy of three families of semiclassical string solutions—in the SU(2), SU(3), and SL(2) sectors—and shows that the resulting coefficient d1 exactly matches the coefficient b1 obtained from finite-size corrections to the twisted Bethe ansatz and from the Landau-Lifshitz effective theory, at least fully for SU(2) and SL(2) and partially for SU(3). The Z_L orbifold allows strings to wind fractionally around orbifolded directions, with winding mu = n/L for n < L/2, producing new stable subsectors of states that do not exist in the smooth AdS5 x S5 background. The author also comments that in the long-quiver regime L >> sqrt(lambda) >> 1, the standard fixed-background semiclassical expansion is reorganised, a point relevant to recent localisation results on the gauge theory side.

Core claim

The central claim is that, despite violating maximal supersymmetry, the leading large-J quantum coefficient d1 in the expansion of the classical energy of certain spinning string solutions on AdS5 x S5/Z_L is exactly captured by the coefficient b1 computed from finite-size corrections to the twisted Bethe equations and from the quantised Landau-Lifshitz model. For the SU(2) and SL(2) sectors the match is complete; for the SU(3) sector the match covers the 'non-anomalous' (zero-mode) part. The key new effect is that the orbifold permits fractional windings mu = n/L along orbifolded directions; for n < L/2 the resulting states are stable, and their energies connect smoothly to BPS states as mu

What carries the argument

The central object is the fractional winding mu = n/L, which enters through the Z_L orbifold action on S5. In the classical solutions, integer windings in the analogous AdS5 x S5 solutions are replaced by mu, and the same replacement appears in the twisted Bethe equations as a shift of the logarithmic branch numbers and in the Landau-Lifshitz action through global identifications of target-space coordinates. The one-loop string computation is an oscillator sum over bosonic and fermionic fluctuation frequencies; the Landau-Lifshitz result comes from a low-energy effective action in the fast-string limit; and the Bethe-ansatz finite-size correction is derived in the continuum J -> infinity lim

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the twisted-sector Bethe computation for n ≠ 0, built on 'virtual' reference states such as Tr[gamma^n X^J] that are not actual physical operators, correctly represents the spectrum of physical twisted-sector single-trace operators; if these auxiliary vacua do not, the one-loop match for n ≠ 0 is a formal identity rather than a prediction about the quiver theory.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop coefficient d1 for a twisted-sector string solution with n ≠ 0 using a physical (non-virtual) reference state in the Bethe ansatz, or construct the explicit physical operators corresponding to the fractional-winding states and compute their scaling dimensions; if these disagree with the virtual-vacuum prediction, the claimed match for n ≠ 0 is an artifact. Alternatively, check whether fractional-winding states with n > L/2, predicted unstable here, are in fact stable in a full non-perturbative treatment.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Planar integrability survives orbifolding at one loop in the SU(2) and SL(2) sectors, providing a new test of AdS/CFT with reduced supersymmetry.
  • The fractional-winding states with n < L/2 are predicted to be stable subsectors of the dual quiver theory, with energies smoothly connecting to BPS states.
  • The long-quiver regime L >> sqrt(lambda) >> 1 is not described by the standard fixed-background semiclassical expansion; understanding it requires a different organisation of the large-charge expansion.
  • The SU(3) match, while partial, suggests the same mechanism operates in nested sectors once 'anomalous' Bethe-root contributions are included.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the virtual reference states used for n != 0 do not correspond to physical twisted-sector operators, the b1 = d1 match for n != 0 would hold only as a formal identity; constructing actual physical twisted-sector operators would test this.
  • The stability condition n < L/2 might generalise to other orbifold groups or to higher-loop orders, providing a broader prediction about which twisted sectors survive as stable sectors.
  • The long-quiver regime, where the twist enters at the same order as two-loop quantum corrections, could be probed by explicit localisation computations on the gauge-theory side; if those disagree with the semiclassical reorganisation proposed here, it would signal a breakdown of the perturbative string expansion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies one-loop quantum corrections to three families of semiclassical string solutions on AdS_5 × S^5/Z_L, in the SU(2), SU(3) and SL(2) sectors of the dual N=2 quiver theory. For each solution the one-loop string coefficient d1 is computed and compared with (i) the continuum finite-size correction b1 from the twisted Bethe ansatz and (ii) the quantised Landau–Lifshitz effective action. The paper reports exact agreement in the SU(2) and SL(2) sectors and a partial, zero-mode-only agreement in SU(3), and identifies stable fractional-winding sectors for n < L/2. The final section also comments on the 'long quiver' regime L ≫ √λ.

