Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Experimental electronic structure of the mineral superconductor covellite CuS

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports the first detailed ARPES band-structure maps of the mineral superconductor covellite (CuS), shows they track density-functional-theory predictions closely, and identifies a low-temperature band at the M high-symmetry point

desk verdict First ARPES on CuS, useful quasi-2D confirmation, but the fingerprint claim leans on a kz calibration slip and a post-hoc domain story. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02468 v1 pith:2U7Z45BR submitted 2025-09-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Alexandre Antezak , Takemi Kato , Pedro Rezende Gonçalves , Franck Fortuna , Marcin Rosmus , Natalia Olszowska , Andrés Felipe Santander-Syro , Emmanouil Frantzeskakis This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords ARPEScovelliteCuSbandstructureFermisurfacestructuralphasetransitionquasi-2Delectronicdensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper supplies the long-missing experimental band structure of covellite (CuS), the first known natural mineral superconductor. Using angle-resolved photoemission, the authors map the electronic states in both the high-temperature hexagonal phase and the low-temperature orthorhombic phase, and compare the maps to density-functional-theory calculations. They find close agreement, a quasi-two-dimensional Fermi surface with hole-like pockets, and a clear electronic signature of the 55 K structural transition: a band at the M point that appears only below the transition. The work directly tests decades of band-structure calculations and gives experimental support to the picture of anisotropic, layer-dominated conduction in CuS.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is synchrotron ARPES with variable photon energy, interpreted through the free-electron final-state model with an inner potential V0 = 7 ± 1 eV, which assigns each photon energy to an out-of-plane momentum kz and enables three-dimensional band mapping. Band-by-band comparison relies on GGA-PBE DFT calculations on relaxed hexagonal and orthorhombic unit cells. A 2D-curvature image-processing method enhances weak spectral features, and the paper uses the inequivalence of M and M' points in the orthorhombic phase, together with the presence of misaligned orthorhombic domains under the beam spot, to account for the observed superposition of the two high-symmetry directions.

What would settle it

Measure the out-of-plane constant-energy maps at fine photon-energy steps and compare the apparent kz periodicity of the M-L bands against the V0 = 7 ± 1 eV prediction; if the periodicity deviates beyond the stated uncertainty, the kz axis is misassigned. Then re-examine whether the flat band at M persists when the data are cut at the true kz of the 100 eV photons.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Angle-resolved photoemission maps of CuS match GGA-PBE density-functional-theory calculations closely enough to identify subtle fingerprints of the hexagonal-to-orthorhombic transition. The in-plane Fermi surface consists of flower- and hexagon-shaped hole contours centered at Γ; the two outer contours, originating from the Cu(2)-S(2) layer, are observed, while the two inner contours predicted from the Cu(1)-S(1) layer are not, and the authors attribute this to layer-selective photoemission sensitivity rather than matrix-element effects alone. Photon-energy-dependent measurements show open, quasi-parallel sheets along the out-of-plane direction, confirming the quasi-2D character near the Fer

