REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 125 references
Quiver superconformal index and giant gravitons: asymptotics and expansions
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read For the \hat{A}_m family of toric quiver gauge theories, the coefficients of the large-N superconformal index obey an explicit Hardy-Ramanujan asymptotic formula, c_n ~ K' n^{(m-5)/4} exp(2C sqrt n), with C = pi sqrt(m/18 + 1/(6m)), determi
desk verdict Solid, honest paper with real new results; the \hat{A}_m asymptotics are likely right but remain conditional because the tail bound (IV.18) is unproven. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The key object is the factorised large-$N$ index determinant, which converts the quiver index into an infinite product of the form of a coloured partition generating function, together with the saddle-point method applied to this product. The load-bearing identity is the saddle equation $n = \left(\frac{\pi^2}{\xi^2}\right)\left(\frac{m}{18} + \frac{1}{6m}\right) + \left(\frac{m-2}{2}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\xi}\right) + O(1)$, whose solution defines the saddle radius $\xi_{\max}$ and the constant $C$ appearing in the exponential growth; Freiman's formula is then used to expand the logarithm of the product near the singularity at $z = -1$.
What would settle it
Compute the coefficients $c_n$ of the $\hat{A}_m$ generating function for, say, $m = 5$ up to $n = 10^5$ using high-precision integer arithmetic and compare $\ln|c_n|$ to $2C\sqrt{n} - \frac{m-2}{2}\ln n + \ln K$; any persistent deviation beyond $o(1)$ would refute (IV.17). More directly, evaluate the contour integral (IV.5) with $\xi = \xi_{\max}$ numerically and estimate the integral over $|\theta| > n^{-\delta}$ for $\delta \in (2/3, 3/4)$; if it is not $o(n^{(m-5)/4} e^{2C\sqrt{n}})$, the central claim collapses.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central mathematical discovery is the asymptotic expansion of the coefficients of the generating function $$g(z) = \prod_{k\ge 1} \frac{(1-z^{3k})^{2m}}{(1-z^{2km})^2 (1-z^{2k})^m}:$$ $$c_n \sim \frac{K}{2\sqrt{\pi} C^{(m-3)/2}} n^{(m-5)/4} e^{2C\sqrt{n}},$$ where $C = \pi \sqrt{\frac{m}{18} + \frac{1}{6m}}$ and $K$ collects the constant terms in the Freiman expansion. Equivalently, $$\ln|c_n| \sim 2C\sqrt{n} - \frac{m-2}{2} \ln n + \ln K + o(1).$$ The proof proceeds by substituting $t = z^3$, reflecting the quiver's R-charges, then localising the Cauchy integral at the singularity $z = -1$ and evaluating the resulting Gaussian integral. The result covers the $N=4$ SYM case ($m=1$) and $Y^{1,1}$ ($m=2$) as special cases, is verified numerically for $1 \le m$
Load-bearing premise
The proof that the integral over the contour away from the saddle point is negligible—the tail bound (IV.18)—is not established; the paper states this remains to be proven, so without it the asymptotic formula (IV.17) is only a local saddle contribution and not a proven coefficient asymptotics.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For each m, the dual gravity state count is predicted to grow as exp(2C sqrt n) n^{(m-5)/4} up to a constant, giving an effective central charge c_eff = m/3 + 1/m for the \hat{A}_m family.
- The logarithmic correction to the entropy changes sign at m = 5, so the subleading correction vanishes for \hat{A}_5.
- The bivariate main-diagonal index for \hat{A}_1 and \hat{A}_3 also obeys a Hardy-Ramanujan formula with explicit constants, yielding c_eff,biv = 3 and 11/3.
- The quivers dP3, Y^{3,3}, Y^{2,0}, and generally Y^{p,0}, grow only polynomially, with the sum-of-squares function controlling dP3 and Y^{2,0}.
- The matrix-coupling giant graviton expansion (V.52) iteratively corrects the large-N index to the finite-N index; for \hat{A}_2 and \hat{A}_3 it reproduces the finite-N index to the computed order.
Reading between the lines
- The same saddle-point structure may govern other Y^{p,q} families with rational R-charges, so their effective central charges could be extracted by the same method even when the full asymptotic proof is not yet available.
- The transition at m = 5, where the logarithmic correction vanishes, might be visible as a qualitative change in the subleading entropy of the dual black-hole or graviton-gas system; this is a testable prediction for a future gravity-side computation.
- The polynomial-growth cases are all generating functions that factor through Jacobi triple product identities; a possible general principle is that exponential Hardy-Ramanujan growth occurs precisely when the factorised product cannot be reduced to such theta-like blocks.
- Because the giant-graviton expansion relies only on the circulant structure of the large-N index matrix, the multi-matrix formula (V.52) may apply to any multi-matrix model with simultaneously diagonalisable couplings, not just the quiver indices studied here.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies the large-N superconformal index of toric quiver gauge theories, combining algebraic factorization of the large-N index matrix with saddle-point analysis of the resulting infinite products. It obtains factorizations for the Y^{p,q} and A-hat_m families and for dP3, uses a-maximization to fix on-shell R-charges, and then derives univariate and bivariate coefficient asymptotics. The stated principal mathematical result is Eq. (IV.17): for the A-hat_m univariate generating function, the coefficients satisfy Hardy-Ramanujan-type growth with exponential parameter 2 C n^{1/2} and a polynomial prefactor n^{(m-5)/4}. The paper also identifies polynomial-growth cases, gives numerical conjectures for several Y^{p,p} quivers, and generalizes Murthy's giant graviton expansion to matrix-coupling models. The central asymptotic formula is supported by extensive numerical checks, but the proof of the required tail bound (IV.18) is explicitly deferred, so the main result is presently a well-motivated conditional statement.
