Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 300 references

Future directions in nuclear $\beta$ decay at FRIB and beyond

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A community white paper from a two-week FRIB program argues that beta decay at FRIB can simultaneously advance nuclear structure, r-process nucleosynthesis, and precision tests of the Standard Model, with the main bottleneck shifting from e

desk verdict A solid community white paper, no new results, but an honest and comprehensive roadmap that deserves referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22983 v1 pith:2R42IT5F submitted 2026-07-25 nucl-th nucl-ex

Garrett B. King , Ayala Glick-Magid , Grigor Sargsyan , Mark A. Caprio , Kyle G. Leach , John A. Behr , Francesca Bonaiti , Maxime Brodeur
show 33 more authors
Graham Chambers-Wall Heather L. Crawford Maria Dawid Wouter Dekens Michael Gennari Robert Grzywacz Peter Gysbers Heather S. Harrington Heiko Hergert Lotta Jokiniemi Brenden Longfellow Rebeka S. Lubna Kelsey A. Lund Giacomo Marocco Anna E. McCoy Dan Melconian Alexis Mercenne David C. Moore Oscar Naviliat-Cuncic Samuel J. Novario Timilehin H. Ogunbeku Walter C. Pettus Ryan Plestid Bertis C. Rasco Ante Ravlíc Yukiya Saito Dustin P. Scriven Chien-Yeah Seng Nadezda A. Smirnova Artemis Spyrou Vandana Tripathi Xing Wu Zhengyu Xu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thnucl-ex PACS 23.40.-s23.40.Hc12.15.Hh
keywords betadecayFRIBnuclearstructureCKMunitarityr-processnucleosynthesisV_udextractionmany-bodymethodsbeyondStandardModel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This white paper, produced after a two-week topical program at FRIB, aims to establish that nuclear beta decay is now a discovery tool spanning three fronts: nuclear structure at the limits of stability, the astrophysical r-process, and precision tests of the Standard Model. It argues that the payoff depends on pairing new experimental capabilities—above all the FRIB Decay Station initiator with its two-focal-plane design for discrete and total absorption spectroscopy—with many-body theory that can supply controlled radiative, recoil, and isospin-breaking corrections. A sympathetic reader should take away that the field's next advances will come less from collecting more events than from nailing down theoretical corrections and uncertainty budgets.

What carries the argument

The corrected Ft value—Ft = f t (1+delta'_R)(1+delta_NS - delta_C)(1 + (f_A/f_V) rho^2)—is the central identity that carries the precision-physics argument, connecting measured half-lives, branching ratios, and Q-values to V_ud through a chain of radiative and nuclear-structure corrections. On the experimental side, the FRIB Decay Station initiator (FDSi) is the named apparatus: a reconfigurable two-focal-plane system with gamma and neutron arrays at one focus and a total absorption spectrometer at the other, designed to deliver decay data far from stability. The argument's pivot is that the corrections, not the counting statistics, now set the achievable precision.

What would settle it

Measure the fully corrected Ft value for 26mAl and compare it with the 15-transition average: a discrepancy beyond the quoted uncertainties would show the correction scheme (delta_NS, delta_C, delta'_R) is incomplete; alternatively, if FRIB's measured production rates for key neutron-rich species near N=126 come in an order of magnitude below the assumed 1-per-week level, the paper's experimental priorities lose their foundation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that FRIB will transform beta-decay studies across nuclear structure, astrophysics, and fundamental symmetries, and that theory-experiment coordination is the limiting factor. It catalogs the experimental toolbox—half-lives, branching ratios, beta-delayed neutron emission, discrete gamma spectroscopy, total absorption spectroscopy, beta-energy and recoil spectroscopy—and maps each to the many-body methods (DFT, QRPA, shell model, and ab initio approaches) needed for interpretation. On the precision side, it identifies the corrected Ft value as the key quantity, with the V_ud extraction now limited by isospin-symmetry-breaking and radiative corrections rather than

Load-bearing premise

The roadmap stands or falls on two planning assumptions: that the workshop's participants represent the field's priorities, and that FRIB will actually produce the assumed beams—reaching the neutron and proton drip lines up to N/Z=82 at about one nucleus per week—with FDSi performing as designed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If FRIB delivers the assumed beam rates, decay spectroscopy near the N/Z=82 shell closures should uncover many new isomers and beta-delayed multi-neutron emitters, giving direct tests of continuum coupling and deformation.
  • Measured half-lives and strength functions for neutron-rich nuclei will constrain or refute global QRPA/DFT decay models; the newer tabulations' prediction of slower rates beyond N=126 would change predicted kilonova heating and the r-process abundance pattern.
  • A single-transition V_ud extraction from 26mAl becomes possible at the same precision as the 15-transition average, providing a sharper CVC test once delta_NS and delta_C are controlled.
  • Ab initio recoil-order calculations imply a Standard-Model Fierz term of about -1.5e-3 in 6He; experiments searching for tensor currents must subtract this baseline to interpret a null result as a BSM limit.
  • Quantum-sensing techniques (CRES, STJ arrays, levitated nanoparticles) extend precision beta spectroscopy to short-lived species, with SALER at FRIB removing the long-half-life constraint on embedded-source measurements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper's diagnosis is right, the highest-leverage investments are in uncertainty quantification for nuclear interactions and in emulators, not simply more beam time; the returns would be visible as shrinking error bars on delta_NS and delta_C.
  • The 26mAl single-transition idea generalizes: a small set of 'golden' superallowed emitters, each with independent ab initio corrections, would give a stronger CVC test than one average, because correlated systematic errors would be exposed.
  • A testable extension the paper leaves implicit: measuring the real-photon spectrum in 0+->0+ decays, where the nucleus-dependent piece scales as E_gamma (Q-E_gamma)^3, could directly probe delta_NS at low momentum transfer.
  • The paper's discussion of induced second-class currents suggests that low-energy beta-decay experiments could constrain CVC-breaking vector-current terms with the same E_beta dependence as the Fierz term; a dedicated global fit of beta-spectrum shapes over a range of Z would separate these contributions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This white paper, produced by the FRIB Theory Alliance topical program 'Future Directions in Nuclear β Decays at FRIB,' surveys the experimental methods, nuclear many-body approaches, and science opportunities relevant to β-decay studies at FRIB and other facilities. It covers half-life, branching-ratio, β-delayed neutron, total absorption, and β-spectrum measurements; density functional theory, QRPA, shell-model, and ab initio methods; and applications to nuclear structure, astrophysics, the extraction of V_ud, searches for scalar/tensor currents, and neutrino physics. The paper explicitly positions itself as a snapshot of the field and a roadmap rather than as a source of new derivations.

Significance. If taken as a roadmap, the paper is a valuable community resource: it is comprehensive, current, and includes many specific numerical results and explicit caveats about unresolved corrections (e.g., δ_NS uncertainty, recoil-order corrections, Fierz-term assumptions). Its main strengths are its breadth, the authority of the author list, and its identification of concrete experimental–theory synergies. The paper makes no new falsifiable scientific claim, but its planning recommendations could significantly influence the FRIB β-decay program, so the accuracy of its implicit assumptions is important.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.B] The roadmap's exotic-beam priorities rest on a single forward-looking rate projection: 'FRIB is expected to reach the neutron and proton drip lines up to at least the N/Z=82 shell closures at the 1/week level [218].' This is a projected yield, not a measured one, and no sensitivity analysis is provided to show how the recommended priorities (e.g., β-strength measurements near N=82 in Sec. IV.C, r-process waiting-point decays in Sec. V.A) would change if actual production rates are an order of magnitude lower. Please add an explicit caveat and a brief discussion of the consequences for the roadmap if the projection is not met.
  2. [Section I (Preface)] The paper states, 'The document reflects the perspectives of the participants of the program.' This is an honest scope limitation, but it is load-bearing for a roadmap intended for the broader community. The manuscript should either describe the participant composition (subfields, institutions, geography) or explicitly acknowledge in the Preface that the prioritization of topics may not be fully representative. Without this, the roadmap could be mistaken for a community-wide consensus when it is only a program-level one.
  3. [Section VI.D.4] The paper reports two independent ab initio determinations of δ_NS for the 10C superallowed transition—NCSM giving δ_NS = −4.22(31)×10^−3 and QMC giving δ_NS = −[4.46(48)−4.64(77)]×10^−3 plus an energy-dependent term. The text correctly notes that 'nuclear interaction uncertainties are at present hard to quantify' and that correlations between calculations are not well quantified. This is a central input to V_ud, so the paper should offer a more concrete recommendation than leaving the discrepancy open-ended—for example, endorsing a common-interaction benchmark across NCSM, QMC, and coupled-cluster methods, and giving a plausible timeline for such a comparison.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III.E] Typo: 'physis' should be 'physics.'
  2. [Section III.D.2] Typo: 'eignenbasis' should be 'eigenbasis.'
  3. [Section IX (Summary)] Typos: 'FSDi' should be 'FDSi' (the acronym used elsewhere), and 'limites' should be 'limits.'
  4. [Section VII.A.2] The sentence about the inconsistency of the ~a prescription in Refs. [379–381] with the assumption of a zero Fierz term is important and could easily be missed in a long subsection. It would benefit from being highlighted as a key caveat for future analyses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a community white paper/roadmap with no derived predictions, so there are no input-output reductions to expose.

full rationale

The paper explicitly defines itself as a discussion summary: 'This white paper summarizes the main points of discussion over the two-week program, and it aims to provide a snapshot of the current status of the field while also highlighting important questions and opportunities for future work.' It makes no prediction derived from fitted parameters and contains no derivation chain whose conclusion is equivalent to an input. The only load-bearing quantitative statements are forward-looking facility and instrument assumptions, e.g., 'it is expected to reach the neutron and proton drip lines up to at least the N/Z=82 shell closures at the 1/week level [218]' and the FDSi two-focal-plane configuration; these are planning assumptions, not results derived by the paper. Several numerical inputs (e.g., δ_NS for 10C from [82], recoil-order corrections for 6He from [393], and VS-IMSRG strength-function results from [83]) are cited from the authors' own prior work, but they are reported as external published results with stated caveats ('nuclear interaction uncertainties are at present hard to quantify'), not manipulated into new conclusions. A review citing its authors' earlier calculations is not circular unless the argument reduces to an unverified self-citation; here no central claim is established solely by a self-citation, and recommendations are framed as opportunities rather than forced conclusions. Thus no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This white paper introduces no new parameters or hypothetical entities. The entries above are fitted quantities the review inherits from the literature; they are listed because the forward-looking recommendations depend on them. The axioms capture the frameworks and facility assumptions the recommendations presuppose.

