The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2309.09120 · v1 · pith:2YETJXWS · submitted 2023-09-17 · cs.AI · cs.CY

Public Perceptions of Gender Bias in Large Language Models: Cases of ChatGPT and Ernie

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:2YETJXWSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.AI cs.CY
keywords biasgenderllmschatgpterniefounddifferentfindings
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models are quickly gaining momentum, yet are found to demonstrate gender bias in their responses. In this paper, we conducted a content analysis of social media discussions to gauge public perceptions of gender bias in LLMs which are trained in different cultural contexts, i.e., ChatGPT, a US-based LLM, or Ernie, a China-based LLM. People shared both observations of gender bias in their personal use and scientific findings about gender bias in LLMs. A difference between the two LLMs was seen -- ChatGPT was more often found to carry implicit gender bias, e.g., associating men and women with different profession titles, while explicit gender bias was found in Ernie's responses, e.g., overly promoting women's pursuit of marriage over career. Based on the findings, we reflect on the impact of culture on gender bias and propose governance recommendations to regulate gender bias in LLMs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.