Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Revisiting One-Zero and Two-Zero Neutrino Mass Textures in Light of Recent Oscillation and Cosmological Data

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stronger cosmological mass bounds leave only two two-zero neutrino textures viable; one-zero patterns still work and give distinct, testable predictions.

desk verdict Clean update of texture zeros under NuFIT 6.0 + DESI: only A1/A2 two-zeros survive CMB+BAO; one-zero scan with flow matching plus non-invertible constructions is the real addition. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08384 v1 pith:2NKOQMYP submitted 2026-07-09 hep-ph cs.LG

Haruto Kitagawa , Coh Miyao , Satsuki Nishimura , Hajime Otsuka This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phcs.LG
keywords neutrinomassmatrixtexturezerostwo-zerotexturesone-zerocosmologicalsumneutrinolessdouble-betadecayflowmatchingnon-invertibleselectionrules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper re-examines every one-zero and two-zero pattern in the neutrino mass matrix against the newest oscillation data, the cosmological upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses, the laboratory bound on the electron-neutrino mass, and the non-observation of neutrinoless double-beta decay. With only the older CMB mass-sum bound, several two-zero textures (especially the B-series) survive and force the Dirac CP phase near π/2 or 3π/2 while predicting sizable effective Majorana masses that future double-beta experiments can reach. Once the tighter CMB+BAO limit is imposed, only the two A-series textures remain allowed for normal ordering. The authors therefore turn to the less restrictive one-zero textures, using flow-matching generative networks together with analytic inequalities to map the still-viable patterns. Those patterns yield characteristic windows for the mass sum, the effective electron-neutrino mass, the Majorana mass, and the CP phase. Finally they show that the surviving one-zero zeros can be generated by non-invertible selection rules that ordinary group symmetries cannot produce.

What carries the argument

The two-zero algebraic relations that fix mass ratios and Majorana phases once four oscillation parameters are set to NuFIT best-fit values, together with flow-matching generative sampling of the eleven-parameter one-zero mass matrices constrained by the same data and by cosmological mass-sum inequalities.

What would settle it

A future determination of δ23 and δCP that falls outside the narrow bands predicted by A1 or A2 (or outside the δCP ≈ π/2, 3π/2 islands preferred by the B-series and by H1/H2 inverted-ordering one-zero textures), or a cosmological mass-sum bound tighter than the A-series predictions, would rule out the surviving patterns.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the DESI BAO+CMB bound on the sum of neutrino masses, the only two-zero textures still compatible with data are A1 and A2 in normal ordering; several one-zero textures remain allowed and produce distinct, experimentally accessible ranges for Σmi, meff_νe, ⟨mee⟩ and δCP.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis freezes the three best-measured oscillation parameters and the two mass-squared differences at their NuFIT central values instead of scanning their full correlated uncertainties.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper re-examines two-zero and one-zero textures (and, in appendices, the corresponding minors) of the Majorana neutrino mass matrix against NuFIT 6.0 oscillation parameters, Planck/ACT/DESI cosmological bounds on Σmi, the KATRIN kinematic limit, and current 0νββ limits. For two-zero textures the standard algebraic relations (Eqs. 2.7–2.22) are solved after fixing θ12, θ13 and the mass-squared differences to NuFIT best-fit values; under the CMB-only sum bound several textures (A1, A2 and the B-series for NO; B1, B3, C for IO) remain viable, while the stronger CMB+BAO bound leaves only A1 and A2 (NO). One-zero textures are explored with conditional flow matching (Sec. 3.1) and cross-checked by triangle-inequality analytics (Eq. 3.10, Sec. 3.2–3.3); several structures survive and yield distinct ranges for Σmi, meff_νe, ⟨mee⟩ and δCP (Tables 7–9). A short model-building section shows how the surviving one-zero patterns can arise from non-invertible selection rules obtained by Z2 or Z3 gauging of cyclic groups.

