Pith. sign in

REVIEW

To Google or To ChatGPT? A Comparison of CS2 Students' Information Gathering Approaches and Outcomes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.11935 v3 pith:2POGTRG3 submitted 2025-01-21 cs.HC cs.AI

To Google or To ChatGPT? A Comparison of CS2 Students' Information Gathering Approaches and Outcomes

classification cs.HC cs.AI
keywords studentsllmschatgptlearningmethodsconceptsenginesfound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

LLMs such as ChatGPT have been widely adopted by students in higher education as tools for learning programming and related concepts. However, it remains unclear how effective students are and what strategies students use while learning with LLMs. Since the majority of students' experiences in online self-learning have come through using search engines such as Google, evaluating AI tools in this context can help us address these gaps. In this mixed methods research, we conducted an exploratory within-subjects study to understand how CS2 students learn programming concepts using both LLMs as well as traditional online methods such as educational websites and videos to examine how students approach learning within and across both scenarios. We discovered that students found it easier to learn a more difficult concept using traditional methods than using ChatGPT. We also found that students ask fewer follow-ups and use more keyword-based queries for search engines while their prompts to LLMs tend to explicitly ask for information.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.