REVIEW 2 cited by
An Integrated Framework Integrating Monte Carlo Tree Search and Supervised Learning for Train Timetabling Problem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The single-track railway train timetabling problem (TTP) is an important and complex problem. This article proposes an integrated Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) computing framework that combines heuristic methods, unsupervised learning methods, and supervised learning methods for solving TTP in discrete action spaces. This article first describes the mathematical model and simulation system dynamics of TTP, analyzes the characteristics of the solution from the perspective of MCTS, and proposes some heuristic methods to improve MCTS. This article considers these methods as planners in the proposed framework. Secondly, this article utilizes deep convolutional neural networks to approximate the value of nodes and further applies them to the MCTS search process, referred to as learners. The experiment shows that the proposed heuristic MCTS method is beneficial for solving TTP; The algorithm framework that integrates planners and learners can improve the data efficiency of solving TTP; The proposed method provides a new paradigm for solving TTP.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mulberry: Empowering MLLM with o1-like Reasoning and Reflection via Collective Monte Carlo Tree Search
Using a group of MLLMs to search reasoning trees and training on the resulting paths improves MLLM reasoning, with Mulberry models beating their base models by up to 7.5 points on average.
-
MC-NEST: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models leveraging a Monte Carlo Self-Refine Tree
MC-NEST adds a constant probability term to MCTSr's node selection and reports improved AIME pass@1 for GPT-4o, but the numbers are weakened by test-set rollout tuning and internal inconsistencies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.