pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.09621 · v2 · pith:2YZAWPVZnew · submitted 2025-09-18 · 💻 cs.CR · cs.CY

Technologies and Security Challenges in Metaverse

Krishno Dey , Diogo Barradas , Saqib Hakak This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 21:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CR cs.CY
keywords MetaverseSecurity challengesVulnerabilitiesCountermeasuresExtended RealityBlockchainPrivacy threatsSystematic literature review
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Metaverse generates a larger attack surface and new vulnerabilities through its immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews technologies including extended reality, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and digital twins that enable the Metaverse. It shows how these features produce security threats in identity management, data governance, and user interactions that go beyond those in traditional platforms. Although countermeasures exist for many issues, the review finds most are theoretical and untested in actual Metaverse environments. This analysis identifies research gaps and suggests directions for building safer systems.

Core claim

The Metaverse, by combining extended reality, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and digital twins, creates a much larger attack surface than conventional digital platforms. Its immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics generate new vulnerabilities. While various countermeasures have been proposed, most remain theoretical or have not been validated in real-world settings.

What carries the argument

Systematic literature review that catalogs enabling technologies, maps them to specific vulnerabilities, and evaluates proposed countermeasures.

If this is right

  • Security strategies must account for the unique permanence and immersion of virtual environments.
  • Empirical testing of countermeasures in operational Metaverse settings is required to confirm their value.
  • Ethical governance frameworks should address privacy and safety to support long-term platform use.
  • Research should target gaps in practical defenses against decentralized threats.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Developers may need to build identity systems that exceed standard practices to handle persistent virtual identities.
  • Vulnerabilities in Metaverse designs could extend to connected physical devices in augmented reality applications.
  • Regulators might develop rules tailored to persistent virtual spaces to limit risks in user interactions.

Load-bearing premise

The systematic literature review captured a representative and unbiased sample of all relevant vulnerabilities and countermeasures in the Metaverse domain.

What would settle it

A comprehensive security audit of an existing Metaverse platform that reveals major vulnerabilities and ineffective countermeasures not accounted for in the reviewed literature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.09621 by Diogo Barradas, Krishno Dey, Saqib Hakak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Interaction of the Metaverse, Physical World, and Virtual World [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Basic network architecture and characteristics of Metaverse. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Enabling technologies of Metaverse. qualitative components, like the advantages and disadvantages of the prioritization methods that are currently in use. The following describes the methodology used to carry out data synthesis, which is customized for every research question: • To answer RQ1, we used architectural figures to present the enabling Metaverse technologies. • We use descriptive analysis to hig… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Taxonomy of Threats in the Metaverse. VII. SECURITY THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES IN METAVERSE (RQ3) The Metaverse offers an immersive and persistent digital ecosystem. However, the Metaverse is subject to a wide array of novel and intensified security threats. In contrast to conventional web-based systems, the Metaverse includes real￾time interactions in three-dimensional environments, complex identity repr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Metaverse utilizes emerging technologies such as Extended Reality (XR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and digital twins to provide an immersive and interactive virtual experience. As the Metaverse continues to evolve, it brings a range of security and privacy threats, such as identity management, data governance, and user interactions. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive review of the enabling technologies for the Metaverse. It also aims to provide a thorough analysis of key vulnerabilities and threats that may compromise its sustainability and user safety. We perform a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify key vulnerabilities and their countermeasures in Metaverse platforms. Metaverse offers a much larger attack surface compared to conventional digital platforms. Immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics of the Metaverse generate new vulnerabilities. Although there are many countermeasures to these vulnerabilities, most of them are theoretical or have not been tested in real-world environments. Our review highlights current advancements, identifies research gaps, and outlines future directions to ensure a secure, resilient, and ethically governed Metaverse.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a survey of enabling technologies for the Metaverse (XR, AI, blockchain, digital twins) and reports performing a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify security and privacy vulnerabilities, threats, and countermeasures. It claims that the Metaverse has a much larger attack surface than conventional digital platforms because its immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics generate new vulnerabilities, while noting that most countermeasures remain theoretical and untested in real-world settings. The paper highlights advancements, research gaps, and future directions.

