Fractonic solids

Akash Jain

arxiv: 2406.07334 · v2 · pith:2NUDC7ZJnew · submitted 2024-06-11 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el

Fractonic solids

Akash Jain This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

keywords fractonsfractonic solidsrestricted mobilitygauge-invariant momentumboost symmetrygravitational couplingholographic model

0 comments

The pith

A symmetry principle restricting fracton motion relative to a physical solid yields models with gauge-invariant momentum that couple consistently to gravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Fractons are quasiparticles whose mobility is limited by symmetries, but standard constructions tie this restriction to absolute space and run into trouble with momentum conservation and gravitational coupling. The paper introduces a symmetry that instead restricts fracton motion relative to the material itself. This change produces field theories that keep momentum density gauge-invariant, respect boost symmetry, and allow consistent coupling to gravity. A holographic model realizing the same principle is also presented. The shift matters because it aligns fracton physics with the expectation that any real-world realization would be embedded in a tangible solid rather than floating in empty space.

Core claim

By imposing a symmetry principle that restricts the motion of fractons relative to a physical solid, one obtains models that admit a gauge-invariant momentum density, remain compatible with boost symmetry, and can be consistently coupled to gravity, in contrast to constructions that enforce mobility restrictions in absolute space; a holographic model for such fractonic solids is proposed as well.

What carries the argument

The new symmetry principle that restricts fracton mobility relative to the solid rather than absolute space.

If this is right

Fractonic solids admit gauge-invariant momentum density.
These models remain compatible with boost symmetry.
The construction permits consistent coupling to gravity.
A holographic dual description exists for the same class of solids.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The relative-motion symmetry may make experimental searches for fractons in real materials more feasible by removing conflicts with conservation laws.
Similar symmetry principles could be applied to other quasiparticles whose mobility is restricted by higher-form symmetries.
The approach opens a route to studying fracton dynamics on curved backgrounds without immediate obstructions from momentum non-conservation.

Load-bearing premise

A symmetry restricting fracton motion relative to the solid can be written down in field theory without creating inconsistencies in the momentum or gravitational sectors.

What would settle it

Construct an explicit field theory or holographic model realizing the relative-motion symmetry and check whether its momentum density remains gauge-invariant and whether the theory couples to gravity without new inconsistencies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2406.07334 by Akash Jain.

read the original abstract

Fractons are exotic quasiparticles whose mobility in space is restricted by symmetries. In potential real-world realisations, fractons are likely lodged to a physical material rather than absolute space. Motivated by this, we propose and explore a new symmetry principle that restricts the motion of fractons relative to a physical solid. Unlike models with restricted mobility in absolute space, these fractonic solids admit gauge-invariant momentum density, are compatible with boost symmetry, and can consistently be coupled to gravity. We also propose a holographic model for fractonic solids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper proposes restricting fracton mobility relative to a physical solid to gain momentum conservation, boost invariance, and gravitational coupling.

read the letter

The core idea is a symmetry that ties fracton motion to the solid itself instead of fixed coordinates. This is presented as the fix for why standard fracton models lack gauge-invariant momentum, clash with boosts, and resist gravity coupling. The abstract also sketches a holographic version. That relative-to-solid restriction looks like the genuinely new element compared to the cited fracton work. It directly targets the gap between abstract models and anything that could sit in a real material. The motivation is stated plainly and the claimed benefits follow from the symmetry choice without obvious circularity. The construction is offered as a proposal rather than a re-derivation of old results. The main limitation is that only the abstract is visible here, so the actual field-theory implementation and any consistency checks on the momentum or gravitational sectors cannot be inspected. If the full paper supplies explicit Lagrangians or examples that hold together, the claim strengthens; if not, the benefits remain unverified. No invented entities or free parameters are flagged. This is for people already working on fractons who care about material realizations or holographic models. A reader focused on symmetry constraints in condensed-matter or gravity contexts could extract the construction and test it themselves. It is coherent enough on its own terms to merit referee time rather than an immediate desk reject, even if the details later need substantial work.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new symmetry principle restricting fracton motion relative to a physical solid (rather than absolute space). This is claimed to yield gauge-invariant momentum density, compatibility with boost symmetry, and consistent gravitational coupling, and the work also introduces a holographic model for fractonic solids.