free parameters (4)
  • Nuclear energy density functional (EDF) parameters = ~10-15 parameters fitted to nuclear masses and radii (Skyrme/Gogny functionals)
    Section III.A states nuclear EDFs are phenomenological with parameters fitted to data; QRPA/DFT beta-decay half-life predictions reviewed here inherit these fits.
  • Chiral low-energy constants (LECs) in weak two-body currents = partially undetermined / fitted to few-body data or lattice input
    Sections VI.D.4-5 and VIII.C report dNS and 0nubetabeta matrix elements whose dominant uncertainties are LECs; the review treats them as inputs to be constrained.
  • Axial quenching factor gA_eff/gA = approx 0.7-0.8 in phenomenological shell-model treatments
    Section IV.C describes the empirical quenching needed in one-body shell-model Gamow-Teller calculations; ab initio two-body currents are claimed to resolve this, but the paper does not derive either.
  • Isospin-symmetry-breaking correction dC = transition-dependent values, e.g., ~0.1-0.5% (Fig. 8)
    Section VI.C reviews dC values computed by fitted shell-model/WS methods; these are inputs to Vud and themselves depend on fitted Woods-Saxon parameters.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Standard Model with CKM unitarity is the correct null hypothesis for interpreting beta-decay observables.
    Section VI frames deviations in Vud, Fierz, and correlations as new physics, assuming SM baseline; not proved here.
  • domain assumption Chiral effective field theory supplies systematically improvable nuclear interactions and electroweak currents, with low-energy constants that can be constrained.
    Sections III, IV, VI-VIII use chiral EFT to assign corrections and uncertainties (dNS, recoil terms, 0nubetabeta operators).
  • domain assumption Existing many-body methods (DFT, QRPA, shell model, NCSM, CC, IMSRG, QMC) provide valid nuclear wave functions for the transitions discussed.
    Section III's survey and the recommendations in later sections presuppose the methods are adequate and extrapolable to FRIB-relevant nuclei.
  • domain assumption FRIB will deliver the beams, intensities, and detector systems assumed in the forward-looking sections.
    Section II describes FDSi and Section IV.B assumes dripline reach 'at the 1/week level' (with citation), so the roadmap depends on facility performance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Future directions in nuclear $\beta$ decay at FRIB and beyond." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2R42IT5F

@misc{pith2026260722983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Future directions in nuclear $\beta$ decay at FRIB and beyond},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2R42IT5F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22983}
}
abstract

Motivated by the opportunities presented for studies relevant to nuclear structure, astrophysics, and fundamental symmetries with nuclear $\beta$ decay, the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) Theory Alliance topical program ``Future Directions in Nuclear $\beta$ Decays at FRIB'' was held in September of 2025. This white paper summarizes the main points of discussion over the two-week program, and it aims to provide a snapshot of the current status of the field while also highlighting important questions and opportunities for future work. We provide an overview of the experimental tools and techniques that enable modern $\beta$ decay studies, discuss the current state of nuclear many-body approaches used to study $\beta$ decays, and highlight the important science questions that can be addressed by weak decays.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22983 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: FRIB Decay Station Initiator is designed to perform comprehensive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The truncation scheme for the many-body oscillator basis expansion with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Decoupling of particle-hole excitations from a 0p0h reference state: the schematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The Segr`e chart with colors indicating the prominent decay mode. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Diagrammatic scheme of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Energy surface of the shape coexisting nucleus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Shell-model plus WS calculations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Evaluations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Schematic representation of the approach taken in this work to connect the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 29 linked inside Pith

  1. [218]

    FRIB Science Community, FRIB400 The Scientific Case for the 400 MeV/u Energy Upgrade of FRIB (2019)

    2019

  2. [7]

    Simon, S

    A. Simon, S. Quinn, A. Spyrou,et al., SuN: Summing NaI(Tl) gamma-ray detector for cap- ture reaction measurements, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment703, 16 (2013)

    2013

  3. [8]

    Harris, M

    C. Harris, M. Smith, A. Spyrou,et al., SuNTAN: A new tape-transport system forβ-decay experiments, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , 171185 (2025)

    2025

  4. [9]

    Helmer, J

    R. Helmer, J. Hardy, V. Iacob,et al., The use of Monte Carlo calculations in the deter- mination of a Ge detector efficiency curve, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment511, 360 (2003)

    2003

  5. [10]

    Blank, J

    B. Blank, J. Souin, P. Ascher,et al., High-precision efficiency calibration of a high-purity co-axial germanium detector, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment776, 34 (2015)

    2015

  6. [11]

    Savard, A

    G. Savard, A. Galindo-Uribarri, E. Hagberg,et al., 10C Superallowed Branching Ratio and the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix Unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 1521 (1995)

    1995

  7. [12]

    Dimitriou, I

    P. Dimitriou, I. Dillmann, B. Singh,et al., Development of a Reference Database for Beta- Delayed Neutron Emission, Nuclear Data Sheets173, 144 (2021), special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data

    2021

  8. [13]

    M. R. Mumpower, G. C. McLaughlin, and R. Surman, Formation of the rare-earth peak: Gaining insight into late-timer-process dynamics, Phys. Rev. C85, 045801 (2012)

    2012

Show all 300 references
  1. [14]

    Miernik, K

    K. Miernik, K. P. Rykaczewski, C. J. Gross,et al., Largeβ-Delayed One and Two Neutron Emission Rates in the Decay of 86Ga, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 132502 (2013)

    2013

  2. [15]

    Yokoyama, R

    R. Yokoyama, R. Grzywacz, B. C. Rasco,et al., Strong one-neutron emission from two- neutron unbound states inβdecays of ther-process nuclei 86,87Ga, Phys. Rev. C100, 031302 (2019)

    2019

  3. [16]

    V. H. Phong, S. Nishimura, G. Lorusso,et al.,β-Delayed One and Two Neutron Emis- sion Probabilities Southeast of 132Sn and the Odd-Even Systematics inr-Process Nuclide Abundances, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 172701 (2022). 91

    2022

  4. [17]

    Dyszel, R

    P. Dyszel, R. Grzywacz, Z. Y. Xu,et al.(IDS Collaboration), Firstβ-Delayed Two-Neutron Spectroscopy of ther-Process Nucleus 134In and Observation of thei 13/2 Single-Particle Neutron State in 133Sn, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 152501 (2025)

    2025

  5. [18]

    Z. Y. Xu, M. Madurga, R. Grzywacz,et al., 133In: A Rosetta Stone for Decays ofr-Process Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 022501 (2023)

    2023

  6. [19]

    Madurga, S

    M. Madurga, S. V. Paulauskas, R. Grzywacz,et al., Evidence for Gamow-Teller Decay of 78Ni Core from Beta-Delayed Neutron Emission Studies, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 092502 (2016)

    2016

  7. [20]

    Tolosa-Delgado, J

    A. Tolosa-Delgado, J. Agramunt, J. Tain,et al., Commissioning of the BRIKEN detector for the measurement of very exoticβ-delayed neutron emitters, Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment92...

    2019

  8. [21]

    Peltier, Z

    J. Peltier, Z. Xu, I. Cox,et al., The evidence ofN= 16 shell closure andβ-delayed neutron emission from 25F, Physics Letters B866, 139576 (2025)

    2025

  9. [22]

    Heideman, D

    J. Heideman, D. P´ erez-Loureiro, R. Grzywacz,et al., Conceptual design and first results for a neutron detector with interaction localization capabilities, Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated E...

    2019

  10. [23]

    Z. Y. Xu, R. Grzywacz, A. Gottardo,et al., Compound-Nucleus and Doorway-State Decays ofβ-Delayed Neutron Emitters 51,52,53K, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 042501 (2024)

    2024

  11. [24]

    Piersa, A

    M. Piersa, A. Korgul, L. M. Fraile,et al.(IDS Collaboration),βdecay of 133In:γemission from neutron-unbound states in 133Sn, Phys. Rev. C99, 024304 (2019)

    2019

  12. [25]

    Z. Y. Xu, M. Madurga, R. Grzywacz,et al.,β-delayed neutron spectroscopy of 133In, Physical Review C108, 014314 (2023)

    2023

  13. [26]

    Erler, N

    J. Erler, N. Birge, M. Kortelainen,et al., The limits of the nuclear landscape, Nature486, 509 (2012)

    2012

  14. [27]

    Smith and P

    G. Smith and P. Simms, Centroid-shift measurement of the mean lifetimes of the 316 and 612 keV states of 192Pt, Nuclear Physics A202, 409 (1973)

    1973

  15. [28]

    FRIB Decay Station initiator,https://fds.ornl.gov/initiator/(2023)

    2023

  16. [29]

    J. C. Hardy, L. C. Carraz, B. Jonson, and P. G. Hansen, The essential decay of pandemonium: A demonstration of errors in complex beta-decay schemes, Phys. Lett. B71, 307 (1977). 92

    1977

  17. [30]

    Algora, D

    A. Algora, D. Jordan, J. L. Ta ´ ın,et al., Reactor Decay Heat in 239Pu: Solving theγDis- crepancy in the 4–3000-s Cooling Period, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 202501 (2010)

    2010

  18. [31]

    B. C. Rasco, K. P. Rykaczewski, A. Fija lkowska,et al., Completeβ-decay pattern for the high- priority decay-heat isotopes 137I and 137Xe determined using total absorption spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. C95, 054328 (2017)

    2017

  19. [32]

    Woli´ nska-Cichocka, B

    M. Woli´ nska-Cichocka, B. C. Rasco, K. P. Rykaczewski,et al., Completeβ-decay patterns of 142Cs,142 Ba,and 142La determined using total absorption spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. C107, 034303 (2023)

    2023

  20. [33]