Significance. A transparent and comprehensive SLR on Metaverse security could consolidate scattered literature and usefully flag gaps in tested countermeasures. The central claim that Metaverse-specific traits create amplified vulnerabilities would be significant for the field if supported by a reproducible review process that distinguishes new risks from those already studied in XR, blockchain, or digital-twin literature.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The manuscript states that a systematic literature review was performed to identify key vulnerabilities and countermeasures, yet supplies no search strings, databases, date ranges, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening process, quality assessment, or final paper count. This omission is load-bearing for the claim that immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics generate new vulnerabilities and a 'much larger attack surface,' because those observations depend on the reviewed sample being representative and unbiased.
minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: Adding the number of papers ultimately included and the literature search time frame would help readers gauge the scope and currency of the review.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying this critical gap in methodological transparency. We agree that the details of the systematic literature review must be provided to substantiate the paper's central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The manuscript states that a systematic literature review was performed to identify key vulnerabilities and countermeasures, yet supplies no search strings, databases, date ranges, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening process, quality assessment, or final paper count. This omission is load-bearing for the claim that immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics generate new vulnerabilities and a 'much larger attack surface,' because those observations depend on the reviewed sample being representative and unbiased.

    Authors: We agree that the current version of the manuscript lacks an explicit description of the SLR protocol, which is necessary to demonstrate that the reviewed literature is representative and that the identified vulnerabilities are genuinely amplified by Metaverse-specific traits rather than already covered in prior XR or blockchain surveys. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated 'Systematic Review Methodology' section (or subsection) that reports the search strings, the databases queried (IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science), the date range, inclusion/exclusion criteria, the two-stage screening process, quality assessment criteria, and the final number of included papers. This addition will directly address the referee's concern and strengthen the evidential basis for our observations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: survey aggregates external literature without self-referential derivations

full rationale

This paper is a systematic literature review surveying Metaverse technologies, vulnerabilities, and countermeasures. It presents no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or first-principles derivations that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. Central claims about larger attack surfaces and new vulnerabilities are positioned as summaries of reviewed external sources rather than outputs forced by self-definition, self-citation chains, or renamed known results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, with no load-bearing steps matching the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the paper relies entirely on synthesis of existing published work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 964 out tokens · 47519 ms · 2026-05-21T21:40:58.774223+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 146 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy.IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 25(1):319–352, 2022

    Yuntao Wang, Zhou Su, Ning Zhang, Rui Xing, Dongxiao Liu, Tom H Luan, and Xuemin Shen. A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy.IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 25(1):319–352, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Mansoor Ali, Faisal Naeem, Georges Kaddoum, and Ekram Hossain. Metaverse communications, networking, security, and applications: Research issues, state-of-the-art, and future directions.IEEE Com- munications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(2):1238–1278, 2023. 25 TABLE VIII FUTURERESEARCHDIRECTIONS FOR THEMETAVERSE(RQ5) Area Research Directions User Safety of sens...

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    A survey on zero trust architecture: Challenges and future trends.Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1):6476274, 2022

    Yuanhang He, Daochao Huang, Lei Chen, Yi Ni, and Xiangjie Ma. A survey on zero trust architecture: Challenges and future trends.Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1):6476274, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review.Ieee Access, 11:12368–12377, 2023

    Georg David Ritterbusch and Malte Rolf Teichmann. Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review.Ieee Access, 11:12368–12377, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Blockchain for the metaverse: A review.Future Generation Computer Systems, 143:401–419, 2023

    Thien Huynh-The, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, Weizheng Wang, Gokul Yenduri, Pasika Ranaweera, Quoc-Viet Pham, Daniel Benevides da Costa, and Madhusanka Liyanage. Blockchain for the metaverse: A review.Future Generation Computer Systems, 143:401–419, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Metaverse in education: Contributors, cooperations, and research themes.IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6):1111–1129, 2023

    Xieling Chen, Di Zou, Haoran Xie, and Fu Lee Wang. Metaverse in education: Contributors, cooperations, and research themes.IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6):1111–1129, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Metaverse - the new age empire: Relinquishing our identity to acquire digital immortality

    Vaibhav Raina, Jayapriya Srinivas, and M S Shilpa. Metaverse - the new age empire: Relinquishing our identity to acquire digital immortality. 2022 International Conference on Futuristic Technologies (INCOFT), pages 1–9, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Bantam Books, 1992

    Neal Stephenson.Snow Crash. Bantam Books, 1992

    work page 1992

  9. [9]

    User- friendly home automation based on 3d virtual world.IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 56(3):1843–1847, 2010

    Jinsoo Han, Jaekwan Yun, Jonghyun Jang, and Kwang-Roh Park. User- friendly home automation based on 3d virtual world.IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 56(3):1843–1847, 2010

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Metaverse-aka: A lightweight and privacypreserving seamless cross-metaverse authentication and key agreement scheme

    Yingying Yao, Xiaolin Chang, Lin Li, Jiqiang Liu, Jelena Mi ˇsi´c, and V ojislav B Miˇsi´c. Metaverse-aka: A lightweight and privacypreserving seamless cross-metaverse authentication and key agreement scheme. In 2022 IEEE Smartworld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Digital Twin, Privacy Computing, Metaverse, Auton...

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    The metaverse: a networked collection of inexpensive, self-configuring, immersive environments

    Christopher Jaynes, William Brent Seales, Kenneth Calvert, Zongming Fei, and Jim Griffioen. The metaverse: a networked collection of inexpensive, self-configuring, immersive environments. InProceedings of the workshop on Virtual environments 2003, pages 115–124, 2003

    work page 2003

  12. [12]

    Security and privacy in metaverse: A comprehensive survey.Big Data Mining and Analytics, 6(2):234–247, 2023

    Yan Huang, Yi Joy Li, and Zhipeng Cai. Security and privacy in metaverse: A comprehensive survey.Big Data Mining and Analytics, 6(2):234–247, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    A scalable server for 3d metaverses

    Ewen Chewslack-Postava, Tahir Azim, Behram FT Mistree, Daniel Re- iter Horn, Jeff Terrace, Philip Levis, and Michael J Freedman. A scalable server for 3d metaverses. In2012 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 12), pages 209–222, 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Analysis of metaverse platform as a new play culture: Focusing on roblox and zepeto

    Jeongmin Han, Jeongyun Heo, and Eunsoon You. Analysis of metaverse platform as a new play culture: Focusing on roblox and zepeto. In International conference on human-centered artificial intelligence, pages 1–10, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Socializing in mobile gaming

    Sheila A Paul, Marianne Jensen, Chui Yin Wong, and Chee Weng Khong. Socializing in mobile gaming. InProceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, pages 2–9, 2008

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    The mediation effects of gaming motives between game involvement and problematic internet use: Escapism, advancement and socializing.Computers & Education, 122:43–53, 2018

    Shan-Mei Chang, Grace MY Hsieh, and Sunny SJ Lin. The mediation effects of gaming motives between game involvement and problematic internet use: Escapism, advancement and socializing.Computers & Education, 122:43–53, 2018

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Talking a team into being in online workplace collaborations: The discourse of virtual work

    Erika Darics and Maria Cristina Gatti. Talking a team into being in online workplace collaborations: The discourse of virtual work. Discourse Studies, 21(3):237–257, 2019

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Charters

    Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart M. Charters. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, 2007

    work page 2007

  19. [19]

