REVIEW 2 cited by
Empowering Large Language Models for Textual Data Augmentation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the capabilities of understanding and executing natural language instructions, Large language models (LLMs) can potentially act as a powerful tool for textual data augmentation. However, the quality of augmented data depends heavily on the augmentation instructions provided, and the effectiveness can fluctuate across different downstream tasks. While manually crafting and selecting instructions can offer some improvement, this approach faces scalability and consistency issues in practice due to the diversity of downstream tasks. In this work, we address these limitations by proposing a new solution, which can automatically generate a large pool of augmentation instructions and select the most suitable task-informed instructions, thereby empowering LLMs to create high-quality augmented data for different downstream tasks. Empirically, the proposed approach consistently generates augmented data with better quality compared to non-LLM and LLM-based data augmentation methods, leading to the best performance on 26 few-shot learning tasks sourced from a wide range of application domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Measuring Diversity in Synthetic Datasets
DCScore measures dataset diversity as the sum of self-classification probabilities under a softmax similarity matrix, and the paper shows it tracks generation temperature, human judgment, and LLM rankings.
-
SynthCTI: LLM-Driven Synthetic CTI Generation to enhance MITRE Technique Mapping
A clustering-guided LLM data augmentation pipeline raises macro-F1 for MITRE technique classification, e.g., ALBERT from 0.35 to 0.52 and SecureBERT to 0.66, across two CTI datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.