    Spyrou, S

    A. Spyrou, S. N. Liddick, F. Naqvi,et al., Strong Neutron-γCompetition above the Neutron Threshold in the Decay of 70Co, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 142701 (2016)

    2016

  21. [34]

    Fija lkowska, M

    A. Fija lkowska, M. Karny, K. P. Rykaczewski,et al., Impact of Modular Total Absorption Spectrometer measurements ofβdecay of fission products on the decay heat and reactor νe flux calculation, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 052503 (2017)

    2017

  22. [35]

    Guadilla, A

    V. Guadilla, A. Algora, J. L. Tain,et al., Large Impact of the Decay of Niobium Isomers on the Reactor νe Summation Calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 042502 (2019)

    2019

  23. [36]

    Dembskiet al., Extreme shape coexistence observed in 70Co, Communications Physics8, 77 (2025)

    C. Dembskiet al., Extreme shape coexistence observed in 70Co, Communications Physics8, 77 (2025)

    2025

  24. [37]

    Stukel, L

    M. Stukel, L. Hariasz, P. C. F. Di Stefano,et al.(KDK Collaboration), Rare 40K Decay with Implications for Fundamental Physics and Geochronology, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 052503 (2023)

    2023

  25. [38]

    Karny, A

    M. Karny, A. Fija lkowska, R. Grzywacz,et al., Design of a new central module for the Mod- ular Total Absorption Spectrometer, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms463(2019)

    2019

  26. [39]

    Shuai, B

    P. Shuai, B. C. Rasco, K. P. Rykaczewski,et al., Determination ofβ-decay feeding patterns of 88Rb and 88Kr using the Modular Total Absorption Spectrometer at ORNL HRIBF, Phys. Rev. C105, 054312 (2022)

    2022

  27. [40]

    Stepaniuk, M

    M. Stepaniuk, M. Karny, A. Fija lkowska,et al., Decay studies of theβ-delayed neutron emitters 87Br and 88Br measured by means of the Modular Total Absorption Spectrometer at ORNL HRIBF, Phys. Rev. C110, 054321 (2024)

    2024

  28. [41]

    A. C. Dombos, D.-L. Fang, A. Spyrou,et al., Total absorption spectroscopy of theβdecay of 76Ga, Phys. Rev. C93, 064317 (2016). 93

    2016

  29. [42]

    Lyons, A

    S. Lyons, A. Spyrou, S. N. Liddick,et al., 69,71Coβ-decay strength distributions from total absorption spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. C100, 025806 (2019)

    2019

  30. [43]

    Naqvi, S

    F. Naqvi, S. Karampagia, A. Spyrou,et al., Total absorption spectroscopy measurement on neutron-rich 74,75Cu isotopes, Nuclear Physics A1018, 122359 (2022)

    2022

  31. [44]

    L. D. Keukeleere, D. Rozpedzik, N. Severijns,et al., A first extraction of the weak magnetism form factor and Fierz interference term from the 114In→ 114Sn Gamow-Teller transition (2024), arXiv:2404.03140 [nucl-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [45]

    Vanlangendonck,The effect of weak magnetism on the shape of the 114In beta energy spectrum, Ph.D

    S. Vanlangendonck,The effect of weak magnetism on the shape of the 114In beta energy spectrum, Ph.D. thesis, KU Leuven (2023)

    2023

  33. [46]

    Monreal and J

    B. Monreal and J. A. Formaggio, Relativistic cyclotron radiation detection of tritium de- cay electrons as a new technique for measuring the neutrino mass, Physical Review D80, 10.1103/physrevd.80.051301 (2009)

    2009 doi

  34. [47]

    Byron, H

    W. Byron, H. Harrington, R. J. Taylor,et al.(He6-CRES Collaboration), First Observation of Cyclotron Radiation from MeV-Scalee ± following NuclearβDecay, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 082502 (2023)

    2023

  35. [48]

    Naviliat-Cuncic, Searches for exotic interactions in nuclear beta decay,Proceedings, 11th Latin American Symposium on Nuclear Physics and Applications: Medellin, Colombia, AIP Conf

    O. Naviliat-Cuncic, Searches for exotic interactions in nuclear beta decay,Proceedings, 11th Latin American Symposium on Nuclear Physics and Applications: Medellin, Colombia, AIP Conf. Proc.1753, 060001 (2016)

    2016

  36. [49]

    Hughes, E

    M. Hughes, E. A. George, O. Naviliat-Cuncic,et al., Measurement of the 20F half-life, Phys. Rev. C97, 054328 (2018)

    2018

  37. [50]

    Kanafani, X

    M. Kanafani, X. Fl´ echard, O. Naviliat-Cuncic,et al., Precision measurements in the beta decay of 6He, EPJ Web of Conferences282, 01010 (2023)

    2023

  38. [51]

    Fretwellet al.(BeEST), Direct Measurement of the 7BeL/KCapture Ratio in Ta-Based Superconducting Tunnel Junctions, Phys

    S. Fretwellet al.(BeEST), Direct Measurement of the 7BeL/KCapture Ratio in Ta-Based Superconducting Tunnel Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 032701 (2020), arXiv:2003.04921 [nucl-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [52]

    Friedrichet al., Limits on the Existence of sub-MeV Sterile Neutrinos from the Decay of7Be in Superconducting Quantum Sensors, Phys

    S. Friedrichet al., Limits on the Existence of sub-MeV Sterile Neutrinos from the Decay of7Be in Superconducting Quantum Sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 021803 (2021), arXiv:2010.09603 [nucl-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [53]

    Smolskyet al., Direct experimental constraints on the spatial extent of a neutrino wavepacket, Nature 10.1038/s41586-024-08479-6 (2025)

    J. Smolskyet al., Direct experimental constraints on the spatial extent of a neutrino wavepacket, Nature 10.1038/s41586-024-08479-6 (2025). 94

    2025 doi

  41. [54]

    Roca-Maza and N

    X. Roca-Maza and N. Paar, Nuclear equation of state from ground and collective excited state properties of nuclei, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics101, 96 (2018)

    2018

  42. [55]

    Meng,Relativistic Density Functional for Nuclear Structure, International Review of Nu- clear Physics, Vol

    J. Meng,Relativistic Density Functional for Nuclear Structure, International Review of Nu- clear Physics, Vol. 10 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2016)

    2016

  43. [56]

    Bender, P.-H

    M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard, Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 121 (2003)

    2003

  44. [57]

    L. M. Robledo, T. R. Rodr ´ ıguez, and R. R. Rodr ´ ıguez-Guzm´ an, Mean field and beyond description of nuclear structure with the Gogny force: a review, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics46, 013001 (2018)

    2018

  45. [58]

    Stone and P.-G

    J. Stone and P.-G. Reinhard, The Skyrme interaction in finite nuclei and nuclear matter, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics58, 587 (2007)

    2007

  46. [59]

    Nakatsukasa, K

    T. Nakatsukasa, K. Matsuyanagi, M. Matsuo,et al., Time-dependent density-functional de- scription of nuclear dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045004 (2016)

    2016

  47. [60]

    P. G. Reinhard and K. Goeke, The generator coordinate method and quantised collective motion in nuclear systems, Reports on Progress in Physics50, 1 (1987)

    1987

  48. [61]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous Electron Gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  49. [62]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  50. [63]

    Nikˇ si´ c, D

    T. Nikˇ si´ c, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, Relativistic nuclear energy density functionals: Mean- field and beyond, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics66, 519 (2011)

    2011

  51. [64]

    Vretenar, A

    D. Vretenar, A. Afanasjev, G. Lalazissis,et al., Relativistic Hartree–Bogoliubov theory: static and dynamic aspects of exotic nuclear structure, Physics Reports409, 101 (2005)

    2005

  52. [65]

    Suhonen,From nucleons to nucleus: concepts of microscopic nuclear theory(Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

    J. Suhonen,From nucleons to nucleus: concepts of microscopic nuclear theory(Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

    2007

  53. [66]

    Holinde, Two-nucleon forces and nuclear matter, Physics Reports68, 121 (1981)

    K. Holinde, Two-nucleon forces and nuclear matter, Physics Reports68, 121 (1981)

    1981

  54. [67]

    Machleidt, F

    R. Machleidt, F. Sammarruca, and Y. Song, Nonlocal nature of the nuclear force and its impact on nuclear structure, Physical Review C53, R1483 (1996)

    1996

  55. [68]

    R. B. Wiringa, V. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge- independence breaking, Physical Review C51, 38 (1995)

    1995

  56. [69]

    Sarriguren, E

    P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra, A. Escuderos,et al.,βdecay and shape isomerism in 74Kr, Nuclear Physics A635, 55 (1998). 95

    1998

  57. [70]

    N. Paar, P. Papakonstantinou, H. Hergert,et al., Collective multipole excitations based on correlated realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions, Phys. Rev. C74, 014318 (2006)

    2006

  58. [71]

    Beaujeault-Taudi` ere, M

    Y. Beaujeault-Taudi` ere, M. Frosini, J.-P. Ebran,et al., Zero- and finite-temperature electro- magnetic strength distributions in closed- and open-shell nuclei from first principles, Phys. Rev. C107, L021302 (2023)

    2023

  59. [72]

    N. Paar, P. Ring, T. Nikˇ si´ c,et al., Quasiparticle random phase approximation based on the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model, Phys. Rev. C67, 034312 (2003)

    2003

  60. [73]

    N. Paar, T. Nikˇ si´ c, D. Vretenar,et al., Quasiparticle random phase approximation based on the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model. II. Nuclear spin and isospin excitations, Phys. Rev. C69, 054303 (2004)

    2004

  61. [74]

    Nakatsukasa, T

    T. Nakatsukasa, T. Inakura, and K. Yabana, Finite amplitude method for the solution of the random-phase approximation, Phys. Rev. C76, 024318 (2007)

    2007

  62. [75]

    Gambacurta, M

    D. Gambacurta, M. Grasso, and J. Engel, Gamow-Teller Strength in 48Ca and 78Ni with the Charge-Exchange Subtracted Second Random-Phase Approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 212501 (2020)

    2020

  63. [76]

