Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 146 references

Technologies and Security Challenges in Metaverse

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read The Metaverse generates a larger attack surface and new vulnerabilities through its immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics.

desk verdict This is a survey that organizes known Metaverse security issues but provides no verifiable details on how its literature review was done. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.09621 v2 pith:2YZAWPVZ submitted 2025-09-18 cs.CR cs.CY

classification cs.CRcs.CY
keywords MetaverseSecuritychallengesVulnerabilitiesCountermeasuresExtendedRealityBlockchainPrivacythreatsSystematicliteraturereview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews technologies including extended reality, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and digital twins that enable the Metaverse. It shows how these features produce security threats in identity management, data governance, and user interactions that go beyond those in traditional platforms. Although countermeasures exist for many issues, the review finds most are theoretical and untested in actual Metaverse environments. This analysis identifies research gaps and suggests directions for building safer systems.

What carries the argument

Systematic literature review that catalogs enabling technologies, maps them to specific vulnerabilities, and evaluates proposed countermeasures.

What would settle it

A comprehensive security audit of an existing Metaverse platform that reveals major vulnerabilities and ineffective countermeasures not accounted for in the reviewed literature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The Metaverse, by combining extended reality, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and digital twins, creates a much larger attack surface than conventional digital platforms. Its immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics generate new vulnerabilities. While various countermeasures have been proposed, most remain theoretical or have not been validated in real-world settings.

Load-bearing premise

The systematic literature review captured a representative and unbiased sample of all relevant vulnerabilities and countermeasures in the Metaverse domain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Security strategies must account for the unique permanence and immersion of virtual environments.
  • Empirical testing of countermeasures in operational Metaverse settings is required to confirm their value.
  • Ethical governance frameworks should address privacy and safety to support long-term platform use.
  • Research should target gaps in practical defenses against decentralized threats.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Developers may need to build identity systems that exceed standard practices to handle persistent virtual identities.
  • Vulnerabilities in Metaverse designs could extend to connected physical devices in augmented reality applications.
  • Regulators might develop rules tailored to persistent virtual spaces to limit risks in user interactions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a survey of enabling technologies for the Metaverse (XR, AI, blockchain, digital twins) and reports performing a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify security and privacy vulnerabilities, threats, and countermeasures. It claims that the Metaverse has a much larger attack surface than conventional digital platforms because its immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics generate new vulnerabilities, while noting that most countermeasures remain theoretical and untested in real-world settings. The paper highlights advancements, research gaps, and future directions.

Significance. A transparent and comprehensive SLR on Metaverse security could consolidate scattered literature and usefully flag gaps in tested countermeasures. The central claim that Metaverse-specific traits create amplified vulnerabilities would be significant for the field if supported by a reproducible review process that distinguishes new risks from those already studied in XR, blockchain, or digital-twin literature.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The manuscript states that a systematic literature review was performed to identify key vulnerabilities and countermeasures, yet supplies no search strings, databases, date ranges, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening process, quality assessment, or final paper count. This omission is load-bearing for the claim that immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics generate new vulnerabilities and a 'much larger attack surface,' because those observations depend on the reviewed sample being representative and unbiased.
minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: Adding the number of papers ultimately included and the literature search time frame would help readers gauge the scope and currency of the review.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying this critical gap in methodological transparency. We agree that the details of the systematic literature review must be provided to substantiate the paper's central claims.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract: The manuscript states that a systematic literature review was performed to identify key vulnerabilities and countermeasures, yet supplies no search strings, databases, date ranges, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening process, quality assessment, or final paper count. This omission is load-bearing for the claim that immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics generate new vulnerabilities and a 'much larger attack surface,' because those observations depend on the reviewed sample being representative and unbiased.

    Authors: We agree that the current version of the manuscript lacks an explicit description of the SLR protocol, which is necessary to demonstrate that the reviewed literature is representative and that the identified vulnerabilities are genuinely amplified by Metaverse-specific traits rather than already covered in prior XR or blockchain surveys. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated 'Systematic Review Methodology' section (or subsection) that reports the search strings, the databases queried (IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science), the date range, inclusion/exclusion criteria, the two-stage screening process, quality assessment criteria, and the final number of included papers. This addition will directly address the referee's concern and strengthen the evidential basis for our observations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: survey aggregates external literature without self-referential derivations

full rationale

This paper is a systematic literature review surveying Metaverse technologies, vulnerabilities, and countermeasures. It presents no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or first-principles derivations that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. Central claims about larger attack surfaces and new vulnerabilities are positioned as summaries of reviewed external sources rather than outputs forced by self-definition, self-citation chains, or renamed known results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, with no load-bearing steps matching the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the paper relies entirely on synthesis of existing published work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Technologies and Security Challenges in Metaverse." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2YZAWPVZ

@misc{pith2026251009621,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Technologies and Security Challenges in Metaverse},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2YZAWPVZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.09621}
}
read the original abstract

The Metaverse utilizes emerging technologies such as Extended Reality (XR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and digital twins to provide an immersive and interactive virtual experience. As the Metaverse continues to evolve, it brings a range of security and privacy threats, such as identity management, data governance, and user interactions. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive review of the enabling technologies for the Metaverse. It also aims to provide a thorough analysis of key vulnerabilities and threats that may compromise its sustainability and user safety. We perform a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify key vulnerabilities and their countermeasures in Metaverse platforms. Metaverse offers a much larger attack surface compared to conventional digital platforms. Immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics of the Metaverse generate new vulnerabilities. Although there are many countermeasures to these vulnerabilities, most of them are theoretical or have not been tested in real-world environments. Our review highlights current advancements, identifies research gaps, and outlines future directions to ensure a secure, resilient, and ethically governed Metaverse.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.09621 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Interaction of the Metaverse, Physical World, and Virtual World [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Basic network architecture and characteristics of Metaverse. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Enabling technologies of Metaverse. qualitative components, like the advantages and disadvantages of the prioritization methods that are currently in use. The following describes the methodology used to carry out data synthesis, which is customized for every research question: • To answer RQ1, we used architectural figures to present the enabling Metaverse technologies. • We use descriptive analysis to highlight the… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Taxonomy of Threats in the Metaverse. VII. SECURITY THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES IN METAVERSE (RQ3) The Metaverse offers an immersive and persistent digital ecosystem. However, the Metaverse is subject to a wide array of novel and intensified security threats. In contra…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 146 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy.IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 25(1):319–352, 2022

    Yuntao Wang, Zhou Su, Ning Zhang, Rui Xing, Dongxiao Liu, Tom H Luan, and Xuemin Shen. A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy.IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 25(1):319–352, 2022

  2. [2]

    Mansoor Ali, Faisal Naeem, Georges Kaddoum, and Ekram Hossain. Metaverse communications, networking, security, and applications: Research issues, state-of-the-art, and future directions.IEEE Com- munications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(2):1238–1278, 2023. 25 TABLE VIII FUTURERESEARCHDIRECTIONS FOR THEMETAVERSE(RQ5) Area Research Directions User Safety of sens...

