Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 3 cited by

Bayesian analysis of analog gravity systems with the Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Modeling the entire time-domain signal of a controlled perturbation can reconstruct the effective black hole metric of an analog gravity system, without any quasinormal-mode extraction.

desk verdict A competent proof-of-principle for full time-domain Bayesian metric reconstruction in analog gravity; the closed-loop recovery tests support feasibility but not yet real-vortex fidelity. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09000 v2 pith:2RXSL3VZ submitted 2025-01-15 gr-qc

Saulo Albuquerque , Sebastian H. Völkel This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C3562F1565M06 PACS 04.70.-s04.30.-w
keywords analoggravitydrainingvortexRezzolla-ZhidenkometricBayesianinferenceMarkovchainMonteCarloquasinormalmodesringdowneffectivereconstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper works out a proof of principle for extracting the effective spacetime of an analog black hole from a single controlled pulse in a draining vortex. The authors adopt the Rezzolla-Zhidenko (RZ) metric, a continued-fraction parametrization of static black hole metrics, evolve scalar perturbations on that background, and use Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo to fit the entire time-domain waveform to simulated observer data. Unlike standard quasinormal-mode ringdown analysis, the fit never needs to choose when the mode sum starts or ends, nor how many modes are present. If the scheme carries over to real experiments, a laboratory could infer the effective metric and perturbation potential directly from wave-scattering data.

What carries the argument

The central object is the RZ metric, adapted to 2+1 dimensions through the radial compactification x=1-(r0/r)^2, with free parameters r0, a0, b0, and epsilon. The scalar wave equation on this background reduces to a 1+1-dimensional wave equation in a tortoise coordinate r* with an effective potential V_m(r). The mechanism that carries the argument is that, during MCMC sampling, the same staggered-leapfrog finite-difference code used to generate the injected waveform is run for every proposed parameter set, so the whole time-domain signal is fitted at once. A Gaussian likelihood with a white-noise inner product defines the posterior, and proposals that would make g_tt or g_rr change sign are rejected to keep the time evolution well defined.

What would settle it

Take mock data from an exact draining-vortex metric known to lie outside the four-parameter RZ family and run the same Bayesian recovery; if the posterior centers on biased parameters or cannot reproduce the waveform, the assumed universality of the ansatz is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central assertion is that a Bayesian analysis of the full time-domain signal from a controlled initial perturbation can reconstruct the effective metric of an analog black hole. In injection-recovery tests on the 2+1-dimensional RZ ansatz, the posterior maxima sit close to the injected values for both the canonical parameter set (r0,a0,b0,epsilon)=(1,0,0,0) and a noncanonical set (1,0.3,0.45,0); the metric functions g_tt and g_rr and the effective potential V_m(r*) are constrained, with the potential best constrained outside its peak. Varying the signal-to-noise ratio from 100 to 500 narrows the posteriors as expected, while moving the observer between tortoise radii 10, 40, and 80 has little effect on the inferred parameters. The authors present this as the first study of its kind and emphasize that the entire signal, including the prompt response and late-time tails, is modeled.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme depends on the four-parameter RZ metric, with the two next-order deformation coefficients set to zero, containing the true effective metric of a real draining vortex, and on the scalar wave equation being the right description of the measured surface waves; if either is false, the inferred parameters will be biased even when the MCMC looks well-behaved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single Gaussian pulse and one distant observer's time series can, in principle, determine the four RZ parameters controlling the analog metric, with the injected values inside the recovered posteriors.
  • Increasing the signal-to-noise ratio from 100 to 500 tightens the posteriors and narrows the reconstructed metric functions and effective potential.
  • Moving the observer between tortoise radii 10, 40, and 80 changes the waveform shape but has almost no effect on the inferred parameters.
  • The noncanonical injection (r0,a0,b0,epsilon)=(1,0.3,0.45,0) is clearly distinguished from the canonical Schwarzschild-like case, so the method can detect deviations from the standard analog description.
  • No choice of quasinormal-mode start or end times and no mode-counting procedure are required anywhere in the analysis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Carried further, the same full-signal likelihood could be applied to multi-observer data from a real vortex experiment; the paper notes that the time series are already computed on the full radial grid, so including all observers in the likelihood is a natural extension.
  • If the true analog metric has structure beyond the four RZ parameters used here, the recovered parameters would be biased; testing the pipeline with exact analog metrics that lie outside the RZ family would quantify how severe this bias is.
  • Because the likelihood in this paper is white noise in the time domain, applying the method to actual experimental data will require an experiment-specific noise model, likely formulated in the frequency domain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper presents a Bayesian framework for reconstructing the effective spacetime metric of an analog gravity system (a draining vortex) from time-domain wave signals. The authors adapt the Rezzolla-Zhidenko (RZ) parametrized metric to 2+1 dimensions, use a staggered-leapfrog code to evolve scalar-field perturbations on this background, and sample the four RZ parameters (r0, a0, b0, epsilon) with an emcee MCMC sampler using a Gaussian white-noise likelihood. They demonstrate parameter recovery for a canonical Schwarzschild-like injection and for a noncanonical injection, and they explore the dependence on signal-to-noise ratio and observer location. The paper claims this full-waveform approach avoids the need to select quasinormal-mode start/end times and the number of modes, and that it is capable of reconstructing analog black hole metrics from actual draining-vortex data.