    Litvinova, P

    E. Litvinova, P. Ring, and V. Tselyaev, Particle-vibration coupling within covariant density functional theory, Phys. Rev. C75, 064308 (2007)

    2007

  64. [77]

    Litvinova, P

    E. Litvinova, P. Ring, and V. Tselyaev, Relativistic quasiparticle time blocking approxima- tion: Dipole response of open-shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. C78, 014312 (2008)

    2008

  65. [78]

    S. R. Stroberg, S. K. Bogner, H. Hergert, and J. D. Holt, Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69, 307 (2019), arXiv:1902.06154 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [79]

    Coraggio, G

    L. Coraggio, G. De Gregorio, T. Fukui, A. Gargano, Y. Z. Ma, Z. H. Cheng, and F. R. Xu, The role of three-nucleon potentials within the shell model: Past and present, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.134, 104079 (2024), arXiv:2309.02314 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [80]

    Caurier, G

    E. Caurier, G. Martinez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, and A. P. Zuker, The Shell Model as Unified View of Nuclear Structure, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 427 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0402046

    2005 arXiv

  68. [81]

    Seng, Radiative Corrections to Semileptonic Beta Decays: Progress and Challenges, Particles4, 397 (2021), arXiv:2108.03279 [hep-ph]

    C.-Y. Seng, Radiative Corrections to Semileptonic Beta Decays: Progress and Challenges, Particles4, 397 (2021), arXiv:2108.03279 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [82]

    Gennari, M

    M. Gennari, M. Drissi, M. Gorchtein,et al., Ab Initio Strategy for Taming the Nuclear- Structure Dependence ofV ud Extractions: The 10C→ 10 B Superallowed Transition, Phys. 96 Rev. Lett.134, 012501 (2025)

    2025

  70. [83]

    Z. Li, T. Miyagi, and A. Schwenk, Ab Initio Calculations ofβ-Decay Half-Lives forN= 50 Neutron-Rich Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 182501 (2026)

    2026

  71. [84]

    Hergert, A Guided Tour ofab initioNuclear Many-Body Theory, Front

    H. Hergert, A Guided Tour ofab initioNuclear Many-Body Theory, Front. in Phys.8, 379 (2020), arXiv:2008.05061 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  72. [85]

    H. W. Hammer, S. K¨ onig, and U. van Kolck, Nuclear effective field theory: status and perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 025004 (2020), arXiv:1906.12122 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  73. [86]

    Carlson, S

    J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, F. Pederiva,et al., Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1067 (2015), arXiv:1412.3081 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  74. [87]

    R. B. Wiringa, Variational calculations of few-body nuclei, Phys. Rev. C43, 1585 (1991)

    1991

  75. [88]

    Piarulli, R

    M. Piarulli, R. B. Wiringa, A. Lovato, G. B. King, and S. Pastore, Quantum Monte Carlo calculation ofδ C in the superallowed beta decay of 10C (2026), arXiv:2605.14006 [nucl-th]

    2026 arXiv

  76. [89]

    Carlson, Green’s function Monte Carlo study of light nuclei, Phys

    J. Carlson, Green’s function Monte Carlo study of light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C36, 2026 (1987)

    2026

  77. [90]

    Lonardoni, S

    D. Lonardoni, S. Gandolfi, J. E. Lynn,et al., Auxiliary field diffusion Monte Carlo calcula- tions of light and medium-mass nuclei with local chiral interactions, Phys. Rev. C97, 044318 (2018), arXiv:1802.08932 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  78. [91]

    Curry, R

    R. Curry, R. Somasundaram, S. Gandolfi,et al., Perturbative treatment of nonlocal chiral interactions in auxiliary-field diffusion Monte Carlo calculations, Phys. Rev. C111, 015801 (2025), arXiv:2409.16365 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  79. [92]

    B. R. Barrett, P. Navr´ atil, and J. P. Vary, Ab initio no core shell model, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics69, 131 (2013)

    2013

  80. [93]

    Navr´ atil, S

    P. Navr´ atil, S. Quaglioni, G. Hupin,et al., Unified ab initio approaches to nuclear structure and reactions, Physica Scripta91, 053002 (2016)

    2016

  81. [94]

    D. C. Zheng, J. P. Vary, and B. R. Barrett, Large-space shell-model calculations for light nuclei, Physical Review C50, 2841 (1994)

    1994

  82. [95]

    Navr´ atil, J

    P. Navr´ atil, J. P. Vary, and B. R. Barrett, Large-basis ab initio no-core shell model and its application to 12C, Physical Review C62, 054311 (2000)

    2000

  83. [96]

    C. Lanczos, An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differ- ential and integral operators, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards45, 255 (1950)

    1950

  84. [97]

    Komzsik,The Lanczos method: evolution and application(SIAM, 2003)

    L. Komzsik,The Lanczos method: evolution and application(SIAM, 2003). 97

    2003

  85. [98]

    Paige, Accuracy and effectiveness of the Lanczos algorithm for the symmetric eigenprob- lem, Linear Algebra and its Applications34, 235 (1980)

    C. Paige, Accuracy and effectiveness of the Lanczos algorithm for the symmetric eigenprob- lem, Linear Algebra and its Applications34, 235 (1980)

    1980

  86. [99]

    B. N. Parlett, Do we fully understand the symmetric Lanczos algorithm yet?, Proceedings of the Cornelius Lanczos International centenary Conference (1993)

    1993

  87. [100]

    Haydock, The inverse of a linear operator, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical, Nuclear and General7, 2120 (1974)

    R. Haydock, The inverse of a linear operator, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical, Nuclear and General7, 2120 (1974)

    1974

  88. [101]

    Haydock, The Recursive Solution of the Schrodinger Equation (Academic Press, 1980) pp

    R. Haydock, The Recursive Solution of the Schrodinger Equation (Academic Press, 1980) pp. 215–294

    1980

  89. [102]

    Heine, Electronic Structure from the Point of View of the Local Atomic Environment (Academic Press, 1980) pp

    V. Heine, Electronic Structure from the Point of View of the Local Atomic Environment (Academic Press, 1980) pp. 1–127

    1980

  90. [103]

    Kelly, Applications of the Recursion Method to the Electronic Structure from an Atomic Point of View (Academic Press, 1980) pp

    M. Kelly, Applications of the Recursion Method to the Electronic Structure from an Atomic Point of View (Academic Press, 1980) pp. 295–383

    1980

  91. [104]

    Haydock, V

    R. Haydock, V. Heine, and M. J. Kelly, Electronic structure based on the local atomic environment for tight-binding bands, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics5, 2845 (1972)

    1972

  92. [105]

    D. G. Pettifor and D. L. Weaire,The Recursion Method and Its Applications: Proceedings of the Conference, Imperial College, London, England September 13–14, 1984, Vol. 58 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    1984

  93. [106]

    Gennari,Electroweak radiative corrections in super-allowed beta decays from Ab initio theory, Ph.D

    M. Gennari,Electroweak radiative corrections in super-allowed beta decays from Ab initio theory, Ph.D. thesis, University of Victoria (2025)

    2025

  94. [107]

    K. D. Launey, T. Dytrych, and J. P. Draayer, Symmetry-guided large-scale shell-model the- ory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.89, 101 (2016), arXiv:1612.04298 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  95. [108]

    Dytrych, K

    T. Dytrych, K. D. Launey, J. P. Draayer,et al., Physics of nuclei: Key role of an emergent symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 042501 (2020), arXiv:1810.05757 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  96. [109]

    K. D. Launey, T. Dytrych, G. H. Sargsyan,et al., Emergent symplectic symmetry in atomic nuclei: Ab initio symmetry-adapted no-core shell model, Eur. Phys. J. ST229, 2429 (2020), arXiv:2108.04900 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  97. [110]

    A. C. Dreyfuss, K. D. Launey, J. E. Escher,et al., Clustering andα-capture reaction rate fromab initiosymmetry-adapted descriptions of 20Ne, Phys. Rev. C102, 044608 (2020)

    2020

  98. [111]

    Ruotsalainen, J

    P. Ruotsalainen, J. Henderson, G. Hackman,et al., Isospin symmetry inB(E2) values: Coulomb excitation study of 21Mg, Phys. Rev. C99, 051301 (2019). 98

    2019

  99. [112]

    Williams, G

    J. Williams, G. C. Ball, A. Chester,et al., Structure of 28Mg and influence of the neutron pfshell, Phys. Rev. C100, 014322 (2019)

    2019

  100. [113]

    K. D. Launey, G. H. Sargsyan, A. Mercenne,et al., Ab initio symmetry-adapted approaches to nuclear reactions, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , 104233 (2026)

    2026

  101. [114]

    K. D. Launey, A. Mercenne, G. H. Sargsyan,et al., Emergent clustering phenomena in the framework of theab initiosymmetry-adapted no-core shell model, inProceedings of the 4th International Workshop on State of the Art in Nuclear Cluster Physics (SOTANCP4), May 2018, Galveston,...

