Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Tinkering Against Scaling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.16546 v1 pith:2PBFDOOX submitted 2025-04-23 cs.CY cs.HC

Tinkering Against Scaling

classification cs.CY cs.HC
keywords researcherscomputationalcriticalsciencesocialstudiestinkeringacademic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The ascent of scaling in artificial intelligence research has revolutionized the field over the past decade, yet it presents significant challenges for academic researchers, particularly in computational social science and critical algorithm studies. The dominance of large language models, characterized by their extensive parameters and costly training processes, creates a disparity where only industry-affiliated researchers can access these resources. This imbalance restricts academic researchers from fully understanding their tools, leading to issues like reproducibility in computational social science and a reliance on black-box metaphors in critical studies. To address these challenges, we propose a "tinkering" approach that is inspired by existing works. This method involves engaging with smaller models or components that are manageable for ordinary researchers, fostering hands-on interaction with algorithms. We argue that tinkering is both a way of making and knowing for computational social science and a way of knowing for critical studies, and fundamentally, it is a way of caring that has broader implications for both fields.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.