Significance. If the method is validated against out-of-family data, it would be a useful proof-of-concept for analog-gravity spectroscopy: the full time-domain signal is used instead of extracted quasinormal modes, and the numerical evolution is cheap enough to be done during MCMC sampling. The strengths of the paper include an independent check of the evolution code against known quasinormal-mode frequencies (Sec. IVA, relative errors 0.0005 and 0.0003), an honest recognition of the closed-loop nature of the injection/recovery procedure (Sec. IVA), and clear statements of the assumptions behind the RZ ansatz (Secs. IIB and IIIA). The main risk is model misspecification: all injections are drawn from the same truncated RZ family with a1=b1=0, so the current results do not yet establish the claimed capability for real vortex data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Secs. II D, IV A, and V.] The central claim that the framework is 'capable of reconstructing analog black hole metrics from time-evolution data corresponding to a draining vortex' (Sec. V) is not supported by the present closed-loop tests. In Sec. IID the injection is defined as d = m(theta_inj), and in Sec. IVA the authors note that using the same resolution for injection and modeling avoids biases by construction. Each recovery in Sec. III therefore verifies only that the MCMC sampler can locate parameters within the same four-parameter RZ family (a1=b1=0), not that this family can absorb an exact draining-vortex effective metric. A real vortex metric has a different functional form (e.g., the metrics in Refs. [41, 77]), and the residual between the true waveform and the best-fit RZ waveform may exceed the noise level at the high SNRs considered (rho=100-500). The authors should add an out-of-family test, such as injecting waveforms from an exact vortex metric or from an RZ metric with nonzero a1,b1, and then analyzing with the truncated model; they should report the resulting bias and the waveform consistency with the noise. This test directly addresses the model-misspecification risk and is needed before the conclusion in Sec. V can be drawn.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. V; see Sec. II C and Fig. 1.] The paper claims that the approach allows one to 'model the entire signal, including the prompt response and possible effects of late-time tails.' In the analyses presented, however, the likelihood uses only the time window t in [120,145] for r*_obs=80 (Fig. 1 and all later injections). This window captures the prompt response and the exponentially damped ringdown, but it very likely stops before any late-time power-law tail becomes the dominant signal component. To support the 'entire signal' claim, the authors should either extend t_end until the waveform has reached the numerical floor (and show the tail in the plots), or qualify the claim as applying to the prompt response and ringdown without quasinormal-mode start/end times. This is a material distinction because the ability to include tails is one of the advertised advantages over standard quasinormal-mode-based analyses.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Sec. II C.] The sentence 'The time resolution is defined by Delta t = 1/4 Delta r*' is ambiguous; it should read Delta t = (1/4) Delta r* = 0.0375 to clarify the factor.
  2. [Sec. II D, Eqs. (21)-(23).] The likelihood and inner product use a constant S, but the text does not specify whether S is the noise variance (per unit time) or the noise spectral density; please state the units and the relation between S and the SNR rho.
  3. [Sec. III A, Fig. 2.] The prior ranges for r0, a0, b0, and epsilon are only visible in the corner plots; add a table listing the prior bounds used for each analysis, since the posterior widths for a0 and b0 are sensitive to those bounds.
  4. [Sec. IV A.] The sentence reporting the quasinormal-mode comparison is syntactically ambiguous: 'we obtained the real part of the fundamental mode with relative errors of 0.0005 and 0.0003 for its imaginary part' could be misread. Please state explicitly, e.g., 'the relative error of the real part is 0.0005 and of the imaginary part is 0.0003.'
  5. [Fig. 8 caption.] The caption labels the observer positions as 'r*_0 = 80, 40, 10', but the text varies r*_obs; use consistent notation.
  6. [References [36] and [38].] References [36] and [38] appear to be the same paper by Clovecko et al. (same journal and volume, with [38] including an arXiv number); please merge or distinguish them.
  7. [Sec. IV C1.] The sentence 'Since the main numerical cost consists of the wave propagation, not using it in the likelihood, it should be straightforward' is confusing; rephrase to say that because the model evolution already computes the full radial domain, including multiple observers in the likelihood is straightforward.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Injection/recovery is closed-loop by construction (d=m(theta_inj)); no load-bearing self-citation, but the forward code is independently benchmarked, so circularity is partial.

  1. self definitional [Sec. IID (Bayesian analysis, after Eq. 21), reinforced in Sec. IVA]
    "In this framework, we assume that both the sampling signals m(θ) and the injections d are modeled equivalently by Eqs. (17) and (18). Hence, it can be stated that the injected signal is equivalent to d=m(θ inj)."