  3. [3]

    A survey on zero trust architecture: Challenges and future trends.Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1):6476274, 2022

    Yuanhang He, Daochao Huang, Lei Chen, Yi Ni, and Xiangjie Ma. A survey on zero trust architecture: Challenges and future trends.Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1):6476274, 2022

  4. [4]

    Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review.Ieee Access, 11:12368–12377, 2023

    Georg David Ritterbusch and Malte Rolf Teichmann. Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review.Ieee Access, 11:12368–12377, 2023

  5. [5]

    Blockchain for the metaverse: A review.Future Generation Computer Systems, 143:401–419, 2023

    Thien Huynh-The, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, Weizheng Wang, Gokul Yenduri, Pasika Ranaweera, Quoc-Viet Pham, Daniel Benevides da Costa, and Madhusanka Liyanage. Blockchain for the metaverse: A review.Future Generation Computer Systems, 143:401–419, 2023

  6. [6]

    Metaverse in education: Contributors, cooperations, and research themes.IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6):1111–1129, 2023

    Xieling Chen, Di Zou, Haoran Xie, and Fu Lee Wang. Metaverse in education: Contributors, cooperations, and research themes.IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6):1111–1129, 2023

  7. [7]

    Metaverse - the new age empire: Relinquishing our identity to acquire digital immortality

    Vaibhav Raina, Jayapriya Srinivas, and M S Shilpa. Metaverse - the new age empire: Relinquishing our identity to acquire digital immortality. 2022 International Conference on Futuristic Technologies (INCOFT), pages 1–9, 2022

  8. [8]

    Bantam Books, 1992

    Neal Stephenson.Snow Crash. Bantam Books, 1992

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    User- friendly home automation based on 3d virtual world.IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 56(3):1843–1847, 2010

    Jinsoo Han, Jaekwan Yun, Jonghyun Jang, and Kwang-Roh Park. User- friendly home automation based on 3d virtual world.IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 56(3):1843–1847, 2010

  2. [10]

    Metaverse-aka: A lightweight and privacypreserving seamless cross-metaverse authentication and key agreement scheme

    Yingying Yao, Xiaolin Chang, Lin Li, Jiqiang Liu, Jelena Mi ˇsi´c, and V ojislav B Miˇsi´c. Metaverse-aka: A lightweight and privacypreserving seamless cross-metaverse authentication and key agreement scheme. In 2022 IEEE Smartworld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Scalab...

  3. [11]

    The metaverse: a networked collection of inexpensive, self-configuring, immersive environments

    Christopher Jaynes, William Brent Seales, Kenneth Calvert, Zongming Fei, and Jim Griffioen. The metaverse: a networked collection of inexpensive, self-configuring, immersive environments. InProceedings of the workshop on Virtual environments 2003, pages 115–124, 2003

  4. [12]

    Security and privacy in metaverse: A comprehensive survey.Big Data Mining and Analytics, 6(2):234–247, 2023

    Yan Huang, Yi Joy Li, and Zhipeng Cai. Security and privacy in metaverse: A comprehensive survey.Big Data Mining and Analytics, 6(2):234–247, 2023

  5. [13]

    A scalable server for 3d metaverses

    Ewen Chewslack-Postava, Tahir Azim, Behram FT Mistree, Daniel Re- iter Horn, Jeff Terrace, Philip Levis, and Michael J Freedman. A scalable server for 3d metaverses. In2012 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 12), pages 209–222, 2012

  6. [14]

    Analysis of metaverse platform as a new play culture: Focusing on roblox and zepeto

    Jeongmin Han, Jeongyun Heo, and Eunsoon You. Analysis of metaverse platform as a new play culture: Focusing on roblox and zepeto. In International conference on human-centered artificial intelligence, pages 1–10, 2021

  7. [15]

    Socializing in mobile gaming

    Sheila A Paul, Marianne Jensen, Chui Yin Wong, and Chee Weng Khong. Socializing in mobile gaming. InProceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, pages 2–9, 2008

  8. [16]

    The mediation effects of gaming motives between game involvement and problematic internet use: Escapism, advancement and socializing.Computers & Education, 122:43–53, 2018

    Shan-Mei Chang, Grace MY Hsieh, and Sunny SJ Lin. The mediation effects of gaming motives between game involvement and problematic internet use: Escapism, advancement and socializing.Computers & Education, 122:43–53, 2018

  9. [17]

    Talking a team into being in online workplace collaborations: The discourse of virtual work

    Erika Darics and Maria Cristina Gatti. Talking a team into being in online workplace collaborations: The discourse of virtual work. Discourse Studies, 21(3):237–257, 2019

  10. [18]

    Charters

    Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart M. Charters. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, 2007

  11. [19]

    Optimal targeted advertising strategy for secure wireless edge metaverse

    Hongyang Du, Dusit Niyato, Chunyan Miao, Jiawen Kang, and Dong In Kim. Optimal targeted advertising strategy for secure wireless edge metaverse. InGLOBECOM 2022-2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pages 4346–4351. IEEE, 2022

  12. [20]

    When the user is inside the user interface: An empirical study of {UI} security properties in augmented reality

    Kaiming Cheng, Arkaprabha Bhattacharya, Michelle Lin, Jaewook Lee, Aroosh Kumar, Jeffery F Tian, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. When the user is inside the user interface: An empirical study of {UI} security properties in augmented reality. In33rd USENIX Security Symp...

