pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07765 · v1 · pith:34AZ72CXnew · submitted 2019-07-10 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.CR

Pakistan's Internet Voting Experiment

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 23:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.CR
keywords internet votingPakistanoverseas diasporaremote votingelection securityvulnerabilitiesmateriality
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pakistan's remote internet voting trials for overseas citizens could create the world's largest enfranchised diaspora if deployed nationwide.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports on Pakistan's small-scale trials of a remote internet voting system designed for its overseas citizens. It documents the sociopolitical, legal, and institutional factors that motivated these trials and describes the system along with its reported vulnerabilities. Additional concerns about materiality are highlighted. A sympathetic reader would care because full deployment in upcoming elections could give voting rights to millions abroad, representing an unprecedented scale of diaspora participation in elections. The authors aim to provide insight into the experiment and point out challenges that need addressing.

Core claim

Pakistan recently conducted small-scale trials of a remote Internet voting system for overseas citizens. The exercise is motivated by a unique combination of sociopolitical, legal, and institutional factors. The paper describes the system and its reported vulnerabilities and highlights new issues pertaining to materiality. If this system is deployed in the next general elections, this would constitute the largest enfranchised diaspora in the world.

What carries the argument

The remote Internet voting system for Pakistan's overseas citizens, which serves as the vehicle for examining motivations, vulnerabilities, and materiality issues in the context of potential large-scale deployment.

If this is right

  • If deployed in the next general elections, it would enfranchise the largest diaspora in the world.
  • The reported vulnerabilities must be addressed to ensure secure elections.
  • New materiality issues require further examination before implementation.
  • Directions for future research are identified to improve such systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar systems in other countries with large diasporas could face comparable challenges.
  • Materiality concerns might influence public trust in digital voting beyond this case.
  • Independent verification of the trial results would strengthen the findings on vulnerabilities.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the reported details about the system, its vulnerabilities, and the outcomes of the trials are accurate and representative without independent verification.

What would settle it

An independent audit or replication of the trials that reveals different vulnerabilities or no major issues with the system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07765 by Hina Binte Haq, Ronan McDermott, Syed Taha Ali.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: i-Voting: System Architecture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: iVoting: Interface The IVTF therefore strongly argued against the deployment of i-Voting in the upcoming General Elections of 2018. Their report stated that this would be “a hasty step with grave consequences” The report also emphasized that “many of these security vulnerabilities are not specific to iVOTE [sic] but are inherent to this particular model of Internet voting systems” [23]. The report also mad… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Voter Registration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Vote Casting The ECP consequently amended the Election Rules to accommodate the requirements of Internet voting. NADRA implemented certain technical recom￾mendations of the IVTF6 and trained ECP officials to administer the system. The ECP launched a media campaign for voter awareness and published detailed guides and video tutorials for the i-Voting system. A dedicated support center was also set up to pro… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Twitter users Posting Screenshot of Vote 6.1 Ballot Secrecy and Voter Coercion In delivering one right (the right of overseas Pakistanis to vote), the solution risks undermining another (the right to secrecy). The i-Voting system does not comply with Article 226 of the Constitution of Pakistan [27] and the Elections Act 2017, Section 8110 [28], that impose ballot secrecy. Being a remote voting modality, th… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Pakistan recently conducted small-scale trials of a remote Internet voting system for overseas citizens. In this contribution, we report on the experience: we document the unique combination of sociopolitical, legal, and institutional factors motivating this exercise. We describe the system and it's reported vulnerabilities, and we also highlight new issues pertaining to materiality. If this system is deployed in the next general elections, as seems likely, this development would constitute the largest enfranchised diaspora in the world. Our goal in this paper, therefore, is to provide comprehensive insight into Pakistan's experiment with Internet voting, emphasize outstanding challenges, and identify directions for future research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a descriptive case study reporting on Pakistan's small-scale trials of a remote Internet voting system for overseas citizens. It documents the sociopolitical, legal, and institutional motivating factors, describes the system along with its reported vulnerabilities, highlights new issues related to materiality, and states that deployment in the next general elections (described as seeming likely) would create the largest enfranchised diaspora in the world. The goal is to provide insight into the experiment, emphasize challenges, and suggest future research directions.