Significance. If the central matching claim is correct, the paper provides a nontrivial extension of the semiclassical AdS/CFT integrability programme to an N=2 orbifold background, including new stable twisted-sector states with no AdS_5 × S^5 analogue. The main strengths are the explicit one-loop fluctuation computations in Appendices A–C, the transparent treatment of the twisted Bethe equations with twisted momentum constraints, and the direct comparison of the d1 and b1 coefficients without free parameters. The LL comparison is less independent than advertised, since Section 4 derives the LL action from the same worldsheet sigma-model rather than from an independent spin-chain/coherent-state computation. In addition, the abstract overstates the SU(3) result, as the paper itself later restricts it to the zero-mode/non-anomalous contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.18); Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.27); Sec. 5, Eq. (5.9)] The claimed equivalence between the regularised sum and the integral representation in (3.18)/(4.27), and with the Bethe-ansatz coefficient (5.9), is not correct as written. Setting v ≡ μ(μ−p) and t = 2√v x in (5.9) gives b1 = −√v ∫_0^{2√v} dt t √(1−t²/(4v)) coth(πt), whereas (3.18)/(4.27) contain −(1/2)∫_0^{2√v} dt t coth(πt)/√(4v−t²). These are not equivalent: for v=1 the first evaluates to approximately −1.4, the second to approximately −1.0, and as v→0 they behave as −v/2 and −1/4 respectively. Since this equivalence is used to identify the string and LL results with the Bethe result, the integral representation must be corrected or the match restated in terms of the explicitly regularised sums.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 6 vs Sec. 5 (Eq. (5.12))] The abstract states that the matching is performed 'in the SU(2), SU(3) and SL(2) sectors' without qualification. However, Section 5 and Section 6 explicitly restrict the SU(3) check to the zero-mode/non-anomalous finite-size contribution (see the text after (5.12) and the concluding paragraph). This is an overstatement of the central result. The abstract and introduction should be amended to say that the SU(3) match is partial.
  3. [Sec. 1.2 and Sec. 5] For n ≠ 0 the Bethe equations (5.1)–(5.7) are built on 'virtual' reference states Tr[γ^n X^J], which the paper itself states are not physical operators. The derived coefficient b1(μ) therefore describes an auxiliary Bethe problem unless one argues that these virtual vacua still capture the physical twisted-sector spectrum after imposing the twisted momentum constraint (5.3). No independent check is supplied — for example, a comparison with small-J exact diagonalisation of the twisted SU(2) spin chain. Since the novelty of the fractional-winding sectors rests on this step, the paper should either provide such a check or explicitly state that the n ≠ 0 d1=b1 agreement is a formal statement about an auxiliary integrable system.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] 'Red 1(n/100)' should read 'Re d1(n/100)'.
  2. [Sec. 4] The LL actions in Secs. 4.1–4.3 are derived from the bosonic string sigma-model, not from an independent spin-chain/coherent-state computation. The claim in Sec. 6 of agreement among 'all three approaches' should be softened to acknowledge that the LL computation is not fully independent of the string-side calculation.
  3. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.15)] The relation K = J3 + J√(1 + λμ²/K²) is implicit; please state that K is the positive solution of this algebraic equation.
  4. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.13)] For L even, the marginal case n=L/2 is mentioned, but the stability formula (3.13) does not explicitly cover it; please specify that n=L/2 is excluded from the stable range.
  5. [References] Reference [68] is an unpublished arXiv preprint; please mark it as such and, if possible, cite the published version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the claimed d1=b1 agreement is a genuine cross-check, not a by-construction identity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The string coefficient d1 is computed independently in Section 3 and Appendices A-C from the one-loop Green-Schwarz fluctuation sum (3.6)-(3.8), (3.18), using characteristic frequencies derived from the orbifold sigma-model. No gauge-theory quantity is used as input there. The gauge-theory coefficient b1 is computed in Section 5 from the twisted Bethe equations (5.1)-(5.4) and (5.8)-(5.9), with independent orbifold inputs: the projection (1.4), the closed-index condition (1.8), and the twisted momentum constraint e^{iP}=ξ^n. The equalities