    2018

  102. [115]

    Burrows, R

    M. Burrows, R. B. Baker, S. Bacca,et al., Response functions and giant monopole resonances for light to medium-mass nuclei from theab initiosymmetry-adapted no-core–shell model, J. of Phys. G52, 035107 (2025)

    2025

  103. [116]

    K. D. Launey, A. Mercenne, and T. Dytrych, Nuclear Dynamics and Reactions in theAb InitioSymmetry-Adapted Framework, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71, 253 (2021)

    2021

  104. [117]

    Hagen, T

    G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, M. Hjorth-Jensen,et al., Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei, Rept. Prog. Phys.77, 096302 (2014), arXiv:1312.7872 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  105. [118]

    Hagen, T

    G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, D. J. Dean,et al., Ab-initio computation of neutron-rich oxygen isotopes, Phys. Rev. C80, 021306 (2009), arXiv:0907.4167 [nucl-th]

    2009 arXiv

  106. [119]

    Z. H. Sun, C. A. Bell, G. Hagen,et al., How to renormalize coupled cluster theory, Phys. Rev. C106, L061302 (2022), arXiv:2205.12990 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  107. [120]

    J. D. Watts, J. Gauss, and R. J. Bartlett, Coupled-cluster methods with noniterative triple excitations for restricted open-shell Hartree–Fock and other general single determinant refer- ence functions. Energies and analytical gradients, The Journal of Chemical Physics98, 8718 (1993)

    1993

  108. [121]

    Huet al., Ab initio predictions link the neutron skin of 208Pb to nuclear forces, Nature Phys.18, 1196 (2022), arXiv:2112.01125 [nucl-th]

    B. Huet al., Ab initio predictions link the neutron skin of 208Pb to nuclear forces, Nature Phys.18, 1196 (2022), arXiv:2112.01125 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  109. [122]

    Bonaiti, G

    F. Bonaiti, G. Hagen, and T. Papenbrock, Structure of the doubly magic nuclei 208Pb and 266Pb from ab initio computations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14217 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  110. [123]

    Hagen, M

    G. Hagen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, G. Jansen,et al., Continuum effects and three-nucleon forces in neutron-rich oxygen isotopes, Physical Review Letters108, 242501 (2012)

    2012

  111. [124]

    Hagen, M

    G. Hagen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, G. Jansen,et al., Evolution of shell structure in neutron-rich calcium isotopes, Physical Review Letters109, 032502 (2012). 99

    2012

  112. [125]

    Hagen, A

    G. Hagen, A. Ekstr¨ om, C. Forssen,et al., Neutron and weak-charge distributions of the 48Ca nucleus, Nature Physics12, 186 (2016)

    2016

  113. [126]

    Hagen, G

    G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, and T. Papenbrock, Structure of 78Ni from first-principles compu- tations, Physical Review Letters117, 172501 (2016)

    2016

  114. [127]

    T. D. Morris, J. Simonis, S. Stroberg,et al., Structure of the lightest tin isotopes, Physical Review Letters120, 152503 (2018)

    2018

  115. [128]

    Gysbers, G

    P. Gysbers, G. Hagen, J. Holt,et al., Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles, Nature Physics15, 428 (2019)

    2019

  116. [129]

    Bacca, N

    S. Bacca, N. Barnea, G. Hagen,et al., First principles description of the giant dipole resonance in 16O, Physical Review Letters111, 122502 (2013)

    2013

  117. [130]

    Bacca, N

    S. Bacca, N. Barnea, G. Hagen,et al., Giant and pigmy dipole resonances in 4He, 16,22O, and 40Ca from chiral nucleon-nucleon interactions, Physical Review C90, 064619 (2014)

    2014

  118. [131]

    Simonis, S

    J. Simonis, S. Bacca, and G. Hagen, First principles electromagnetic responses in medium- mass nuclei: Recent progress from coupled-cluster theory, The European Physical Journal A 55, 241 (2019)

    2019

  119. [132]

    Kaufmann, J

    S. Kaufmann, J. Simonis, S. Bacca,et al., Charge radius of the short-lived 68Ni and correla- tion with the dipole polarizability, Physical review letters124, 132502 (2020)

    2020

  120. [133]

    R. W. Fearick, P. von Neumann-Cosel, S. Bacca,et al., Electric dipole polarizability of 40Ca, Physical Review Research5, L022044 (2023)

    2023

  121. [134]

    Sobczyk, B

    J. Sobczyk, B. Acharya, S. Bacca,et al., Ab initio computation of the longitudinal response function in 40Ca, Physical Review Letters127, 072501 (2021)

    2021

  122. [135]

    J. E. Sobczyk, B. Acharya, S. Bacca,et al., 40Ca transverse response function from coupled- cluster theory, Physical Review C109, 025502 (2024)

    2024

  123. [136]

    Acharya, J

    B. Acharya, J. E. Sobczyk, S. Bacca,et al., 16O electroweak Response Functions from First Principles, Physical Review Letters134, 202501 (2025)

    2025

  124. [137]

    Giraud, J

    S. Giraud, J. Zamora, R. Zegers,et al.,β + Gamow-Teller Strengths from Unstable 14O via the (d,2 He) Reaction in Inverse Kinematics, Physical Review Letters130, 232301 (2023)

    2023

  125. [138]

    Neupane, N

    S. Neupane, N. Kitamura, Z. Xu,et al., Firstβ-delayed neutron spectroscopy of 24O, Physical Review C110, 034323 (2024)

    2024

  126. [139]

    Bonaiti, S

    F. Bonaiti, S. Bacca, G. Hagen,et al., Electromagnetic observables of open-shell nuclei from coupled-cluster theory, Physical Review C110, 044306 (2024). 100

    2024

  127. [140]

    Marino, F

    F. Marino, F. Bonaiti, S. Bacca,et al., Structure and dynamics of open-shell nuclei from spherical coupled-cluster theory, Physical Review C112, 014315 (2025)

    2025

  128. [141]

    S. J. Novario, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen,et al., Charge radii of exotic neon and magnesium isotopes, Physical Review C102, 051303 (2020)

    2020

  129. [142]

    Hagen, S

    G. Hagen, S. J. Novario, Z. Sun,et al., Angular-momentum projection in coupled-cluster theory: Structure of 34Mg, Physical Review C105, 064311 (2022)

    2022

  130. [143]

    Z. Sun, A. Ekstr¨ om, C. Forss´ en,et al., Multiscale physics of atomic nuclei from first principles, Physical Review X15, 011028 (2025)

    2025

  131. [144]

    Hergert, S

    H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, T. D. Morris,et al., The In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group: A Novel Ab Initio Method for Nuclei, Physics Reports621, 165 (2016)

    2016

  132. [145]

    S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, and R. J. Perry, Similarity Renormalization Group for Nucleon- Nucleon Interactions, Physical Review C75, 061001 (2007)

    2007

  133. [146]

    M. D. Schuster, S. Quaglioni, C. W. Johnson,et al., Operator Evolution for Ab Initio Theory of Light Nuclei, Physical Review C90, 011301 (2014)

    2014

  134. [147]

    Hergert, In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group for Closed and Open-Shell Nuclei, Physica Scripta92, 023002 (2016)

    H. Hergert, In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group for Closed and Open-Shell Nuclei, Physica Scripta92, 023002 (2016)

    2016

  135. [148]

    N. M. Parzuchowski, S. R. Stroberg, P. Navr´ atil,et al., Ab Initio Electromagnetic Observables with the In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group, Physical Review C96, 034324 (2017)

    2017

  136. [149]

    Gebrerufael, K

    E. Gebrerufael, K. Vobig, H. Hergert,et al., Ab Initio Description of Open-Shell Nuclei: Merging No-Core Shell Model and In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group, Physical Review Letters118, 152503 (2017)

    2017

  137. [150]

    S. R. Stroberg, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt,et al., Ground and Excited States of Doubly Open-Shell Nuclei from Ab Initio Valence-Space Hamiltonians, Physical Review C93, 051301 (2016)

    2016

  138. [151]

    S. R. Stroberg, Beta Decay in Medium-Mass Nuclei with the In-Medium Similarity Renor- malization Group, Particles4, 521 (2021)

    2021

  139. [152]

    J. M. Yao, J. Engel, L. J. Wang,et al., Generator-Coordinate Reference States for Spectra and 0νββDecay in the in-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group, Physical Review C 98, 054311 (2018), arXiv:1807.11053 [cond-mat, physics:nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  140. [153]

    J. Yao, B. Bally, J. Engel,et al., Ab initio treatment of collective correlations and the neutrinoless double beta decay of 48Ca, Physical Review Letters124, 232501 (2020). 101

    2020

  141. [154]

    Belley, J

    A. Belley, J. Yao, B. Bally,et al., Ab initio uncertainty quantification of neutrinoless double- beta decay in 76Ge, Physical Review Letters132, 182502 (2024)

    2024

  142. [155]

    C. W. Johnson, K. D. Launey, N. Auerbach,et al., White Paper: From Bound States to the Continuum, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics47, 123001 (2020)

    2020

  143. [156]

    R. J. Furnstahl, EFT for DFT, inRenormalization Group and Effective Field Theory Ap- proaches to Many-Body Systems, edited by A. Schwenk and J. Polonyi (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012) pp. 133–191

    2012

  144. [157]

    Dobaczewski, K

    J. Dobaczewski, K. Bennaceur, and F. Raimondi, Effective theory for low-energy nuclear energy density functionals, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics39, 125103 (2012)

    2012

  145. [158]

    L. Huth, V. Durant, J. Simonis,et al., Shell-model interactions from chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. C98, 044301 (2018)

    2018

  146. [159]

    C. R. Ding, C. C. Wang, J. M. Yao,et al., From Spin to Pseudospin Symmetry: The Origin of Magic Numbers in Nuclear Structure, Physical Review Letters136, 052501 (2026)

    2026

  147. [160]

    Pastore, L

    S. Pastore, L. Girlanda, R. Schiavilla,et al., Electromagnetic currents and magnetic moments in chiral effective field theory (χEFT), Phys. Rev. C80, 034004 (2009)

    2009

  148. [161]

    Krebs, Nuclear currents in chiral effective field theory, The European Physical Journal A 56, 234 (2020)

    H. Krebs, Nuclear currents in chiral effective field theory, The European Physical Journal A 56, 234 (2020)

    2020

  149. [162]

    Cirigliano, W

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries,et al., Toward complete leading-order predictions for neutrinoless doubleβdecay, Physical Review Letters126, 172002 (2021)

    2021

  150. [163]

    E. Zhou, C. Ding, J. Yao,et al., Ab initio nuclear shape coexistence and emergence of island of inversion aroundN= 20, Physics Letters B865, 139464 (2025)

    2025

  151. [164]

    Bally and M

    B. Bally and M. Bender, Projection on particle number and angular momentum: Example of triaxial Bogoliubov quasiparticle states, Phys. Rev. C103, 024315 (2021)

    2021

  152. [165]

    Frosini, T

    M. Frosini, T. Duguet, J. P. Ebran,et al., Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei. I. Novel PGCM-PT Formalism., Eur. Phys. J. A58(2022)

    2022

  153. [166]

    Frosini, T

    M. Frosini, T. Duguet, J. P. Ebran,et al., Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei. II. Ab initio study of neon isotopes via PGCM and IM-NCSM calculations., Eur. Phys. J. A58(2022)

    2022

  154. [167]