Significance. If the reported details prove accurate, the paper offers a timely documentation of a real-world e-voting trial in a distinctive national context, including materiality considerations not previously emphasized. This could inform policy discussions on remote voting for diasporas. However, the forward-looking claim about global scale lacks supporting evidence, limiting the work's ability to establish broader significance without additional comparative analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that deployment 'would constitute the largest enfranchised diaspora in the world' is presented without any comparative data on overseas population sizes, citations to diaspora statistics (e.g., for India, Mexico, or other nations), or evidence supporting the 'as seems likely' prediction of deployment in the next general elections. This assertion is central to the paper's stated significance but functions as an unsupported external assumption rather than a derived result.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the contribution rests on the assumption that the documented system details, vulnerabilities, and trial outcomes are accurate and representative, yet the text provides no independent verification, error analysis, or cross-checks against other deployments. This assumption is load-bearing for treating the manuscript as a reliable case study.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'it's reported vulnerabilities' contains a grammatical error and should read 'its reported vulnerabilities'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that deployment 'would constitute the largest enfranchised diaspora in the world' is presented without any comparative data on overseas population sizes, citations to diaspora statistics (e.g., for India, Mexico, or other nations), or evidence supporting the 'as seems likely' prediction of deployment in the next general elections. This assertion is central to the paper's stated significance but functions as an unsupported external assumption rather than a derived result.

    Authors: We agree that the forward-looking claim in the abstract would benefit from additional support or qualification to avoid appearing as an unsupported assertion. In the revised version we will either insert brief comparative references to overseas population sizes for other large diasporas (with appropriate citations) or revise the wording to present the statement as a contextual observation rather than a central claim, while retaining the paper's focus on the Pakistani case. The 'as seems likely' phrasing will also be softened or removed if supporting political context from the body cannot be succinctly referenced in the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the contribution rests on the assumption that the documented system details, vulnerabilities, and trial outcomes are accurate and representative, yet the text provides no independent verification, error analysis, or cross-checks against other deployments. This assumption is load-bearing for treating the manuscript as a reliable case study.

    Authors: The manuscript is explicitly framed as a descriptive case study that reports on publicly documented trials, official statements, and reported vulnerabilities rather than conducting original technical validation. We will add a short clarification in the introduction and methods section specifying the sources (government announcements, public reports, and secondary analyses) on which the description relies. Because the paper's contribution centers on sociopolitical context, materiality issues, and research directions rather than independent security auditing, we do not intend to add error analysis or cross-deployment comparisons, which would exceed the stated scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: factual report on external trial with no derivations or self-referential predictions.

full rationale

The paper is a descriptive account of a real-world internet voting trial in Pakistan, documenting sociopolitical factors, system details, and vulnerabilities. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, derivations, or internal predictions that reduce to inputs by construction. The conditional statement about potential future deployment and diaspora size is presented as an external observation rather than a derived result from any model or self-citation chain. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems appear. The work is self-contained as journalism-style documentation of an independent event.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a descriptive case study report rather than a theoretical or quantitative paper. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced. The primary reliance is on the accuracy of external trial reports.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The vulnerabilities and system details reported from the trials are accurate and complete.
    The paper's insights and recommendations depend on the fidelity of the trial reports and authors' access to information without independent verification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5624 in / 1274 out tokens · 29590 ms · 2026-05-24T23:17:50.686357+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pakistan as a return migrant destination

    PRIO. Pakistan as a return migrant destination. https://opf.org.pk/media/ 1410/pakistan-as-a-return-migration-destination.pdf , 2015

  2. [2]

    Final List of Constituencies (Final Delimitation 2018)

    ECP. Final List of Constituencies (Final Delimitation 2018). https://www.ecp. gov.pk/frmGenericPage.aspx?PageID=3100

  3. [3]

    India tops labour export, Pakistan ranks 6th

    Riaz Haq. India tops labour export, Pakistan ranks 6th. https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/opinion/blog/ international-migrants-day-india-tops-labor-export-pakistan-ranks-6th/ , December 2016

  4. [4]

    Pakistan remittances may hit $22 billion in 2018-19

    Muzaffar Rizvi. Pakistan remittances may hit $22 billion in 2018-19. https:// www.khaleejtimes.com/business/economy/Pakistan-remittances-may-hit-\ $22-billion-in-2018-19- , October 2018