  13. [21]

    Digital twin networks: A survey

    Yiwen Wu, Ke Zhang, and Yan Zhang. Digital twin networks: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(18):13789–13804, 2021

  14. [22]

    Digital twin consensus for blockchain-enabled intelligent transportation systems in smart cities.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11):22619–22629, 2021

    Siyi Liao, Jun Wu, Ali Kashif Bashir, Wu Yang, Jianhua Li, and Usman Tariq. Digital twin consensus for blockchain-enabled intelligent transportation systems in smart cities.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11):22619–22629, 2021

  15. [23]

    Blockchain-based multisignature lock for uac in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10(5):2201–2213, 2022

    Keke Gai, Shuo Wang, Hui Zhao, Yufeng She, Zijian Zhang, and Liehuang Zhu. Blockchain-based multisignature lock for uac in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10(5):2201–2213, 2022

  16. [24]

    Smart contract: Attacks and protections.Ieee Access, 8:24416–24427, 2020

    Sarwar Sayeed, Hector Marco-Gisbert, and Tom Caira. Smart contract: Attacks and protections.Ieee Access, 8:24416–24427, 2020

  17. [25]

    Survey of experimental evaluation studies for wireless mesh network deployments in urban areas towards ubiquitous internet.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15:223–239, 2012

    Serdar Vural, Dali Wei, and Klaus Moessner. Survey of experimental evaluation studies for wireless mesh network deployments in urban areas towards ubiquitous internet.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15:223–239, 2012

  18. [26]

    The metaverse and terrorism

    Gabriel Weimann and Roy Dimant. The metaverse and terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 17(2):92–107, 2023

  19. [27]

    An anti-disguise authentication system using the first impression of avatar in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 19:6393–6408, 2024

    Zhenyong Zhang, Kedi Yang, Youliang Tian, and Jianfeng Ma. An anti-disguise authentication system using the first impression of avatar in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 19:6393–6408, 2024

  20. [28]

    Industrial metaverse: Enabling technologies, open problems, and future trends.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    Shiying Zhang, Jun Li, Long Shi, Ming Ding, Dinh C Nguyen, Wen Chen, and Zhu Han. Industrial metaverse: Enabling technologies, open problems, and future trends.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

  21. [29]

    Security against impersonation attacks in distributed systems.IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 6(1):440–450, 2018

    Philip N Brown, Holly P Borowski, and Jason R Marden. Security against impersonation attacks in distributed systems.IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 6(1):440–450, 2018

  22. [30]

    Design of secure mutual authentication scheme for metaverse environments using blockchain.Ieee Access, 10:98944– 98958, 2022

    Jongseok Ryu, Seunghwan Son, Joonyoung Lee, Yohan Park, and Youngho Park. Design of secure mutual authentication scheme for metaverse environments using blockchain.Ieee Access, 10:98944– 98958, 2022

  23. [31]

    Personal identity in the metaverse: Challenges and risks.Kutafin Law Review, 9(4):793–817, 2023

    Anastasia N Mitrushchenkova. Personal identity in the metaverse: Challenges and risks.Kutafin Law Review, 9(4):793–817, 2023

  24. [32]

    A secure authentication framework to guarantee the traceability of avatars in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 18:3817–3832, 2023

    Kedi Yang, Zhenyong Zhang, Tian Youliang, and Jianfeng Ma. A secure authentication framework to guarantee the traceability of avatars in metaverse.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 18:3817–3832, 2023

  25. [33]

    A survey on network slicing security: Attacks, challenges, solutions and research directions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(1):534–570, 2023

    Chamitha De Alwis, Pawani Porambage, Kapal Dev, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, and Madhusanka Liyanage. A survey on network slicing security: Attacks, challenges, solutions and research directions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(1):534–570, 2023

  26. [34]

    Blockchain-empowered space-air-ground integrated networks: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(1):160–209, 2021

    Yuntao Wang, Zhou Su, Jianbing Ni, Ning Zhang, and Xuemin Shen. Blockchain-empowered space-air-ground integrated networks: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(1):160–209, 2021

  27. [35]

    The 2015 ukraine blackout: Implications for false data injection attacks.IEEE transactions on power systems, 32(4):3317–3318, 2016

    Gaoqi Liang, Steven R Weller, Junhua Zhao, Fengji Luo, and Zhao Yang Dong. The 2015 ukraine blackout: Implications for false data injection attacks.IEEE transactions on power systems, 32(4):3317–3318, 2016

  28. [36]

    Sadia Jabeen Siddiqi, Bushra Tahir, Mian Ahmad Jan, and Muhammad Tariq. Multichain-assisted lightweight security for code mutated false data injection attacks in connected autonomous vehicles.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(9):11000–11010, 2024. 26

  29. [37]

    Metaomnicity: Toward immersive urban metaverse cyberspaces using smart city digital twins.Ieee Access, 11:43844– 43868, 2023

    Kaya Kuru. Metaomnicity: Toward immersive urban metaverse cyberspaces using smart city digital twins.Ieee Access, 11:43844– 43868, 2023

  30. [39]

    Deepfake in the metaverse: Security implications for virtual gaming, meetings, and offices

    Shahroz Tariq, Alsharif Abuadbba, and Kristen Moore. Deepfake in the metaverse: Security implications for virtual gaming, meetings, and offices. InProceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Security Implications of Deepfakes and Cheapfakes, pages 16–19, 2023

  31. [40]

    A mechanism to detect and prevent ethereum blockchain smart contract reentrancy attacks.Frontiers in Computer Science, 3:598780, 2021

    Ayman Alkhalifah, Alex Ng, Paul A Watters, and ASM Kayes. A mechanism to detect and prevent ethereum blockchain smart contract reentrancy attacks.Frontiers in Computer Science, 3:598780, 2021

  32. [41]

    Gptscan: Detecting logic vulnerabilities in smart contracts by combining gpt with program analysis

    Yuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu, Haijun Wang, Zhengzi Xu, Xiaofei Xie, and Yang Liu. Gptscan: Detecting logic vulnerabilities in smart contracts by combining gpt with program analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineeri...