    Frosini, T

    M. Frosini, T. Duguet, J. P. Ebran,et al., Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei. III. Ab initio calculations at second order in PGCM-PT, Eur. Phys. J. A58, 64 102 (2022)

    2022

  155. [168]

    Porro, T

    A. Porro, T. Duguet, J. P. Ebran,et al., Ab initio description of monopole resonances in light- and medium-mass nuclei. I. Technical aspects and uncertainties of ab initio PGCM calculations, The European Physical Journal A60, 133 (2024)

    2024

  156. [169]

    Porro, T

    A. Porro, T. Duguet, J. P. Ebran,et al., Ab initio description of monopole resonances in light- and medium-mass nuclei. II. Ab initio PGCM calculations in 46Ti, 28Si and 24Mg, The European Physical Journal A60, 134 (2024)

    2024

  157. [170]

    Porro, T

    A. Porro, T. Duguet, J. P. Ebran,et al., Ab initio description of monopole resonances in light- and medium-mass nuclei. III. Moments evaluation in ab initio PGCM calculations, The European Physical Journal A60, 155 (2024)

    2024

  158. [171]

    Porro, T

    A. Porro, T. Duguet, J. P. Ebran,et al., Ab initio description of monopole resonances in light- and medium-mass nuclei. IV. Angular momentum projection and rotation-vibration coupling, The European Physical Journal A60, 233 (2024)

    2024

  159. [172]

    Porro, A

    A. Porro, A. Schwenk, and A. Tichai, Impact of ground-state correlations on the multipole response of nuclei: Ab initio calculations of moment operators, Physical Review C112, 054303 (2025)

    2025

  160. [173]

    Bonaiti, A

    F. Bonaiti, A. Porro, S. Bacca, A. Schwenk, and A. Tichai, Ab initio calculations of monopole sum rules: From finite nuclei to infinite nuclear matter, Physical Review C113, 024333 (2026)

    2026

  161. [174]

    A. E. McCoy, M. A. Caprio, T. Dytrych,et al., Emergent Sp(3,R) Dynamical Symmetry in the Nuclear Many-Body System from an Ab Initio Description, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 102505 (2020)

    2020

  162. [175]

    Dytrych, K

    T. Dytrych, K. D. Launey, J. P. Draayer,et al., Physics of Nuclei: Key Role of an Emergent Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 042501 (2020)

    2020

  163. [176]

    Frosini, T

    M. Frosini, T. Duguet, and P. Tamagno, Tensor factorization in ab initio many-body calcu- lations, The European Physical Journal A60, 183 (2024)

    2024

  164. [177]

    Cirigliano, W

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries,et al., Ab initio electroweak corrections to superallowed βdecays and their impact onV ud, Phys. Rev. C110, 055502 (2024), arXiv:2405.18464 [nucl- th]

    2024 arXiv

  165. [178]

    Cirigliano, W

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries,et al., Radiative Corrections to SuperallowedβDecays in Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211801 (2024), arXiv:2405.18469 [hep-ph]. 103

    2024 arXiv

  166. [179]

    G. B. King, J. Carlson, A. R. Flores,et al., Quantum Monte Carlo calculation ofδ NS in 10C using an effective field theory approach, ”arXiv” (2025), arXiv:2509.07310 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  167. [180]

    Cirigliano, W

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, E. Mereghetti,et al., Neutrinoless double-βdecay in effective field theory: The light-Majorana neutrino-exchange mechanism, Physical Review C97, 065501 (2018)

    2018

  168. [181]

    Cirigliano, W

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries,et al., A neutrinoless double beta decay master formula from effective field theory, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 1 (2018)

    2018

  169. [182]

    Cirigliano, W

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries,et al., Renormalized approach to neutrinoless double-β decay, Physical Review C100, 055504 (2019)

    2019

  170. [183]

    Chambers-Wall, J

    G. Chambers-Wall, J. Lieffers, G. B. King, E. Mereghetti, S. Pastore, M. Piarulli, and R. B. Wiringa, Three-nucleon lepton-number-violating potentials in chiral effective field theory and their matrix elements in light nuclei, Physical Review C113, 025502 (2026)

    2026

  171. [184]

    Jokiniemi, P

    L. Jokiniemi, P. Soriano, and J. Men´ endez, Impact of the leading-order short-range nuclear matrix element on the neutrinoless double-beta decay of medium-mass and heavy nuclei, Physics Letters B823, 136720 (2021)

    2021

  172. [185]

    Jokiniemi, B

    L. Jokiniemi, B. Romeo, P. Soriano,et al., Neutrinolessββ-decay nuclear matrix elements from two-neutrinoββ-decay data, Physical Review C107, 044305 (2023)

    2023

  173. [186]

    Castillo, L

    D. Castillo, L. Jokiniemi, P. Soriano,et al., Neutrinolessββdecay nuclear matrix elements complete up to N2LO in heavy nuclei, Physics Letters B860, 139181 (2025), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 869, 139851 (2025)]

    2025

  174. [187]

    P. J. Fasano,Ab initio nuclear structure and electroweak properties from chiral effective field theory, Springer Theses (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2025)

    2025

  175. [188]

    Duguet, J

    T. Duguet, J. P. Ebran, M. Frosini,et al., Rooting the EDF method into the ab initio framework, The European Physical Journal A59, 13 (2023)

    2023

  176. [189]

    O. T. Unke, S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda,et al., Machine Learning Force Fields, Chemical Reviews121, 10142 (2021)

    2021

  177. [190]

    Akashi, M

    R. Akashi, M. Sogal, and K. Burke, Can machines learn density functionals? Past, present, and future of ML in DFT, (2025), arXiv:2503.01709 [physics.comp-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  178. [191]

    Bakurov, P

    I. Bakurov, P. Giuliani, K. Godbey,et al., Genetic programming for the nuclear many-body problem: a guide, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics52, 102001 (2025). 104

    2025

  179. [192]

    B. C. He and S. R. Stroberg, Factorized approximation to the in-medium similarity renor- malization group IMSRG(3), Phys. Rev. C110, 044317 (2024)

    2024

  180. [193]

    S. R. Stroberg, T. D. Morris, and B. C. He, In-medium similarity renormalization group with flowing 3-body operators, and approximations thereof, Phys. Rev. C110, 044316 (2024)

    2024

  181. [194]

    E. F. Zhou, C. R. Ding, Q. Y. Luo,et al., Ab initio mapping of the boundary of theN= 20 island of inversion, (2026), arXiv:2603.07363 [nucl-th]

    2026

  182. [195]

    G. H. Lang, C. W. Johnson, S. E. Koonin,et al., Monte Carlo evaluation of path integrals for the nuclear shell model, Phys. Rev. C48, 1518 (1993)

    1993

  183. [196]

    Alhassid, D

    Y. Alhassid, D. J. Dean, S. E. Koonin,et al., Practical solution to the Monte Carlo sign problem: Realistic calculations of 54Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 613 (1994)

    1994

  184. [197]

    Schunck and L

    N. Schunck and L. M. Robledo, Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 116301 (2016)

    2016

  185. [198]

    Litvinova and H

    E. Litvinova and H. Wibowo, Finite-Temperature Relativistic Nuclear Field Theory: An Application to the Dipole Response, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 082501 (2018)

    2018

  186. [199]

    Ravlic, E

    A. Ravlic, E. Y¨ uksel, Y. F. Niu,et al., Evolution ofβ-decay half-lives in stellar environments, Phys. Rev. C104, 054318 (2021)

    2021

  187. [200]

    Ravli´ c, E

    A. Ravli´ c, E. Y¨ uksel, T. Nikˇ si´ c,et al., Expanding the limits of nuclear stability at finite temperature, Nature Communications14, 4834 (2023)

    2023

  188. [201]

    Ravli´ c, E

    A. Ravli´ c, E. M. Ney, J. Engel,et al., Elucidating the finite temperature quasiparticle random phase approximation, The European Physical Journal A61, 37 (2025)

    2025

  189. [202]

    Rios, Green’s Function Techniques for Infinite Nuclear Systems, Frontiers in Physics8, 387 (2020)

    A. Rios, Green’s Function Techniques for Infinite Nuclear Systems, Frontiers in Physics8, 387 (2020)

    2020

  190. [203]

    B.-N. Lu, N. Li, S. Elhatisari,et al., Ab Initio Nuclear Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 192502 (2020)

    2020

  191. [204]

    Y.-Z. Ma, Z. Lin, B.-N. Lu,et al., Structure Factors for Hot Neutron Matter from Ab Initio Lattice Simulations with High-Fidelity Chiral Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 232502 (2024)

    2024

  192. [205]

    I. G. Smith, H. Hergert, and S. K. Bogner, In-medium similarity renormalization group at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. C111, 044318 (2025)

    2025

  193. [206]

    National Nuclear Data Center, NuDat 3.0. 105

  194. [207]

    Crawford, P

    H. Crawford, P. Fallon, A. Macchiavelli,et al., First spectroscopy of the near drip-line nucleus 40Mg, Physical Review Letters122, 052501 (2019)

    2019

  195. [208]

    Crawford, V

    H. Crawford, V. Tripathi, J. Allmond,et al., Crossing N= 28 toward the neutron drip line: first measurement of half-lives at FRIB, Physical Review Letters129, 212501 (2022)

    2022

  196. [209]

    P. M. Walker and Z. Podoly´ ak, Nuclear Isomers, inHandbook of Nuclear Physics, edited by I. Tanihata, H. Toki, and T. Kajino (Springer, 2022) pp. 1–37

    2022

  197. [210]

    Thibault, R

    C. Thibault, R. Klapisch, C. Rigaud,et al., Direct measurement of the masses of 11Li and 26−32Na with an on-line mass spectrometer, Phys. Rev. C12, 644 (1975)

    1975

  198. [211]

    D´ etraz, D

    C. D´ etraz, D. Guillemaud, G. Huber,et al., Beta decay of 27−32Na and their descendants, Phys. Rev. C19, 164 (1979)

    1979

  199. [212]

    Guillemaud-Mueller, C

    D. Guillemaud-Mueller, C. Detraz, M. Langevin,et al.,β-Decay schemes of very neutron-rich sodium isotopes and their descendants, Nuclear Physics A426, 37 (1984)