    The data d are generated as m(θ_inj) using the same wave equation, same initial Gaussian data, same truncated RZ family, and, as Sec. IVA states, the same numerical resolution as the model m(θ). The likelihood then compares d with m(θ), so the posterior is centered on θ_inj by construction. The reported 'reconstruction' of the injected RZ parameters is therefore a self-consistency check of the MCMC/time-evolution pipeline, not an inference from an independent analog measurement. The conclusion that the method can reconstruct analog black hole metrics from data corresponding to a draining vortex extends this closed loop to a real vortex metric that the paper never generates or evolves.

full rationale

The single genuinely circular element is the injection/recovery design: the data are defined as d=m(theta_inj), with identical equations, initial data, RZ truncation, and numerical resolution. The paper states this openly in Sec. IID and again in Sec. IVA ('we assume the same resolution for the injection and the modeling, which, by construction, avoids biases in a noiseless injection'). This means the recovery of theta_inj is a pipeline consistency test rather than an external validation. However, the circularity is partial and explicitly bounded. The forward evolution code is externally benchmarked: Sec. IVA reports fundamental quasinormal-mode frequencies matching literature values to relative errors of a few times 10^-4, which independently grounds the wave-equation solver. The RZ parameterization is imported from the original Rezzolla-Zhidenko papers, not from the authors' own prior work, and the self-citations in Sec. IVB are contextual comparisons rather than load-bearing premises. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in through self-citation. Finally, Sec. IVC.3 acknowledges that applying the method to exact analog black hole metrics not represented by the RZ family is future work, conceding the model-misspecification gap behind the draining-vortex wording in the conclusions. Because one 'prediction' reduces by construction but the framework retains independent content and is not built on a self-citation chain, a score of 4 is appropriate rather than 6 or higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; its free parameters are the RZ metric ansatz parameters and tunable experimental or analysis choices. The central assumptions are that the RZ family covers the real analog metric and that the scalar wave equation is the right model. The MCMC and finite-difference schemes are standard tools whose convergence is assumed rather than demonstrated.

free parameters (5)
  • RZ parameters (r0, a0, b0, epsilon) = canonical injection (1,0,0,0); noncanonical (1,0.3,0.45,0)
    Free parameters of the effective metric ansatz; the inference target of the MCMC analysis. Their posterior widths are the main results.
  • Higher-order RZ coefficients a1, b1 = 0
    Fixed to zero for both injection and recovery in all runs; this truncates the metric and assumes leading coefficients suffice (Sec. IIIA).
  • Gaussian initial data (A, d, r*_0, m) = A=4, d=2, r*_0=50, m=3
    Chosen by hand for all runs; the controlled perturbation defines which parts of the potential are excited. Dependence on these choices is not explored.
  • Observer location r*_obs = 80 (also 40 and 10 in the observer scan)
    A fixed distant observer for most runs; the paper shows results are almost insensitive to this choice at SNR=100.
  • Likelihood noise scale S (via SNR rho) = rho=100, 250, 500
    Chosen per run to set posterior width in the noiseless-injection likelihood Eq. (21)-(22); no actual noise realizations are added.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Leapfrog finite-difference scheme is stable and convergent for the chosen grid and time step.
    Relied on in Sec. IIC; no convergence study is reported beyond one grid setting.
  • standard math emcee ensemble sampler produces converged posterior samples with 50 walkers and 1000 steps per run.
    Assumed in Sec. IID; no autocorrelation or convergence diagnostics are shown.
  • domain assumption The scalar wave equation on the effective metric describes the relevant analog system dynamics.
    Sec. IIB: 'we assume this structure is valid for classes of analog systems, e.g., a draining vortex.'
  • domain assumption The truncated RZ metric is a sufficient universal ansatz for the effective analog spacetime.
    Sec. IIIA: 'we assume that keeping a similar number of free parameters is sufficient to model, in principle, various analog systems.'
  • domain assumption g_tt and g_rr do not change sign, so r0 is the outermost horizon and evolution is well-defined.
    Sec. IID: enforced by rejecting proposals that violate this condition during sampling.
  • domain assumption Gaussian white noise in the time domain is a valid likelihood model for analog gravity experiments.
    Sec. IID: the likelihood and inner product assume white noise; the authors explicitly leave experiment-specific noise modeling to future work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bayesian analysis of analog gravity systems with the Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RXSL3VZ

@misc{pith2026250109000,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bayesian analysis of analog gravity systems with the Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RXSL3VZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09000}
}
read the original abstract