  33. [42]

    Oracle-supported dynamic exploit generation for smart contracts.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(3):1795–1809, 2020

    Haijun Wang, Ye Liu, Yi Li, Shang-Wei Lin, Cyrille Artho, Lei Ma, and Yang Liu. Oracle-supported dynamic exploit generation for smart contracts.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(3):1795–1809, 2020

  34. [43]

    Blockchain and the built environment: Potentials and limitations.Journal of Building Engineering, 25:100832, 2019

    Nawari O Nawari and Shriraam Ravindran. Blockchain and the built environment: Potentials and limitations.Journal of Building Engineering, 25:100832, 2019

  35. [44]

    Facilitating the delegation of use for private devices in the era of the internet of wearable things

    Aleksandr Ometov, Sergey V Bezzateev, Joona Kannisto, Jarmo Harju, Sergey Andreev, and Yevgeni Koucheryavy. Facilitating the delegation of use for private devices in the era of the internet of wearable things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(4):843–854, 2016

  36. [45]

    Botnet: classification, attacks, detection, tracing, and preven- tive measures.EURASIP journal on wireless communications and networking, 2009(1):692654, 2009

    Jing Liu, Yang Xiao, Kaveh Ghaboosi, Hongmei Deng, and Jingyuan Zhang. Botnet: classification, attacks, detection, tracing, and preven- tive measures.EURASIP journal on wireless communications and networking, 2009(1):692654, 2009

  37. [46]

    The social metaverse: Battle for privacy.IEEE technology and society magazine, 37(2):52–61, 2018

    Ben Falchuk, Shoshana Loeb, and Ralph Neff. The social metaverse: Battle for privacy.IEEE technology and society magazine, 37(2):52–61, 2018

  38. [47]

    Ldp-based social content protection for trending topic recommendation.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(6):4353–4372, 2020

    Jianhao Wei, Junyi Li, Yaping Lin, and Jin Zhang. Ldp-based social content protection for trending topic recommendation.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(6):4353–4372, 2020

  39. [48]

    Botnets and internet of things security

    Elisa Bertino and Nayeem Islam. Botnets and internet of things security. Computer, 50(2):76–79, 2017

  40. [49]

    Nft investors lose $1.7m in opensea phishing attack, Feb 2022

    Nate Nelson. Nft investors lose $1.7m in opensea phishing attack, Feb 2022

  41. [50]

    Detecting impersonation attacks in future wireless and mobile networks

    Michel Barbeau, Jyanthi Hall, and Evangelos Kranakis. Detecting impersonation attacks in future wireless and mobile networks. In International Workshop on Secure Mobile Ad-hoc Networks and Sensors, pages 80–95. Springer, 2005

  42. [51]

    Dynamic defense strategy against advanced persistent threat with insiders

    Pengfei Hu, Hongxing Li, Hao Fu, Derya Cansever, and Prasant Mohapatra. Dynamic defense strategy against advanced persistent threat with insiders. In2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 747–755. IEEE, 2015

  43. [52]

    3d virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities

    John David N Dionisio, William G Burns Iii, and Richard Gilbert. 3d virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 45(3):1–38, 2013

  44. [53]

    Blockchain-assisted cross-platform authentication protocol with conditional traceability for metaverse environment in web 3.0.IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2024

    Garima Thakur, Deepika Gautam, Pankaj Kumar, Ashok Kumar Das, Vivekananda Bhat, and Joel JPC Rodrigues. Blockchain-assisted cross-platform authentication protocol with conditional traceability for metaverse environment in web 3.0.IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2024

  45. [54]

    A secure content trading for cross-platform in the metaverse with blockchain and searchable encryption.Ieee Access, 11:120680–120693, 2023

    Jihyeon Oh, Myeonghyun Kim, Yohan Park, and Youngho Park. A secure content trading for cross-platform in the metaverse with blockchain and searchable encryption.Ieee Access, 11:120680–120693, 2023

  46. [55]

    Arspy: Breaking location- based multi-player augmented reality application for user location tracking.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 21(2):433–447, 2020

    Jiacheng Shang, Si Chen, Jie Wu, and Shu Yin. Arspy: Breaking location- based multi-player augmented reality application for user location tracking.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 21(2):433–447, 2020

  47. [56]

    Second life and the new generation of virtual worlds.Computer, 41(9):46–53, 2008

    Sanjeev Kumar, Jatin Chhugani, Changkyu Kim, Daehyun Kim, Anthony Nguyen, Pradeep Dubey, Christian Bienia, and Youngmin Kim. Second life and the new generation of virtual worlds.Computer, 41(9):46–53, 2008

  48. [57]

    Immersive virtual reality attacks and the human joystick.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 18(2):550–562, 2019

    Peter Casey, Ibrahim Baggili, and Ananya Yarramreddy. Immersive virtual reality attacks and the human joystick.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 18(2):550–562, 2019

  49. [58]

    The xrsi privacy framework, 2020

    XR Safety Initiative. The xrsi privacy framework, 2020

  50. [59]

    Avatar privacy challenges in the metaverse: A comprehensive review and future directions.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(4):1967–1984, 2025

    Somaya Eltanbouly, Osama Halabi, and Junaid Qadir. Avatar privacy challenges in the metaverse: A comprehensive review and future directions.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(4):1967–1984, 2025

  51. [60]

    Security risks of the metaverse world.Int

    Tanya Abdulsattar Jaber. Security risks of the metaverse world.Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., 16(13):4–14, 2022

  52. [61]

    An empirical study on meta virtual reality applications: Security and privacy perspectives.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2025

    Hanyang Guo, Hong-Ning Dai, Xiapu Luo, Gengyang Xu, Fengliang He, and Zibin Zheng. An empirical study on meta virtual reality applications: Security and privacy perspectives.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2025

  53. [62]

    Metahuman based phishing attacks in the metaverse realm: Awareness for cyber security education

    Agarsha Manoharan, Abiniah Sriskantharajah, HMKKMB Herath, LGPK Guruge, and SLP Yasakethu. Metahuman based phishing attacks in the metaverse realm: Awareness for cyber security education. Education and Information Technologies, pages 1–27, 2025

  54. [63]

    Lvbs: Lightweight vehicular blockchain for secure data sharing in disaster rescue.IEEE Transactions on dependable and secure computing, 19(1):19–32, 2020

    Zhou Su, Yuntao Wang, Qichao Xu, and Ning Zhang. Lvbs: Lightweight vehicular blockchain for secure data sharing in disaster rescue.IEEE Transactions on dependable and secure computing, 19(1):19–32, 2020

  55. [64]

    Wireless edge-empowered metaverse: A learning- based incentive mechanism for virtual reality

    Minrui Xu, Dusit Niyato, Jiawen Kang, Zehui Xiong, Chunyan Miao, and Dong In Kim. Wireless edge-empowered metaverse: A learning- based incentive mechanism for virtual reality. InICC 2022-IEEE International conference on Communications, pages 5220–5225. IEEE, 2022

  56. [65]

    Leveraging content sensitiveness and user trustworthiness to recommend fine-grained privacy settings for social image sharing

    Jun Yu, Zhenzhong Kuang, Baopeng Zhang, Wei Zhang, Dan Lin, and Jianping Fan. Leveraging content sensitiveness and user trustworthiness to recommend fine-grained privacy settings for social image sharing. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, 13(5):1317– 1332, 2018