    Optimal targeted advertising strategy for secure wireless edge metaverse

    Hongyang Du, Dusit Niyato, Chunyan Miao, Jiawen Kang, and Dong In Kim. Optimal targeted advertising strategy for secure wireless edge metaverse. InGLOBECOM 2022-2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pages 4346–4351. IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    When the user is inside the user interface: An empirical study of {UI} security properties in augmented reality

    Kaiming Cheng, Arkaprabha Bhattacharya, Michelle Lin, Jaewook Lee, Aroosh Kumar, Jeffery F Tian, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. When the user is inside the user interface: An empirical study of {UI} security properties in augmented reality. In33rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 24), pages 2707–2723, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Digital twin networks: A survey

    Yiwen Wu, Ke Zhang, and Yan Zhang. Digital twin networks: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(18):13789–13804, 2021

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Digital twin consensus for blockchain-enabled intelligent transportation systems in smart cities.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11):22619–22629, 2021

    Siyi Liao, Jun Wu, Ali Kashif Bashir, Wu Yang, Jianhua Li, and Usman Tariq. Digital twin consensus for blockchain-enabled intelligent transportation systems in smart cities.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11):22619–22629, 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Blockchain-based multisignature lock for uac in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10(5):2201–2213, 2022

    Keke Gai, Shuo Wang, Hui Zhao, Yufeng She, Zijian Zhang, and Liehuang Zhu. Blockchain-based multisignature lock for uac in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10(5):2201–2213, 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Smart contract: Attacks and protections.Ieee Access, 8:24416–24427, 2020

    Sarwar Sayeed, Hector Marco-Gisbert, and Tom Caira. Smart contract: Attacks and protections.Ieee Access, 8:24416–24427, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Survey of experimental evaluation studies for wireless mesh network deployments in urban areas towards ubiquitous internet.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15:223–239, 2012

    Serdar Vural, Dali Wei, and Klaus Moessner. Survey of experimental evaluation studies for wireless mesh network deployments in urban areas towards ubiquitous internet.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15:223–239, 2012

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    The metaverse and terrorism

    Gabriel Weimann and Roy Dimant. The metaverse and terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 17(2):92–107, 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    An anti-disguise authentication system using the first impression of avatar in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 19:6393–6408, 2024

    Zhenyong Zhang, Kedi Yang, Youliang Tian, and Jianfeng Ma. An anti-disguise authentication system using the first impression of avatar in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 19:6393–6408, 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Industrial metaverse: Enabling technologies, open problems, and future trends.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    Shiying Zhang, Jun Li, Long Shi, Ming Ding, Dinh C Nguyen, Wen Chen, and Zhu Han. Industrial metaverse: Enabling technologies, open problems, and future trends.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Security against impersonation attacks in distributed systems.IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 6(1):440–450, 2018

    Philip N Brown, Holly P Borowski, and Jason R Marden. Security against impersonation attacks in distributed systems.IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 6(1):440–450, 2018

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Design of secure mutual authentication scheme for metaverse environments using blockchain.Ieee Access, 10:98944– 98958, 2022

    Jongseok Ryu, Seunghwan Son, Joonyoung Lee, Yohan Park, and Youngho Park. Design of secure mutual authentication scheme for metaverse environments using blockchain.Ieee Access, 10:98944– 98958, 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Personal identity in the metaverse: Challenges and risks.Kutafin Law Review, 9(4):793–817, 2023

    Anastasia N Mitrushchenkova. Personal identity in the metaverse: Challenges and risks.Kutafin Law Review, 9(4):793–817, 2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    A secure authentication framework to guarantee the traceability of avatars in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 18:3817–3832, 2023

    Kedi Yang, Zhenyong Zhang, Tian Youliang, and Jianfeng Ma. A secure authentication framework to guarantee the traceability of avatars in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 18:3817–3832, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    A survey on network slicing security: Attacks, challenges, solutions and research directions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(1):534–570, 2023

    Chamitha De Alwis, Pawani Porambage, Kapal Dev, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, and Madhusanka Liyanage. A survey on network slicing security: Attacks, challenges, solutions and research directions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(1):534–570, 2023