  5. [5]

    https: //pakistanconstitutionlaw.com/article-17-freedom-of-association/ , 1973

    Article: 17 Freedom of association — The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973. https: //pakistanconstitutionlaw.com/article-17-freedom-of-association/ , 1973

  6. [7]

    Arranging Voting by Overseas Pakistanis

    Ahmed Bilal Mehboob. Arranging Voting by Overseas Pakistanis. https://pildat.org/blog/ arranging-voting-by-overseas-pakistanis-when-and-whose-job-is-it-2 , April 2018. Pakistan’s Internet Voting Experiment 15

  7. [8]

    http://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/ web/user_files/File/Const.P.39and90of2011-dt-3-5-2013.pdf

    Const.p.39and90of2011-dt-3-5-2013. http://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/ web/user_files/File/Const.P.39and90of2011-dt-3-5-2013.pdf

  8. [9]

    Ihc refers matter to ECP

    Shahid Rao. Ihc refers matter to ECP. https://www.pakistanpressfoundation. org/ihc-refers-matter-ecp/ , December 2014

  9. [10]

    Const.p. 74 2015. http://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/web/user_files/File/ ConstP.\_74\_2015.pdf

  10. [11]

    Election preparations: Overseas Pakistanis un- likely to vote in polls

    Qaiser Butt. Election preparations: Overseas Pakistanis un- likely to vote in polls. https://tribune.com.pk/story/435109/ election-preparations-overseas-pakistanis-unlikely-to-vote-in-polls/ , Sept 2012

  11. [12]

    https://ecp.gov.pk/documents/ ivotingreport.pdf, October 2018

    Report on I/-Voting Pilot Test. https://ecp.gov.pk/documents/ ivotingreport.pdf, October 2018

  12. [13]

    Voting from abroad

    Ahmed Bilal Mehboob. Voting from abroad. https://www.dawn.com/news/ 1335670, May 2017

  13. [14]

    Apathy of electoral reform

    Furkan Ali. Apathy of electoral reform. https://www.dawn.com/news/1258537, May 2016

  14. [15]

    SC accepts 16 petitions regarding overseas Pakistanis

    Haseeb Bhatti. SC accepts 16 petitions regarding overseas Pakistanis. https: //www.dawn.com/news/1380952, January 2018

  15. [16]

    CJP asks whether parliament will give voting rights to overseas Pakistanis

    Correspondent. CJP asks whether parliament will give voting rights to overseas Pakistanis. http://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/ 423769-CJP-Justice-Saqib-Nisar-parliament-voting-rights-overseas-Pakistanis , January 2018

  16. [17]

    NADRA to develop Internet voting sys- tem for expats

    Monitoring Report. NADRA to develop Internet voting sys- tem for expats. https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/01/25/ nadra-to-develop-internet-voting-system-for-expats-report/ , January 2018

  17. [18]

    Overseas Pakistanis suffrage: SC orders NADRA to de- velop voting software in 10-weeks

    Hasnaat Malik. Overseas Pakistanis suffrage: SC orders NADRA to de- velop voting software in 10-weeks. https://tribune.com.pk/story/1621120/ 1-software-overseas-pakistanis-vote-elections-will-ready-april-nadra-tells-cjp/ , January 2018

  18. [19]

    SC hears constitution petitions regarding right of vote to overseas Pakistanis in general elections

    Supreme Court Press Release. SC hears constitution petitions regarding right of vote to overseas Pakistanis in general elections. http://www.supremecourt.gov. pk/web/user_files/File/Press_Release_47_2018.pdf

  19. [20]

    https://www.overseasvoting.gov.pk/i-voting/ en-guide.pdf

    iVoting- Registration Closed. https://www.overseasvoting.gov.pk/i-voting/ en-guide.pdf

  20. [21]

    https://ecp.gov.pk/TOR\%20and\%20ECP\%20order.pdf, April 2018

    TOR and ECP order. https://ecp.gov.pk/TOR\%20and\%20ECP\%20order.pdf, April 2018

  21. [22]

    Trust im- plications of DDoS protection in online elections

    Chris Culnane, Mark Eldridge, Aleksander Essex, and Vanessa Teague. Trust im- plications of DDoS protection in online elections. In International Joint Conference on Electronic Voting , pages 127–145. Springer, 2017

