Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Scalable Incremental Nonconvex Optimization Approach for Phase Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.05499 v3 pith:2XMX6JXI submitted 2018-07-15 math.OC

Scalable Incremental Nonconvex Optimization Approach for Phase Retrieval

classification math.OC
keywords nonconvexsolversconvexincreprmeasurementsmethodsphaseproposed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We aim to find a solution $\bm{x}\in\mathbb{C}^n$ to a system of quadratic equations of the form $b_i=\lvert\bm{a}_i^*\bm{x}\rvert^2$, $i=1,2,\ldots,m$, e.g., the well-known NP-hard phase retrieval problem. As opposed to recently proposed state-of-the-art nonconvex methods, we revert to the semidefinite relaxation (SDR) PhaseLift convex formulation and propose a successive and incremental nonconvex optimization algorithm, termed as \texttt{IncrePR}, to indirectly minimize the resulting convex problem on the cone of positive semidefinite matrices. Our proposed method overcomes the excessive computational cost of typical SDP solvers as well as the need of a good initialization for typical nonconvex methods. For Gaussian measurements, which is usually needed for provable convergence of nonconvex methods, \texttt{IncrePR} with restart strategy outperforms state-of-the-art nonconvex solvers with a sharper phase transition of perfect recovery and typical convex solvers in terms of computational cost and storage. For more challenging structured (non-Gaussian) measurements often occurred in real applications, such as transmission matrix and oversampling Fourier transform, \texttt{IncrePR} with several restarts can be used to find a good initial guess. With further refinement by local nonconvex solvers, one can achieve a better solution than that obtained by applying nonconvex solvers directly when the number of measurements is relatively small. Extensive numerical tests are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.