Significance. If the main asymptotic formulas are fully established, the paper gives a clean family of Hardy-Ramanujan asymptotics for large-N quiver indices, with explicit constants and logarithmic corrections, and introduces an effective central charge (IV.50) for these theories. The giant graviton expansion for matrix couplings, Eqs. (V.52)-(V.53), is a valuable generalization that goes beyond the scalar-coupling results and is checked to low order in the appendix. Strengths of the paper include the absence of fitted parameters in the A-hat_m derivation, the use of on-shell R-charges from a-maximization rather than from the asymptotic formula itself, and the extensive symbolic and numerical verification of factorizations and coefficient growth. The paper is also honest in labelling several statements as conjectures. However, the single load-bearing issue is the unproved tail estimate (IV.18), without which Eq. (IV.17) is a saddle-point contribution rather than a proven asymptotic expansion.
major comments (3)
- [Section IV.B, Eq. (IV.18)] The derivation of Eq. (IV.17) restricts the Cauchy integral (IV.5) to |θ| < n^{-δ} with δ in (2/3, 3/4). For this to yield the asymptotics of c_n, the integral over the complement must be o(n^{(m-5)/4} exp(2 C n^{1/2})). The manuscript explicitly states: 'It remains to prove that the remnant of the contour integral (IV.4) contributes negligibly' and 'We hope to return to a rigorous treatment of (IV.18) in future works.' Because g(z) has a dense set of singularities on the unit circle, this is not a routine dominant-singularity argument. Consequently Eq. (IV.17), Table I, and the derived effective central charge (IV.50) are conditional on an unproved bound. The numerical checks in Fig. 9 support the formula for finitely many n and m but do not constitute a proof. This is the principal gap and should be resolved or the result should be explicitly reframed as a conjecture with a clearly ide
- [Section IV.C, Eqs. (IV.21) and (IV.24)] The generalized asymptotic formulas are stated as obtained results, but no tail bound or dominance proof is supplied for the general function (IV.19) or its z -> -z transform (IV.23). The paper says that when (IV.21) is valid it 'can be proved by bounding the Cauchy integral', but the proof is not given, and the validity conditions (IV.27) are only conditions on the exponent inequality, not a demonstration that the saddle contribution dominates all other unit-circle singularities. The paper itself notes for Y^{2,2} that the z=-1 contribution (IV.28) is not the true asymptotic growth. These formulas should therefore be presented as conditional contributions unless a tail estimate is provided, particularly because they are used as the basis for statements about other quiver families.
- [Section III.C, Eq. (III.28)] The A-hat_m factorization (III.31) and the subsequent on-shell charges (III.6) depend on an assumed superpotential and on the zig-zag path method, which Section II.B describes as conjectural for inexact R-charges. The paper verifies the factorization by computer for several m and by hand in the symmetric equal-charge case, which is useful evidence, but it does not establish the ansatz or the zig-zag factorization for all m. Since Section IV uses exactly this factorization to define the generating function (IV.6), the status of this assumption should be clearly stated at the point where the asymptotic analysis begins. This is not a criticism of the numerical checks, but a request for explicitness about the provenance of a load-bearing ingredient.
minor comments (4)
- [Section IV.B, before Eq. (IV.18)] The text promises that 'the next subsection proves the integral over the remaining points is comparatively negligible', but the following subsection explicitly provides only computational evidence and defers a rigorous proof. The wording should be corrected to avoid implying a proof that is not present.
- [Notation throughout] The symbols p,q denote both fugacities and the integers labelling the Y^{p,q} family, while m denotes both the A-hat_m index and, in Section V, a giant-graviton tuple index. These overloaded notations are common in the literature but make the paper harder to read; a short reminder when switching between the two uses would help.
- [Table III and Fig. 11] Table III lists the polynomial-growth case Y^{3,3}, while the caption of Fig. 11(b) and the surrounding text refer to Y^{3,0}. Please check which quiver is actually being plotted and make the notation uniform.
- [Appendix B] The giant graviton corrections are verified only to O(z^15) for N=1 and O(z^12) for N=2. This is adequate for a consistency check, but the limited truncation should be stated in the main text when these computations are cited as evidence for the matrix-coupling expansion.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the Â_m asymptotic derivation is parameter-free and self-contained; the unproven tail bound is a proof gap, not a circular step.