Load-bearing premise

The band-by-band comparison rests on assigning each photon energy to a specific out-of-plane momentum via a free-electron final-state model with inner potential V0 = 7 ± 1 eV; the text assigns 100 eV to the Brillouin zone boundary in one place and to the middle of the zone in another, and if the correct assignment is different, the comparison to DFT at that momentum breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The quasi-2D Fermi surface provides a direct experimental basis for the anisotropic conductivity of CuS predicted by theory.
  • The 55 K structural transition leaves a measurable electronic trace—an approximately 80 meV energy shift and a new band at M—despite the small atomic displacements involved.
  • The derived inner potential V0 = 7 ± 1 eV gives a working kz calibration for future ARPES studies of CuS and related layered chalcogenides.
  • The seeming absence of the two inner Fermi contours indicates a layer-selective photoemission response, which future experiments can exploit to separate Cu(1)-S(1) from Cu(2)-S(2) contributions.
  • The observation that orthorhombic domains superimpose M and M' directions implies that single-domain samples would allow a cleaner measurement of the low-temperature band structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the internal inconsistency in the kz calibration is resolved differently than the paper assumes—e.g., if 100 eV photons probe mid-zone rather than the zone boundary—the claimed DFT comparison and the M-point fingerprint would need re-evaluation against a corrected momentum assignment.
  • The layer-selective visibility of the Fermi contours suggests a testable prediction: tuning photon energy or polarization should eventually render the Cu(1)-S(1) derived contours, which would directly verify the orbital-character assignment.
  • The flat band at M below the transition, if it survives cleaner single-domain measurements, could serve as a spectroscopic order parameter for the orthorhombic distortion, trackable with temperature-dependent ARPES.
  • The same experimental strategy could be applied to related copper sulfides and selenides to see whether the 55 K transition's electronic fingerprint is a general feature of mixed-valence layered superconductors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first ARPES study of the electronic structure of CuS, the mineral superconductor, in both the high-temperature hexagonal and low-temperature orthorhombic phases. The authors compare constant-energy maps and energy-momentum dispersions with DFT-PBE calculations, concluding that the experimental Fermi surface is quasi-2D with open out-of-plane sheets, that the in-plane contours agree with the calculated Cu(2)-S(2)-derived pockets, and that a band at the M point appears only below the 55 K structural transition. The experimental data are presented with careful polarization and photon-energy dependence; the main evidence consists of in-plane Fermi-surface maps (Fig. 2), photon-energy-dependent maps (Fig. 3), and M-Γ-M cuts at 100 eV (Fig. 4).