Significance. If the symmetry construction can be shown to be internally consistent, the result would address longstanding obstacles in fracton models (momentum non-invariance and gravitational incompatibility) and provide a more physically motivated framework for potential material realizations.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central construction and its explicit symmetry generators are not described even at a schematic level, making it difficult to assess the claimed properties without the body of the paper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report on our manuscript. The summary accurately reflects the core proposal of fractonic solids via a new symmetry principle. No specific major comments were raised in the report, so we provide no point-by-point responses below. We remain available to address any questions regarding internal consistency or other aspects if the referee wishes to elaborate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces a new symmetry principle restricting fracton motion relative to a physical solid, presented as an original construction. The abstract and available context describe this as yielding gauge-invariant momentum density, boost compatibility, and consistent gravitational coupling without any visible reduction of outputs to fitted inputs, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations or steps are shown that equate a claimed prediction to its own defining assumptions by construction. The proposal is self-contained as a novel field-theoretic model rather than a re-derivation of prior quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The proposal implicitly assumes a consistent field-theoretic realization of the new symmetry exists.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 918 out tokens · 17894 ms · 2026-05-24T00:02:18.990303+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

crystal-multipole symmetries... [PI,QJ]=iδJI Q... compatible with boosts... coupled to dynamical gravity
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

LΨ = |DvΨ|^2 − λ|DIJ(Ψ,Ψ)|^2... subdiffusive mode ω=−ik^4 σd/(∂n/∂μ+...)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Schwinger-Keldysh effective theory of charge transport: redundancies and systematic $\omega/T$ expansion
hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Proves equivalence of redundant Goldstone and adjoint-matter formulations of SK EFTs for non-Abelian symmetries and extends both to all orders in ħω/T while classifying invariant kernels under DKMS and unitarity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 24 internal anchors

[1]

Quantum Glassiness

C. Chamon, Quantum Glassiness, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 040402 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0404182

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[2]

Topological order in an exactly solvable 3D spin model

S. Bravyi, B. Leemhuis, and B. M. Terhal, Topological order in an exactly solvable 3D spin model, Annals of Physics 326, 839 (2011), arXiv:1006.4871 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[3]

Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators

J. Haah,Localstabilizercodes in three dimensions without string logical operators, Phys. Rev. A83, 042330 (2011), arXiv:1101.1962 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[4]

A New Kind of Topological Quantum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparticles Built from Stationary Excitations

S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, A New Kind of Topological Quantum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparti- cles Built from Stationary Excitations, Phys. Rev. B92, 235136 (2015), arXiv:1505.02576 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[5]

R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, Fractons, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.10,295 (2019),arXiv:1803.11196 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[6]

Pretko, X

M. Pretko, X. Chen, and Y. You, Fracton Phases of Matter, preprint 10.1142/S0217751X20300033 (2020), arXiv:2001.01722 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x20300033 2020
[7]

Fracton Topological Order, Generalized Lattice Gauge Theory and Duality

S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, Fracton Topological Order, GeneralizedLattice Gauge TheoryandDuality,Phys. Rev. B 94, 235157 (2016), arXiv:1603.04442 [cond-mat.str-el]. 6

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[8]

Y. You, T. Devakul, F. J. Burnell, and S. L. Sondhi, Subsystem symmetry protected topological order, Phys. Rev. B98,035112 (2018),arXiv:1803.02369 [cond-mat.str- el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[9]

Seiberg and S.-H

N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, SciPost Phys. 10, 027 (2021), arXiv:2003.10466 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

Seiberg and S.-H

N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, ExoticU (1) Symmetries, Du- ality, and Fractons in 3+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, SciPost Phys.9, 046 (2020), arXiv:2004.00015 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020
[11]

Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids

M. Pretko, Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. B95, 115139 (2017), arXiv:1604.05329 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[12]

Gromov, Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra, Phys

A. Gromov, Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra, Phys. Rev. X9, 031035 (2019), arXiv:1812.05104 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2019
[13]

Slagle, A

K. Slagle, A. Prem, and M. Pretko, Symmetric Tensor Gauge Theories on Curved Spaces, Annals Phys.410, 167910 (2019), arXiv:1807.00827 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2019
[14]

Jain and K

A. Jain and K. Jensen, Fractons in curved space, SciPost Phys. 12, 142 (2022), arXiv:2111.03973 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[15]

Peña Benitez, Fractons, symmetric gauge fields and geometry, Phys

F. Peña Benitez, Fractons, symmetric gauge fields and geometry, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013101 (2023), arXiv:2107.13884 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Bidussi, J

L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus, and S. Pro- hazka, Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime, SciPost Phys.12, 205 (2022), arXiv:2111.03668 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

Glorioso, X

P. Glorioso, X. Huang, J. Guo, J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, and A. Lucas, Goldstone bosons and fluctuating hydrodynam- ics with dipole and momentum conservation, JHEP05 (05), 022, arXiv:2301.02680 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[18]

Jensen and A

K. Jensen and A. Raz, LargeN fractons, preprint (2022), arXiv:2205.01132 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

Gromov, A

A. Gromov, A. Lucas, and R. M. Nandkishore, Frac- ton hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033124 (2020), arXiv:2003.09429 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

Osborne and A

A. Osborne and A. Lucas,Infinite families of fracton fluids with momentum conservation, Phys. Rev. B105, 024311 (2022), arXiv:2111.09323 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

K. T. Grosvenor, C. Hoyos, F. Peña Benitez, and P. Surówka, Hydrodynamics of ideal fracton fluids, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043186 (2021), arXiv:2105.01084 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

A. Jain, K. Jensen, R. Liu, and E. Mefford, Dipole super- fluidhydrodynamics,JHEP 09(09),184,arXiv:2304.09852 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[23]

Armas and E

J. Armas and E. Have, Ideal fracton superfluids, SciPost Phys. 16, 039 (2024), arXiv:2304.09596 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

A. Jain, K. Jensen, R. Liu, and E. Mefford, Dipole super- fluid hydrodynamics II,preprint (2024),arXiv:2401.16385 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Fracton-Elasticity Duality

M. Pretko and L. Radzihovsky, Fracton-Elasticity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 195301 (2018), arXiv:1711.11044 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[26]

D. X. Nguyen, A. Gromov, and S. Moroz, Fracton- elasticity duality of two-dimensional superfluid vortex crystals: defect interactions and quantum melting, SciPost Phys. 9, 076 (2020), arXiv:2005.12317 [cond-mat.quant- gas]

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

Chiral Topological Elasticity and Fracton Order

A. Gromov, Chiral Topological Elasticity and Frac- ton Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076403 (2019), arXiv:1712.06600 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[28]

Caddeo, C

A. Caddeo, C. Hoyos, and D. Musso, Emergent dipole gauge fields and fractons, Phys. Rev. D106, L111903 (2022), arXiv:2206.12877 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Doshi and A

D. Doshi and A. Gromov, Vortices and Fractons, preprint (2020), arXiv:2005.03015 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020
[30]

You and F

Y. You and F. von Oppen, Majorana Quantum Lego, a Route Towards Fracton Matter, Phys. Rev. Research.1, 013011 (2019), arXiv:1812.06091 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2019
[31]

Y. You, Z. Bi, and M. Pretko, Emergent fractons and algebraic quantum liquid from plaquette melting transi- tions, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013162 (2020), arXiv:1908.08540 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Sous and M