    1984

  200. [213]

    Huber, F

    G. Huber, F. Touchard, S. B¨ uttgenbach,et al., Spins, magnetic moments, and isotope shifts of 21−31Na by high resolution laser spectroscopy of the atomicD 1 line, Phys. Rev. C18, 2342 (1978)

    1978

  201. [214]

    Otsuka, A

    T. Otsuka, A. Gade, O. Sorlin,et al., Evolution of shell structure in exotic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 015002 (2020)

    2020

  202. [215]

    Sorlin and M.-G

    O. Sorlin and M.-G. Porquet, Nuclear magic numbers: New features far from stability, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics61, 602 (2008)

    2008

  203. [216]

    G. W. Misch, S. K. Ghorui, P. Banerjee,et al., Astromers: nuclear isomers in astrophysics, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series252, 2 (2020)

    2020

  204. [217]

    G. W. Misch and M. R. Mumpower, Astromers: status and prospects, The European Physical Journal Special Topics233, 1075 (2024)

    2024

  205. [219]

    Young, D

    B. Young, D. Bazin, W. Benenson,et al., Strong isomer production in fragmentation reac- tions, Physics Letters B311, 22 (1993)

    1993

  206. [220]

    T. J. Gray, J. M. Allmond, Z. Xu,et al., Microsecond Isomer at the N=20 Island of Shape Inversion Observed at FRIB, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 242501 (2023)

    2023

  207. [221]

    R. S. Lubna, S. N. Liddick, T. H. Ogunbeku,et al.,βdecay of 36Mg and 36Al: Identification of aβ-decaying isomer in 36Al, Phys. Rev. C108, 014329 (2023). 106

    2023

  208. [222]

    T. H. Ogunbeku, J. M. Allmond, T. J. Gray,et al., Universal Effective Charges in thesd andf pShells, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 072501 (2025)

    2025

  209. [223]

    FRIBet al., Discovery of Isomer Project 10.11578/frib/2572219 (2025)

    2025

  210. [224]

    Suchyta, S

    S. Suchyta, S. N. Liddick, Y. Tsunoda,et al., Shape coexistence in 68Ni, Phys. Rev. C89, 021301 (2014)

    2014

  211. [225]

    Crider, C

    B. Crider, C. Prokop, S. Liddick,et al., Shape coexistence from lifetime and branching-ratio measurements in 68,70Ni, Physics Letters B763, 108 (2016)

    2016

  212. [226]

    I. Cox, Z. Y. Xu, R. Grzywacz,et al., Proton Shell Gaps inN= 28 Nuclei from the First Complete Spectroscopy Study with FRIB Decay Station Initiator, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 152503 (2024)

    2024

  213. [227]

    G. King, L. Andreoli, S. Pastore,et al., Chiral effective field theory calculations of weak transitions in light nuclei, Physical Review C102, 025501 (2020)

    2020

  214. [228]

    Brase, T

    C. Brase, T. Miyagi, J. Men´ endez,et al., Two-body currents at finite momentum transfer and applications to M1 transitions, Phys. Rev. C113, 014317 (2026), arXiv:2504.08711 [nucl-th]

    2026

  215. [229]

    E. M. Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler,et al., Synthesis of the Elements in Stars, Rev. Mod. Phys.29, 547 (1957)

    1957

  216. [230]

    A. G. W. Cameron,Stellar evolution, nuclear astrophysics, and nucleogenesis, Technical Report CRL-41 (Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., 1957)

    1957

  217. [231]

    J. M. Lattimer and D. N. Schramm, Black-Hole-Neutron-Star Collisions, The Astrophysical Journal Letters192, L145 (1974)

    1974

  218. [232]

    J. M. Lattimer and D. N. Schramm, The tidal disruption of neutron stars by black holes in close binaries., Astrophys. J.210, 549 (1976)

    1976

  219. [233]

    Popham, S

    R. Popham, S. E. Woosley, and C. Fryer, Hyperaccreting Black Holes and Gamma-Ray Bursts, The Astrophysical Journal518, 356 (1999)

    1999

  220. [234]

    Winteler, R

    C. Winteler, R. K¨ appeli, A. Perego,et al., Magnetorotationally Driven Supernovae as the Origin of Early Galaxyr-Process Elements?, The Astrophysical Journal Letters750, L22 (2012)

    2012

  221. [235]

    Patel, B

    A. Patel, B. D. Metzger, J. A. Goldberg,et al.,r-process Nucleosynthesis and Radioactively Powered Transients from Magnetar Giant Flares, The Astrophysical Journal985, 234 (2025)

    2025

  222. [236]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, T. Pitik, L. F. Longo Micchi,et al., Gamma-Ray Bursts and Kilonovae from the Accretion-induced Collapse of White Dwarfs, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 107 978, L38 (2025)

    2025

  223. [237]

    Barnes and D

    J. Barnes and D. Kasen, Effect of a high opacity on the light curves of radioactively powered transients from compact object mergers, ApJ775, 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/18 (2013)

    2013 doi

  224. [238]

    N. R. Tanvir, A. J. Levan, C. Gonzalez-Fernandez,et al., The emergence of a lanthanide-rich kilonova following the merger of two neutron stars, The Astrophysical Journal Letters848, L27 (2017)

    2017

  225. [239]

    C. J. Horowitz, A. Arcones, B. Cˆ ot´ e,et al.,r-process Nucleosynthesis: Connecting Rare- isotope Beam Facilities with the Cosmos, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.46, 083001 (2019)

    2019

  226. [240]

    J. J. Cowan, C. Sneden, J. E. Lawler,et al., Origin of the heaviest elements: The rapid neutron-capture process, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015002 (2021)

    2021

  227. [241]

    Surman, J

    R. Surman, J. Engel, J. R. Bennett,et al., Source of the Rare-Earth Element Peak inr- Process Nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1809 (1997)

    1997

  228. [242]

    Minato and K

    F. Minato and K. Hagino,β-decay half-lives at finite temperatures forN= 82 isotones, Phys. Rev. C80, 065808 (2009)

    2009

  229. [243]

    Ravli´ c, E

    A. Ravli´ c, E. Y¨ uksel, T. Nikˇ si´ c,et al., Global properties of nuclei at finite-temperature within the covariant energy density functional theory, Phys. Rev. C109, 014318 (2024)

    2024

  230. [244]

    Langanke and G

    K. Langanke and G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, Rate tables for the weak processes ofpf-shell nuclei in stellar environments, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables79, 1 (2001)

    2001

  231. [245]

    Litvinova, C

    E. Litvinova, C. Robin, and H. Wibowo, Temperature Dependence of Nuclear Spin-Isospin Response and Beta Decay in Hot Astrophysical Environments, Physics Letters B800, 135134 (2020)

    2020

  232. [246]

    Saito, A

    Y. Saito, A. Ravli´ c, P. Nalamwar,et al., Effect of Finite-temperatureβ-decay Rates on the Rapid Neutron Capture Process (2026), arXiv:2510.08772 [nucl-th]

    2026

  233. [247]

    M¨ oller, J

    P. M¨ oller, J. Nix, and K.-L. Kratz, Nuclear properties for astrophysical and radioactive-ion- beam applications, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables66, 131 (1997)

    1997

  234. [248]

    M¨ oller, B

    P. M¨ oller, B. Pfeiffer, and K.-L. Kratz, New calculations of grossβ-decay properties for astrophysical applications: Speeding-up the classicalrprocess, Phys. Rev. C67, 055802 (2003)

    2003

  235. [249]

    M¨ oller, M

    P. M¨ oller, M. Mumpower, T. Kawano,et al., Nuclear properties for astrophysical and radioactive-ion-beam applications (II), Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables125, 1 (2019). 108

    2019

  236. [250]

    Marketin, L

    T. Marketin, L. Huther, and G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, Large-scale evaluation ofβ-decay rates of r-process nuclei with the inclusion of first-forbidden transitions, Phys. Rev. C93, 025805 (2016)

    2016

  237. [251]

    E. M. Ney, J. Engel, T. Li,et al., Global description ofβ − decay with the axially deformed Skyrme finite-amplitude method: Extension to odd-mass and odd-odd nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034326 (2020)

    2020

  238. [252]

    K. A. Lund, J. Engel, G. C. McLaughlin,et al., The Influence ofβ-decay Rates onr-process Observables, The Astrophysical Journal944, 144 (2023)

    2023

  239. [253]

    Kullmann, S

    I. Kullmann, S. Goriely, O. Just,et al., Impact of systematic nuclear uncertainties on com- position and decay heat of dynamical and disc ejecta in compact binary mergers, MNRAS 523, 2551 (2023), arXiv:2207.07421 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  240. [254]

    Langanke, G

    K. Langanke, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, and R. G. T. Zegers, Electron capture in stars, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 066301 (2021)

    2021

  241. [255]

    Langanke and G

    K. Langanke and G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 819 (2003)

    2003

  242. [256]

    H. A. Bethe, Supernova mechanisms, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 801 (1990)

    1990

  243. [257]

    G. M. Fuller, W. A. Fowler, and M. J. Newman, Stellar weak-interaction rates forsd-shell nuclei. I - Nuclear matrix element systematics with application to Al-26 and selected nuclei of importance to the supernova problem, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.42, 447 (1980)

    1980

  244. [258]

    G. M. Fuller, W. A. Fowler, and M. J. Newman, Stellar weak interaction rates for intermediate mass nuclei. III - Rate tables for the free nucleons and nuclei with A = 21 to A = 60, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.48, 279 (1982)

    1982

  245. [259]

    G. M. Fuller, W. A. Fowler, and M. J. Newman, Stellar weak interaction rates for intermediate-mass nuclei. II - A = 21 to A = 60, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.252, 715 (1982)

    1982

  246. [260]

    G. M. Fuller, W. A. Fowler, and M. J. Newman, Stellar weak interaction rates for intermediate-mass nuclei. IV - Interpolation procedures for rapidly varying lepton capture rates using effective log(f t)-values, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.293, 1 (1985)

    1985

  247. [261]

