Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 40 references

Revisit of discrete energy bands in Galilean moon's footprint tails: remote signals of particle absorption

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Discrete energy bands in Jupiter's moon flux tubes are absorption gaps, not resonances.

desk verdict A plausible alternative to bounce resonance for the discrete bands, but the quantitative link to moon-spacecraft separation is not yet validated; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11905 v1 pith:3AVRZFX3 submitted 2024-11-16 astro-ph.EP physics.space-ph

Fan Yang , Xuzhi-Zhou , Ying Liu , Yi-Xin Sun , Ze-Fan Yin , Yi-Xin Hao , Zhi-Yang Liu , Michel Blanc
show 6 more authors
Jiu-Tong Zhao Dong-Wen He Ya-Ze Wu Shan Wang Chao Yue Qiu-Gang Zong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPphysics.space-ph
keywords GalileanmoonsJunodiscreteenergybandsparticleabsorptionbounceresonancemicrosignaturescorotationmoon-plasmainteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the discrete, equally spaced energy bands observed by the Juno spacecraft in the flux tubes of Jupiter's Galilean moons are not wave-particle resonance signatures but absorption gaps created when bouncing, eastward-drifting particles encounter the moon. It shows that the previously proposed bounce-resonance explanation predicts a harmonic velocity sequence, which contradicts the observed arithmetic (equally spaced) sequence. The new model ties absorption to the number of quarter-bounce cycles completed during the drift from the moon to the spacecraft, predicting bands at velocities $v_n = n L_s(\Omega_c - \Omega_m)/\Delta\phi$. If correct, the observed band spacing directly encodes the moon-spacecraft longitudinal separation, giving a new tool for evaluating Jovian magnetospheric models.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quarter-bounce absorption condition, $\Delta T/\tau_b = (2k-1)/4$: a particle is absorbed if, while drifting from the moon-connecting flux tube to the spacecraft, it completes an odd number of quarter bounce cycles. With bounce period $\tau_b = L_s/v$ and drift time $\Delta T = \Delta\phi/(\Omega_c - \Omega_m)$, this condition becomes the velocity ladder $v_n = n L_s(\Omega_c - \Omega_m)/\Delta\phi$ for $n = 1/4, 3/4, 5/4, \dots$, with band separation $\delta v = L_s(\Omega_c - \Omega_m)/(2\Delta\phi)$. The moon's finite radius sets the band width, which grows with band index until adjacent bands overlap and the discrete structure disappears.

What would settle it

Compute the moon-spacecraft longitudinal separation $\Delta\phi$ from the Juno trajectory and moon ephemeris, independent of field-line tracing, and check whether the observed band spacing satisfies $\delta v = L_s(\Omega_c - \Omega_m)/(2\Delta\phi)$ with $\Omega_c = 0.633$ rad/h and a modeled $L_s$; a disagreement beyond the combined uncertainties would falsify the absorption scenario as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the banded structures in the Juno particle spectra are remote absorption signals: particles whose drift time from the moon to the spacecraft equals an odd multiple of a quarter bounce period are absorbed by the moon, leaving discrete dips in an otherwise enhanced flux. This yields discrete velocities equally spaced by $\delta v = L_s(\Omega_c - \Omega_m)/(2\Delta\phi)$, which the model shows are consistent with the Io and Europa events (proton spacing ~540 km/s, electron spacing ~10,000 km/s). The same mechanism explains why ion and electron bands are never seen together, how band widths grow and merge at high velocities, and why the observed remnant flux profiles are smooth rather than sharp-edged.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that all particles of interest drift eastward at exactly Jupiter's rigid corotation speed, independent of energy, species, and local time, with negligible gradient-curvature drift and convection electric field; if the true drift speed differs, every inferred separation and predicted band spacing is biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The inferred moon-spacecraft longitudinal separation from band spacing can be compared with field-line tracing in magnetospheric models, offering a new observable for testing Jovian field models.
  • Because the spacing is independent of particle species but the Juno ion and electron instruments cover disjoint velocity ranges, the model explains why banded ion and electron features are never observed in the same event.
  • At high velocities the absorption bands widen and overlap, so the discrete structure should vanish; the model therefore unifies the discrete bands with classical microsignatures, which are the overlapping limit.
  • The width of each band grows linearly with band index, so the discrete pattern should progressively smear out toward higher velocities, as seen in the Europa event above roughly 50,000 km/s.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this interpretation is correct, the same absorption mechanism should produce discrete velocity bands in flux-tube crossings of Ganymede and Callisto, and the predicted spacing should scale with their orbital angular speeds and local field geometry; Juno data from those crossings would provide a direct test.
  • The systematic offset in the paper's Figure 4 between field-line-traced and Fourier-inferred separations may indicate a modest sub-corotation of the plasma or a systematic error in the magnetic field models; combining this method with plasma measurements could map corotation lag as a function of distance.
  • Pitch-angle-resolved observations should show absorption bands shifting in velocity with pitch angle, following the $L_s(\alpha_{\mathrm{eq}})$ dependence; a clear absence of this shift would falsify the model.
  • Equations (5)--(8) are parameter-free once the geometry and field model are fixed, so applying them to a large event list with accurate ephemeris would provide a sharp test of both the absorption scenario and the assumed rigid corotation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reinterprets Juno observations of discrete energy bands in particle fluxes during flux-tube crossings of the Galilean moons. The authors argue that the arithmetic spacing of the bands in particle speed is inconsistent with the bounce-resonance explanation of Sarkango et al. (2024), and instead propose that the bands are absorption gaps produced when bouncing and eastward-drifting particles encounter the moon. From a guiding-center model they derive Eq. (5), v_n = n L_s (Omega_c - Omega_m)/Delta_phi, predicting equally spaced absorption velocities, and Eq. (6) for the velocity separation delta_v. They apply a discrete Fourier transform to the two headline events (Io proton event and Europa electron event), infer Delta_phi from the observed delta_v, and compare Delta_phi with field-line tracing in a 13-event statistical sample (Figure 4).

