REVIEW 2 cited by
Parametrized modified gravity constraints after Planck
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Parametrized modified gravity constraints after Planck
read the original abstract
We constrain $f(R)$ and chameleon-type modified gravity in the framework of the Berstchinger-Zukin parametrization using the recent released Planck data, including both CMB temperature power spectrum and lensing potential power spectrum. Some other external data sets are included, such as BAO measurements from the 6dFGS, SDSS DR7 and BOSS DR9 surveys, HST $H_0$ measurement and supernovae from Union2.1 compilation. We also use WMAP9yr data for consistency check and comparison. For $f(R)$ gravity, WMAP9yr results can only give quite a loose constraint on the modified gravity parameter $B_0$, which is related to the present value of the Compton wavelength of the extra scalar degree of freedom, $B_0<3.37$ at $95\% {\rm C.L.}$ We demonstrate that this constraint mainly comes from the late ISW effect. With only Planck CMB temperature power-spectrum data, we can improve the WMAP9yr result by a factor $3.7$ ($B_0<0.91$ at $95\% {\rm C.L.}$). If the Planck lensing potential power-spectrum data are also taken into account, the constraint can be further strenghtened by a factor $5.1$ ($B_0<0.18$ at $95\% {\rm C.L.}$). This major improvement mainly comes from the small-scale lensing signal. Furthermore, BAO, HST and supernovae data could slightly improve the $B_0$ bound ($B_0<0.12$ at $95\% {\rm C.L.}$).For the chameleon-type model, we find that the data set which we used cannot constrain the Compton wavelength $B_0$ and the potential index $s$ of chameleon field, but can give a tight constraint on the parameter $\beta_1=1.043^{+0.163}_{-0.104}$ at $95\% {\rm C.L.}$ ($\beta_1=1$ in general relativity), which accounts for the non-minimal coupling between the chameleon field and the matter component. In addition, we find that both modified gravity models we considered favor a relatively higher Hubble parameter than the concordance LCDM model in general relativity.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Galaxy formation in modified gravity -- II. galaxy halo connection and assembly bias
Simulations in f(R) gravity show that environment density in the HOD model reduces assembly bias effects to 2-3% at z≲0.5 in both ΛCDM and modified gravity.
-
Forecast on $f(R)$ Gravity with HI 21cm Intensity Mapping Surveys
Fisher forecasts show BINGO and SKA1-MID 21-cm intensity mapping, combined with Planck priors, could constrain the f(R) gravity parameter B0 down to ~10⁻⁶–10⁻⁸.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.