REVIEW 1 cited by
Exploring Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Exploring Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Analysis
read the original abstract
This paper investigates the effectiveness of self-supervised pre-trained vision transformers (ViTs) compared to supervised pre-trained ViTs and conventional neural networks (ConvNets) for detecting facial deepfake images and videos. It examines their potential for improved generalization and explainability, especially with limited training data. Despite the success of transformer architectures in various tasks, the deepfake detection community is hesitant to use large ViTs as feature extractors due to their perceived need for extensive data and suboptimal generalization with small datasets. This contrasts with ConvNets, which are already established as robust feature extractors. Additionally, training ViTs from scratch requires significant resources, limiting their use to large companies. Recent advancements in self-supervised learning (SSL) for ViTs, like masked autoencoders and DINOs, show adaptability across diverse tasks and semantic segmentation capabilities. By leveraging SSL ViTs for deepfake detection with modest data and partial fine-tuning, we find comparable adaptability to deepfake detection and explainability via the attention mechanism. Moreover, partial fine-tuning of ViTs is a resource-efficient option.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Deepfake Detection in Social Media: A Temporal Artifact Analysis Using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks
3D CNN detector with temporal consistency regularizer reaches 92.8% accuracy on DeepfakeTIMIT and 76.4% cross-dataset on FaceForensics++ without fine-tuning.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.