Significance. The work supplies a timely, comprehensive update of the classic two-zero texture classification under the latest DESI BAO+CMB mass-sum bounds and extends the analysis to one-zero textures with a modern generative-AI sampler that is validated against analytic inequalities. The resulting viability tables and the characteristic δCP islands of the B-series (and of H1, H2 in IO) are concrete, experimentally testable predictions that can be confronted by next-generation 0νββ experiments and by improved cosmological measurements. The non-invertible-selection-rule constructions further connect the phenomenological classification to a concrete ultraviolet origin. These features make the paper a useful reference for both model builders and experimentalists.

major comments (2)
  1. Secs. 2.1 and 3.2 fix θ12, θ13 and the mass-squared differences to NuFIT 6.0 central values when solving the two-zero algebraic constraints and when constructing the one-zero triangle inequalities. While the surviving A-series textures lie comfortably inside the allowed mass-sum window and the one-zero flow-matching samples already scan θ23/δCP over 3σ ranges, a quantitative estimate of how the 3σ correlations among the fixed inputs shift the viability boundaries (especially for the B-series under the CMB-only cut) is missing. A short sensitivity check or a Monte-Carlo variation of the fixed parameters would make the robustness of Tables 3 and 7 fully transparent.
  2. The flow-matching pipeline (Sec. 3.1.1) employs a transformer with fixed hyperparameters and a multi-round fine-tuning schedule whose χ² thresholds are structure-dependent. Although the final samples are required to satisfy χ² < 45 on the five NuFIT observables and are cross-checked by the analytic inequalities, no ablation or comparison with a simpler sampler (e.g., nested sampling or a plain MCMC) is provided. A brief demonstration that the reported viable regions are stable under reasonable changes of network architecture or fine-tuning schedule would strengthen confidence that the exclusions in Table 7 are not artifacts of the generative model.
minor comments (5)
  1. Table 3 and the surrounding text use both “CMB” and “CMB+BAO”; a single consistent acronym (e.g., “Planck+ACT+DESI”) would avoid ambiguity with the pure CMB bound of Eq. (2.23).
  2. In Figs. 1–2 and 13–19 the green/yellow bands for δCP are taken from the NuFIT 3σ ranges, yet the red prediction curves sometimes extend outside those bands; a short sentence clarifying that the curves are pure texture predictions (not constrained by the δCP measurement) would help the reader.
  3. Appendix B, Table 12: the caption still says “texture” in a few places where “minor” is intended; likewise Table 14 header.
  4. Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.4): the fusion rule is written without multiplicities; a parenthetical remark that multiplicities are suppressed (as later noted for the Z3 case) would improve clarity.
  5. References [36] and [37] cite DESI and KATRIN results that appeared after the NuFIT 6.0 release; a brief note on whether the oscillation parameters remain consistent with those newer data sets would be useful.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: viability tables and δCP/mass predictions follow from external NuFIT/cosmology cuts applied to algebraic zero conditions; flow matching is conditioned on oscillation labels and filtered by independent bounds.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 3.1 (flow-matching setup) and Sec. 4 (non-invertible selection rules)]
    "Recent applications of machine learning techniques to flavor physics (Refs. [41–52]) have demonstrated the effectiveness of such approaches. … we adopt flow matching … To realize these neutrino mass textures, we deal with non-invertible selection rules realized by Z2 gauging of ZN [30, 31]."