  57. [66]

    The impact of user- generated content, social interactions and virtual economies on meta- verse environments.Journal of Sustainable Economics, 1(2):34–44, 2023

    Zahid Hussain, Arman Khan, and Aftab Ali. The impact of user- generated content, social interactions and virtual economies on meta- verse environments.Journal of Sustainable Economics, 1(2):34–44, 2023

  58. [67]

    What enhances or worsens the user-generated metaverse experience? an application of bertopic to roblox user ewom.Internet Research, 34(5):1800–1817, 2024

    Yun Kyung Oh, Jisu Yi, and Jongdae Kim. What enhances or worsens the user-generated metaverse experience? an application of bertopic to roblox user ewom.Internet Research, 34(5):1800–1817, 2024

  59. [68]

    metaverse

    Vanissa Wanick and James Stallwood. Brand storytelling, gamification and social media marketing in the “metaverse”: A case study of the ralph lauren winter escape. InReinventing fashion retailing: Digitalising, gamifying, entrepreneuring, pages 35–54. Springer, 2023

  60. [69]

    Non-fungible token (nft): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447, 2021

    Qin Wang, Rujia Li, Qi Wang, and Shiping Chen. Non-fungible token (nft): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447, 2021

  61. [70]

    Non-fungible tokens (nft)–innovation beyond the craze

    Andrei-Dragos Popescu et al. Non-fungible tokens (nft)–innovation beyond the craze. In5th International Conference on Innovation in Business, Economics and Marketing Research, volume 32, pages 26–30, 2021

  62. [71]

    Privacy-preserving data aggregation for mobile crowdsensing with ex- ternality: An auction approach.IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 29(3):1046–1059, 2021

    Mengyuan Zhang, Lei Yang, Shibo He, Ming Li, and Junshan Zhang. Privacy-preserving data aggregation for mobile crowdsensing with ex- ternality: An auction approach.IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 29(3):1046–1059, 2021

  63. [72]

    Free-riding on bittorrent-like peer-to- peer file sharing systems: Modeling analysis and improvement.IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 19(7):954–966, 2008

    Minglu Li, Jiadi Yu, and Jie Wu. Free-riding on bittorrent-like peer-to- peer file sharing systems: Modeling analysis and improvement.IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 19(7):954–966, 2008

  64. [73]

    Collusion-resistant repeated double auc- tions for relay assignment in cooperative networks.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(3):1196–1207, 2014

    Zichuan Xu and Weifa Liang. Collusion-resistant repeated double auc- tions for relay assignment in cooperative networks.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(3):1196–1207, 2014

  65. [74]

    The single point of failure

    Beth Simone Noveck. The single point of failure. InInnovating Government: Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government, pages 77–99. Springer, 2011

  66. [75]

    Metaverse intrusion detection of wormhole attacks based on a novel statistical mechanism

    Shu-Yu Kuo, Fan-Hsun Tseng, and Yao-Hsin Chou. Metaverse intrusion detection of wormhole attacks based on a novel statistical mechanism. Future Generation Computer Systems, 143:179–190, 2023

  67. [76]

    Eden: An edge computing empowered proof-of-personhood protocol for anti-sybil in blockchain-based metaverse

    Yinfeng Cao, Jiannong Cao, Hongbo Liu, Zeyang Cui, and Long Wen. Eden: An edge computing empowered proof-of-personhood protocol for anti-sybil in blockchain-based metaverse. In2024 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Metaverse Technologies & Applications (iMETA), pages...

  68. [77]

    Novel analytical models for sybil attack detection in ipv6-based rpl wireless iot networks

    Jae-Dong Kim, Minseok Ko, and Jong-Moon Chung. Novel analytical models for sybil attack detection in ipv6-based rpl wireless iot networks. In2022 IEEE international conference on consumer electronics (ICCE), pages 1–3. IEEE, 2022

  69. [78]

    Secure and efficient federated learning for smart grid with edge-cloud collaboration.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(2):1333–1344, 2021

    Zhou Su, Yuntao Wang, Tom H Luan, Ning Zhang, Feng Li, Tao Chen, and Hui Cao. Secure and efficient federated learning for smart grid with edge-cloud collaboration.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(2):1333–1344, 2021

  70. [79]

    Rise of the metaverse’s immersive virtual reality malware and the man- 27 in-the-room attack & defenses.Computers & Security, 127:102923, 2023

    Martin V ondr´aˇcek, Ibrahim Baggili, Peter Casey, and Mehdi Mekni. Rise of the metaverse’s immersive virtual reality malware and the man- 27 in-the-room attack & defenses.Computers & Security, 127:102923, 2023

  71. [80]

    Cheating and detection method in massively multiplayer online role-playing game: systematic literature review.IEEE Access, 10:49050–49063, 2022

    Mee Lan Han, Byung Il Kwak, and Huy Kang Kim. Cheating and detection method in massively multiplayer online role-playing game: systematic literature review.IEEE Access, 10:49050–49063, 2022

  72. [81]

    Space authentication in the metaverse: A blockchain-based user-centric approach.IEEE Access, 12:18703–18713, 2024

    Jungwon Seo, Hankyeong Ko, and Sooyong Park. Space authentication in the metaverse: A blockchain-based user-centric approach.IEEE Access, 12:18703–18713, 2024

  73. [82]

    Securing the metaverse: A blockchain- enabled zero-trust architecture for virtual environments.IEEE Access, 12:92337–92347, 2024

    Ikram Ud Din, Kamran Habib Khan, Ahmad Almogren, Mahdi Zareei, and Jesus Arturo Perez Diaz. Securing the metaverse: A blockchain- enabled zero-trust architecture for virtual environments.IEEE Access, 12:92337–92347, 2024

  74. [83]

    Learning latent representation for iot anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(5):3769–3782, 2020

    Ly Vu, Quang Uy Nguyen, Diep N Nguyen, Dinh Thai Hoang, Eryk Dutkiewicz, et al. Learning latent representation for iot anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(5):3769–3782, 2020

  75. [84]

    A study on vulnerabilities and threats to wearable devices

    Felton Blow, Yen-Hung Hu, and Mary Hoppa. A study on vulnerabilities and threats to wearable devices. InJournal of The Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education, volume 7, pages 7–7, 2020

  76. [85]

    A verifiable privacy-preserving machine learning prediction scheme for edge-enhanced hcpss.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(8):5494–5503, 2021

    Xiong Li, Jiabei He, Pandi Vijayakumar, Xiaosong Zhang, and Victor Chang. A verifiable privacy-preserving machine learning prediction scheme for edge-enhanced hcpss.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(8):5494–5503, 2021

  77. [86]

    General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – Legal Text — gdpr-info.eu

    GDPR. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – Legal Text — gdpr-info.eu. https://gdpr-info.eu/. [Accessed 28-07-2025]

  78. [87]

    MIT press, 2007

    Peter Ludlow and Mark Wallace.The Second Life Herald: The virtual tabloid that witnessed the dawn of the metaverse. MIT press, 2007

  79. [88]

    Inference of security hazards from event composition based on incomplete or uncertain information.IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 20(8):1111–1114, 2008

    Segev Wasserkrug, Avigdor Gal, and Opher Etzion. Inference of security hazards from event composition based on incomplete or uncertain information.IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 20(8):1111–1114, 2008

  80. [89]

    The ecosystem of digital content governance.IEEE Internet Computing, 25(3):13–17, 2021

    Virg´ılio Almeida, Fernando Filgueiras, and Danilo Doneda. The ecosystem of digital content governance.IEEE Internet Computing, 25(3):13–17, 2021

  81. [90]

    3d social virtual worlds: research issues and challenges.IEEE internet computing, 12(1):88–92, 2008

    Adel Hendaoui, Moez Limayem, and Craig W Thompson. 3d social virtual worlds: research issues and challenges.IEEE internet computing, 12(1):88–92, 2008

  82. [91]

    Identity, crimes, and law enforcement in the metaverse.Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1):1–15, 2025

    Hua Xuan Qin, Yuyang Wang, and Pan Hui. Identity, crimes, and law enforcement in the metaverse.Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1):1–15, 2025

  83. [92]

    Public participation consortium blockchain for smart city governance

    Yuhao Bai, Qin Hu, Seung-Hyun Seo, Kyubyung Kang, and John J Lee. Public participation consortium blockchain for smart city governance. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(3):2094–2108, 2021

  84. [93]

    Software-defined infrastructure for decentralized data lifecycle governance: principled design and open challenges

    Gang Huang, Chaoran Luo, Kaidong Wu, Yun Ma, Ying Zhang, and Xuanze Liu. Software-defined infrastructure for decentralized data lifecycle governance: principled design and open challenges. In2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), page...

  85. [94]

    Toward vehicular digital forensics from decentralized trust: An account- able, privacy-preserving, and secure realization.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(9):7009–7024, 2021

    Ming Li, Jian Weng, Jia-Nan Liu, Xiaodong Lin, and Charlie Obimbo. Toward vehicular digital forensics from decentralized trust: An account- able, privacy-preserving, and secure realization.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(9):7009–7024, 2021

  86. [95]

    Cpindex: Cyber-physical vulnerability assessment for power- grid infrastructures.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6(2):566–575, 2014

    Ceeman Vellaithurai, Anurag Srivastava, Saman Zonouz, and Robin Berthier. Cpindex: Cyber-physical vulnerability assessment for power- grid infrastructures.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6(2):566–575, 2014

  87. [96]

    The Right of Publicity: Likeness Lawsuits Against Video Game Companies — btlj.org

    BTLJ. The Right of Publicity: Likeness Lawsuits Against Video Game Companies — btlj.org. https://btlj.org/2014/12/ the-right-of-publicity-likeness-lawsuits-against-video-game-companies/. [Accessed 28-07-2025]

  88. [97]

    Modeling and defense of social virtual reality attacks inducing cybersickness.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(6):4127–4144, 2021

    Samaikya Valluripally, Aniket Gulhane, Khaza Anuarul Hoque, and Prasad Calyam. Modeling and defense of social virtual reality attacks inducing cybersickness.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(6):4127–4144, 2021

  89. [98]

    Privacy in the metaverse: Regulating a complex social construct in a virtual world

    Ronald Leenes. Privacy in the metaverse: Regulating a complex social construct in a virtual world. InIFIP international Summer School on the future of identity in the information society, pages 95–112. Springer, 2007

  90. [99]

    Activity minimization of misinformation influence in online social networks.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 7(4):897–906, 2020

    Jianming Zhu, Peikun Ni, and Guoqing Wang. Activity minimization of misinformation influence in online social networks.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 7(4):897–906, 2020

  91. [100]

    Federated identity management- we built it; why won’t they come?IEEE security & privacy, 11(2):34–41, 2012

    Jostein Jensen and Martin Gilje Jaatun. Federated identity management- we built it; why won’t they come?IEEE security & privacy, 11(2):34–41, 2012

  92. [101]

    Dt-ssim: A decentralized trustworthy self-sovereign identity management framework.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(11):7972– 7988, 2021

    Efat Samir, Hongyi Wu, Mohamed Azab, Chunsheng Xin, and Qiao Zhang. Dt-ssim: A decentralized trustworthy self-sovereign identity management framework.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(11):7972– 7988, 2021

  93. [102]

    Mian Ahmad Jan, Fazlullah Khan, Rahim Khan, Spyridon Mastorakis, Varun G Menon, Mamoun Alazab, and Paul Watters. Lightweight mutual authentication and privacy-preservation scheme for intelligent wearable devices in industrial-cps.IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 17...

  94. [103]

    Identification of wearable devices with bluetooth.IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 6(2):221–230, 2018

    Hidayet Aksu, A Selcuk Uluagac, and Elizabeth S Bentley. Identification of wearable devices with bluetooth.IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 6(2):221–230, 2018

  95. [104]

    Privacy and security in internet of things and wearable devices.IEEE transactions on multi-scale computing systems, 1(2):99–109, 2015

    Orlando Arias, Jacob Wurm, Khoa Hoang, and Yier Jin. Privacy and security in internet of things and wearable devices.IEEE transactions on multi-scale computing systems, 1(2):99–109, 2015

  96. [105]

    Blockchain-assisted secure device authenti- cation for cross-domain industrial iot.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 38(5):942–954, 2020

    Meng Shen, Huisen Liu, Liehuang Zhu, Ke Xu, Hongbo Yu, Xiaojiang Du, and Mohsen Guizani. Blockchain-assisted secure device authenti- cation for cross-domain industrial iot.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 38(5):942–954, 2020

  97. [106]

    Xauth: Efficient privacy-preserving cross-domain authentication.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(5):3301–3311, 2021