Significance. If the conclusions hold, this is a valuable experimental benchmark for a material whose electronic structure has previously been studied only theoretically. The paper provides a direct test of DFT predictions of quasi-2D character and of the subtle impact of the structural transition. The use of a standard, un-fitted DFT calculation and the detailed polarization-dependent ARPES data are strengths. The claim of a spectroscopic fingerprint of the 55 K transition is original and falsifiable by subsequent measurements. However, the kz assignment on which the DFT-overlay comparison rests is internally inconsistent, and some interpretative assumptions (domain averaging, layer-selective sensitivity) are invoked without direct evidence. These issues do not undermine the intrinsic value of the data but must be resolved before the central conclusions can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [III. Results (kz discussion after Fig. 3); Fig. 4(e) caption] The manuscript contains two mutually incompatible statements about the out-of-plane momentum probed at 100 eV. The text states that 'a photon energy of 100 eV ... yields photoelectrons with a kz corresponding to the high-symmetry point A', whereas the Fig. 4(e) caption assigns 100 eV to kz = 0.09675 Å^-1, the middle of Γ-A. With c ≈ 16.29 Å, A is at kz = π/c ≈ 0.193 Å^-1. Using the paper's free-electron expression with hν = 100 eV, Φ ≈ 4–5 eV, and V0 = 7 eV gives k ≈ 5.2 Å^-1; modulo c* = 2π/c, the reduced kz is ≈ 0.18 Å^-1, i.e. near A, not 0.097. The DFT bands overlaid in Figs. 4(f,g) and computed in Fig. 4(e) are at kz = 0.09675, so the comparison is made at a kz the experiment most likely does not probe. This directly affects the identification of the 'band at M' fingerprint (which would be at L, not M, if kz = A) and the claimed 'remarkable agreement' with DFT. The temperature-diffe
  2. [III. Results (domain explanation for low-T data)] The attribution of the low-temperature 'extra' hole-like band at M to misaligned orthorhombic domains contributing Γ-M' signals is post hoc. The Methods state that spectra were acquired in single-domain regions or regions with minimal misalignment 'unless stated otherwise', but Fig. 4 is not explicitly designated as multi-domain. The authors infer multiple domains from the tendency to form domains under stress, without providing a direct measure of the domain distribution under the ~60 µm beam. Because this assumption is used to reconcile the low-T data with DFT, it is load-bearing for the 'remarkable agreement' claim. Please provide evidence for the domain population (e.g., real-space imaging, or a quantitative fit of the two-domain superposition) or soften the claim and present the Γ-M vs Γ-M' assignment as one possible interpretation.
  3. [III. Results (after Fig. 2(c))] The absence of the two inner Fermi-surface contours is attributed to 'preferential sensitivity' to the Cu(2)-S(2) layer. This is a reasonable hypothesis, but it is not tested; matrix-element arguments are dismissed, yet no calculation or measurement of the orbital weight is provided. Since the claimed agreement with the calculated FS rests on the outer contours only, the statement that the projected FS shows 'four sixfold contours whose overall shape is in very good agreement with the experimental results' overstates the case. At minimum, this should be framed as an unresolved discrepancy, and the authors should discuss whether any published photoemission matrix-element calculation supports the layer-selective suppression.
minor comments (4)
  1. [II. Methods; III. Results; Appendix] Typographical errors: 'structureswererelaxed' missing space; 'composed several individual peaks' missing 'of'; 'peaks et around −160.5 eV' should be 'peaks at around'.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption lists panels in the order (a),(b),(c),(d),(f),(g),(h),(e); reordering would improve readability.
  3. [III. Results (Fig. 4(f))] The symmetrization of the data in Fig. 4(f) is not justified. Please state why symmetrization is appropriate given the possible domain misalignment discussed later.
  4. [II. Methods (3D k-space mapping)] The determination of V0 from the out-of-plane periodicity is only reported as a result (7 ± 1 eV). A plot showing the photon-energy dependence and the fit used to extract V0 would strengthen the reproducibility of the calibration.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: ARPES data and independent PBE DFT are compared directly; the only fitted quantity (inner potential V0) is standard kz calibration and does not encode the transition fingerprint.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are (1) experimental ARPES band maps of CuS agree with DFT-PBE calculations, and (2) a low-temperature band feature near M is a fingerprint of the structural transition. Neither claim reduces to its inputs by construction. The DFT bands are computed from first principles using standard pseudopotentials and published crystal structures, not fitted to the ARPES data. The experimental feature at M is identified directly in curvature maps and EDCs by comparing 14 K and 65 K data; its existence does not depend on the DFT overlay. The inner potential V0 = 7 ± 1 eV is determined from the out-of-plane periodicity of the experimental electronic structure, which is a standard ARPES calibration step, and it is not fitted to the specific band-at-M fingerprint. There are no load-bearing self-citations: the DFT and structural references are independent prior works, and the current authors do not cite their own prior results to justify any premise. The M' domain interpretation is post-hoc but does not constitute a parameter fit or a derived prediction. One internal inconsistency exists outside the circularity analysis: the text states that 100 eV photons correspond to the A point (BZ boundary), while the Fig. 4(e) caption assigns 100 eV to kz = 0.09675 Å^-1, the middle of Γ-A. This is a calibration/consistency error that would affect the kz label of the DFT overlay, but it is not a circular reduction—the experimental band maps and the DFT band structure remain independent inputs. Since no derived quantity is equivalent to its own input and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on standard computational and experimental assumptions. The two ad hoc assumptions about domain mixing and layer sensitivity are the least secure, and the V0-kz calibration contains an internal inconsistency. No genuinely new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Inner potential V0 = 7 ± 1 eV
    Determined by matching the periodicity of out-of-plane ARPES maps to the Brillouin zone; used to convert photon energy to kz for comparison with DFT bands.
  • 2D-curvature smoothing parameters = a0 = 1 (Figs. 4f,g); a0 = 1e-6 (Figs. 3c,d); a0 = 1e-5 (Figs. 3e,f); Gaussian FWHM 0.2 Å^-1/0.055 eV and 0.15 Å^-1/0.04
    Chosen by hand to enhance weak spectral features; the features detected in the curvature maps depend on these values.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption DFT-GGA-PBE provides a quantitatively reliable band structure benchmark for CuS.
    The paper compares ARPES to PBE-DFT and attributes small discrepancies to known DFT gap underestimation; if PBE is qualitatively wrong, the identification of fingerprints and dimensionality is compromised.
  • domain assumption Free-electron final-state model for ARPES kz mapping.
    Used in the '3D k-space mapping' section to convert photon energy to out-of-plane momentum; the inner potential V0 is the only adjustment.
  • domain assumption Cleavage exposes the (001) plane and the measured surface is representative of the bulk.
    ARPES is a surface-sensitive technique; the paper assumes the cleaved (001) surface reflects bulk band structure, which is standard for layered materials.
  • domain assumption The observed 14 K vs 65 K spectral differences are due to the structural phase transition and not to temperature-dependent matrix elements or other thermal effects.
    The paper compares data at two temperatures and assigns the differences to the transition without a control for other temperature effects.
  • ad hoc to paper The extra band at M in the orthorhombic phase arises from misaligned orthorhombic domains contributing Γ-M' signals.
    Invoked post hoc to reconcile the experimental band with DFT along Γ-M' without direct measurement of the domain orientations.
  • ad hoc to paper ARPES is preferentially sensitive to the Cu(2)-S(2) layer, explaining the absence of the two inner Fermi contours.
    The paper states it cannot attribute the absence to matrix elements, then invokes this possibility; it is speculative and not independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental electronic structure of the mineral superconductor covellite CuS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2U7Z45BR