full rationale
The central derivation of Eq. (IV.17) is not circular by construction. The generating function g(z) (IV.6) follows from the factorization (III.31)/(III.33), and the on-shell R-charges r_U=r_V=r_Y=2/3 are obtained independently from a-maximization (III.34)–(III.38); no coefficient of g is fitted from the asymptotic formula. The saddle-point constants C and K are computed from Freiman/Euler–Maclaurin expansions (IV.10)–(IV.13) and are not adjusted to match c_n. The numerical checks in Fig. 9 are independent verification of a derived formula, not an input. The explicitly acknowledged gap is the tail bound in §IV.B: "It remains to prove that the remnant of the contour integral (IV.4) contributes negligibly" and "We hope to return to a rigorous treatment of (IV.18) in future works." This makes (IV.17) a conditional saddle-point estimate rather than a fully proved theorem, but conditionality is a correctness/completeness issue, not circularity. The Â_m superpotential ansatz (III.28) is an unproven assumption, as the paper states ("the superpotential is not known in general"), and it is not defined in terms of the asymptotic coefficients; it is checked through independent factorization and a-maximization. No load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation by the present authors: the factorization proof is cited to [18], the zig-zag method to [19], and a-maximization to [20], all external. The paper's own prior-work citations are not used to force the central asymptotics. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- Y^{2,2} exponential constants 3/8 and 5/8 =
3/8 for n=3 mod 4; 5/8 for even n
assumptions (6)
- domain assumption Large-N index formula I_infinity(p,q) = product_{k>=1} ((1-p^k)^V (1-q^k)^V) / det M(p^k,q^k) (II.6)
- domain assumption Zig-zag path factorization detM(t) = product_i (1 - t^{sum of R-charges}) (II.14) holds off-shell
- ad hoc to paper The \hat{A}_m superpotential is W = sum_k (U_k Y_{k+1} V_{k+1} - Y_k U_k V_{k+1}) (III.28)
- ad hoc to paper Tail bound (IV.18) holds
- domain assumption a-maximization gives the on-shell R-charges used in the generating functions
- ad hoc to paper For the \hat{A}_m generating functions, the singularity at z=-1 dominates the asymptotics
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Quiver superconformal index and giant gravitons: asymptotics and expansions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ZCEY4Z5
@misc{pith2026250912123,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Quiver superconformal index and giant gravitons: asymptotics and expansions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ZCEY4Z5}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.12123}
}
abstract
We study asymptotics of the $d=4$, $\mathcal{N}=1$ superconformal index for toric quiver gauge theories. Using graph-theoretic and algebraic factorization techniques, we obtain a cycle expansion for the large-$N$ index in terms of the $R$-charge-weighted adjacency matrix. Applying saddle-point techniques at the on-shell $R$-charges, we determine the asymptotic degeneracy in the univariate specialization for $\hat{A}_{m}$, and along the main diagonal for the bivariate index for $\mathcal{N}=4$ and $\hat{A}_{3}$. In these cases we find $\ln |c_{n}| \sim \gamma n^{\frac{1}{2}}+ \beta \ln n + \alpha$ (Hardy-Ramanujan type). We also identify polynomial growth for $dP3$, $Y^{3,3}$ and $Y^{p,0}$, and give numerical evidence for $\gamma$ in further $Y^{p,p}$ examples. Finally, we generalize Murthy's giant graviton expansion via the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation and Borodin-Okounkov formula to multi-matrix models relevant for quivers.
Figures
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,
G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,” Conf. Proc. C930308(1993) 284–296,arXiv:gr-qc/9310026
arXiv 1993
-
[2]
Quantum geometry and BPS states
For p= 2 values in Table II let us conjecture ceff[Y 2,2] = { 27 128, n≡3 (mod 4), 75 128, n≡1 (mod 2), (IV.51) corresponding toa=c= 1. It would be interesting to obtainc eff for generalY p,q. In the case of the bivariate main-diagonal generating functions in Table V, we obtain ceff,biv[ ˆA1] = 3, ceff,biv[ ˆA3] = 11 3 .(IV.52) These generating functions ...
2022
-
[3]
The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,
J. Maldacena, “The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics38no. 4, (1999) 1113–1133,ArXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]
arXiv 1999
-
[4]
For theY p,p quivers, we havea=c= p
-
[5]
L. Susskind, “The world as a hologram,” Journal of Mathematical Physics36no. 11, (Nov, 1995) 6377–6396, arXiv:hep-th/9409089 [hep-th]
arXiv 1995
-
[6]
M. Natsuume, “AdS/CFT duality user guide,”arXiv:1409.3575 [hep-th]
-
[7]
Particle creation by black holes,
S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes,” Communications in Mathematical Physics43no. 3, (1975) 199 – 220
1975
-
[8]
Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,
A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Physics Letters B379no. 1-4, (Jun,
Show all 125 references
-
[9]
