Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

DisasterQA: A Benchmark for Assessing the performance of LLMs in Disaster Response

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.20707 v1 pith:37X7CDK4 submitted 2024-10-09 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsdisasterresponsebenchmarkdisasterqadisastersknowledgemaking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Disasters can result in the deaths of many, making quick response times vital. Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as valuable in the field. LLMs can be used to process vast amounts of textual information quickly providing situational context during a disaster. However, the question remains whether LLMs should be used for advice and decision making in a disaster. To evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in disaster response knowledge, we introduce a benchmark: DisasterQA created from six online sources. The benchmark covers a wide range of disaster response topics. We evaluated five LLMs each with four different prompting methods on our benchmark, measuring both accuracy and confidence levels through Logprobs. The results indicate that LLMs require improvement on disaster response knowledge. We hope that this benchmark pushes forth further development of LLMs in disaster response, ultimately enabling these models to work alongside. emergency managers in disasters.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DisasterBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for UAV-Based Disaster Response in Complex Environments

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DisasterBench is a new multi-stage multimodal reasoning benchmark for UAV disaster response with 14 scenes and 9 tasks; the accompanying 2B DisasterVL model outperforms open-source MLLMs and approaches GPT-4o efficiency.

  2. RAPID: A Reproducible Multi-Agent Pipeline for Interpretable Disaster Damage Assessment from Satellite and Street-View Imagery

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RAPID is a multi-agent pipeline for zero-shot interpretable damage assessment and reporting from cross-view satellite and street-view imagery across multiple disaster types.

  3. A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey categorizing scaling in LLM reasoning across input size, steps, rounds, training, and future directions, noting that scaling can negatively affect performance.

Pith tools