Analog gravity systems have the unique opportunity to probe theoretical aspects of black hole physics in a controlled laboratory environment that one cannot easily observe for astrophysical black holes. In this work, we address the question of whether one could use controlled initial perturbations to excite the black hole ringdown and infer the effective black hole metric. Using a theory-agnostic ansatz for the effective metric described by the Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric and evolving perturbations on that background, we quantify with Bayesian analysis what regions of the effective spacetime could be constrained in experiments. In contrast to standard ringdown analyses based on quasi-normal mode extraction, a laboratory-controlled setup, in combination with our framework, allows one to model the entire signal, including the prompt response and possible effects of late-time tails. Therefore, it has the intriguing advantage of not relying on start and end times when the superposition of quasi-normal modes is a good signal approximation. It also avoids the non-trivial question of how many modes are present. We demonstrate that this approach is feasible in principle and discuss opportunities beyond this study.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09000 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Here, we show the injected signal (black solid) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Here we show the posterior distribution of four RZ pa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Here, we show the prior and posterior distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Here, we show the marginalized posterior distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Here, we show the marginalized posterior distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Here, we show the posterior distributions for the met [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Here, we show the injected signal (black solid) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Here, we show the injected signal (lines) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Here, we show the posterior distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Here, we show the posterior distributions for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimal frequency scales for probing black-hole geometries

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Gaussian pulse extracts the most black-hole metric information when its width is about the inverse square root of the effective-potential maximum, not when it is as narrow as possible.

  2. Probing the Unstable Spectrum of Schwarzschild-like Black Holes

    gr-qc 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The quasinormal mode spectrum of physically deformed Schwarzschild-like black holes stays unstable, contradicting the expectation that displaced spectra become stable.

  3. Dynamical analog spacetimes from nonlinear perturbations in a topological material

    gr-qc 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A nonlinear acoustic metric and microkelvin Hawking temperature are claimed for Berry-curvature-modified graphene electron flow, but the derivation is incomplete and the temperature has inconsistent units.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    [54] for spherically symmetric 3+1 dimensional black holes

    Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric in3 + 1dimensions In this work, we study a slight modification of the RZ metric, which was originally introduced in Ref. [54] for spherically symmetric 3+1 dimensional black holes. It was extended as the Konoplya-Rezzolla-Zhidenko (KRZ) metric to axial symmetric black holes in Ref. [55], and for aD-dimensional black holes, whereD≥...

  2. [2]

    In our applications, however, we want to extend the RZ metric to a2 + 1dimensional, effective spacetime describing an analog black hole

    Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric in2 + 1dimensions In3 + 1dimensions, the radial compactification, as originally proposed [54], is defined as x≡1− r0 r .(7) Demanding an asymptotic matching to the Schwarzschild metric one finds ϵ= 2M−r 0 r0 =− 1− 2M r0 ,(8) which relates ADM massM, horizon locationr 0 andϵ with each other. In our applications, however, we want to...

    2000

  3. [3]

    Impact of SNR To investigate how the SNR changes the posterior, we now include one smaller and one larger SNRρ= (100,500)to our analysis while fixing the observer loca- tion tor ∗ obs = 80. In Fig. 4, we report the injected signal with2σnoise 6 a0 = 0.09+0.59 0.54 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 b0 b0 = 0.07+0.34 0.32 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 = 0.06+0.32 0.33 0.8 0.4 0.0 ...

  4. [4]

    Inthiscase, onlyaphaseshiftisexpectedontheobserved signal

    Impact of observer distance Because the waveform can vary with the observer’s lo- cation, one might expect that this could also affect the observer’s sensitivity for inferring the physical parame- ters, at least as long one is not already in the far zone. Inthiscase, onlyaphaseshiftisexpectedontheobserved signal. We investigate this by varying the observe...

  5. [5]

    However, one could also combine the data of multiple observers, and thus not only analyze the time-domain, but also resolve the full spatial domain

    Analyze full observer space In this work, we selected a few observers and ana- lyzed their signals independently. However, one could also combine the data of multiple observers, and thus not only analyze the time-domain, but also resolve the full spatial domain. This would be qualitatively in the spirit of Ref. [99], which explores a so-called spacetime t...

  6. [6]

    Combining differentm In a real experiment, many different harmonicsmcan be excited at the same time. Although it should be straightforward to extract the different harmonic con- tentsmto high accuracy, we have yet to explore how information of the RZ metric is imprinted across differ- entm. Since themperturbation potentials are qualita- tively similar and...

  7. [7]

    Varying the number of RZ parameters For simplicity, we chose a fixed number of RZ param- eters for the injection and recovery. Since existing works demonstrate the capabilities of the RZ metric to provide a good approximation to non-Schwarzschild metrics by using only a few leading parameters [54, 74], we did not increase the number of RZ parameters. Incl...

  8. [8]

    First, the background spacetime needs to be generalized, which couldbereadilydonebyusingtheKRZmetric[55]

    Extension to rotating black holes The technically more challenging aspect will be to gen- eralizeourapproachtorotatinganalogblackholes. First, the background spacetime needs to be generalized, which couldbereadilydonebyusingtheKRZmetric[55]. How- ever, the main problem one would face is that even the scalar field equation is, in general, not separable, wh...

Show all 115 references
  1. [9]

    Extension to analog gravity sampling techniques For acoustic black holes in Bose-Einstein condensates, it has been shown that the truncated Wigner method

  2. [10]

    Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole, Astron

    R. Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole, Astron. Astro- phys.636, L5 (2020), arXiv:2004.07187 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Michell, On the Means of Discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &c

    J. Michell, On the Means of Discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &c. of the Fixed Stars, in Consequence of the Diminution of the Velocity of Their Light, in Case Such a Diminution Should be Found to Take Place in any of Them, and Such Other Data Should be Pro- cured from Obser...