b1=(5.7)=(3.9) and b1=(5.9)=(3.18) are nontrivial integral identities, not definitions. The SU(3) comparison is explicitly partial, as the paper states that only the non-anomalous finite-size correction is computed, so it is not presented as a forced identity. The Landau-Lifshitz agreement in Section 4 is derived from the same bosonic string sigma-model and is therefore a consistency/reduction check rather than an independent external test; this weakens its evidentiary independence but is not a circular step, since the LL result is not the input of the string one-loop computation. The use of virtual reference states for n≠0 (Section 1.2) is a physical-validity assumption, not a parameter fit or a definition of d1. The only self-citation, [46], appears in a background remark about twisted-sector effective theories and is not load-bearing for the central derivation. Thus no link in the claimed derivation reduces to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No continuous parameters are fitted to data; μ, L, q, and u are physical or sector choices rather than free parameters. No new particles, forces, or fields are introduced. The central computations rest on standard integrability assumptions, a specific regularisation scheme, the physical identification of fractional windings, and the use of virtual Bethe vacua.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The planar one-loop dilatation operator of the N=2 quiver is locally the same as in N=4, with the orbifold entering only through twisted boundary conditions and momentum phases.
    Invoked in Sec. 5 and Appendix D; this is what allows the twisted Bethe ansatz to reuse the N=4 machinery after a phase substitution. If local interactions changed, the b1 computations would not follow.
  • domain assumption Despite reduced supersymmetry, the string and gauge-theory large-charge expansions (1.6) and (1.9) can be equated at order λ/J^2 and λ^2/J^4.
    Explicitly stated in Sec. 1.2: 'Despite the lack of maximal supersymmetry, we assume that (1.6) should be matched...'. This is the premise that gives the comparison meaning.
  • ad hoc to paper Virtual reference states Tr[γ^n X^J] with n≠0 may serve as Bethe vacua even though they are not physical gauge-invariant operators.
    Stated in Sec. 1.2 and Sec. 5. All twisted-sector Bethe predictions for n≠0 are built on these auxiliary vacua, and the paper provides no independent check that this is valid for physical single-trace operators.
  • domain assumption ζ-function regularisation of divergent LL/one-loop sums selects the physically correct finite part.
    Used in Secs. 4.1–4.3 and 5 to convert divergent sums into finite d1/b1 integrals. Different regularisation choices could shift the finite part; the paper relies on the standard prescription inherited from [16].
  • domain assumption The purely fractional winding branch μ=n/L with m̃=0 is the relevant branch for the new stable subsectors.
    Sec. 2.1 and footnote 11 restrict the analysis to this branch. Integer-winding shifts are mentioned but not analysed, so the stability and matching statements are branch-dependent.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 44824 in / 13252 out tokens · 122064 ms · 2026-08-01T09:24:12.640933+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider three families of semiclassical string solutions on AdS$_5\times S^5/\mathbb{Z}_L$ orbifold backgrounds which correspond to `twisted' single-trace operators in the SU$(2)$, SU$(3)$ and SL$(2)$ sectors, respectively, of the dual 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ quiver gauge theory. The leading quantum correction to the classical energy of each solution is computed, and is matched, despite the lack of maximal supersymmetry, to the corresponding results from finite-size corrections to the twisted Bethe ansatz in the continuum $J\to\infty$ limit and the associated Landau-Lifshitz low-energy effective theory. The $\mathbb{Z}_L$ quotient allows the string to have fractional windings $\mu$ along orbifolded directions, resulting in novel stable subsectors of semiclassical states that are absent in the analogous semiclassical string solutions on AdS$_5\times S^5$. The energies of these stable states connect smoothly to those of states in relevant BPS sectors as $\mu\to0$. Motivated by recent localisation results on the dual gauge theory, we comment on the `long quiver' regime $L\gg\sqrt{\lambda}\gg 1$ from a semiclassical perspective, concluding that it reorganises the standard fixed-background semiclassical expansion.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 58 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Beisert, C