@misc{pith2026250902468,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental electronic structure of the mineral superconductor covellite CuS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2U7Z45BR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02468}
}
read the original abstract

Covellite (CuS) is the first known natural mineral superconductor. Despite its simple chemical formula, covellite exhibits a rich crystal structure at the origin of several remarkable properties. The ionic arrangement in CuS crystals leads to a mixed valence of Cu and a second-order structural transition at 55 K. Despite the abundance of structural studies and theoretical reports on its electronic structure, there are scarce references on its experimental band structure. By means of Angle Resolved PhotoEmission Spectroscopy (ARPES), we have probed the experimental electronic structure of covellite. We compare our results with the predictions of density-functional theory (DFT) calculations. Our experimental data are in remarkable agreement with the calculations, revealing subtle fingerprints of the structural phase transition, and confirming the quasi-2D nature of the electronic structure of CuS.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02468 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic model of the hexagonal high-temperature crystal structure of CuS. The crystal is composed of two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a), (b). Projection of the orthorhombic and hexagonal theoretical Fermi surface (FS) on the (001) plane. In the case of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a), (b) Constant energy ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a), (b) Energy-momentum dispersion maps measured along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chung and H.-J

    J.-S. Chung and H.-J. Sohn. Electrochemical behaviors of CuS as a cathode material for lithium secondary bat- teries. Journal of Power Sources, 108(1):226–231, 2002. 9

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    CuS and Cu2S as cathode materials for lithium batteries: A re- view

    Kyle Jiang, Zonghai Chen, and Xiangbo Meng. CuS and Cu2S as cathode materials for lithium batteries: A re- view. ChemElectroChem, 6(11):2825–2840, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Mrinmoyee Basu, Arun Kumar Sinha, Mukul Pradhan, SougataSarkar, YuichiNegishi, Govind , andTarasankar Pal. Evolution of Hierarchical Hexagonal Stacked Plates of CuS from Liquid-Liquid Interface and its Photocat- alytic Application for Oxidative Degradation of Different Dyes under Indoor Lighting. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(16):6313–6318, Augus...

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Support for research and development with the use of research infra-structure of the National Synchrotron Radiation Centre SOLARIS

    The anisotropic distribution of the contour broaden- ing is not evident for the other pairs of contours. Finally, Fig. 2(b)showstheequivalentofFig. 2(a)butnowinthe high-temperature hexagonal phase. No major changes in the Fermi contours are observed in the high-temperature phase [Fig. 2(b)] with respect to its low-temperature counterpart, except for the f...

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Plasmonic Cu2−xS nanocrystals: Optical and structural properties of copper-deficient copper(I) sulfides

    Yixin Zhao, Hongcheng Pan, Yongbing Lou, Xiaofeng Qiu, JunJie Zhu, and Clemens Burda. Plasmonic Cu2−xS nanocrystals: Optical and structural properties of copper-deficient copper(I) sulfides. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 131(12):4253–4261, 2009. PMID: 19267472

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    2D-curvature details: 2D-curvature rendering is used to enhance the intensity of weak or broad spectral features on the ARPES energy-momentum maps [34]

    and visualized using the FermiSurfer software [33]. 2D-curvature details: 2D-curvature rendering is used to enhance the intensity of weak or broad spectral features on the ARPES energy-momentum maps [34]. For Figs. 4(f) and 4(g), boxcar smoothing was used eight times with a width of 0.004 Å−1 along the k-axis and four times with a width of 0.02 eV along t...

    work page

  7. [7]

    S. Ya. Kuchmii, A. V. Korzhak, A. E. Raevskaya, and A. I. Kryukov. Catalysis of the Sodium Sulfide Reduction of Methylviologene by CuS Nanoparticles. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry, 37(1):36–41, January 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Surface-dependent localized surface plasmon resonances in CuS nanodisks

    Tiaoxing Wei, Yufeng Liu, Wenjing Dong, Yun Zhang, Chanyan Huang, Yan Sun, Xin Chen, and Ning Dai. Surface-dependent localized surface plasmon resonances in CuS nanodisks. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 5(21):10473–10477, 2013. PMID: 24138006

    work page 2013

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Davide Cozzoli

    Yi Xie, Luigi Carbone, Concetta Nobile, Vincenzo Grillo, Stefania D?Agostino, Fabio Della Sala, Cinzia Giannini, Davide Altamura, Christian Oelsner, Carola Kryschi, and P. Davide Cozzoli. Metallic-like stoichiometric cop- per sulfide nanocrystals: Phase- and shape-selective sy...

  2. [10]

    First evidence of natural supercon- ductivity: covellite

    Francesco Di Benedetto, Miria Borgheresi, Andrea Caneschi, Guillaume Chastanet, Curzio Cipriani, Dante Gatteschi, Giovanni Pratesi, Maurizio Romanelli, and Roberta Sessoli. First evidence of natural supercon- ductivity: covellite. European Journal of Mineralogy, 18(3):283–287, 07 2006

    2006

  3. [11]

    Meissner

    W. Meissner. Messungen mit Hilfe von flussigem He- lium. V. Supraleitfahigkeit von Kupfersulfid.Zeitschrift fur Physik, 58(7):570–572, July 1929

    1929

  4. [12]

    Goncalves, E.B

    A.P. Goncalves, E.B. Lopes, A. Casaca, M. Dias, and M. Almeida. Growth of CuS platelet single crystals by the high-temperature solution growth technique.Journal of Crystal Growth, 310(11):2742–2745, 2008

    2008

  5. [13]

    Electrical transport properties of CuS single crystals

    A Casaca, E B Lopes, A P Goncalves, and M Almeida. Electrical transport properties of CuS single crystals. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 24(1):015701, dec 2011

    2011

  6. [14]

    Quantitative X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopies: electronic structure elucidation of Cu2S and CuS

    Prashant Kumar, Rajamani Nagarajan, and Ritimukta Sarangi. Quantitative X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopies: electronic structure elucidation of Cu2S and CuS. J. Mater. Chem. C, 1:2448–2454, 2013

    2013

  7. [15]

    Pearce, R.A.D

    C.I. Pearce, R.A.D. Pattrick, D.J. Vaughan, C.M.B. Henderson, and G. van der Laan. Copper oxidation state in chalcopyrite: Mixed Cu d9 and d10 character- istics. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 70(18):4635– 4642, 2006

    2006

  8. [16]

    R. R. Gainov, A. V. Dooglav, I. N. Pen’kov, I. R. Mukhamedshin, N. N. Mozgova, I. A. Evlampiev, and I. A. Bryzgalov. Phase transition and anomalous electronic behavior in the layered superconductor CuS probed by NQR.Phys. Rev. B, 79:075115, Feb 2009

