REVIEW 2 cited by
Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper examines the transformative role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education and their potential as learning tools, despite their inherent risks and limitations. The authors propose seven approaches for utilizing AI in classrooms: AI-tutor, AI-coach, AI-mentor, AI-teammate, AI-tool, AI-simulator, and AI-student, each with distinct pedagogical benefits and risks. The aim is to help students learn with and about AI, with practical strategies designed to mitigate risks such as complacency about the AI's output, errors, and biases. These strategies promote active oversight, critical assessment of AI outputs, and complementarity of AI's capabilities with the students' unique insights. By challenging students to remain the "human in the loop," the authors aim to enhance learning outcomes while ensuring that AI serves as a supportive tool rather than a replacement. The proposed framework offers a guide for educators navigating the integration of AI-assisted learning in classrooms
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Scalable and Personalized Oral Assessments Using Voice AI
Viva conducts voice-based oral exams and grades transcripts with a multi-LLM panel; tested on two small NYU cohorts at under $1 per exam while surfacing five implementation patterns from observed failures.
-
LearnLM: Improving Gemini for Learning
A model trained with pedagogical instruction following and co-trained with Gemini's post-training was preferred by expert raters over three leading LLMs in tutoring scenarios.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.