Constraints on supersymmetry breaking,
E. Witten, “Constraints on supersymmetry breaking,” Nuclear Physics B202no. 2, (1982) 253–316
1982
-
[10]
D-branes, quivers, and ALE instantons,
M. R. Douglas and G. Moore, “D-branes, quivers, and ALE instantons,”arXiv:hep-th/9603167 [hep-th]. 46
-
[11]
Lectures on D-branes, Gauge Theories and Calabi-Yau Singularities,
Y.-H. He, “Lectures on D-branes, Gauge Theories and Calabi-Yau Singularities,”arXiv:hep-th/0408142 [hep-th]
-
[12]
An infinite family of superconformal quiver gauge theories with Sasaki-Einstein duals,
S. Benvenuti, S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “An infinite family of superconformal quiver gauge theories with Sasaki-Einstein duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics2005no. 06, (Jun, 2005) 064–064,ArXiv:hep-th/0411264 [hep-th]
2005 arXiv
-
[13]
An index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,
J. Kinney, J. Maldacena, S. Minwalla, and S. Raju, “An index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,” Communications in Mathematical Physics275no. 1, (Jun, 2007) 209–254,arXiv:hep-th/0510251 [hep-th]
2007 arXiv
-
[14]
Quivers, words and fundamentals,
P. Mattioli and S. Ramgoolam, “Quivers, words and fundamentals,” Journal of High Energy Physics2015no. 3, (Mar,
-
[15]
Affine root systems and Dedekind’sη-function.,
I. MacDonald, “Affine root systems and Dedekind’sη-function.,” Inventiones mathematicae15(1971/72) 91–143
1971
-
[16]
N. A. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0306238 [hep-th]
2006 arXiv
-
[17]
The growth of the 1 16-BPS index in 4dN= 4 SYM,
S. Murthy, “The growth of the 1 16-BPS index in 4dN= 4 SYM,”arXiv:2005.10843 [hep-th]
2005 arXiv
-
[18]
Pemantle, M
R. Pemantle, M. C. Wilson, and S. Melczer, Analytic combinatorics in several variables. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2024
2024
-
[19]
A zig-zag index,
P. Agarwal, A. Amariti, and A. Mariotti, “A zig-zag index,”arXiv:1304.6733 [hep-th]
-
[20]
The exact superconformal R-symmetry maximizes a,
K. Intriligator and B. Wecht, “The exact superconformal R-symmetry maximizes a,” Nuclear Physics B667no. 1-2, (Sep,
-
[21]
On the superconformal index ofN= 1 IR fixed points. A holographic check,
A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, “On the superconformal index ofN= 1 IR fixed points. A holographic check,” Journal of High Energy Physics2011no. 3, (Mar, 2011) 041,ArXiv:1011.5278 [hep-th]
2011 arXiv
-
[22]
Superconformal indices, Sasaki-Einstein manifolds, and cyclic homologies,
R. Eager, J. Schmude, and Y. Tachikawa, “Superconformal indices, Sasaki-Einstein manifolds, and cyclic homologies,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.18no. 1, (2014) 129–175,arXiv:1207.0573 [hep-th]
2014 arXiv
-
[23]
de Bruijn, Asymptotic methods in analysis
N. de Bruijn, Asymptotic methods in analysis. Bibliotheca Mathematica. North-Holland Publishing Company, Netherlands, 3rd ed., 1970
1970
-
[24]
Asymptotic formulaæ in combinatory analysis,
G. H. Hardy and S. Ramanujan, “Asymptotic formulaæ in combinatory analysis,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Societys2-17no. 1, (1918) 75–115
1918
-
[25]
Asymptotic expressions of numerical functions occurring in problems of partitions of numbers,
J. Uspensky, “Asymptotic expressions of numerical functions occurring in problems of partitions of numbers,” Bull. Acad. Sci. de Russie14(1920) 199–218
1920
-
[26]
Quivers as calculators: counting, correlators and Riemann surfaces,
J. Pasukonis and S. Ramgoolam, “Quivers as calculators: counting, correlators and Riemann surfaces,” Journal of High Energy Physics2013no. 4, (Apr, 2013) 94,arXiv:1301.1980 [hep-th]
2013 arXiv
-
[27]
Quiver asymptotics:N= 1 free chiral ring,
S. Ramgoolam, M. C. Wilson, and A. Zahabi, “Quiver asymptotics:N= 1 free chiral ring,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53no. 10, (Feb, 2020) 105401,arXiv:1811.11229 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[28]
Microscopic and macroscopic entropy of extremal black holes in string theory,
A. Sen, “Microscopic and macroscopic entropy of extremal black holes in string theory,” General Relativity and Gravitation 46no. 5, (Apr, 2014) ,arXiv:1402.0109 [hep-th]
2014 arXiv
-
[29]
c eff for 3dN= 2 theories,
S. Gukov and M. Jagadale, “c eff for 3dN= 2 theories,” International Journal of Modern Physics A0no. 0, (0) 2446012, arXiv:2308.05360 [hep-th]
-
[30]
ceff from resurgence at the stokes line,
G. Adams, O. Costin, G. V. Dunne, S. Gukov, and O. ¨Oner, “ceff from resurgence at the stokes line,”arXiv:2508.10112 [hep-th]
-
[31]
R. C. Vaughan, The Hardy-Littlewood Method. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 1997
1997
-
[32]
Arithmetic ofN= 8 black holes,
A. Sen, “Arithmetic ofN= 8 black holes,” Journal of High Energy Physics2010no. 2, (Feb, 2010) ,0908.0039 [hep-th]
2010 arXiv
-
[33]
Logarithmic correction to the bekenstein-hawking entropy,
R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, “Logarithmic correction to the bekenstein-hawking entropy,” Physical Review Letters84 no. 23, (June, 2000) 5255–5257.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5255
