Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.02477 v3 pith:33JLWFQH submitted 2018-04-06 cs.LG cs.AIcs.PLstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.PLstat.ML
keywords policieslearningndpsneuralreinforcementinterpretablepirlprogrammatic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a reinforcement learning framework, called Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learning (PIRL), that is designed to generate interpretable and verifiable agent policies. Unlike the popular Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) paradigm, which represents policies by neural networks, PIRL represents policies using a high-level, domain-specific programming language. Such programmatic policies have the benefits of being more easily interpreted than neural networks, and being amenable to verification by symbolic methods. We propose a new method, called Neurally Directed Program Search (NDPS), for solving the challenging nonsmooth optimization problem of finding a programmatic policy with maximal reward. NDPS works by first learning a neural policy network using DRL, and then performing a local search over programmatic policies that seeks to minimize a distance from this neural "oracle". We evaluate NDPS on the task of learning to drive a simulated car in the TORCS car-racing environment. We demonstrate that NDPS is able to discover human-readable policies that pass some significant performance bars. We also show that PIRL policies can have smoother trajectories, and can be more easily transferred to environments not encountered during training, than corresponding policies discovered by DRL.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 98 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A latent mediation framework with sparse autoencoders enables non-additive token-level influence attribution in LLMs by learning orthogonal features and back-propagating attributions.

  2. BASIL: Best-Action Symbolic Interpretable Learning for Evolving Compact RL Policies

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BASIL evolves compact symbolic if-then rule policies with a quality-diversity archive and matches a DQN baseline on CartPole, MountainCar, and Acrobot.

  3. "So, Tell Me About Your Policy...": Distillation of interpretable policies from Deep Reinforcement Learning agents

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EXPLAIN trains an interpretable linear policy from an expert's offline trajectories by combining advantage-weighted policy gradients with a behavioral cloning regularizer.

  4. Scenario Generation for Risk-Aware Reinforcement Learning with Probably Approximately Safe Guarantees

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Approximates encountered state distribution via VAE and constructs dual bound barrier certificates to provide probably approximately safe guarantees in RL by optimizing the non-robust region.

Pith tools