Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Impact of Accuracy on Model Interpretations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.09903 v1 pith:2PIWOCNY submitted 2020-11-17 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords modelaccuracyinterpretationsinterpretationqualityimpactmethodsmetrics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Model interpretations are often used in practice to extract real world insights from machine learning models. These interpretations have a wide range of applications; they can be presented as business recommendations or used to evaluate model bias. It is vital for a data scientist to choose trustworthy interpretations to drive real world impact. Doing so requires an understanding of how the accuracy of a model impacts the quality of standard interpretation tools. In this paper, we will explore how a model's predictive accuracy affects interpretation quality. We propose two metrics to quantify the quality of an interpretation and design an experiment to test how these metrics vary with model accuracy. We find that for datasets that can be modeled accurately by a variety of methods, simpler methods yield higher quality interpretations. We also identify which interpretation method works the best for lower levels of model accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BanClickThumb: A Multimodal Dataset and Transformer Fusion Benchmarks for Clickbait Detection in Bengali YouTube Videos

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    First public multimodal Bengali clickbait dataset (7,147 pairs) plus a 27-configuration fusion benchmark; ViT+XLM-RoBERTa intermediate fusion tops out at 0.84 accuracy.

  2. Are machine learning interpretations reliable? A stability study on global interpretations

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Popular machine learning interpretation methods are frequently unstable under small data perturbations, and interpretation stability does not track prediction accuracy.

Pith tools