    N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen and M. Staudacher,The Dilatation operator of conformal N=4 superYang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B664(2003) 131 [hep-th/0303060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Zarembo,Semiclassical Bethe Ansatz and AdS/CFT,Comptes Rendus Physique5(2004) 1081 [hep-th/0411191]

    K. Zarembo,Semiclassical Bethe Ansatz and AdS/CFT,Comptes Rendus Physique5(2004) 1081 [hep-th/0411191]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    Tseytlin,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter II.1: Classical AdS5xS5 string solutions,Lett

    A.A. Tseytlin,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter II.1: Classical AdS5xS5 string solutions,Lett. Math. Phys.99(2012) 103 [1012.3986]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Frolov and A

    S. Frolov and A. Tseytlin,Multi-spin string solutions inAdS5 ×S 5,Nuclear Physics B668 (2003) 77–110

    2003

  7. [7]

    Arutyunov, S

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, J. Russo and A.A. Tseytlin,Spinning strings in AdS(5) x S**5 and integrable systems,Nucl. Phys. B671(2003) 3 [hep-th/0307191]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Arutyunov, J

    G. Arutyunov, J. Russo and A.A. Tseytlin,Spinning strings in AdS(5) x S**5: New integrable system relations,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 086009 [hep-th/0311004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  9. [9]

    Beisert, J.A

    N. Beisert, J.A. Minahan, M. Staudacher and K. Zarembo,Stringing spins and spinning strings,JHEP09(2003) 010 [hep-th/0306139]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  10. [10]

    Beisert, S

    N. Beisert, S. Frolov, M. Staudacher and A.A. Tseytlin,Precision spectroscopy of AdS / CFT,JHEP10(2003) 037 [hep-th/0308117]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    Engquist, J.A

    J. Engquist, J.A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,Yang-Mills duals for semiclassical strings on AdS(5) x S(5),JHEP11(2003) 063 [hep-th/0310188]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    Frolov and A.A

    S. Frolov and A.A. Tseytlin,Quantizing three spin string solution in AdS(5) x S**5,JHEP 07(2003) 016 [hep-th/0306130]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  13. [13]

    Frolov, I.Y

    S.A. Frolov, I.Y. Park and A.A. Tseytlin,On one-loop correction to energy of spinning strings in S**5,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 026006 [hep-th/0408187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    I.Y. Park, A. Tirziu and A.A. Tseytlin,Spinning strings in AdS(5) x S**5: One-loop correction to energy in SL(2) sector,JHEP03(2005) 013 [hep-th/0501203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Integrable Hamiltonian for classical strings on AdS(5) x S**5, JHEP02(2005) 059 [hep-th/0411089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  16. [16]

    Beisert, A.A

    N. Beisert, A.A. Tseytlin and K. Zarembo,Matching quantum strings to quantum spins: One-loop versus finite-size corrections,Nucl. Phys. B715(2005) 190 [hep-th/0502173]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  17. [17]

    Kazakov, A

    V.A. Kazakov, A. Marshakov, J.A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,Classical/quantum integrability in AdS/CFT,JHEP05(2004) 024 [hep-th/0402207]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  18. [18]

    Kruczenski,Spin chains and string theory,Phys

    M. Kruczenski,Spin chains and string theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 161602 [hep-th/0311203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    Kruczenski, A.V

    M. Kruczenski, A.V. Ryzhov and A.A. Tseytlin,Large spin limit of AdS(5) x S**5 string theory and low-energy expansion of ferromagnetic spin chains,Nucl. Phys. B692(2004) 3 [hep-th/0403120]. – 46 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [20]

    Hernandez and E

    R. Hernandez and E. Lopez,The SU(3) spin chain sigma model and string theory,JHEP04 (2004) 052 [hep-th/0403139]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Stefanski, Jr

    B. Stefanski, Jr. and A.A. Tseytlin,Large spin limits of AdS/CFT and generalized Landau-Lifshitz equations,JHEP05(2004) 042 [hep-th/0404133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    Kruczenski and A.A

    M. Kruczenski and A.A. Tseytlin,Semiclassical relativistic strings in S**5 and long coherent operators in N=4 SYM theory,JHEP09(2004) 038 [hep-th/0406189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  23. [23]

    Minahan, A

    J.A. Minahan, A. Tirziu and A.A. Tseytlin,1/J corrections to semiclassical AdS/CFT states from quantum Landau-Lifshitz model,Nucl. Phys. B735(2006) 127 [hep-th/0509071]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Serban and M

    D. Serban and M. Staudacher,Planar N=4 gauge theory and the Inozemtsev long range spin chain,JHEP06(2004) 001 [hep-th/0401057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  25. [25]

    Beisert, V

    N. Beisert, V. Dippel and M. Staudacher,A Novel long range spin chain and planar N=4 super Yang-Mills,JHEP07(2004) 075 [hep-th/0405001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Beisert and A.A