    2009

  9. [17]

    I. I. Mazin. Structural and electronic properties of the two-dimensionalsuperconductorCuSwith1 1 3-valentcop- per. Phys. Rev. B, 85:115133, Mar 2012

    2012

  10. [18]

    Morales-Garcia, Antonio Lenito Jr

    A. Morales-Garcia, Antonio Lenito Jr. Soares, Egon C. Dos Santos, Heitor A. de Abreu, and Helio A. Duarte. First-Principles Calculations and Electron Density Topo- logical Analysis of Covellite (CuS).The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry A, 118(31):5823–5831, August 2014. Pub- l...

    2014

  11. [19]

    Valence transition model of the pseu- dogap, charge order, and superconductivity in electron- doped and hole-doped copper oxides

    Sumit Mazumdar. Valence transition model of the pseu- dogap, charge order, and superconductivity in electron- doped and hole-doped copper oxides. Phys. Rev. B, 98:205153, Nov 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    The remarkable un- derlying ground states of cuprate superconductors.An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 10(Volume10, 2019):409–429, 2019

    Cyril Proust and Louis Taillefer. The remarkable un- derlying ground states of cuprate superconductors.An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 10(Volume10, 2019):409–429, 2019

    2019

  13. [21]

    Raveau, Tapati Sarkar, and A

    B. Raveau, Tapati Sarkar, and A. Pautrat. Comment on our article ?superconducting-like behaviour of the lay- ered chalcogenides CuS and CuSe below 40 K? (solid state sciences 13 (2011) 1874?1878).Solid State Sciences, 14(2):291, 2012

    2011

  14. [22]

    Low-temperaturestructuraldistortioninCuS

    Fjellvåg Helmer, Grønvold Frederik, and Stølen Svein. Low-temperaturestructuraldistortioninCuS. Zeitschrift fur Kristallographie, 184(1-2):111–121, 1988

    1988

  15. [23]

    Liang and M.-H

    W. Liang and M.-H. Whangbo. Conductivity anisotropy and structural phase transition in covellite CuS. Solid State Communications, 85(5):405–408, 1993

    1993

  16. [24]

    Sergio Conejeros, Iberio de P. R. Moreira, Pere Alemany, and Enric Canadell. Nature of Holes, Oxidation States, and Hypervalency in Covellite (CuS).Inorganic Chem- istry, 53(23):12402–12406, December 2014. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2014

  17. [25]

    Metallic hole conduction in CuS.Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 91(2):306–311, 1991

    Hiroshi Nozaki, Kenji Shibata, and Naoki Ohhashi. Metallic hole conduction in CuS.Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 91(2):306–311, 1991

    1991

  18. [26]

    The valence of copper in sulphides and selenides: An X-ray photoelectron spec- troscopy study

    J.C.W Folmer and F Jellinek. The valence of copper in sulphides and selenides: An X-ray photoelectron spec- troscopy study. Journal of the Less Common Metals, 76(1):153–162, 1980

    1980

  19. [27]

    QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials

    Paolo Giannozzi, Stefano Baroni, Nicola Bonini, Mat- teo Calandra, Roberto Car, Carlo Cavazzoni, Davide Ceresoli, Guido L Chiarotti, Matteo Cococcioni, Ismaila Dabo, Andrea Dal Corso, Stefano de Gironcoli, Ste- fano Fabris, Guido Fratesi, Ralph Gebauer, Uwe Ger- stmann, Christ...

    2009

  20. [28]

    Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with QUANTUM ESPRESSO.Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter, 29(46):465901, 2017

    P Giannozzi, O Andreussi, T Brumme, O Bunau, M Buongiorno Nardelli, M Calandra, R Car, C Cavaz- zoni, D Ceresoli, M Cococcioni, N Colonna, I Carnimeo, A Dal Corso, S de Gironcoli, P Delugas, R A DiStasio Jr, A Ferretti, A Floris, G Fratesi, G Fugallo, R Gebauer, U Gerstmann, F...