  4. [12]

    P. S. Laplace, Beweis des Satzes, dass die anziehende Kraft bey einem Weltkörper so groß seyn könne, dass das Licht davon nicht ausströmen kann, Allgemeine Ge- ographische Ephemeriden4, 1 (1799)

  5. [13]

    Einstein, The foundation of the general theory of relativity., Annalen Phys.49, 769 (1916)

    A. Einstein, The foundation of the general theory of relativity., Annalen Phys.49, 769 (1916)

    1916

  6. [14]

    Schwarzschild, On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory, Sitzungsber

    K. Schwarzschild, On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1916, 189 (1916), arXiv:physics/9905030

    1916 arXiv

  7. [15]

    R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

    1963

  8. [16]

    E. T. Newman, R. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass, J. Math. Phys.6, 918 (1965)

    1965

  9. [17]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    G. E. Volovik,The Universe in a helium droplet(Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333 (1973). 12

    1973

  14. [22]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, The Four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys.31, 161 (1973)

    1973

  15. [23]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Com- mun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975), [Erratum: Com- mun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  16. [24]

    Rel.8, 12 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065

    C.Barcelo, S.Liberati,andM.Visser,Analoguegravity, Living Rev. Rel.8, 12 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065

    2005 arXiv

  17. [25]

    W. G. Unruh, Experimental black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1351 (1981)

    1981

  18. [26]

    Visser, Acoustic propagation in fluids: an unex- pected example of lorentzian geometry (1993), arXiv:gr- qc/9311028 [gr-qc]

    M. Visser, Acoustic propagation in fluids: an unex- pected example of lorentzian geometry (1993), arXiv:gr- qc/9311028 [gr-qc]

    1993

  19. [27]

    L. J. Garay, J. R. Anglin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Sonic Analog of Gravitational Black Holes in Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4643 (2000)

    2000

  20. [28]

    L. J. Garay, J. R. Anglin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Sonic black holes in dilute Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A63, 023611 (2001)

    2001

  21. [29]

    Novello, M

    M. Novello, M. Visser, and E. Volovik, Grigory,Ar- tificial black holes(World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2002)

    2002

  22. [30]

    Del Porro, S

    F. Del Porro, S. Liberati, and M. Schneider, Tun- neling method for Hawking quanta in analogue gravity, Comptes Rendus Physique25, 1 (2025), arXiv:2406.14603 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    H.Nakano, Y.Kurita, K.Ogawa,andC.-M.Yoo,Quasi- normal ringing for acoustic black holes at low tem- perature, Phys. Rev. D71, 084006 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0411041

    2005

  24. [32]

    W. G. Unruh and R. Schützhold,Quantum Analogues: From Phase Transitions to Black Holes and Cosmology (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    H. S. Vieira and K. D. Kokkotas, Quasibound states of Schwarzschild acoustic black holes, Phys. Rev. D104, 024035 (2021), arXiv:2104.03938 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Steinhauer, Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black hole laser, Nature Phys

    J. Steinhauer, Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black hole laser, Nature Phys. 10, 864 (2014), arXiv:1409.6550 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cardoso, A

    V. Cardoso, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, and S. Weinfurt- ner, Detecting rotational superradiance in fluid labora- tories, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 271101 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Barceló, Analogue black-hole horizons, Nature Phys

    C. Barceló, Analogue black-hole horizons, Nature Phys. 15, 210 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    H. S. Vieira, K. Destounis, and K. D. Kokkotas, Slowly-rotating curved acoustic black holes: Quasi- normal modes, Hawking-Unruh radiation, and qua- sibound states, Phys. Rev. D105, 045015 (2022), arXiv:2112.08711 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    H. S. Vieira, K. Destounis, and K. D. Kokkotas, Analog Schwarzschild black holes of Bose-Einstein condensates in a cavity: Quasinormal modes and quasibound states, Phys. Rev. D107, 104038 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Solidoro, S

    L. Solidoro, S. Patrick, R. Gregory, and S. Weinfurt- ner, Quasinormal modes in semi-open systems (2024), arXiv:2406.11013 [gr-qc]

    2024

  32. [40]

    Švančara, P

    P. Švančara, P. Smaniotto, L. Solidoro, J. F. Mac- Donald, S. Patrick, R. Gregory, C. F. Barenghi, and S. Weinfurtner, Rotating curved spacetime signatures from a giant quantum vortex, Nature628, 66 (2024), arXiv:2308.10773 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Keshet, I

    E. Keshet, I. Shemesh, and J. Steinhauer, The ringdown-hawking radiation connection in real and ana- logue black holes (2024), arXiv:2407.00448 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    L. Liao, E. C. I. van der Wurff, D. van Oosten, and H. T. C. Stoof, Proposal for an analog Schwarzschild black hole in condensates of light, Phys. Rev. A99, 023850 (2019), arXiv:1806.00023 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Moreno-Ruiz and D