    Several methodological and model-building citations ([30, 31, 46, 47] and related works) share authors with the present paper. They supply the flow-matching pipeline and the non-invertible fusion rules used for existence proofs, but the viability conclusions themselves rest on external NuFIT/cosmology data applied to the algebraic zero conditions, not on those self-citations. The step is therefore only mildly circular and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (only A1/A2 two-zero textures survive CMB+BAO; several one-zero textures remain viable with distinct ranges for Σmi, meff_νe, ⟨mee⟩, δCP) are obtained by imposing vanishing matrix entries (or minors) on M u or M u−1, solving the resulting algebraic relations (Eqs. 2.7–2.13, 2.19, 3.9–3.10, B.3–B.9, C.2–C.3) for mass ratios and phases, and then confronting the solutions with external NuFIT 6.0 oscillation parameters, DESI/Planck/ACT mass-sum bounds, KATRIN, and 0 uetaeta limits. These external inputs are not fitted inside the paper; the two-zero solutions continuously map heta23 o δCP and Σmi, while one-zero analyses either scan the triangle inequality over cosmologically allowed mass sums or generate samples via flow matching conditioned only on oscillation labels and subsequently filtered by independent cosmological cuts. The non-invertible selection-rule constructions in Sec. 4 are existence proofs, not uniqueness claims that close a loop. Minor self-citations (prior ML flavor papers and non-invertible-symmetry works by overlapping authors) supply methodology or model-building motivation and are not load-bearing for the viability tables. The only mild methodological choice is fixing heta12, heta13 and Δm^{2} to NuFIT best-fits when solving the two-zero equations and constructing one-zero inequalities; this is a standard approximation, not a circular redefinition of the predicted quantities. Score 1 reflects that single non-load-bearing self-citation pattern and the best-fit fixing, with no reduction of any claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The phenomenological claims rest on standard PMNS kinematics, external oscillation and cosmological data, and the definition of texture zeros. The ML scan introduces sampling ranges and network hyperparameters as free choices. The UV section imports non-invertible fusion rules from prior string/orbifold literature rather than inventing new particles.

free parameters (3)
  • Complex entries α,β,γ,δ,ε of one-zero mass matrices (ML sampling) = uniform prior Re/Im ∈ [−1,1]
    Sampled uniformly in Re/Im ∈ [−1,1] before overall scale; these are free parameters of each texture, not fixed by data.
  • Overall mass scale s = log10(Λν/meV) = s ∈ [−1, 3]
    Sampled in [−1,3] corresponding to 0.1–1000 meV; sets absolute mass scale of generated matrices.
  • Flow-matching network hyperparameters (hidden dim, layers, LR, batch, fine-tuning χ² thresholds) = hidden=100, layers=5, LR=5e-4, batch=256, χ²_max schedule 10000→1000
    Chosen by hand to achieve χ² < 45 acceptance; affect which regions of parameter space are populated.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Standard three-flavor PMNS parametrization with Majorana phases α2,3 and Dirac phase δCP diagonalizes the flavor-basis Majorana mass matrix (Eqs. 2.1–2.3).
    Assumed throughout Secs. 2–3; no sterile neutrinos or non-unitary mixing.
  • domain assumption NuFIT 6.0 best-fit and 3σ ranges for θij, Δm², δCP are taken as the experimental truth for viability cuts (Table 1).
    Fixed inputs for both analytical and ML analyses; correlations among parameters not fully propagated.
  • domain assumption Cosmological sum-of-masses bounds under flat ΛCDM: Σmν < 0.21 eV (CMB) and the tighter DESI BAO+CMB cuts for NO/IO (Eqs. 2.23–2.25).
    Load-bearing for which textures survive; depends on cosmological model assumptions.
  • domain assumption Neutrino masses arise from the dimension-5 Weinberg operator after electroweak symmetry breaking.
    Used to motivate the symmetric mass matrix and the UV constructions in Sec. 4.
  • domain assumption Non-invertible selection rules from Z2 gauging of ZN (fusion [gk1]·[gk2]=[gk1+k2]+[gk1−k2]) and Z3 gauging of Z7 correctly forbid/allow the listed mass-matrix entries.
    Imported from prior literature (Kobayashi–Otsuka et al.); used to claim UV realization of G/H textures.
  • standard math Triangle inequality applied to the one-zero complex equation yields necessary (not always sufficient) viable regions in (θ23, δCP) (Eq. 3.10).
    Standard complex-number bound; used to cross-check ML results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting One-Zero and Two-Zero Neutrino Mass Textures in Light of Recent Oscillation and Cosmological Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2NKOQMYP

@misc{pith2026260708384,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting One-Zero and Two-Zero Neutrino Mass Textures in Light of Recent Oscillation and Cosmological Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2NKOQMYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08384}
}
abstract

We revisit one-zero and two-zero textures of the neutrino mass matrix under current experimental and cosmological constraints. We identify the phenomenologically viable texture structures using the latest results on neutrino oscillation parameters, the cosmological bound on the sum of neutrino masses, the kinematic bound on the effective electron-neutrino mass, and limits from neutrinoless double-beta decay. For two-zero textures, several structures are still allowed if only the CMB bound on the neutrino mass sum is imposed. Among them, the $B$-series textures show a characteristic prediction for the Dirac CP phase, with $\delta_{\rm CP}$ lying around $\pi/2$ and $3\pi/2$, and are within the reach of future neutrinoless double-beta decay searches. When the stronger CMB+BAO constraint is included, however, only the $A$-series textures remain viable. Therefore, we also analyze one-zero textures by using machine learning techniques, particularly flow matching. It turns out that some of the texture structures are already excluded by current data, while the allowed ones give distinct predictions for $\sum_i m_i$, $m_{\nu_e}^{\rm eff}$, $\langle m_{ee}\rangle$, and $\delta_{\rm CP}$. We further discuss how the one-zero texture structures can arise from non-invertible selection rules.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J.a.P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP12 (2024) 216 [2410.05380]. [10]Hyper-Kamiokandecollaboration,Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report,1805.04163. – 41 – [11]DUNEcollaboration,Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Un...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 1566

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    Zeroes of the Neutrino Mass Matrix

    P.H. Frampton, S.L. Glashow and D. Marfatia,Zeroes of the neutrino mass matrix,Phys. Lett. B536(2002) 79 [hep-ph/0201008]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Mass and Flavor Mixing Schemes of Quarks and Leptons

    H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing,Mass and flavor mixing schemes of quarks and leptons,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.45(2000) 1 [hep-ph/9912358]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  5. [5]

    Texture Zeros and Majorana Phases of the Neutrino Mass Matrix

    Z.-z. Xing,Texture zeros and Majorana phases of the neutrino mass matrix,Phys. Lett. B 530(2002) 159 [hep-ph/0201151]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    A Full Determination of the Neutrino Mass Spectrum from Two-zero Textures of the Neutrino Mass Matrix

    Z.-z. Xing,A Full determination of the neutrino mass spectrum from two zero textures of the neutrino mass matrix,Phys. Lett. B539(2002) 85 [hep-ph/0205032]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  7. [7]

    Implications of the KamLAND Measurement on the Lepton Flavor Mixing Matrix and the Neutrino Mass Matrix

    W.-l. Guo and Z.-z. Xing,Implications of the KamLAND measurement on the lepton flavor mixing matrix and the neutrino mass matrix,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 053002 [hep-ph/0212142]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    S. Dev, S. Kumar, S. Verma and S. Gupta,Phenomenology of Two Texture Zero Neutrino Mass Matrices,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 013002 [hep-ph/0612102]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Lashin and N

    E.I. Lashin and N. Chamoun,Zero minors of the neutrino mass matrix,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 073002 [0708.2423]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Fritzsch, Z.-z

    H. Fritzsch, Z.-z. Xing and S. Zhou,Two-zero Textures of the Majorana Neutrino Mass Matrix and Current Experimental Tests,JHEP09(2011) 083 [1108.4534]

    2011 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Meloni and G

    D. Meloni and G. Blankenburg,Fine-Tuning and Naturalness Issues in the Two-Zero Neutrino Mass Textures,Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 749 [1204.2706]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Ludl and W

    P.O. Ludl and W. Grimus,A Complete Survey of Texture Zeros in the Lepton Mass Matrices,JHEP07(2014) 090 [1406.3546]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    J. Liao, D. Marfatia and K. Whisnant,Texture and Cofactor Zeros of the Neutrino Mass Matrix,JHEP09(2014) 013 [1311.2639]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Zhou,Update on Two-Zero Textures of the Majorana Neutrino Mass Matrix in Light of Recent T2K, Super-Kamiokande and NOvA Data,Chin