    2017

  21. [29]

    Quantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale.The Journal of Chem- ical Physics, 152(15):154105, 2020

    Paolo Giannozzi, Oscar Baseggio, Pietro Bonfa, Davide Brunato, Roberto Car, Ivan Carnimeo, Carlo Cavaz- zoni, Stefano de Gironcoli, Pietro Delugas, Fabrizio Ferrari Ruffino, Andrea Ferretti, Nicola Marzari, Iurii Timrov, Andrea Urru, and Stefano Baroni. Quantum ESPRESSO toward...

    2020

  22. [30]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Phys. Rev. Lett., 77:3865–3868, Oct 1996

    1996

  23. [31]

    P. E. Blöchl. Projector augmented-wave method.Phys. Rev. B, 50:17953–17979, Dec 1994

    1994

  24. [32]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert. From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B, 59:1758–1775, Jan 1999

    1999

  25. [33]

    Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu.Computational Materials Science, 95:337– 350, 2014

    Andrea Dal Corso. Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu.Computational Materials Science, 95:337– 350, 2014

    2014

  26. [34]

    Monkhorst and James D

    Hendrik J. Monkhorst and James D. Pack. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Physical Review B, 13(12):5188–5192, 1976

    1976

  27. [35]

    Fermisurfer: Fermi-surface viewer providing multiple representation schemes

    Mitsuaki Kawamura. Fermisurfer: Fermi-surface viewer providing multiple representation schemes. Computer Physics Communications, 239:197–203, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Zhang, P

    P. Zhang, P. Richard, T. Qian, Y.-M. Xu, X. Dai, and H. Ding. A precise method for visualizing dispersive fea- tures in image plots. Review of Scientific Instruments, 82(4):043712, April 2011

    2011

  29. [37]

    Coghlan and R.E

    W.A. Coghlan and R.E. Clausing. Auger catalog calcu- lated transition energies listed by energy and element. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 5(4):317–469, 1973

    1973

  30. [38]

    Intrinsicaccuracyin3-dimensionalphotoe- mission band mapping.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 130(1-3):65–78, July 2003

    V.N.Strocov. Intrinsicaccuracyin3-dimensionalphotoe- mission band mapping.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 130(1-3):65–78, July 2003

    2003

  31. [39]

    An experimentalist’s guide to the ma- trix element in angle resolved photoemission.J

    Simon Moser. An experimentalist’s guide to the ma- trix element in angle resolved photoemission.J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 214:29–52, January 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    R. O. Jones. Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future.Rev. Mod. Phys., 87(3):897–923, August 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Beyond the quasiparticle approxima- tion: Fully self-consistent GW calculations

    Manuel Grumet, Peitao Liu, Merzuk Kaltak, Jiří Klimeš, and Georg Kresse. Beyond the quasiparticle approxima- tion: Fully self-consistent GW calculations. Phys. Rev. B, 98(15):155143, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    First-principles approach with a pseudohybrid density functional for extended Hubbard interactions

    Sang-Hoon Lee and Young-Woo Son. First-principles approach with a pseudohybrid density functional for extended Hubbard interactions. Phys. Rev. Research, 2(4):043410, December 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    Thompson.X-ray Data Booklet

    A.C. Thompson.X-ray Data Booklet. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, 2001

    2001

  36. [44]

    P-N Heterojunction Embedded CuS/TiO2 Bifunc- tional Photocatalyst for synchronous hydrogen produc- tion and benzylamine conversion.Small, 20(10):2306344, 2024

    Jianan Liu, Xuemeng Sun, Yuying Fan, Yaoguang Yu, Qi Li, Jing Zhou, Huiquan Gu, Keying Shi, and Baojiang Jiang. P-N Heterojunction Embedded CuS/TiO2 Bifunc- tional Photocatalyst for synchronous hydrogen produc- tion and benzylamine conversion.Small, 20(10):2306344, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.