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Blockchain-empowered space-air-ground integrated networks: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(1):160–209, 2021

    Yuntao Wang, Zhou Su, Jianbing Ni, Ning Zhang, and Xuemin Shen. Blockchain-empowered space-air-ground integrated networks: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(1):160–209, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    The 2015 ukraine blackout: Implications for false data injection attacks.IEEE transactions on power systems, 32(4):3317–3318, 2016

    Gaoqi Liang, Steven R Weller, Junhua Zhao, Fengji Luo, and Zhao Yang Dong. The 2015 ukraine blackout: Implications for false data injection attacks.IEEE transactions on power systems, 32(4):3317–3318, 2016

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Sadia Jabeen Siddiqi, Bushra Tahir, Mian Ahmad Jan, and Muhammad Tariq. Multichain-assisted lightweight security for code mutated false data injection attacks in connected autonomous vehicles.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(9):11000–11010, 2024. 26

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Metaomnicity: Toward immersive urban metaverse cyberspaces using smart city digital twins.Ieee Access, 11:43844– 43868, 2023

    Kaya Kuru. Metaomnicity: Toward immersive urban metaverse cyberspaces using smart city digital twins.Ieee Access, 11:43844– 43868, 2023

    work page 2023

  38. [39]

    Deepfake in the metaverse: Security implications for virtual gaming, meetings, and offices

    Shahroz Tariq, Alsharif Abuadbba, and Kristen Moore. Deepfake in the metaverse: Security implications for virtual gaming, meetings, and offices. InProceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Security Implications of Deepfakes and Cheapfakes, pages 16–19, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [40]

    A mechanism to detect and prevent ethereum blockchain smart contract reentrancy attacks.Frontiers in Computer Science, 3:598780, 2021

    Ayman Alkhalifah, Alex Ng, Paul A Watters, and ASM Kayes. A mechanism to detect and prevent ethereum blockchain smart contract reentrancy attacks.Frontiers in Computer Science, 3:598780, 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [41]

    Gptscan: Detecting logic vulnerabilities in smart contracts by combining gpt with program analysis

    Yuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu, Haijun Wang, Zhengzi Xu, Xiaofei Xie, and Yang Liu. Gptscan: Detecting logic vulnerabilities in smart contracts by combining gpt with program analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 1–13, 2024

    work page 2024

  41. [42]

    Oracle-supported dynamic exploit generation for smart contracts.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(3):1795–1809, 2020

    Haijun Wang, Ye Liu, Yi Li, Shang-Wei Lin, Cyrille Artho, Lei Ma, and Yang Liu. Oracle-supported dynamic exploit generation for smart contracts.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(3):1795–1809, 2020

    work page 2020

  42. [43]

    Blockchain and the built environment: Potentials and limitations.Journal of Building Engineering, 25:100832, 2019

    Nawari O Nawari and Shriraam Ravindran. Blockchain and the built environment: Potentials and limitations.Journal of Building Engineering, 25:100832, 2019

    work page 2019

  43. [44]

    Facilitating the delegation of use for private devices in the era of the internet of wearable things

    Aleksandr Ometov, Sergey V Bezzateev, Joona Kannisto, Jarmo Harju, Sergey Andreev, and Yevgeni Koucheryavy. Facilitating the delegation of use for private devices in the era of the internet of wearable things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(4):843–854, 2016

    work page 2016

  44. [45]

    Botnet: classification, attacks, detection, tracing, and preven- tive measures.EURASIP journal on wireless communications and networking, 2009(1):692654, 2009

    Jing Liu, Yang Xiao, Kaveh Ghaboosi, Hongmei Deng, and Jingyuan Zhang. Botnet: classification, attacks, detection, tracing, and preven- tive measures.EURASIP journal on wireless communications and networking, 2009(1):692654, 2009

    work page 2009

  45. [46]