    S. Zhou,Update on Two-Zero Textures of the Majorana Neutrino Mass Matrix in Light of Recent T2K, Super-Kamiokande and NOvA Data,Chin. Phys. C40(2016) 033102 [1509.05300]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi and N. Nagata,Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal gauged U(1)Lµ−Lτ model,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 763 [1705.00419]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, S.-Y. Tseng and K. Tsumura,Minimal Gauged U(1)Lα−Lβ Models Driven into a Corner,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 055029 [1811.07571]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Asai,Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal model extended by linear combination of U(1)Le−Lµ, U(1)Lµ−Lτ and U(1)B−L gauge symmetries,Eur

    K. Asai,Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal model extended by linear combination of U(1)Le−Lµ, U(1)Lµ−Lτ and U(1)B−L gauge symmetries,Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 76 [1907.04042]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    K. Asai, C. Miyao, S. Okawa and K. Tsumura,New constraints on gauged U(1)Lµ−Lτ models via Z - Z’ mixing,JHEP12(2024) 018 [2401.17613]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M. Ibe, S. Shirai and K. Watanabe,Global neutrino constraints on the minimal U(1)Lµ-Lτ model,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 095034 [2503.01399]. – 42 –

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kobayashi and H

    T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka,Non-invertible flavor symmetries in magnetized extra dimensions,JHEP11(2024) 120 [2408.13984]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka and M. Tanimoto,Yukawa textures from non-invertible symmetries, JHEP12(2024) 117 [2409.05270]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Lashin and N

    E.I. Lashin and N. Chamoun,The One-zero Textures of Majorana Neutrino Mass Matrix and Current Experimental Tests,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 113011 [1108.4010]

    2012 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Deepthi, S

    K.N. Deepthi, S. Gollu and R. Mohanta,Neutrino mixing matrices with relatively largeθ13 and with texture one-zero,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1888 [1111.2781]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gautam, M

    R.R. Gautam, M. Singh and M. Gupta,Neutrino mass matrices with one texture zero and a vanishing neutrino mass,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 013006 [1506.04868]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Arora and B.C

    Priya, S. Arora and B.C. Chauhan,Embedding generalized CP symmetry in one zero texture neutrino mass models,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A41(2026) 2650061 [2501.00776]. [36]DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,JCA...

    2026

  18. [26]

    Harvey and A

    T.R. Harvey and A. Lukas,Quark Mass Models and Reinforcement Learning,JHEP08 (2021) 161 [2103.04759]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Nishimura, C

    S. Nishimura, C. Miyao and H. Otsuka,Exploring the flavor structure of quarks and leptons with reinforcement learning,JHEP23(2020) 021 [2304.14176]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Matchev, K

    K.T. Matchev, K. Matcheva, P. Ramond and S. Verner,Exploring the truth and beauty of theory landscapes with machine learning,Phys. Lett. B856(2024) 138941 [2401.11513]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kawai and N

    S. Kawai and N. Okada,Truth, beauty, and goodness in grand unification: A machine learning approach,Phys. Lett. B860(2025) 139221 [2411.06718]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Nishimura, C

    S. Nishimura, C. Miyao and H. Otsuka,Reinforcement learning-based statistical search strategy for an axion model from flavor,JHEP10(2025) 043 [2409.10023]

    2025

  23. [31]

    Nishimura, H

    S. Nishimura, H. Otsuka and H. Uchiyama,Exploring the flavor structure of leptons via diffusion models,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 055030 [2503.21432]

    2026 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nishimura, H

    S. Nishimura, H. Otsuka and H. Uchiyama,Diffusion-Model Approach to Flavor Models: A Case Study for S’4 Modular Flavor Model,PTEP2026(2026) 053B08 [2504.00944]

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Baretz, M

    J.B. Baretz, M. Fieg, V. Ganesh, A. Ghosh, V. Knapp-Perez, J. Rudolph et al.,Towards AI-assisted neutrino flavor theory design,Commun. Phys.9(2026) 227 [2506.08080]

    2026 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Mendizabal et al.,Leveraging reinforcement learning, genetic algorithms and – 43 – transformers for background determination in particle physics,Phys