J. Sous and M. Pretko,Fractons from polarons,Phys. Rev. B 102, 214437 (2020), arXiv:1904.08424 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020
[33]

Guardado-Sanchez, A

E. Guardado-Sanchez, A. Morningstar, B. M. Spar, P. T. Brown,D. A. Huse,andW. S. Bakr,Subdiffusion andHeat Transport in a Tilted Two-Dimensional Fermi-Hubbard System,Phys. Rev. X10,011042 (2020),arXiv:1909.05848 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

Armas and A

J. Armas and A. Jain, Viscoelastic hydrodynamics and holography, JHEP01 (01), 126, arXiv:1908.01175 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 1908
[35]

Armas and A

J. Armas and A. Jain, Hydrodynamics for charge density waves and their holographic duals, Phys. Rev. D101, 121901 (2020), arXiv:2001.07357 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[36]

Armas, A

J. Armas, A. Jain, and R. Lier, Approximate symmetries, pseudo-Goldstones, and the second law of thermodynam- ics, Phys. Rev. D108, 086011 (2023), arXiv:2112.14373 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[37]

Armas, E

J. Armas, E. van Heumen, A. Jain, and R. Lier, Hydro- dynamics of plastic deformations in electronic crystals, Phys. Rev. B107, 155108 (2023), arXiv:2211.02117 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

The Fracton Gauge Principle

M. Pretko, The Fracton Gauge Principle, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115134 (2018), arXiv:1807.11479 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[39]

Relativistic viscoelastic fluid mechanics

M. Fukuma and Y. Sakatani, Relativistic viscoelas- tic fluid mechanics, Phys. Rev. E 84, 026316 (2011), arXiv:1104.1416 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[40]

Supersolids: what and where are they ?

M. Boninsegni and N. V. Prokof’ev, Colloquium: Super- solids: What and where are they?, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 759 (2012), arXiv:1201.2227 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[41]

C. Stahl,M. Qi,P. Glorioso,A. Lucas,andR. Nandkishore, Fracton superfluid hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B108, 144509 (2023), arXiv:2303.09573 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

One may also approach hydrodynamics using Schwinger- Keldysh effective actions [50–56], useful for including stochastic fluctuations in hydrodynamic models

work page
[43]

There will still be finite wavevector instabilities that usu- ally appear in relativistic hydrodynamics and may be treated using similar techniques

work page
[44]

Gorantla, H

P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, Low- energylimitofsomeexoticlatticetheoriesandUV/IRmix- ing, Phys. Rev. B104, 235116 (2021), arXiv:2108.00020 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2021
[45]

A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation

T. Andrade and B. Withers, A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation, JHEP 05 (05), 101, arXiv:1311.5157 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[46]

Dissipative superfluid dynamics from gravity

J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, and S. Minwalla, Dis- sipative Superfluid dynamics from gravity, JHEP04 (04), 125, arXiv:1101.3332 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[47]

Baggioli and G

M. Baggioli and G. Frangi, Holographic Super- solids, preprint 10.1007/JHEP06(2022)152 (2022), arXiv:2202.03745 [hep-th]. 7

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2022)152 2022
[48]

J. C. Baez and J. Huerta, An Invitation to Higher Gauge Theory, Gen. Rel. Grav.43, 2335 (2011), arXiv:1003.4485 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[49]

Generalized Global Symmetries

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02 (02), 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[50]

Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory

S. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi, Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 91, 105031 (2015), arXiv:1305.3670 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[51]

On thermal fluctuations and the generating functional in relativistic hydrodynamics

M. Harder, P. Kovtun, and A. Ritz, On thermal fluctua- tions and the generating functional in relativistic hydro- dynamics, JHEP07 (07), 025, arXiv:1502.03076 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[52]

Effective field theory of dissipative fluids

M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids, JHEP09 (09), 095, arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[53]

F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, Topo- logical sigma models & dissipative hydrodynamics, JHEP 04 (04), 039, arXiv:1511.07809 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[54]