    A. Moreno-Ruiz and D. Bermudez, Optical analogue of the Schwarzschild–Planck metric, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 145001 (2022), arXiv:2112.00194 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Haller, S

    A. Haller, S. Hegde, C. Xu, C. De Beule, T. L. Schmidt, and T. Meng, Black hole mirages: Electron lensing and Berry curvature effects in inhomogeneously tilted Weyl semimetals, SciPost Phys.14, 119 (2023), arXiv:2210.16254 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Smaniotto, L

    P. Smaniotto, L. Solidoro, P. Švančara, S. Patrick, M. Richartz, C. F. Barenghi, R. Gregory, and S. Wein- furtner, Black-hole spectroscopy from a giant quantum vortex (2025), arXiv:2502.11209 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Človečko, E

    M. Človečko, E. Gažo, M. Kupka, and P. Skyba, Magnonic analog of black- and white-hole horizons in superfluid 3He−b, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 161302 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Steinhauer, Observation of quantum Hawking radi- ation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Nature Phys.12, 959 (2016), arXiv:1510.00621 [gr-qc]

    J. Steinhauer, Observation of quantum Hawking radi- ation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Nature Phys.12, 959 (2016), arXiv:1510.00621 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Človečko, E

    M. Človečko, E. Gažo, M. Kupka, and P. Skyba, Magnonic Analog of Black- and White-Hole Horizons in Superfluid 3He-B, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 161302 (2019), arXiv:1810.09890 [cond-mat.other]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    S. L. Braunstein, M. Faizal, L. M. Krauss, F. Marino, and N. A. Shah, Analogue simulations of quantum gravity with fluids, Nature Rev. Phys.5, 612 (2023), arXiv:2402.16136 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    J. R. Muñoz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V. I. Kolobov, and J. Steinhauer, Observation of thermal Hawking radia- tion and its temperature in an analogue black hole, Na- ture (London)569, 688 (2019), arXiv:1809.00913 [gr- qc]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    U. R. Fischer and R. Schützhold, Quantum simulation of cosmic inflation in two-component bose-einstein con- densates, Phys. Rev. A70, 063615 (2004)

    2004

  44. [52]

    cosmological

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, “cosmological” quasi- particle production in harmonically trapped superfluid gases, Phys. Rev. A69, 033602 (2004)

    2004

  45. [53]

    C. C. H. Ribeiro, S.-S. Baak, and U. R. Fischer, Exis- tence of steady-state black hole analogs in finite quasi- one-dimensional bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. D105, 124066 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    C. C. Holanda Ribeiro and U. R. Fischer, Impact of trans-planckian excitations on black-hole radiation in dipolar condensates, Phys. Rev. D107, L121502 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Towards the Ob- servation of Hawking Radiation in Bose–Einstein Con- densates,InternationalJournalofModernPhysicsA18, 3735 (2003)

    2003

  48. [56]

    C.Barceló, S.Liberati,andM.Visser,Probingsemiclas- sical analog gravity in Bose-Einstein condensates with widely tunable interactions, Phys. Rev. A68, 053613 (2003)

    2003

  49. [57]

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, Gibbons-Hawking Ef- fect in the Sonic de Sitter Space-Time of an Expand- ing Bose-Einstein-Condensed Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 240407 (2003)

    2003

  50. [58]

    Rousseaux, C

    G. Rousseaux, C. Mathis, P. Maissa, T. G. Philbin, and U. Leonhardt, Observation of negative phase ve- locity waves in a water tank: A classical analogue to the Hawking effect?, New J. Phys.10, 053015 (2008), arXiv:0711.4767 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  51. [59]

    L.-P. Euvé, F. Michel, R. Parentani, T. G. Philbin, and G. Rousseaux, Observation of noise correlated by the 13 hawking effect in a water tank, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 121301 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    Buonanno, G

    A. Buonanno, G. B. Cook, and F. Pretorius, Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D75, 124018 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610122

    2007 arXiv

  53. [61]

    V. I. Kolobov, K. Golubkov, J. R. Muñoz de Nova, and J. Steinhauer, Observation of stationary sponta- neous Hawking radiation and the time evolution of an analogue black hole, Nature Physics17, 362 (2021), arXiv:1910.09363 [gr-qc]

    2021

  54. [62]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, E. W. Tedford, and S. Weinfurtner, Rotational superradiant scattering in a vortex flow, Nature Physics13, 833 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, M. Richartz, and S. Weinfurtner, Quasinormal Mode Oscillations in an Analogue Black Hole Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 011301 (2020), arXiv:1811.07858 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Rezzolla and A

    L. Rezzolla and A. Zhidenko, New parametrization for spherically symmetric black holes in metric the- ories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D90, 084009 (2014), arXiv:1407.3086 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Konoplya, L

    R. Konoplya, L. Rezzolla, and A. Zhidenko, General parametrization of axisymmetric black holes in metric theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D93, 064015 (2016), arXiv:1602.02378 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Visser and S

