REVIEW 1 cited by
From ML to LLM: Evaluating the Robustness of Phishing Webpage Detection Models against Adversarial Attacks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
From ML to LLM: Evaluating the Robustness of Phishing Webpage Detection Models against Adversarial Attacks
read the original abstract
Phishing attacks attempt to deceive users into stealing sensitive information, posing a significant cybersecurity threat. Advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have led to the development of numerous phishing webpage detection solutions, but these models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Evaluating their robustness against adversarial phishing webpages is essential. Existing tools contain datasets of pre-designed phishing webpages for a limited number of brands, and lack diversity in phishing features. To address these challenges, we develop PhishOracle, a tool that generates adversarial phishing webpages by embedding diverse phishing features into legitimate webpages. We evaluate the robustness of three existing task-specific models - Stack model, VisualPhishNet, and Phishpedia - against PhishOracle-generated adversarial phishing webpages and observe a significant drop in their detection rates. In contrast, a multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based phishing detector demonstrates stronger robustness against these adversarial attacks but still is prone to evasion. Our findings highlight the vulnerability of phishing detection models to adversarial attacks, emphasizing the need for more robust detection approaches. Furthermore, we conduct a user study to evaluate whether PhishOracle-generated adversarial phishing webpages can deceive users. The results show that many of these phishing webpages evade not only existing detection models but also users.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Measuring and Evaluating the Performance of Generative AI Models for Scam Detection
A new benchmark of 2,742 real scam messages shows top LLMs reach about 64-65% micro-F1 and generalize to an unseen 59,991-sample proprietary set better than a fine-tuned BERT.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.