    The social metaverse: Battle for privacy.IEEE technology and society magazine, 37(2):52–61, 2018

    Ben Falchuk, Shoshana Loeb, and Ralph Neff. The social metaverse: Battle for privacy.IEEE technology and society magazine, 37(2):52–61, 2018

    work page 2018

  46. [47]

    Ldp-based social content protection for trending topic recommendation.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(6):4353–4372, 2020

    Jianhao Wei, Junyi Li, Yaping Lin, and Jin Zhang. Ldp-based social content protection for trending topic recommendation.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(6):4353–4372, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [48]

    Botnets and internet of things security

    Elisa Bertino and Nayeem Islam. Botnets and internet of things security. Computer, 50(2):76–79, 2017

    work page 2017

  48. [49]

    Nft investors lose $1.7m in opensea phishing attack, Feb 2022

    Nate Nelson. Nft investors lose $1.7m in opensea phishing attack, Feb 2022

    work page 2022

  49. [50]

    Detecting impersonation attacks in future wireless and mobile networks

    Michel Barbeau, Jyanthi Hall, and Evangelos Kranakis. Detecting impersonation attacks in future wireless and mobile networks. In International Workshop on Secure Mobile Ad-hoc Networks and Sensors, pages 80–95. Springer, 2005

    work page 2005

  50. [51]

    Dynamic defense strategy against advanced persistent threat with insiders

    Pengfei Hu, Hongxing Li, Hao Fu, Derya Cansever, and Prasant Mohapatra. Dynamic defense strategy against advanced persistent threat with insiders. In2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 747–755. IEEE, 2015

    work page 2015

  51. [52]

    3d virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities

    John David N Dionisio, William G Burns Iii, and Richard Gilbert. 3d virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 45(3):1–38, 2013

    work page 2013

  52. [53]

    Blockchain-assisted cross-platform authentication protocol with conditional traceability for metaverse environment in web 3.0.IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2024

    Garima Thakur, Deepika Gautam, Pankaj Kumar, Ashok Kumar Das, Vivekananda Bhat, and Joel JPC Rodrigues. Blockchain-assisted cross-platform authentication protocol with conditional traceability for metaverse environment in web 3.0.IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2024

    work page 2024

  53. [54]

    A secure content trading for cross-platform in the metaverse with blockchain and searchable encryption.Ieee Access, 11:120680–120693, 2023

    Jihyeon Oh, Myeonghyun Kim, Yohan Park, and Youngho Park. A secure content trading for cross-platform in the metaverse with blockchain and searchable encryption.Ieee Access, 11:120680–120693, 2023

    work page 2023

  54. [55]

    Arspy: Breaking location- based multi-player augmented reality application for user location tracking.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 21(2):433–447, 2020

    Jiacheng Shang, Si Chen, Jie Wu, and Shu Yin. Arspy: Breaking location- based multi-player augmented reality application for user location tracking.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 21(2):433–447, 2020

    work page 2020

  55. [56]

    Second life and the new generation of virtual worlds.Computer, 41(9):46–53, 2008

    Sanjeev Kumar, Jatin Chhugani, Changkyu Kim, Daehyun Kim, Anthony Nguyen, Pradeep Dubey, Christian Bienia, and Youngmin Kim. Second life and the new generation of virtual worlds.Computer, 41(9):46–53, 2008

    work page 2008

  56. [57]

    Immersive virtual reality attacks and the human joystick.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 18(2):550–562, 2019

    Peter Casey, Ibrahim Baggili, and Ananya Yarramreddy. Immersive virtual reality attacks and the human joystick.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 18(2):550–562, 2019

    work page 2019

  57. [58]

    The xrsi privacy framework, 2020

    XR Safety Initiative. The xrsi privacy framework, 2020

    work page 2020

  58. [59]

    Avatar privacy challenges in the metaverse: A comprehensive review and future directions.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(4):1967–1984, 2025