    Jing Chen, Zeyi Zhan, Kun He, Ruiying Du, Donghui Wang, and Fei Liu. Xauth: Efficient privacy-preserving cross-domain authentication.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(5):3301–3311, 2021

  98. [107]

    Scalable access control for privacy-aware media sharing.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21(1):173–183, 2018

    Changsha Ma, Zhisheng Yan, and Chang Wen Chen. Scalable access control for privacy-aware media sharing.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21(1):173–183, 2018

  99. [108]

    Time- domain attribute-based access control for cloud-based video content sharing: A cryptographic approach.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 18(5):940–950, 2016

    Kan Yang, Zhen Liu, Xiaohua Jia, and Xuemin Sherman Shen. Time- domain attribute-based access control for cloud-based video content sharing: A cryptographic approach.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 18(5):940–950, 2016

  100. [109]

    Leo Yu Zhang, Yifeng Zheng, Jian Weng, Cong Wang, Zihao Shan, and Kui Ren. You can access but you cannot leak: Defending against illegal content redistribution in encrypted cloud media center.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 17(6):1218–1231, 2018

  101. [110]

    Fedsens: A federated learning approach for smart health sensing with class imbalance in resource constrained edge computing

    Daniel Yue Zhang, Ziyi Kou, and Dong Wang. Fedsens: A federated learning approach for smart health sensing with class imbalance in resource constrained edge computing. InIEEE INFOCOM 2021-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 1–10. IEEE, 2021

  102. [111]

    Blockmaze: An efficient privacy-preserving account-model blockchain based on zk-snarks.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(3):1446–1463, 2020

    Zhangshuang Guan, Zhiguo Wan, Yang Yang, Yan Zhou, and Butian Huang. Blockmaze: An efficient privacy-preserving account-model blockchain based on zk-snarks.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(3):1446–1463, 2020

  103. [112]

    My privacy my decision: Control of photo sharing on online social networks.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 14(2):199–210, 2015

    Kaihe Xu, Yuanxiong Guo, Linke Guo, Yuguang Fang, and Xiaolin Li. My privacy my decision: Control of photo sharing on online social networks.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 14(2):199–210, 2015

  104. [113]

    Spds: A secure and auditable private data sharing scheme for smart grid based on blockchain.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(11):7688–7699, 2020

    Yuntao Wang, Zhou Su, Ning Zhang, Jianfei Chen, Xin Sun, Zhiyuan Ye, and Zhenyu Zhou. Spds: A secure and auditable private data sharing scheme for smart grid based on blockchain.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(11):7688–7699, 2020

  105. [114]

    Experiencing simulated confrontations in virtual reality

    Patrick Dickinson, Arthur Jones, Wayne Christian, Andrew Westerside, Francis Mulloy, Kathrin Gerling, Kieran Hicks, Liam Wilson, and Adrian Parke. Experiencing simulated confrontations in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing ...

  106. [115]

    Game theory and reinforcement learning based secure edge caching in mobile social networks.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15:3415–3429, 2020

    Qichao Xu, Zhou Su, and Rongxing Lu. Game theory and reinforcement learning based secure edge caching in mobile social networks.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15:3415–3429, 2020

  107. [116]

    A dynamic hierarchical framework for iot-assisted digital twin synchronization in the metaverse

    Yue Han, Dusit Niyato, Cyril Leung, Dong In Kim, Kun Zhu, Shaohan Feng, Xuemin Shen, and Chunyan Miao. A dynamic hierarchical framework for iot-assisted digital twin synchronization in the metaverse. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(1):268–284, 2022

  108. [117]

    Machine learning in metaverse security: Current solutions and future challenges.ACM Computing Surveys, 56(8):1–36, 2024

    Yazan Otoum, Navya Gottimukkala, Neeraj Kumar, and Amiya Nayak. Machine learning in metaverse security: Current solutions and future challenges.ACM Computing Surveys, 56(8):1–36, 2024

  109. [118]

    A robust adversary detection-deactivation method for metaverse-oriented collaborative deep learning.IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(14):22011–22022, 2023

    Pengfei Li, Zhibo Zhang, Ameena Saad Al-Sumaiti, Naoufel Werghi, and Chan Yeob Yeun. A robust adversary detection-deactivation method for metaverse-oriented collaborative deep learning.IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(14):22011–22022, 2023

  110. [119]

    Stealthy and efficient adversarial attacks against deep reinforcement learning

    Jianwen Sun, Tianwei Zhang, Xiaofei Xie, Lei Ma, Yan Zheng, Kangjie Chen, and Yang Liu. Stealthy and efficient adversarial attacks against deep reinforcement learning. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pages 5883–5891, 2020

  111. [120]

    Efficient adversarial training with transferable adversarial examples

    Haizhong Zheng, Ziqi Zhang, Juncheng Gu, Honglak Lee, and Atul Prakash. Efficient adversarial training with transferable adversarial examples. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1181–1190, 2020

  112. [121]

    Modality to modality translation: An adversarial representation learning and graph fusion 28 network for multimodal fusion

    Sijie Mai, Haifeng Hu, and Songlong Xing. Modality to modality translation: An adversarial representation learning and graph fusion 28 network for multimodal fusion. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pages 164–172, 2020

  113. [122]

    Takeru Miyato, Shin-ichi Maeda, Masanori Koyama, and Shin Ishii. Virtual adversarial training: a regularization method for supervised and semi-supervised learning.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 41(8):1979–1993, 2018

  114. [123]

    A digital twin based industrial automation and control system security architecture.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(1):669–680, 2019

    Christian Gehrmann and Martin Gunnarsson. A digital twin based industrial automation and control system security architecture.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(1):669–680, 2019

  115. [124]

    Spatialized audio streaming for networked virtual environments

    Roger Zimmermann and Ke Liang. Spatialized audio streaming for networked virtual environments. InProceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 299–308, 2008

  116. [125]

    Rendering spatial sound for interoperable experiences in the audio metaverse

    Jean-Marc Jot, R ´emi Audfray, Mark Hertensteiner, and Brian Schmidt. Rendering spatial sound for interoperable experiences in the audio metaverse. In2021 Immersive and 3D Audio: from Architecture to Automotive (I3DA), pages 1–15. IEEE, 2021

  117. [126]

    Secure {Multi-User} content sharing for augmented reality applications

    Kimberly Ruth, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. Secure {Multi-User} content sharing for augmented reality applications. In 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19), pages 141– 158, 2019

  118. [127]

    {AdCube}:{WebVR} ad fraud and practical confinement of{Third-Party}ads

    Hyunjoo Lee, Jiyeon Lee, Daejun Kim, Suman Jana, Insik Shin, and Sooel Son. {AdCube}:{WebVR} ad fraud and practical confinement of{Third-Party}ads. In30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21), pages 2543–2560, 2021

  119. [128]

    Dynamic watermarking: Active defense of networked cyber–physical systems

    Bharadwaj Satchidanandan and Panganamala R Kumar. Dynamic watermarking: Active defense of networked cyber–physical systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(2):219–240, 2016

  120. [129]

    Provchain: A blockchain-based data provenance architecture in cloud environment with enhanced privacy and availability

    Xueping Liang, Sachin Shetty, Deepak Tosh, Charles Kamhoua, Kevin Kwiat, and Laurent Njilla. Provchain: A blockchain-based data provenance architecture in cloud environment with enhanced privacy and availability. In2017 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud a...