-
[34]
General logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy,
S. Das, P. Majumdar, and R. K. Bhaduri, “General logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy,” Class. Quant. Grav.19 (2002) 2355–2368,arXiv:hep-th/0111001
2002 arXiv
-
[35]
Logarithmic corrections toN= 2 black hole entropy: an infrared window into the microstates,
A. Sen, “Logarithmic corrections toN= 2 black hole entropy: an infrared window into the microstates,” General Relativity and Gravitation44no. 5, (Feb, 2012) 1207–1266,arXiv:1108.3842 [hep-th]
2012 arXiv
-
[36]
c eff from surgery and modularity,
S. Harichurn, M. Jagadale, D. Noshchenko, and D. Passaro, “c eff from surgery and modularity,”arXiv:2508.10087 [hep-th]
-
[37]
Conical singularity and quantum corrections to the entropy of a black hole,
S. N. Solodukhin, “Conical singularity and quantum corrections to the entropy of a black hole,” Physical Review D51 no. 2, (Jan., 1995) 609–617,hep-th/9407001 [hep-th]
1995 arXiv
-
[38]
Sub-leading structures in superconformal indices: subdominant saddles and logarithmic contributions,
A. Gonz´ alez Lezcano, J. Hong, J. T. Liu, and L. A. Pando Zayas, “Sub-leading structures in superconformal indices: subdominant saddles and logarithmic contributions,” Journal of High Energy Physics2021no. 1, (Jan., 2021) , arXiv:2007.12604 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[40]
Unitary matrix models, free fermion ensembles, and the giant graviton expansion,
S. Murthy, “Unitary matrix models, free fermion ensembles, and the giant graviton expansion,”arXiv:2202.06897 [hep-th]. 47
-
[41]
Logarithmic corrections to Schwarzschild and other non-extremal black hole entropy in different dimensions,
A. Sen, “Logarithmic corrections to Schwarzschild and other non-extremal black hole entropy in different dimensions,” Journal of High Energy Physics2013no. 4, (Apr, 2013) ,arXiv:1205.0971 [hep-th]
2013 arXiv
-
[42]
Microstate counting via Bethe Ans¨ atze in the 4dN= 1 superconformal index,
A. Gonz´ alez Lezcano and L. A. Pando Zayas, “Microstate counting via Bethe Ans¨ atze in the 4dN= 1 superconformal index,” JHEP03(2020) 088,arXiv:1907.12841 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[43]
Giant graviton expansion for general Wilson line operator indices,
Y. Imamura, A. Sei, and D. Yokoyama, “Giant graviton expansion for general Wilson line operator indices,” Journal of High Energy Physics2024no. 9, (Sep, 2024) 202,arXiv:2406.19777 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[44]
Simple-Sum Giant Graviton Expansions for Orbifolds and Orientifolds,
S. Fujiwara, Y. Imamura, T. Mori, S. Murayama, and D. Yokoyama, “Simple-Sum Giant Graviton Expansions for Orbifolds and Orientifolds,” PTEP2024no. 2, (2024) 023B02,arXiv:2310.03332 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[45]
Finite N indices and the giant graviton expansion,
J. T. Liu and N. J. Rajappa, “Finite N indices and the giant graviton expansion,” Journal of High Energy Physics2023 no. 4, (Apr., 2023) ,ArXiv:2212.05408 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[46]
Giant graviton expansion from bubbling geometry: Discreteness from quantized geometry,
E. Deddo, J. T. Liu, L. A. Pando Zayas, and R. J. Saskowski, “Giant graviton expansion from bubbling geometry: Discreteness from quantized geometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132(Jun, 2024) 261501,arXiv:2402.19452 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[47]
Analytic continuation for giant gravitons,
Y. Imamura, “Analytic continuation for giant gravitons,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2022no. 10, (09, 2022) 103B02,arXiv:2205.14615 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[48]
Deformed Schur indices and Macdonald polynomials,
Y. Hatsuda, “Deformed Schur indices and Macdonald polynomials,”arXiv:2503.03952 [hep-th]
-
[49]
Trace relations and open string vacua,
J. H. Lee, “Trace relations and open string vacua,” Journal of High Energy Physics2024no. 2, (Feb, 2024) 224, 2312.00242 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[50]
One-loop quantization of Euclidean D3-branes in holographic backgrounds,
F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden, “One-loop quantization of Euclidean D3-branes in holographic backgrounds,” JHEP06 (2024) 073,arXiv:2402.16779 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[51]
Analytic continuation and the giant graviton expansion,
N. Ezroura, J. T. Liu, and N. J. Rajappa, “Analytic continuation and the giant graviton expansion,” Journal of High Energy Physics01(2025) 028,arXiv:2408.02759 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[52]
The giant graviton expansion inAdS 5×S 5,
G. Eleftheriou, S. Murthy, and M. Rossell´ o, “The giant graviton expansion inAdS 5×S 5,” SciPost Physics17no. 4, (Oct,
-
[53]
Rychkov, EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D≥ 3 Dimensions
S. Rychkov, EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D≥ 3 Dimensions. Springer International Publishing, 2017. arXiv:1601.05000 [hep-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[54]
Superconformal symmetry and representations,
