REVIEW 5 cited by
Scalable Framework for Classifying AI-Generated Content Across Modalities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Scalable Framework for Classifying AI-Generated Content Across Modalities
read the original abstract
The rapid growth of generative AI technologies has heightened the importance of effectively distinguishing between human and AI-generated content, as well as classifying outputs from diverse generative models. This paper presents a scalable framework that integrates perceptual hashing, similarity measurement, and pseudo-labeling to address these challenges. Our method enables the incorporation of new generative models without retraining, ensuring adaptability and robustness in dynamic scenarios. Comprehensive evaluations on the Defactify4 dataset demonstrate competitive performance in text and image classification tasks, achieving high accuracy across both distinguishing human and AI-generated content and classifying among generative methods. These results highlight the framework's potential for real-world applications as generative AI continues to evolve. Source codes are publicly available at https://github.com/ffyyytt/defactify4.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection
The Counter Turing Test competition finds F1-scores above 0.83 for binary real-vs-AI classification but only 0.4986 at best for identifying the specific generative model.
-
Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection
A competition using a new 50k-image dataset found high accuracy in binary real-vs-AI detection but only modest success in identifying the exact generative model.
-
Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection
Binary AI vs. real image classification reaches F1 > 0.83 while identifying the exact generative model achieves a highest F1 of 0.4986 on the MS COCOAI dataset.
-
Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Text Detection
Shared task findings show F1=1.0000 for binary AI text detection and 0.9531 for model attribution using fine-tuned DeBERTa and BART transformers with ensembles.
-
Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Text Detection
Shared task findings show near-perfect binary detection of AI-generated text but greater difficulty in attributing outputs to particular language models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.