Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tools for Verifying Neural Models' Training Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.00682 v1 pith:2XYD42SS submitted 2023-07-02 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords trainingdatamodelmodelsattacksincludingmethodneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

It is important that consumers and regulators can verify the provenance of large neural models to evaluate their capabilities and risks. We introduce the concept of a "Proof-of-Training-Data": any protocol that allows a model trainer to convince a Verifier of the training data that produced a set of model weights. Such protocols could verify the amount and kind of data and compute used to train the model, including whether it was trained on specific harmful or beneficial data sources. We explore efficient verification strategies for Proof-of-Training-Data that are compatible with most current large-model training procedures. These include a method for the model-trainer to verifiably pre-commit to a random seed used in training, and a method that exploits models' tendency to temporarily overfit to training data in order to detect whether a given data-point was included in training. We show experimentally that our verification procedures can catch a wide variety of attacks, including all known attacks from the Proof-of-Learning literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Societal Impact of Foundation Models: Advancing Evidence-based AI Policy

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A dissertation that synthesizes prior work on foundation models into a three-part framework: conceptual framing, empirical measurement (HELM, FMTI), and evidence-based AI policy.

Pith tools