    N. Beisert and A.A. Tseytlin,On quantum corrections to spinning strings and Bethe equations,Phys. Lett. B629(2005) 102 [hep-th/0509084]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    McLoughlin, R

    T. McLoughlin, R. Roiban and A.A. Tseytlin,Quantum spinning strings in AdS(4) x CP**3: Testing the Bethe Ansatz proposal,JHEP11(2008) 069 [0809.4038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  28. [28]

    Astolfi, V.G.M

    D. Astolfi, V.G.M. Puletti, G. Grignani, T. Harmark and M. Orselli,Finite-size corrections in the SU(2) x SU(2) sector of type IIA string theory on AdS(4) x CP**3,Nucl. Phys. B 810(2009) 150 [0807.1527]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    Hernández and J.M

    R. Hernández and J.M. Nieto,Spinning strings inAdS3 ×S 3 with NS–NS flux,Nucl. Phys. B888(2014) 236 [1407.7475]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Frolov, R

    S.A. Frolov, R. Roiban and A.A. Tseytlin,Gauge-string duality for superconformal deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP07(2005) 045 [hep-th/0503192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Borsato, S

    R. Borsato, S. Driezen, J.M. Nieto García and L. Wyss,Semiclassical spectrum of a Jordanian deformation of AdS5×S5,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 066015 [2207.14748]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Billo, M

    M. Billo, M. Frau, A. Lerda, A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Localization vs holography in 4dN= 2 quiver theories,JHEP10(2022) 020 [2207.08846]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Beccaria and G.P

    M. Beccaria and G.P. Korchemsky,Four-dimensionalN= 2 superconformal long circular quivers,JHEP04(2024) 054 [2312.03836]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Korchemsky and A

    G.P. Korchemsky and A. Testa,Correlation functions in four-dimensional superconformal long circular quivers,JHEP07(2025) 223 [2501.17223]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Kachru and E

    S. Kachru and E. Silverstein,4d Conformal Field Theories and Strings on Orbifolds,Physical Review Letters80(1998) 4855–4858

    1998

  36. [36]

    Lawrence, N

    A.E. Lawrence, N. Nekrasov and C. Vafa,On conformal field theories in four-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B533(1998) 199 [hep-th/9803015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  37. [37]

    Bershadsky and A

    M. Bershadsky and A. Johansen,Large N limit of orbifold field theories,Nucl. Phys. B536 (1998) 141 [hep-th/9803249]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  38. [38]

    Klebanov and N.A

    I.R. Klebanov and N.A. Nekrasov,Gravity duals of fractional branes and logarithmic rg flow, Nuclear Physics B574(2000) 263–274

    2000

  39. [39]

    Gukov,Comments on N=2 AdS orbifolds,Phys

    S. Gukov,Comments on N=2 AdS orbifolds,Phys. Lett. B439(1998) 23 [hep-th/9806180]. – 47 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  40. [40]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity,Nucl. Phys. B536(1998) 199 [hep-th/9807080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  41. [41]

    Oz and J

    Y. Oz and J. Terning,Orbifolds ofAdS5 ×S 5 and 4d Conformal Field Theories,Nuclear Physics B532(1998) 163–180

    1998

  42. [42]

    Gaberdiel and F

    M.R. Gaberdiel and F. Galvagno,Worldsheet dual of freeN= 2 quiver gauge theories, JHEP10(2022) 077 [2206.08795]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Dixon, J.A

    L.J. Dixon, J.A. Harvey, C. Vafa and E. Witten,Strings on Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B261 (1985) 678

    1985

  44. [44]

    Dixon, J.A

    L.J. Dixon, J.A. Harvey, C. Vafa and E. Witten,Strings on Orbifolds. 2.,Nucl. Phys. B274 (1986) 285

    1986

  45. [45]

    Skrzypek and A.A

    T. Skrzypek and A.A. Tseytlin,On AdS/CFT duality in the twisted sector of string theory on AdS5×S 5/Z2 orbifold background,JHEP03(2024) 045 [2312.13850]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Barredo Martínez and T

    C. Barredo Martínez and T. Skrzypek,Exploring the twisted sector ofZL orbifolds: matching α’-corrections to localisation,JHEP05(2026) 157 [2512.16984]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Tseytlin,Semiclassical quantization of superstrings: AdS(5) x S**5 and beyond,Int