    Somaya Eltanbouly, Osama Halabi, and Junaid Qadir. Avatar privacy challenges in the metaverse: A comprehensive review and future directions.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(4):1967–1984, 2025

    work page 1967

  59. [60]

    Security risks of the metaverse world.Int

    Tanya Abdulsattar Jaber. Security risks of the metaverse world.Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., 16(13):4–14, 2022

    work page 2022

  60. [61]

    An empirical study on meta virtual reality applications: Security and privacy perspectives.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2025

    Hanyang Guo, Hong-Ning Dai, Xiapu Luo, Gengyang Xu, Fengliang He, and Zibin Zheng. An empirical study on meta virtual reality applications: Security and privacy perspectives.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2025

    work page 2025

  61. [62]

    Metahuman based phishing attacks in the metaverse realm: Awareness for cyber security education

    Agarsha Manoharan, Abiniah Sriskantharajah, HMKKMB Herath, LGPK Guruge, and SLP Yasakethu. Metahuman based phishing attacks in the metaverse realm: Awareness for cyber security education. Education and Information Technologies, pages 1–27, 2025

    work page 2025

  62. [63]

    Lvbs: Lightweight vehicular blockchain for secure data sharing in disaster rescue.IEEE Transactions on dependable and secure computing, 19(1):19–32, 2020

    Zhou Su, Yuntao Wang, Qichao Xu, and Ning Zhang. Lvbs: Lightweight vehicular blockchain for secure data sharing in disaster rescue.IEEE Transactions on dependable and secure computing, 19(1):19–32, 2020

    work page 2020

  63. [64]

    Wireless edge-empowered metaverse: A learning- based incentive mechanism for virtual reality

    Minrui Xu, Dusit Niyato, Jiawen Kang, Zehui Xiong, Chunyan Miao, and Dong In Kim. Wireless edge-empowered metaverse: A learning- based incentive mechanism for virtual reality. InICC 2022-IEEE International conference on Communications, pages 5220–5225. IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  64. [65]

    Leveraging content sensitiveness and user trustworthiness to recommend fine-grained privacy settings for social image sharing

    Jun Yu, Zhenzhong Kuang, Baopeng Zhang, Wei Zhang, Dan Lin, and Jianping Fan. Leveraging content sensitiveness and user trustworthiness to recommend fine-grained privacy settings for social image sharing. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, 13(5):1317– 1332, 2018

    work page 2018

  65. [66]

    The impact of user- generated content, social interactions and virtual economies on meta- verse environments.Journal of Sustainable Economics, 1(2):34–44, 2023

    Zahid Hussain, Arman Khan, and Aftab Ali. The impact of user- generated content, social interactions and virtual economies on meta- verse environments.Journal of Sustainable Economics, 1(2):34–44, 2023

    work page 2023

  66. [67]

    What enhances or worsens the user-generated metaverse experience? an application of bertopic to roblox user ewom.Internet Research, 34(5):1800–1817, 2024

    Yun Kyung Oh, Jisu Yi, and Jongdae Kim. What enhances or worsens the user-generated metaverse experience? an application of bertopic to roblox user ewom.Internet Research, 34(5):1800–1817, 2024

    work page 2024

  67. [68]

    metaverse

    Vanissa Wanick and James Stallwood. Brand storytelling, gamification and social media marketing in the “metaverse”: A case study of the ralph lauren winter escape. InReinventing fashion retailing: Digitalising, gamifying, entrepreneuring, pages 35–54. Springer, 2023

    work page 2023

  68. [69]

    Non-fungible token (nft): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447, 2021

    Qin Wang, Rujia Li, Qi Wang, and Shiping Chen. Non-fungible token (nft): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [70]

    Non-fungible tokens (nft)–innovation beyond the craze

    Andrei-Dragos Popescu et al. Non-fungible tokens (nft)–innovation beyond the craze. In5th International Conference on Innovation in Business, Economics and Marketing Research, volume 32, pages 26–30, 2021

    work page 2021

  70. [71]