L. Eberhardt, “Superconformal symmetry and representations,” J. Phys. A54no. 6, (2021) 063002,arXiv:2006.13280 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[55]
Fulton and J
W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation Theory: A First Course. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 2004
2004
-
[56]
J. F. Adams, Lectures on Lie Groups. Midway reprint. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, Jan., 1983
1983
-
[57]
Lectures on the Superconformal Index,
A. Gadde, “Lectures on the Superconformal Index,”arXiv:2006.13630 [hep-th]
2006 arXiv
-
[58]
Calculating the superconformal index and Seiberg duality,
C. R¨ omelsberger, “Calculating the superconformal index and Seiberg duality,”arXiv:0707.3702 [hep-th]
-
[59]
Possible third-order phase transition in the large-Nlattice gauge theory,
D. J. Gross and E. Witten, “Possible third-order phase transition in the large-Nlattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 446–453
1980
-
[60]
N=∞Phase Transition in a Class of Exactly Soluble Model Lattice Gauge Theories,
S. R. Wadia, “N=∞Phase Transition in a Class of Exactly Soluble Model Lattice Gauge Theories,” Phys. Lett. B93 (1980) 403–410
1980
-
[61]
A Study ofU(N) Lattice Gauge Theory in 2-dimensions,
S. R. Wadia, “A Study ofU(N) Lattice Gauge Theory in 2-dimensions,”arXiv:1212.2906 [hep-th]
-
[62]
Applications of the superconformal index for protected operators and q-hypergeometric identities to dual theories,
F. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Applications of the superconformal index for protected operators and q-hypergeometric identities to dual theories,” Nuclear Physics B818no. 3, (Sep, 2009) 137–178,arXiv:0801.4947 [hep-th]
2009 arXiv
-
[63]
A method for the computation of quantum distribution functions,
R. Stratonovich, “A method for the computation of quantum distribution functions,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR115no. 6, (1957) 1097–1100
1957
-
[64]
Calculation of partition functions,
J. Hubbard, “Calculation of partition functions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.3(Jul, 1959) 77–78
1959
-
[65]
Restrictions imposed by superconformal invariance on quantum field theories,
S. Minwalla, “Restrictions imposed by superconformal invariance on quantum field theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 783–851,arXiv:hep-th/9712074
1998 arXiv
-
[66]
Dimer models from mirror symmetry and quivering amoebae,
B. Feng, Y.-H. He, K. D. Kennaway, and C. Vafa, “Dimer models from mirror symmetry and quivering amoebae,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics12no. 3, (2008) 489–545,arXiv:hep-th/0511287 [hep-th]
2008 arXiv
-
[67]
An introduction to the dimer model,
R. Kenyon, “An introduction to the dimer model,”arXiv:math/0310326 [math.CO]
-
[68]
Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories,
S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Vegh, B. Wecht, and K. D. Kennaway, “Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics2006no. 01, (Jan, 2006) 096–096,ArXiv:hep-th/0504110 [hep-th]
2006 arXiv
-
[69]
Counting BPS operators in gauge theories: quivers, syzygies and plethystics,
S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y.-H. He, “Counting BPS operators in gauge theories: quivers, syzygies and plethystics,” Journal of High Energy Physics2007no. 11, (Nov., 2007) 050–050,arXiv:hep-th/0608050 [hep-th]
2007 arXiv
-
[70]
The deconfinement and Hagedorn phase transitions in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,
O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The deconfinement and Hagedorn phase transitions in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,” Comptes Rendus Physique5no. 9-10, (Nov, 2004) 945–954, arXiv:hep-th/0310285 [hep-th]
2004 arXiv
-
[71]
The holographic weyl anomaly,
M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, “The holographic weyl anomaly,” Journal of High Energy Physics1998no. 07, (July,
-
[72]
Supersymmetric phases of 4dN= 4 SYM at large N,
A. Cabo-Bizet and S. Murthy, “Supersymmetric phases of 4dN= 4 SYM at large N,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2020no. 9, (Sep, 2020) 184,ArXiv:1909.09597 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[73]
Aztec castles and the dP3 quiver,
M. Leoni, G. Musiker, S. Neel, and P. Turner, “Aztec castles and the dP3 quiver,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical47no. 47, (Nov, 2014) 474011,arXiv:1308.3926 [math.CO]
2014 arXiv
-
[74]
D-brane gauge theories from toric singularities and toric duality,
B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y.-H. He, “D-brane gauge theories from toric singularities and toric duality,” Nuclear Physics B 48 595no. 1-2, (Feb, 2001) 165–200,arXiv:hep-th/0003085 [hep-th]
2001 arXiv
-
[75]
Positivity constraints on anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theories,
D. Anselmi, J. Erlich, D. Z. Freedman, and A. A. Johansen, “Positivity constraints on anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theories,” Physical Review D57no. 12, (June, 1998) 7570–7588,arXiv:hep-th/9711035 [hep-th]