    Langanke, E

    K. Langanke, E. Kolbe, and D. J. Dean, Unblocking of the Gamow-Teller strength in stellar electron capture on neutron-rich germanium isotopes, Phys. Rev. C63, 032801 (2001)

    2001

  248. [262]

    Langanke, G

    K. Langanke, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, J. M. Sampaio,et al., Electron Capture Rates on Nuclei and Implications for Stellar Core Collapse, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 241102 (2003). 109

    2003

  249. [263]

    A. L. Cole, T. S. Anderson, R. G. T. Zegers,et al., Gamow-Teller strengths and electron- capture rates forpf-shell nuclei of relevance for late stellar evolution, Phys. Rev. C86, 015809 (2012)

    2012

  250. [264]

    Juodagalvis, K

    A. Juodagalvis, K. Langanke, W. Hix,et al., Improved estimate of electron capture rates on nuclei during stellar core collapse, Nuclear Physics A848, 454 (2010)

    2010

  251. [265]

    N. Paar, G. Col` o, E. Khan,et al., Calculation of stellar electron-capture cross sections on nuclei based on microscopic Skyrme functionals, Phys. Rev. C80, 055801 (2009)

    2009

  252. [266]

    Y. F. Niu, N. Paar, D. Vretenar,et al., Stellar electron-capture rates calculated with the finite-temperature relativistic random-phase approximation, Phys. Rev. C83, 045807 (2011)

    2011

  253. [267]

    Ravli´ c, E

    A. Ravli´ c, E. Y¨ uksel, Y. F. Niu,et al., Stellar electron-capture rates based on finite- temperature relativistic quasiparticle random-phase approximation, Phys. Rev. C102, 065804 (2020)

    2020

  254. [268]

    A. A. Dzhioev, K. Langanke, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo,et al., Unblocking of stellar electron cap- ture for neutron-richN= 50 nuclei at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. C101, 025805 (2020)

    2020

  255. [269]

    Giraud, R

    S. Giraud, R. G. T. Zegers, B. A. Brown,et al., Finite-temperature electron-capture rates for neutron-rich nuclei nearN= 50 and effects on core-collapse supernova simulations, Phys. Rev. C105, 055801 (2022)

    2022

  256. [270]

    Sullivan, E

    C. Sullivan, E. O’Connor, R. G. T. Zegers,et al., The sensitivity of core-collapse supernovae to nuclear electron capture, The Astrophysical Journal816, 44 (2015)

    2015

  257. [271]

    Ravli´ c, S

    A. Ravli´ c, S. Giraud, N. Paar,et al., Self-consistent microscopic calculations for electron captures on nuclei in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. C112, L032801 (2025)

    2025

  258. [272]

    Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, K

    G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, K. Langanke, and D. J. Dean, Competition of Electron Capture and Beta-Decay Rates in Supernova Collapse, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series126, 493 (2000)

    2000

  259. [273]

    Dasher, A

    T. Dasher, A. Ravli´ c, S. Lalit,et al., Enhanced antineutrino emission fromβdecay in core- collapse supernovae with self-consistent weak decay rates, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21567 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  260. [274]

    Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Physical Review Letters10, 531 (1963)

    N. Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Physical Review Letters10, 531 (1963)

    1963

  261. [275]

    Kobayashi and T

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP-violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interac- tion, Progress of theoretical physics49, 652 (1973). 110

    1973

  262. [276]

    Navas, C

    S. Navas, C. Amsler, T. Gutsche,et al., Review of particle physics, Physical Review D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  263. [277]

    Hardy and I

    J. Hardy and I. Towner, Superallowed 0 + →0 + nuclearβdecays: 2020 critical survey, with implications forV ud and CKM unitarity, Physical Review C102, 045501 (2020)

    2020

  264. [278]

    A. D. MacLean, A. T. Laffoley, C. E. Svensson,et al., High-precision branching ratio mea- surement and spin assignment implications for 62Ga superallowedβdecay, Phys. Rev. C102, 054325 (2020)

    2020

  265. [279]

    Sharma, G

    S. Sharma, G. F. Grinyer, G. C. Ball,et al., High-precision half-life determination of 14O via directβcounting, The European Physical Journal A58, 83 (2022)

    2022

  266. [280]

    Plattner, E

    P. Plattner, E. Wood, L. Al Ayoubi,et al., Nuclear Charge Radius of 26mAl and Its Impli- cation for V ud in the Quark Mixing Matrix, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 222502 (2023)

    2023

  267. [281]

    Shidling, M

    P. Shidling, M. Mehlman, V. Kolhinen,et al., The TAMUTRAP facility: A Penning trap facility at Texas A&M University for weak interaction studies, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry468, 116636 (2021)

    2021

  268. [282]

    Severijns, L

    N. Severijns, L. Hayen, V. De Leebeeck,et al.,Ftvalues of the mirrorβtransitions and the weak-magnetism-induced current in allowed nuclearβdecay, Phys. Rev. C107, 015502 (2023)

    2023

  269. [283]

    J. Long, C. R. Nicoloff, D. W. Bardayan,et al., Precision half-life determination for theβ + emitter 13N, Phys. Rev. C106, 045501 (2022)

    2022

  270. [284]

    P. D. Shidling, R. S. Behling, B. Fenker,et al., High-precision half-life measurement of the β+ decay of 21Na, Phys. Rev. C98, 015502 (2018)

    2018

  271. [285]

    B. M. Rebeiro, S. Triambak, P. Z. Mabika,et al., Precise branching ratio measurements in 19Neβdecay and fundamental tests of the weak interaction, Phys. Rev. C99, 065502 (2019)

    2019

  272. [286]

    Karthein, D

    J. Karthein, D. Atanasov, K. Blaum,et al.,Q EC-value determination for 21Na→ 21 Ne and 23Mg→ 23 Na mirror-nuclei decays using high-precision mass spectrometry with ISOLTRAP at the CERN ISOLDE facility, Phys. Rev. C100, 015502 (2019)

    2019

  273. [287]

    Naviliat-Cuncic and N

    O. Naviliat-Cuncic and N. Severijns, Test of the Conserved Vector Current Hypothesis in T= 1/2 Mirror Transitions and New Determination of|V ud|, Physical Review Letters102, 142302 (2009)

    2009

  274. [288]

    Hayen and A

    L. Hayen and A. R. Young, Consistent description of angular correlations inβdecay for Beyond Standard Model physics searches (2020), arXiv:2009.11364 [nucl-th]. 111

    2020 arXiv

  275. [289]

    Fenker, A

    B. Fenker, A. Gorelov, D. Melconian,et al., Precision Measurement of theβAsymmetry in Spin-Polarized 37K Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 062502 (2018)

    2018

  276. [290]

    Brodeur, T

    M. Brodeur, T. Ahn, D. Bardayan,et al., Construction of St. Benedict, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 541, 79 (2023)

    2023

  277. [291]

    R. P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, Theory of the Fermi interaction, Physical Review109, 193 (1958)

    1958

  278. [292]

    E. C. Sudarshan and R. Marshak, Chirality invariance and the universal Fermi interaction, Physical Review109, 1860 (1958)

    1958

  279. [293]

    Sherr and J

    R. Sherr and J. Gerhart, Experimental evidence for the Fermi interaction in theβdecay of O 14 and C 10, Physical Review91, 909 (1953)

    1953

  280. [294]

    Xayavong and N

    L. Xayavong and N. Smirnova, Higher-order isospin-symmetry-breaking corrections to nu- clear matrix elements of Fermiβdecays, Physical Review C109, 014317 (2024)

    2024

  281. [295]

    N. A. Smirnova, Isospin-symmetry breaking within the nuclear shell model: present status and developments, Physics5, 352 (2023)

    2023

  282. [296]

    Towner and J

    I. Towner and J. C. Hardy, Improved calculation of the isospin-symmetry-breaking corrections to superallowed Fermiβdecay, Physical Review C77, 025501 (2008)

    2008

  283. [297]

    Xayavong and N

    L. Xayavong and N. A. Smirnova, Radial overlap correction to superallowed 0 + →0 + β decay reexamined, Physical Review C97, 024324 (2018)

    2018

  284. [298]

    Xayavong, N

    L. Xayavong, N. Smirnova, and F. Nowacki, Refined shell-model calculations of theδ C cor- rection to superallowed 0+ →0 + nuclearβdecay and Standard-Model implications, Physical Review C112, 055503 (2025)

    2025

  285. [299]

    Xayavong and N

    L. Xayavong and N. Smirnova, Radial overlap correction to superallowed 0 + →0 + nuclear βdecays using the shell model with Hartree-Fock radial wave functions, Physical Review C 105, 044308 (2022)

    2022

  286. [300]

    G. A. Miller and A. Schwenk, Isospin-symmetry-breaking corrections to superallowed Fermi βdecay: formalism and schematic models, Physical Review C78, 035501 (2008)

    2008

  287. [301]

    Miller and A

    G. Miller and A. Schwenk, Isospin-symmetry-breaking corrections to superallowed Fermiβ decay: radial excitations, Physical Review C80, 064319 (2009)

    2009

  288. [302]

    Plestid and M

    R. Plestid and M. B. Wise, Vertex corrections and wavefunction renormalization for atoms, nuclei, and other heavy composite particles, Phys. Rev. D113, 096011 (2026). 112

    2026

  289. [303]

    Seng and M

    C.-Y. Seng and M. Gorchtein, Electroweak nuclear radii constrain the isospin breaking cor- rection toV ud, Physics Letters B838, 137654 (2023)

    2023

  290. [304]

    Seng and M

    C.-Y. Seng and M. Gorchtein, Toward ab-initio nuclear theory calculations ofδ C, Physical Review C109, 044302 (2024)

    2024

  291. [305]

    Ohayon, Critical evaluation of reference charge radii and applications in mirror nuclei, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables165, 101732 (2025)

    B. Ohayon, Critical evaluation of reference charge radii and applications in mirror nuclei, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables165, 101732 (2025)

    2025

  292. [306]

    Sirlin, General properties of the electromagnetic corrections to the beta decay of a physical nucleon, Physical Review164, 1767 (1967)

    A. Sirlin, General properties of the electromagnetic corrections to the beta decay of a physical nucleon, Physical Review164, 1767 (1967)

    1967

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.