    G.H. Mendizabal et al.,Leveraging reinforcement learning, genetic algorithms and – 43 – transformers for background determination in particle physics,Phys. Scripta101(2026) 196002 [2509.14894]

    2026

  27. [35]

    Abu-Ajamieh, S

    F. Abu-Ajamieh, S. Kawai and N. Okada,Good flavor search in SU(5): A machine learning approach,Nucl. Phys. B1028(2026) 117503 [2511.08154]

    2026 arXiv

  28. [36]

    N. Haba, J. Ikemoto, Y. Shimizu and T. Yamada,Optimizing Yukawa couplings to suppress Dimension-five Proton Decay inSU(5)GUT,2605.09000

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Aranda, R

    A. Aranda, R. Ramos and A.J. Stuart,Rolling Down the Leptonic BSM Landscape Using Machine Learning Techniques,2606.04571

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lipman, R.T.Q

    Y. Lipman, R.T.Q. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel and M. Le,Flow Matching for Generative Modeling,2210.02747

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Tejero-Cantero, J

    A. Tejero-Cantero, J. Boelts, M. Deistler, J.-M. Lueckmann, C. Durkan, P.J. Gonçalves et al., sbi: A toolkit for simulation-based inference,Journal of Open Source Software5(2020) 2505

    2020

  32. [40]

    J. Dong, T. Kobayashi, R. Nishida, S. Nishimura and H. Otsuka,Coupling selection rules in heterotic Calabi-Yau compactifications,JHEP09(2025) 012 [2504.09773]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. Dong, T. Jeric, T. Kobayashi, R. Nishida and H. Otsuka,Discrete gauging and noninvertible selection rules,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 056028 [2507.02375]

    2026 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Abe, K.-S

    H. Abe, K.-S. Choi, T. Kobayashi and H. Ohki,Non-Abelian Discrete Flavor Symmetries from Magnetized/Intersecting Brane Models,Nucl. Phys. B820(2009) 317 [0904.2631]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Berasaluce-Gonzalez, P.G

    M. Berasaluce-Gonzalez, P.G. Camara, F. Marchesano, D. Regalado and A.M. Uranga, Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in 4d string models,JHEP09(2012) 059 [1206.2383]

    2012 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Marchesano, D

    F. Marchesano, D. Regalado and L. Vazquez-Mercado,Discrete flavor symmetries in D-brane models,JHEP09(2013) 028 [1306.1284]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Kaidi, Y

    J. Kaidi, Y. Tachikawa and H.Y. Zhang,On a class of selection rules without group actions in field theory and string theory,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 169 [2402.00105]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Kobayashi, Y

    T. Kobayashi, Y. Nishioka, H. Otsuka and M. Tanimoto,More about quark Yukawa textures from selection rules without group actions,JHEP05(2025) 177 [2503.09966]

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, M. Tanimoto and H. Uchida,Lepton mass textures from non-invertible multiplication rules,JHEP08(2025) 189 [2505.07262]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Nakai, H

    Y. Nakai, H. Otsuka, Y. Shigekami and Z. Zhang,The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with Non-Invertible Selection Rules,2512.21509

  41. [49]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka and T.T. Yanagida,Noninvertible symmetry as a solution to the strong CP problem in a GUT-inspired standard model,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 055016 [2508.12287]

    2026 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, M. Tanimoto and T.T. Yanagida,GUT-motivated noninvertible symmetry as a solution to the strong CP problem and the neutrino CP-violating phase,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 095034 [2510.01680]

    2026

  43. [51]

    Chen, W.-H

    Z.-Q. Chen, W.-H. Jiang and Y.-L. Zhou,Universal two-zero texture in SO(10): implications of JUNO and realization from non-invertible symmetries,2606.24571

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    B.-Y. Qu, Z. Jiang and G.-J. Ding,Two-zero textures of the Majorana neutrino mass matrix fromZ 3 gauging ofZ N non-invertible symmetry,2602.24214. – 44 –

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.