    Privacy-preserving data aggregation for mobile crowdsensing with ex- ternality: An auction approach.IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 29(3):1046–1059, 2021

    Mengyuan Zhang, Lei Yang, Shibo He, Ming Li, and Junshan Zhang. Privacy-preserving data aggregation for mobile crowdsensing with ex- ternality: An auction approach.IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 29(3):1046–1059, 2021

    work page 2021

  71. [72]

    Free-riding on bittorrent-like peer-to- peer file sharing systems: Modeling analysis and improvement.IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 19(7):954–966, 2008

    Minglu Li, Jiadi Yu, and Jie Wu. Free-riding on bittorrent-like peer-to- peer file sharing systems: Modeling analysis and improvement.IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 19(7):954–966, 2008

    work page 2008

  72. [73]

    Collusion-resistant repeated double auc- tions for relay assignment in cooperative networks.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(3):1196–1207, 2014

    Zichuan Xu and Weifa Liang. Collusion-resistant repeated double auc- tions for relay assignment in cooperative networks.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(3):1196–1207, 2014

    work page 2014

  73. [74]

    The single point of failure

    Beth Simone Noveck. The single point of failure. InInnovating Government: Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government, pages 77–99. Springer, 2011

    work page 2011

  74. [75]

    Metaverse intrusion detection of wormhole attacks based on a novel statistical mechanism

    Shu-Yu Kuo, Fan-Hsun Tseng, and Yao-Hsin Chou. Metaverse intrusion detection of wormhole attacks based on a novel statistical mechanism. Future Generation Computer Systems, 143:179–190, 2023

    work page 2023

  75. [76]

    Eden: An edge computing empowered proof-of-personhood protocol for anti-sybil in blockchain-based metaverse

    Yinfeng Cao, Jiannong Cao, Hongbo Liu, Zeyang Cui, and Long Wen. Eden: An edge computing empowered proof-of-personhood protocol for anti-sybil in blockchain-based metaverse. In2024 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Metaverse Technologies & Applications (iMETA), pages 182–189. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  76. [77]

    Novel analytical models for sybil attack detection in ipv6-based rpl wireless iot networks

    Jae-Dong Kim, Minseok Ko, and Jong-Moon Chung. Novel analytical models for sybil attack detection in ipv6-based rpl wireless iot networks. In2022 IEEE international conference on consumer electronics (ICCE), pages 1–3. IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  77. [78]

    Secure and efficient federated learning for smart grid with edge-cloud collaboration.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(2):1333–1344, 2021

    Zhou Su, Yuntao Wang, Tom H Luan, Ning Zhang, Feng Li, Tao Chen, and Hui Cao. Secure and efficient federated learning for smart grid with edge-cloud collaboration.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(2):1333–1344, 2021

    work page 2021

  78. [79]

    Rise of the metaverse’s immersive virtual reality malware and the man- 27 in-the-room attack & defenses.Computers & Security, 127:102923, 2023

    Martin V ondr´aˇcek, Ibrahim Baggili, Peter Casey, and Mehdi Mekni. Rise of the metaverse’s immersive virtual reality malware and the man- 27 in-the-room attack & defenses.Computers & Security, 127:102923, 2023

    work page 2023

  79. [80]

    Cheating and detection method in massively multiplayer online role-playing game: systematic literature review.IEEE Access, 10:49050–49063, 2022

    Mee Lan Han, Byung Il Kwak, and Huy Kang Kim. Cheating and detection method in massively multiplayer online role-playing game: systematic literature review.IEEE Access, 10:49050–49063, 2022

    work page 2022

  80. [81]

    Space authentication in the metaverse: A blockchain-based user-centric approach.IEEE Access, 12:18703–18713, 2024

    Jungwon Seo, Hankyeong Ko, and Sooyong Park. Space authentication in the metaverse: A blockchain-based user-centric approach.IEEE Access, 12:18703–18713, 2024

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.