    M. Visser and S. E. C. Weinfurtner, Vortex geometry for the equatorial slice of the Kerr black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 2493 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0409014

    2005 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Patrick, A

    S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, and S. Weinfurt- ner, Black hole quasibound states from a draining bath- tub vortex flow, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061101 (2018), arXiv:1801.08473 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [68]

    R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravitational collapse. 1. Scalar and gravitational per- turbations, Phys. Rev. D5, 2419 (1972)

    1972

  61. [69]

    E. W. Leaver, Spectral decomposition of the perturba- tion response of the Schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D34, 384 (1986)

    1986

  62. [70]

    Chatziioannou, T

    K. Chatziioannou, T. Dent, M. Fishbach, F. Ohme, M. Pürrer, V. Raymond, and J. Veitch, Compact bi- nary coalescences: gravitational-wave astronomy with ground-based detectors (2024), arXiv:2409.02037 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Baibhav, M

    V. Baibhav, M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, R. Cotesta, W. Del Pozzo, and F. Duque, Agnostic black hole spectroscopy: Quasinormal mode content of numerical relativity waveforms and limits of validityoflinearperturbationtheory,Phys.Rev.D108, 104020 (2023), ar...

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    P. J. Nee, S. H. Völkel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Role of black hole quasinormal mode overtones for ringdown analysis, Phys. Rev. D108, 044032 (2023), arXiv:2302.06634 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Thomopoulos, S

    S. Thomopoulos, S. H. Völkel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Ringdown spectroscopy of phenomenologically modified black holes (2025), arXiv:2504.17848 [gr-qc]

    2025

  66. [74]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Effective one-body ap- proach to general relativistic two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091

    1999 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Ajithet al., Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with non-precessing spins, Phys

    P. Ajithet al., Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with non-precessing spins, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 241101 (2011), arXiv:0909.2867 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  68. [76]

    S. E. Field, C. R. Galley, J. S. Hesthaven, J. Kaye, and M. Tiglio, Fast prediction and evaluation of gravi- tational waveforms using surrogate models, Phys. Rev. X4, 031006 (2014), arXiv:1308.3565 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Pürrer, Frequency domain reduced order models for gravitational waves from aligned-spin compact binaries, Class

    M. Pürrer, Frequency domain reduced order models for gravitational waves from aligned-spin compact binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 195010 (2014), arXiv:1402.4146 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  71. [79]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology(Oxford University Press, 2018)

    2018

  72. [80]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. As- tron. Soc. Pac.125, 306 (2013), arXiv:1202.3665 [astro- ph.IM]

    2013 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Johannsen and D

    T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, A Metric for Rapidly Spin- ning Black Holes Suitable for Strong-Field Tests of the No-Hair Theorem, Phys. Rev. D83, 124015 (2011), arXiv:1105.3191 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Johannsen, Regular Black Hole Metric with Three Constants of Motion, Phys

    T. Johannsen, Regular Black Hole Metric with Three Constants of Motion, Phys. Rev. D88, 044002 (2013), arXiv:1501.02809 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  75. [83]

    R. A. Konoplya, T. D. Pappas, and Z. Stuchlík, General parametrization of higher-dimensional black holes and its application to Einstein-Lovelock theory, Phys. Rev. D102, 084043 (2020), arXiv:2007.14860 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  76. [84]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, General parametriza- tion of black holes: The only parameters that matter, Phys. Rev. D101, 124004 (2020), arXiv:2001.06100 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Schutzhold and W

    R. Schutzhold and W. G. Unruh, Gravity wave analogs of black holes, Phys. Rev. D66, 044019 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0205099

    2002 arXiv

  78. [86]

    S. R. Dolan, L. A. Oliveira, and L. C. B. Crispino, Res- onances of a rotating black hole analogue, Phys. Rev. D 85, 044031 (2012), arXiv:1105.1795 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, and R. Gregory, Imperfect drain- ingvortexasanalogextremecompactobject,Phys.Rev. D106, 045026 (2022), arXiv:2204.10139 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Sivia and J

    D. Sivia and J. Skilling,Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tu- torial, Oxford science publications (OUP Oxford, 2006)

    2006

  81. [89]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of state calcula- tions by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys.21, 1087 (1953)

    1953

  82. [90]

    Albuquerque, S

    S. Albuquerque, S. H. Völkel, and K. D. Kokkotas, Inverse problem in energy-dependent potentials us- ing semiclassical methods, Phys. Rev. D109, 096014 (2024), arXiv:2404.11478 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Goodman and J

    J. Goodman and J. Weare, Ensemble samplers with affine invariance, Communications in Applied Mathe- matics and Computational Science5, 65 (2010)

    2010

  84. [92]

    Kocherlakota and L

    P. Kocherlakota and L. Rezzolla, Distinguishing grav- itational and emission physics in black hole imaging: spherical symmetry, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.513, 1229 (2022), arXiv:2201.05641 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Kocherlakota and L

