Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Finding Longer Proofs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.13100 v2 pith:2RXP3GUT submitted 2019-05-30 cs.LO cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.LOcs.AIcs.LG
keywords flopproofsveryfindinglearninglonglongerproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a reinforcement learning (RL) based guidance system for automated theorem proving geared towards Finding Longer Proofs (FLoP). Unlike most learning based approaches, we focus on generalising from very little training data and achieving near complete confidence. We use several simple, structured datasets with very long proofs to show that FLoP can successfully generalise a single training proof to a large class of related problems. On these benchmarks, FLoP is competitive with strong theorem provers despite using very limited search, due to its ability to solve problems that are prohibitively long for other systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools