Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

New Rules for Causal Identification with Background Knowledge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.15259 v1 pith:2YPAXQM2 submitted 2024-07-21 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords causaldataobservationalrelationsrulesbackgroundknowledgeopen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Identifying causal relations is crucial for a variety of downstream tasks. In additional to observational data, background knowledge (BK), which could be attained from human expertise or experiments, is usually introduced for uncovering causal relations. This raises an open problem that in the presence of latent variables, what causal relations are identifiable from observational data and BK. In this paper, we propose two novel rules for incorporating BK, which offer a new perspective to the open problem. In addition, we show that these rules are applicable in some typical causality tasks, such as determining the set of possible causal effects with observational data. Our rule-based approach enhances the state-of-the-art method by circumventing a process of enumerating block sets that would otherwise take exponential complexity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM Cannot Discover Causality, and Should Be Restricted to Non-Decisional Support in Causal Discovery

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs are unreliable causal reasoners, so they should be limited to non-decisional search support in causal discovery algorithms.

Pith tools