1998 arXiv
-
[76]
New results on superconformal quivers,
S. Benvenuti and A. Hanany, “New results on superconformal quivers,” Journal of High Energy Physics2006no. 04, (Apr,
-
[77]
Toeplitz and circulant matrices: A review,
R. M. Gray, “Toeplitz and circulant matrices: A review,” Foundations and Trends® in Communications and Information Theory2no. 3, (2006) 155–239
2006
-
[78]
Eigenvectors of block circulant and alternating circulant matrices,
G. J. Tee, “Eigenvectors of block circulant and alternating circulant matrices,” New Zealand Journal of Mathematics36 (2007) 195–211
2007
-
[79]
Construction g´ eom´ etrique de la correspondance de McKay,
G. Gonzalez-Sprinberg and J. l. Verdier, “Construction g´ eom´ etrique de la correspondance de McKay,”Annales scientifiques de l’´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure4e s´erie, 16no. 3, (1983) 409–449
1983
-
[80]
Symmetries of toric duality,
B. Feng, S. Franco, A. Hanany, and Y.-H. He, “Symmetries of toric duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics2002no. 12, (Jan, 2003) 076,arXiv:hep-th/0205144 [hep-th]
2003 arXiv
-
[81]
Toric mutations in the dP 2 quiver and subgraphs of the dP 2 Brane Tiling,
Y. Gao, Z. Li, T.-D. Vuong, and L. Yang, “Toric mutations in the dP 2 quiver and subgraphs of the dP 2 Brane Tiling,” The electronic journal of combinatorics26no. 2, (2019) ,arXiv:1611.05320 [math.CO]
2019 arXiv
-
[82]
Postnikov, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory
A. Postnikov, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory. Translations of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society, 1988
1988
-
[83]
Elliptic Hypergeometry of Supersymmetric Dualities,
V. P. Spiridonov and G. S. Vartanov, “Elliptic Hypergeometry of Supersymmetric Dualities,” Communications in Mathematical Physics304no. 3, (Mar, 2011) 797–874,ArXiv:0910.5944 [hep-th]
2011 arXiv
-
[84]
Superconformal indices for n=1 theories with multiple duals,
V. Spiridonov and G. Vartanov, “Superconformal indices for n=1 theories with multiple duals,” Nuclear Physics B824 no. 1, (2010) 192–216.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321309004647
2010
-
[85]
Asymptotic formulas for general colored partition functions,
Y.-G. Chen and Y.-L. Li, “Asymptotic formulas for general colored partition functions,”arXiv:1610.05938 [math.NT]
-
[86]
On the representation of a number as the sum of any number of squares, and in particular of five,
G. H. Hardy, “On the representation of a number as the sum of any number of squares, and in particular of five,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society21no. 3, (1920) 255–284.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1988931
1920
-
[87]
Is there an upper bound on the number of representations as a sum of squares?
MathqA, “Is there an upper bound on the number of representations as a sum of squares?” https://mathoverflow.net/q/456863. (version: 2023-10-22)
2023
-
[88]
Jacobi, Fundamenta nova theoriae functionum ellipticarum
C. Jacobi, Fundamenta nova theoriae functionum ellipticarum. Sumtibus fratrum, 1829
-
[89]
An introduction to the theory of numbers,
G. Hardy, E. Wright, R. Heath-Brown, and J. Silverman, “An introduction to the theory of numbers,” . https://books.google.pl/books?id=P6uTBqOa3T4C
-
[90]
An elementary proof of Jacobi’s six squares theorem,
S. H. Chan, “An elementary proof of Jacobi’s six squares theorem,” The American Mathematical Monthly111no. 9, (2004) 806–811
2004
-
[91]
Asymptotische aussagen ¨ uber partitionen
G. Meinardus, “Asymptotische aussagen ¨ uber partitionen. ”Mathematische Zeitschrift59(1953/54) 388–398. http://eudml.org/doc/169399
1953
-
[92]
Infinite products, partition functions, and the Meinardus theorem,
A. A. Actor, “Infinite products, partition functions, and the Meinardus theorem,” Journal of Mathematical Physics35 no. 11, (11, 1994) 5749–5764
1994
-
[93]
Black hole/string transition for the small schwarzschild black hole ofAdS 5×S 5 and critical unitary matrix models,
L. ´Alvarez-Gaum´ e, P. Basu, M. Mari˜ no, and S. Wadia, “Black hole/string transition for the small schwarzschild black hole ofAdS 5×S 5 and critical unitary matrix models,” The European Physical Journal C48no. 2, (Nov, 2006) 647–665, arXiv:hep-th/0408001 [hep-th]
2006 arXiv
-
[94]
Unitary matrix models and random partitions: Universality and multi-criticality,
T. Kimura and A. Zahabi, “Unitary matrix models and random partitions: Universality and multi-criticality,” Journal of High Energy Physics2021no. 7, (July, 2021) ,arXiv:2105.00509 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[95]
Character Expansion Methods for USp(2N), SO(n), and O(n) using the Characters of the Symmetric Group,
A. Sei, “Character Expansion Methods for USp(2N), SO(n), and O(n) using the Characters of the Symmetric Group,” arXiv:2303.03674 [hep-th]
-
[96]
A Fredholm determinant formula for Toeplitz determinants,
A. Borodin and A. Okounkov, “A Fredholm determinant formula for Toeplitz determinants,” Integral Equ. Oper. Theory37 (2000) 386 – 396,arXiv:math/9907165 [math.CA]
2000 arXiv
-
[97]
Toeplitz forms and their applications,