F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, Ef- fective Action for Relativistic Hydrodynamics: Fluctua- tions, Dissipation, and Entropy Inflow, JHEP10 (10), 194, arXiv:1803.11155 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[55]

Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace

K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, and A. Yarom, Dissipa- tive hydrodynamics in superspace, JHEP09 (09), 127, arXiv:1701.07436 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[56]

Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics

H. Liu and P. Glorioso, Lectures on non-equilibrium ef- fective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, PoS TASI2017, 008 (2018), arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]. 8 Supplementary Material Gauging crystal-dipole symmetry algebra In this appendix, we discuss the gauging procedure for relativistic crystal-dipole symmetry algebra. The analo- gous discussion f...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[1] [1]

Quantum Glassiness

C. Chamon, Quantum Glassiness, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 040402 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0404182

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

[2] [2]

Topological order in an exactly solvable 3D spin model

S. Bravyi, B. Leemhuis, and B. M. Terhal, Topological order in an exactly solvable 3D spin model, Annals of Physics 326, 839 (2011), arXiv:1006.4871 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[3] [3]

Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators

J. Haah,Localstabilizercodes in three dimensions without string logical operators, Phys. Rev. A83, 042330 (2011), arXiv:1101.1962 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[4] [4]

A New Kind of Topological Quantum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparticles Built from Stationary Excitations

S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, A New Kind of Topological Quantum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparti- cles Built from Stationary Excitations, Phys. Rev. B92, 235136 (2015), arXiv:1505.02576 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[5] [5]

R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, Fractons, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.10,295 (2019),arXiv:1803.11196 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[6] [6]

Pretko, X

M. Pretko, X. Chen, and Y. You, Fracton Phases of Matter, preprint 10.1142/S0217751X20300033 (2020), arXiv:2001.01722 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x20300033 2020

[7] [7]

Fracton Topological Order, Generalized Lattice Gauge Theory and Duality

S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, Fracton Topological Order, GeneralizedLattice Gauge TheoryandDuality,Phys. Rev. B 94, 235157 (2016), arXiv:1603.04442 [cond-mat.str-el]. 6

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[8] [8]

Y. You, T. Devakul, F. J. Burnell, and S. L. Sondhi, Subsystem symmetry protected topological order, Phys. Rev. B98,035112 (2018),arXiv:1803.02369 [cond-mat.str- el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[9] [9]

Seiberg and S.-H

N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, SciPost Phys. 10, 027 (2021), arXiv:2003.10466 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2021

[10] [10]

Seiberg and S.-H

N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, ExoticU (1) Symmetries, Du- ality, and Fractons in 3+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, SciPost Phys.9, 046 (2020), arXiv:2004.00015 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020

[11] [11]

Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids

M. Pretko, Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. B95, 115139 (2017), arXiv:1604.05329 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[12] [12]

Gromov, Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra, Phys

A. Gromov, Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra, Phys. Rev. X9, 031035 (2019), arXiv:1812.05104 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2019

[13] [13]

Slagle, A

K. Slagle, A. Prem, and M. Pretko, Symmetric Tensor Gauge Theories on Curved Spaces, Annals Phys.410, 167910 (2019), arXiv:1807.00827 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2019

[14] [14]

Jain and K

A. Jain and K. Jensen, Fractons in curved space, SciPost Phys. 12, 142 (2022), arXiv:2111.03973 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[15] [15]

Peña Benitez, Fractons, symmetric gauge fields and geometry, Phys

F. Peña Benitez, Fractons, symmetric gauge fields and geometry, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013101 (2023), arXiv:2107.13884 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2023

[16] [16]

Bidussi, J

L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus, and S. Pro- hazka, Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime, SciPost Phys.12, 205 (2022), arXiv:2111.03668 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[17] [17]