    P. Kocherlakota and L. Rezzolla, Comment on the ana- lytical bounds in the rezzolla-zhidenko parametrization (2022), arXiv:2206.03146 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Matyjasek, K

    J. Matyjasek, K. Benda, and M. Stafińska, Accurate quasinormalmodesoftheanalogblackholes, Phys.Rev. D110, 064083 (2024), arXiv:2408.16116 [gr-qc]. 14

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    J. A. Wheeler,Studies in Mathematical Physics: Essays in Honor of Valentine Bargmann, Princeton Series in Physics (Princeton University Press, 2015) pp. 351–422

    2015

  88. [96]

    Chadan and P

    K. Chadan and P. C. Sabatier,Inverse problems in quantum scattering theory, 2nd ed., Texts and Mono- graphs in Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989)

    1989

  89. [97]

    J. C. Lazenby and D. J. Griffiths, Classical inverse scat- tering in one dimension, American Journal of Physics 48, 432 (1980)

    1980

  90. [98]

    S. C. Gandhi and C. J. Efthimiou, Inversion of Gamow’s formula and inverse scattering, American Journal of Physics74, 638 (2006), quant-ph/0503223

    2006 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Albuquerque, S

    S. Albuquerque, S. H. Völkel, K. D. Kokkotas, and V. B. Bezerra, Inverse problem of analog gravity systems, Phys. Rev. D108, 124053 (2023), arXiv:2309.11168 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    can be used to study the existence of Hawking radi- ation [101, 102], and other analog effects [103–105]. The method consists of studying the time evolution of per- turbed samples, which may provide an interesting over- lap between different sampling algorithms that could be e...

  93. [101]

    Albuquerque, S

    S. Albuquerque, S. H. Völkel, K. D. Kokkotas, and V. B. Bezerra, Inverse problem of analog gravity systems. II. Rotation and energy-dependent boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. D110, 064084 (2024), arXiv:2406.16670 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Chandrasekhar and V

    S. Chandrasekhar and V. Ferrari, On the non-radial os- cillations of a star. III. A reconsideration of the axial modes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Se- ries A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences434, 449 (1991)

    1991

  95. [103]

    K. D. Kokkotas, Axial modes for relativistic stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.268, 1015 (1994)

    1994

  96. [104]

    S. H. Völkel and K. D. Kokkotas, Ultra Compact Stars: Reconstructing the Perturbation Potential, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 175015 (2017), arXiv:1704.07517 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  97. [105]

    S. H. Völkel and K. D. Kokkotas, Wormhole Potentials and Throats from Quasi-Normal Modes, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 105018 (2018), arXiv:1802.08525 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  98. [106]

    S. H. Völkel, R. Konoplya, and K. D. Kokkotas, In- verse problem for Hawking radiation, Phys. Rev. D99, 104025 (2019), arXiv:1902.07611 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  99. [107]

    S. H. Völkel and E. Barausse, Bayesian Metric Recon- struction with Gravitational Wave Observations, Phys. Rev. D102, 084025 (2020), arXiv:2007.02986 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  100. [108]

    S. H. Völkel and K. D. Kokkotas, Scalar Fields and Parametrized Spherically Symmetric Black Holes: Can one hear the shape of space-time?, Phys. Rev. D100, 044026 (2019), arXiv:1908.00252 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  101. [109]

    H. Zhu, J. L. Ripley, A. Cárdenas-Avendaño, and F. Pretorius, Challenges in quasinormal mode extrac- tion: Perspectives from numerical solutions to the Teukolsky equation, Phys. Rev. D109, 044010 (2024), arXiv:2309.13204 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Sinatra, C

    A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, The truncated wigner method for bose-condensed gases: limits of va- lidity and applications, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics35, 3599–3631 (2002)

    2002

  103. [111]

    Carusotto, S

    I. Carusotto, S. Fagnocchi, A. Recati, R. Balbinot, and A. Fabbri, Numerical observation of Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes in atomic BECs, New J. Phys. 10, 103001 (2008), arXiv:0803.0507 [cond-mat.other]

    2008 arXiv

  104. [112]

    M. J. Jacquet, M. Joly, L. Giacomelli, F. Claude, Q. Glorieux, A. Bramati, I. Carusotto, and E. Gia- cobino, Analogue quantum simulation of the Hawking effect in a polariton superfluid, Eur. Phys. J. D76, 152 (2022), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.D 76, 247 (2022)], arXiv:2201.02038 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Y.-H. Wang, T. Jacobson, M. Edwards, and C. W. Clark, Induced density correlations in a sonic black hole condensate, SciPost Phys.3, 022 (2017)

    2017

  106. [114]

    Butera and I

    S. Butera and I. Carusotto, Numerical studies of back reaction effects in an analog model of cosmological pre- heating, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 241501 (2023)

    2023

  107. [115]

    J. R. M. n. de Nova and F. Sols, Black-hole laser to bogoliubov-cherenkov-landau crossover: From nonlin- ear to linear quantum amplification, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043282 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.