U. Grenander, G. Szeg¨ o, and M. Kac, “Toeplitz forms and their applications,” Physics Today11no. 10, (Jan., 1958) 38
1958
-
[98]
Universal edge scaling in random partitions,
T. Kimura and A. Zahabi, “Universal edge scaling in random partitions,” Letters in Mathematical Physics111no. 2, (Apr,
-
[99]
Simple proofs of Jacobi’s two and four square theorems,
S. Bhargava and C. Adiga, “Simple proofs of Jacobi’s two and four square theorems,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol19 (1988) 779–782
1988
-
[100]
Partition sums and entropy bounds in weakly coupled CFT,
D. Kutasov and F. Larsen, “Partition sums and entropy bounds in weakly coupled CFT,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2001no. 01, (Jan., 2001) 001–001,hep-th/0009244 [hep-th]
2001 arXiv
-
[101]
Giant graviton expansion from eigenvalue instantons,
Y. Chen, R. Mahajan, and H. Tang, “Giant graviton expansion from eigenvalue instantons,”arXiv:2407.08155 [hep-th]
-
[102]
Complex eigenvalue instantons and the Fredholm determinant expansion in the Gross-Witten-Wadia model,
D. S. Eniceicu, R. Mahajan, and C. Murdia, “Complex eigenvalue instantons and the Fredholm determinant expansion in the Gross-Witten-Wadia model,” Journal of High Energy Physics2024no. 1, (Jan, 2024) 129,ArXiv:2308.06320 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[103]
Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations,
J. H. Lee and D. Stanford, “Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations,”arXiv:2412.20769 [hep-th]
-
[104]
The giant graviton expansion,
D. Gaiotto and J. H. Lee, “The giant graviton expansion,” Journal of High Energy Physics2024no. 8, (Aug, 2024) 25, arXiv:2109.02545 [hep-th].https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.02545
2024 arXiv
-
[105]
Comments on the giant-graviton expansion of the superconformal index,
D. S. Eniceicu, “Comments on the giant-graviton expansion of the superconformal index,”arXiv:2302.04887 [hep-th]
-
[106]
OEIS sequence A115139
“OEIS sequence A115139. ”https://oeis.org/A115139. Version: May 9 22:03 EDT 2025
2025
-
[107]
On polynomials related to powers of the generating function of Catalan’s numbers,
W. Lang, “On polynomials related to powers of the generating function of Catalan’s numbers,” The Fibonacci Quarterly38 49 no. 5, (2000) 408–419
2000
-
[108]
Universal cusp scaling in random partitions,
T. Kimura and A. Zahabi, “Universal cusp scaling in random partitions,” Letters in Mathematical Physics114no. 1, (Feb,
-
[109]
,arXiv:2208.07288 [hep-th]
-
[110]
Infinite wedge and random partitions,
A. Okounkov, “Infinite wedge and random partitions,” Selecta Mathematica7no. 1, (Apr, 2001) 57,arXiv:math/9907127 [math.RT]
2001 arXiv
-
[111]
Quivers and BPS states in 3d and 4d,
P. Kucharski, P. Longhi, D. Noshchenko, S. Park, and P. Su/suppress lkowski, “Quivers and BPS states in 3d and 4d,” arXiv:2508.09729 [hep-th]
-
[112]
Cohomological Hall algebra of a symmetric quiver,
A. I. Efimov, “Cohomological Hall algebra of a symmetric quiver,” Compositio Mathematica148no. 4, (May, 2012) 1133–1146,arXiv:1103.2736 [math.AG]
2012 arXiv
-
[113]
Knots-quivers correspondence,
P. Kucharski, M. Reineke, M. Stoˇ si´ c, and P. Su/suppress lkowski, “Knots-quivers correspondence,”Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics23no. 7, (2019) 1849–1902,ArXiv:1707.04017 [hep-th]
2019 arXiv
-
[114]
P. A. MacMahon, Combinatory Analysis, vol. 2. The University Press, Cambridge [Eng.], 1915-1916
1915
-
[115]
The Nekrasov-Okounkov hook length formula: refinement, elementary proof, extension and applications,
G.-N. Han, “The Nekrasov-Okounkov hook length formula: refinement, elementary proof, extension and applications,” arXiv:0805.1398 [math.CO]
-
[116]
An elementary proof ofp(11m+ 6)≡0(mod 11),
L. Winquist, “An elementary proof ofp(11m+ 6)≡0(mod 11),” Journal of Combinatorial Theory6no. 1, (1969) 56–59
1969
-
[118]
The asymptotic growth of states of the 4dN= 1 superconformal index,
A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and S. Murthy, “The asymptotic growth of states of the 4dN= 1 superconformal index,” Journal of High Energy Physics2019no. 8, (Aug, 2019) 120,arXiv:1904.05865 [hep-th]
2019 arXiv
-
[119]
LargeNsuperconformal indices for 3d holographic SCFTs,
N. Bobev, S. Choi, J. Hong, and V. Reys, “LargeNsuperconformal indices for 3d holographic SCFTs,” Journal of High Energy Physics2023no. 2, (Feb., 2023) ,arXiv:2210.15326 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[120]
Localization and wall-crossing of giant graviton expansions inAdS 5,
G. Eleftheriou, S. Murthy, and M. Rossell´ o, “Localization and wall-crossing of giant graviton expansions inAdS 5,” arXiv:2501.13910 [hep-th]
-
[1996]
99–104,arXiv:hep-th/9601029 [hep-th]
-
[1998]
023–023,arXiv:hep-th/9806087 [hep-th].http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/1998/07/023
1998 arXiv
-
[2003]
183–200,arXiv:hep-th/0304128 [hep-th]
-
[2006]
032–032,ArXiv:hep-th/0411262 [hep-th]
-
[2015]
105,arXiv:1412.5991 [hep-th]
-
[2021]
,arXiv:2012.06424 [hep-th]
2012 arXiv
-
[2024]
,arXiv:2312.14921 [hep-th]
Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.