Glorioso, X

P. Glorioso, X. Huang, J. Guo, J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, and A. Lucas, Goldstone bosons and fluctuating hydrodynam- ics with dipole and momentum conservation, JHEP05 (05), 022, arXiv:2301.02680 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[18] [18]

Jensen and A

K. Jensen and A. Raz, LargeN fractons, preprint (2022), arXiv:2205.01132 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[19] [19]

Gromov, A

A. Gromov, A. Lucas, and R. M. Nandkishore, Frac- ton hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033124 (2020), arXiv:2003.09429 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020

[20] [20]

Osborne and A

A. Osborne and A. Lucas,Infinite families of fracton fluids with momentum conservation, Phys. Rev. B105, 024311 (2022), arXiv:2111.09323 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2022

[21] [21]

K. T. Grosvenor, C. Hoyos, F. Peña Benitez, and P. Surówka, Hydrodynamics of ideal fracton fluids, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043186 (2021), arXiv:2105.01084 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2021

[22] [22]

A. Jain, K. Jensen, R. Liu, and E. Mefford, Dipole super- fluidhydrodynamics,JHEP 09(09),184,arXiv:2304.09852 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[23] [23]

Armas and E

J. Armas and E. Have, Ideal fracton superfluids, SciPost Phys. 16, 039 (2024), arXiv:2304.09596 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[24] [24]

A. Jain, K. Jensen, R. Liu, and E. Mefford, Dipole super- fluid hydrodynamics II,preprint (2024),arXiv:2401.16385 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[25] [25]

Fracton-Elasticity Duality

M. Pretko and L. Radzihovsky, Fracton-Elasticity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 195301 (2018), arXiv:1711.11044 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[26] [26]

D. X. Nguyen, A. Gromov, and S. Moroz, Fracton- elasticity duality of two-dimensional superfluid vortex crystals: defect interactions and quantum melting, SciPost Phys. 9, 076 (2020), arXiv:2005.12317 [cond-mat.quant- gas]

work page arXiv 2020

[27] [27]

Chiral Topological Elasticity and Fracton Order

A. Gromov, Chiral Topological Elasticity and Frac- ton Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076403 (2019), arXiv:1712.06600 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[28] [28]

Caddeo, C

A. Caddeo, C. Hoyos, and D. Musso, Emergent dipole gauge fields and fractons, Phys. Rev. D106, L111903 (2022), arXiv:2206.12877 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2022

[29] [29]

Doshi and A

D. Doshi and A. Gromov, Vortices and Fractons, preprint (2020), arXiv:2005.03015 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020

[30] [30]

You and F

Y. You and F. von Oppen, Majorana Quantum Lego, a Route Towards Fracton Matter, Phys. Rev. Research.1, 013011 (2019), arXiv:1812.06091 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2019

[31] [31]

Y. You, Z. Bi, and M. Pretko, Emergent fractons and algebraic quantum liquid from plaquette melting transi- tions, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013162 (2020), arXiv:1908.08540 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020

[32] [32]

Sous and M

J. Sous and M. Pretko,Fractons from polarons,Phys. Rev. B 102, 214437 (2020), arXiv:1904.08424 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020

[33] [33]

Guardado-Sanchez, A

E. Guardado-Sanchez, A. Morningstar, B. M. Spar, P. T. Brown,D. A. Huse,andW. S. Bakr,Subdiffusion andHeat Transport in a Tilted Two-Dimensional Fermi-Hubbard System,Phys. Rev. X10,011042 (2020),arXiv:1909.05848 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page arXiv 2020

[34] [34]

Armas and A

J. Armas and A. Jain, Viscoelastic hydrodynamics and holography, JHEP01 (01), 126, arXiv:1908.01175 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 1908

[35] [35]

Armas and A

J. Armas and A. Jain, Hydrodynamics for charge density waves and their holographic duals, Phys. Rev. D101, 121901 (2020), arXiv:2001.07357 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020

[36] [36]