  121. [130]

    Light-weight security and data provenance for multi-hop internet of things.IEEE Access, 6:34439–34448, 2018

    Mohsin Kamal et al. Light-weight security and data provenance for multi-hop internet of things.IEEE Access, 6:34439–34448, 2018

  122. [131]

    Reducing the attack surface in massively multiplayer online role-playing games.ieee seCurity & PrivaCy, 7(3):13–19, 2009

    Stephen Bono, Dan Caselden, Gabriel Landau, and Charlie Miller. Reducing the attack surface in massively multiplayer online role-playing games.ieee seCurity & PrivaCy, 7(3):13–19, 2009

  123. [132]

    Towards security and privacy for multi-user augmented reality: Foundations with end users

    Kiron Lebeck, Kimberly Ruth, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. Towards security and privacy for multi-user augmented reality: Foundations with end users. In2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pages 392–408. IEEE, 2018

  124. [133]

    A privacy framework for games & interactive media

    Peter M Corcoran and Claudia Costache. A privacy framework for games & interactive media. In2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM), pages 1–9. IEEE, 2018

  125. [134]

    Incorporating privacy into digital game platform design: The what, why, and how.IEEE Security & Privacy, 14(4):22–32, 2016

    Jussi Laakkonen, Janne Parkkila, Pekka J ¨appinen, Jouni Ikonen, and Ahmed Seffah. Incorporating privacy into digital game platform design: The what, why, and how.IEEE Security & Privacy, 14(4):22–32, 2016

  126. [135]

    Teaching earth systems beyond the classroom: Developing a mixed reality (xr) sandbox

    Damith Tennakoon, Aman U Usmani, Apostolos Vasileiou, Sasha Latchaev, Melanie Baljko, Muhammad Usman, Usman Khan, Matthew Perras, and Mojgan Jadidi. Teaching earth systems beyond the classroom: Developing a mixed reality (xr) sandbox. In2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022

  127. [136]

    Metaverse or metaworst with cybersecurity attacks.IT Prof., 25(3):54–60, 2023

    Akashdeep Bhardwaj and Keshav Kaushik. Metaverse or metaworst with cybersecurity attacks.IT Prof., 25(3):54–60, 2023

  128. [137]

    Analytic review of using augmented reality for situational awareness.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(4):2166–2183, 2022

    Julia Woodward and Jaime Ruiz. Analytic review of using augmented reality for situational awareness.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(4):2166–2183, 2022

  129. [138]

    Acoustic cues increase situational awareness in accident situations: A vr car- driving study.IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 23(4):3281–3291, 2020

    Uijong Ju, Lewis L Chuang, and Christian Wallraven. Acoustic cues increase situational awareness in accident situations: A vr car- driving study.IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 23(4):3281–3291, 2020

  130. [139]

    Industrial security solution for virtual reality.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(8):6273–6281, 2020

    Zhihan Lv, Dongliang Chen, Ranran Lou, and Houbing Song. Industrial security solution for virtual reality.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(8):6273–6281, 2020

  131. [140]

    Medmon: Securing medical devices through wireless monitoring and anomaly detection

    Meng Zhang, Anand Raghunathan, and Niraj K Jha. Medmon: Securing medical devices through wireless monitoring and anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical circuits and Systems, 7(6):871–881, 2013

  132. [141]

    Siamese neural network based few-shot learning for anomaly detection in industrial cyber-physical systems.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(8):5790–5798, 2020

    Xiaokang Zhou, Wei Liang, Shohei Shimizu, Jianhua Ma, and Qun Jin. Siamese neural network based few-shot learning for anomaly detection in industrial cyber-physical systems.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(8):5790–5798, 2020

  133. [142]

    Self-configurable cyber-physical intrusion detection for smart homes using reinforcement learning.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 16:1720–1735, 2020

    Ryan Heartfield, George Loukas, Anatolij Bezemskij, and Emmanouil Panaousis. Self-configurable cyber-physical intrusion detection for smart homes using reinforcement learning.IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 16:1720–1735, 2020

  134. [143]

    Metaverse governance: An empir- ical analysis of voting within decentralized autonomous organizations

    Mitchell Goldberg and Fabian Sch ¨ar. Metaverse governance: An empir- ical analysis of voting within decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Business Research, 160:113764, 2023

  135. [144]

    Md Facklasur Rahaman, Mohtasin Golam, Md Raihan Subhan, Es- mot Ara Tuli, Dong-Seong Kim, and Jae-Min Lee. Meta-governance: Blockchain-driven metaverse platform for mitigating misbehavior using smart contract and ai.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 21(4):40...

  136. [145]

    Navigating ethical dimensions in the metaverse: Challenges, frameworks, and solutions.IEEE Access, 2025

    Mousa Al-Kfairy, Saed Alrabaee, Omar Alfandi, Amr Taha Mohamed, and Souheil Khaddaj. Navigating ethical dimensions in the metaverse: Challenges, frameworks, and solutions.IEEE Access, 2025

  137. [146]

    Avatars in the metaverse: potential legal issues and remedies.International Cybersecurity Law Review, 3(2):467–494, 2022

    Ben Chester Cheong. Avatars in the metaverse: potential legal issues and remedies.International Cybersecurity Law Review, 3(2):467–494, 2022

  138. [147]

    Hon- eymix: Toward sdn-based intelligent honeynet

    Wonkyu Han, Ziming Zhao, Adam Doup ´e, and Gail-Joon Ahn. Hon- eymix: Toward sdn-based intelligent honeynet. InProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Workshop on Security in Software Defined Networks & Network Function Virtualization, pages 1–6, 2016

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.