    A.A. Tseytlin,Semiclassical quantization of superstrings: AdS(5) x S**5 and beyond,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18(2003) 981 [hep-th/0209116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  48. [48]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,A Semiclassical limit of the gauge / string correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B636(2002) 99 [hep-th/0204051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Frolov and A.A

    S. Frolov and A.A. Tseytlin,Semiclassical quantization of rotating superstring in AdS(5) x S**5,JHEP06(2002) 007 [hep-th/0204226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  50. [50]

    Ideguchi,Semiclassical Strings onAdS 5 ×S 5/ZM and Operators in Orbifold Field Theories,Journal of High Energy Physics2004(2004) 008–008

    K. Ideguchi,Semiclassical Strings onAdS 5 ×S 5/ZM and Operators in Orbifold Field Theories,Journal of High Energy Physics2004(2004) 008–008

    2004

  51. [51]

    Minahan and K

    J.A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,The Bethe ansatz for N=4 superYang-Mills,JHEP03(2003) 013 [hep-th/0212208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  52. [52]

    Beisert and R

    N. Beisert and R. Roiban,The Bethe ansatz for Z(S) orbifolds of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP11(2005) 037 [hep-th/0510209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    Astolfi, V

    D. Astolfi, V. Forini, G. Grignani and G.W. Semenoff,Finite size corrections and integrability of mathcal N=2 SYM and DLCQ strings on a pp-wave,JHEP09(2006) 056 [hep-th/0606193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  54. [54]

    le Plat and T

    D. le Plat and T. Skrzypek,Three-point functions from integrability inN= 2orbifold theories,JHEP12(2025) 172 [2506.21323]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Metsaev and A.A

    R.R. Metsaev and A.A. Tseytlin,Type IIB superstring action in AdS(5) x S**5 background, Nucl. Phys. B533(1998) 109 [hep-th/9805028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  56. [56]

    Metsaev and A.A

    R.R. Metsaev and A.A. Tseytlin,Exactly solvable model of superstring in Ramond-Ramond plane wave background,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 126004 [hep-th/0202109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  57. [57]

    Beccaria, S

    M. Beccaria, S. Giombi and A.A. Tseytlin,Instanton contributions to the ABJM free energy from quantum M2 branes,JHEP10(2023) 029 [2307.14112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Schafer-Nameki,Exact expressions for quantum corrections to spinning strings,Phys

    S. Schafer-Nameki,Exact expressions for quantum corrections to spinning strings,Phys. Lett. B639(2006) 571 [hep-th/0602214]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Berenstein, J.M

    D.E. Berenstein, J.M. Maldacena and H.S. Nastase,Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,JHEP04(2002) 013 [hep-th/0202021]. – 48 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  60. [60]

    Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed

    E. Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. (2013), 10.1017/CBO9781139015509

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139015509 2013

  61. [61]

    Astolfi, G

    D. Astolfi, G. Grignani, T. Harmark and M. Orselli,Finite-size corrections to the rotating string and the winding state,JHEP08(2008) 099 [0804.3301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    Skrzypek,Integrability treatment of AdS/CFT orbifolds,J

    T. Skrzypek,Integrability treatment of AdS/CFT orbifolds,J. Phys. A56(2023) 345401 [2211.03806]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Pomoni,4DN= 2SCFTs and spin chains,J

    E. Pomoni,4DN= 2SCFTs and spin chains,J. Phys. A53(2020) 283005 [1912.00870]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Freyhult,Bethe ansatz and fluctuations in SU(3) Yang-Mills operators,JHEP06(2004) 010 [hep-th/0405167]

    L. Freyhult,Bethe ansatz and fluctuations in SU(3) Yang-Mills operators,JHEP06(2004) 010 [hep-th/0405167]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  65. [65]

    Freyhult and C

    L. Freyhult and C. Kristjansen,Rational three-spin string duals and non-anomalous finite size effects,JHEP05(2005) 043 [hep-th/0502122]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    Tseytlin,On limits of superstring in AdS(5) x S**5,Theor

    A.A. Tseytlin,On limits of superstring in AdS(5) x S**5,Theor. Math. Phys.133(2002) 1376 [hep-th/0201112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  67. [67]

    Giombi, S.A

    S. Giombi, S.A. Kurlyand and A.A. Tseytlin,Non-planar corrections in ABJM theory from quantum M2 branes,JHEP11(2024) 056 [2408.10070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Bath and K

    J. Bath and K. Zoubos,Spin chains for ADE quiver theories,2602.22065. – 49 –

    arXiv