Armas, A

J. Armas, A. Jain, and R. Lier, Approximate symmetries, pseudo-Goldstones, and the second law of thermodynam- ics, Phys. Rev. D108, 086011 (2023), arXiv:2112.14373 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023

[37] [37]

Armas, E

J. Armas, E. van Heumen, A. Jain, and R. Lier, Hydro- dynamics of plastic deformations in electronic crystals, Phys. Rev. B107, 155108 (2023), arXiv:2211.02117 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2023

[38] [38]

The Fracton Gauge Principle

M. Pretko, The Fracton Gauge Principle, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115134 (2018), arXiv:1807.11479 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[39] [39]

Relativistic viscoelastic fluid mechanics

M. Fukuma and Y. Sakatani, Relativistic viscoelas- tic fluid mechanics, Phys. Rev. E 84, 026316 (2011), arXiv:1104.1416 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[40] [40]

Supersolids: what and where are they ?

M. Boninsegni and N. V. Prokof’ev, Colloquium: Super- solids: What and where are they?, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 759 (2012), arXiv:1201.2227 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[41] [41]

C. Stahl,M. Qi,P. Glorioso,A. Lucas,andR. Nandkishore, Fracton superfluid hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B108, 144509 (2023), arXiv:2303.09573 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2023

[42] [42]

One may also approach hydrodynamics using Schwinger- Keldysh effective actions [50–56], useful for including stochastic fluctuations in hydrodynamic models

work page

[43] [43]

There will still be finite wavevector instabilities that usu- ally appear in relativistic hydrodynamics and may be treated using similar techniques

work page

[44] [44]

Gorantla, H

P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, Low- energylimitofsomeexoticlatticetheoriesandUV/IRmix- ing, Phys. Rev. B104, 235116 (2021), arXiv:2108.00020 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2021

[45] [45]

A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation

T. Andrade and B. Withers, A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation, JHEP 05 (05), 101, arXiv:1311.5157 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[46] [46]

Dissipative superfluid dynamics from gravity

J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, and S. Minwalla, Dis- sipative Superfluid dynamics from gravity, JHEP04 (04), 125, arXiv:1101.3332 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[47] [47]

Baggioli and G

M. Baggioli and G. Frangi, Holographic Super- solids, preprint 10.1007/JHEP06(2022)152 (2022), arXiv:2202.03745 [hep-th]. 7

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2022)152 2022

[48] [48]

J. C. Baez and J. Huerta, An Invitation to Higher Gauge Theory, Gen. Rel. Grav.43, 2335 (2011), arXiv:1003.4485 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[49] [49]

Generalized Global Symmetries

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02 (02), 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[50] [50]

Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory

S. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi, Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 91, 105031 (2015), arXiv:1305.3670 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[51] [51]

On thermal fluctuations and the generating functional in relativistic hydrodynamics

M. Harder, P. Kovtun, and A. Ritz, On thermal fluctua- tions and the generating functional in relativistic hydro- dynamics, JHEP07 (07), 025, arXiv:1502.03076 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[52] [52]

Effective field theory of dissipative fluids

M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids, JHEP09 (09), 095, arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[53] [53]

F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, Topo- logical sigma models & dissipative hydrodynamics, JHEP 04 (04), 039, arXiv:1511.07809 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[54] [54]

F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, Ef- fective Action for Relativistic Hydrodynamics: Fluctua- tions, Dissipation, and Entropy Inflow, JHEP10 (10), 194, arXiv:1803.11155 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[55] [55]

Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace

K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, and A. Yarom, Dissipa- tive hydrodynamics in superspace, JHEP09 (09), 127, arXiv:1701.07436 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[56] [56]

Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics

H. Liu and P. Glorioso, Lectures on non-equilibrium ef- fective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, PoS TASI2017, 008 (2018), arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]. 8 Supplementary Material Gauging crystal-dipole symmetry algebra In this appendix, we discuss the gauging procedure for relativistic crystal-dipole symmetry algebra. The analo- gous discussion f...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018