  22. [23]

    https://www.ecp.gov.pk/ivoting/IVTF\ %20Report\%20Executive\%20Version\%201.\%20Final.pdf, May 2018

    Ivtf Report Executive Version. https://www.ecp.gov.pk/ivoting/IVTF\ %20Report\%20Executive\%20Version\%201.\%20Final.pdf, May 2018

  23. [24]

    By-Election Report - PP-168 Lahore

    FAFEN. By-Election Report - PP-168 Lahore. http://fafen.org/wp-content/ uploads/2018/12/By-Election-Report-PP-168-Lahore-XXV.pdf , Dec 2018

  24. [25]

    PTI defeats PML-N by close margin in Lahore’s PP-168 by-poll

    Rana Bilal. PTI defeats PML-N by close margin in Lahore’s PP-168 by-poll. https://www.dawn.com/news/1451213, December 2018

  25. [26]

    http://fafen

    General Election Observation 2018: Key Findings and Analysis. http://fafen. org/fafen-general-election-observation-2018-result-assessment-and-analysis/

  26. [27]

    http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/constitution/part8.ch2

    Constitution of Pakistan, part VIII: Chapter 2: Electoral Laws and Conduct of Elections. http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/constitution/part8.ch2. html. 16 HB Haq, R McDermott et al

  27. [28]

    http://www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1506961151_ 781.pdf

    Elections act, 2017. http://www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1506961151_ 781.pdf

  28. [29]

    Internet Voting leaves out a Cornerstone of Democ- racy: The Secret Ballot

    Mike Orcutt. Internet Voting leaves out a Cornerstone of Democ- racy: The Secret Ballot. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602204/ internet-voting-leaves-out-a-cornerstone-of-democracy-the-secret-ballot/ , August 2016

  29. [30]

    2.43 million Pakistanis working in Europe

    Qadeer Tanoli. 2.43 million Pakistanis working in Europe. https://tribune.com.pk/story/1391730/ overseas-workforce-2-43-million-pakistanis-working-europe/ , April 2017

  30. [31]

    Employer-Migrant Worker Relationships in the Middle East

    ILO. Employer-Migrant Worker Relationships in the Middle East. https://www. ilo.org/beirut/publications/WCMS_552697/lang--en/index.htm, May 2017

  31. [32]

    https://www.overseasvoting.gov.pk/i-voting/ index.html

    i-Voting - Registration Closed. https://www.overseasvoting.gov.pk/i-voting/ index.html

  32. [33]

    Scorecard on Perceptions of Pre-poll Fair- ness

    PILDAT. Scorecard on Perceptions of Pre-poll Fair- ness. https://pildat.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ PILDATScorecardonPerceptionofPre-PollFairness_May-2018.pdf, May 2018

  33. [34]

    Iftikhar A. Khan. No haste in introducing i-voting for expats. https://epaper. dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=12_09_2018_005_008, Sept 2018

  34. [35]

    i-Voting being pushed to rig polls, says raza rabbani

    Staff Reporter. i-Voting being pushed to rig polls, says raza rabbani. https://www.dawn.com/news/1431256/ i-voting-being-pushed-to-rig-polls-says-raza-rabbani , Sept 2018

  35. [36]

    CDA promises proper waste disposal to Supreme Court

    Ikram Junaidi. CDA promises proper waste disposal to Supreme Court. https: //www.dawn.com/news/1082080, Jan 2014

  36. [37]

    Judicial Activism Shaping the Future of Pakistan

    Syeda Saima Shabbir. Judicial Activism Shaping the Future of Pakistan. https: //ssrn.com/abstract=2209067, January 2013

  37. [38]

    http:// www.supremecourt.gov.pk/DamFund/index.html

    Supreme Court of Pakistan Diamer Basha and Mohmand Dam Fund. http:// www.supremecourt.gov.pk/DamFund/index.html

  38. [39]

    Risky voting

    Waqas Younis. Risky voting. https://www.dawn.com/news/1436323, October 2018

  39. [40]

    Electronic Voting not appropriate for Pakistan, senate body told

    Ikram Junaidi. Electronic Voting not appropriate for Pakistan, senate body told. https://www.dawn.com/news/1481153, May 2019