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the paper would overturn the resonance-based explanation of a recently reported Juno phenomenon and would provide a new remote-sensing probe of Jovian magnetospheric models. The manuscript has clear strengths: the analytic derivation is transparent, the arithmetic-versus-harmonic sequence argument against bounce resonance is logically sound, and the model makes falsifiable predictions (equally spaced velocities, velocity-dependent band widths, and a species-independent delta_v). The main weakness is that the quantitative link between delta_v and Delta_phi is not independently validated for the two clearest events, and the acknowledged corotation uncertainty is not quantified. The paper is a plausible hypothesis paper whose central claim needs stronger validation before it can support the proposed application to magnetospheric model evaluation.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (6) and Section 2] The inferred Delta_phi values of 14.5 degrees (Io) and 1.5 degrees (Europa), derived from delta_v via Eq. (6), differ from the field-line-tracing estimates of approximately 36 degrees and 13 degrees by factors of roughly 2.5 and 8.7. Because sub-corotation reduces (Omega_c - Omega_m), a realistic 10-20 percent departure from rigid corotation would make the inferred Delta_phi even smaller, so the corotation caveat acknowledged in Section 4 cannot explain the discrepancy. The central claim that delta_v directly encodes the moon-spacecraft longitudinal separation therefore rests on an unvalidated quantitative relation for the two headline events; the manuscript needs a quantitative uncertainty analysis or an independent validation of Delta_phi before this claim can be considered established.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (2) vs. Eq. (6)] The path length L_s entering Eqs. (5) and (6) is computed with the Hamlin et al. (1961) dipole approximation, whereas the tracing-based Delta_phi values used in Figure 4 are obtained with the JRM33+Con2020 field model. Since delta_v is proportional to L_s and the inferred Delta_phi is proportional to L_s/delta_v, any error in the dipole approximation for L_s propagates directly into the inferred Delta_phi. The manuscript does not quantify the difference between L_s from the dipole approximation and the value consistent with the field model, so part of the discrepancy identified in the previous comment may be an artifact of inconsistent field descriptions.
  3. [Section 3, Eq. (3)] The model assumes that all particles drift eastward at the rigid corotation speed Omega_c = 0.633 rad/h, independent of energy, species, and local time. Section 4 notes that the Jovian magnetosphere deviates from rigid corotation near the Io plasma torus, but it gives no quantitative bound. Because Eq. (3) determines the time interval Delta_T over which the bounce-phase quantization is applied, a biased drift speed biases every predicted v_n and delta_v. The authors should estimate the plausible range of Omega_c - Omega_m along the relevant field lines and propagate this range into the predictions in Figures 3 and 4.
  4. [Section 3, Figure 4 and Table S1] The 13-event comparison in Figure 4 is the only independent test of the model, but the two headline events are outliers and the overall distribution shows a systematic offset rather than scatter about the line of equality. No correlation coefficient, RMS deviation, or other statistical characterization is provided, and the uncertainties on both axes are not specified. A quantitative measure of agreement, including a discussion of the two outliers, is needed to support the statement that 'most of the data points are relatively close to the line of equality'.
  5. [Section 3, Figure 3] The DFT-derived values of delta_v, approximately 540 km/s for the Io proton event and 10,000 km/s for the Europa electron event, are presented without uncertainty estimates. The finite velocity range of the measurements, the background subtraction through the kappa-distribution fit, and spectral leakage could all bias the peak frequency. The manuscript should report the spectral resolution, the number of discernible bands used, and the robustness of the DFT peak before Eq. (6) is applied.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4] There is a typo in the opening sentence: 'Gailean moons' should be 'Galilean moons'.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (7)] The symbol M in the denominator Rm/(M RJ) is not defined in the text; if it denotes the M-shell value of the moon's orbital distance, this should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Section 3, Eqs. (4)-(5)] The symbol n is used both for the quarter-bounce phase number (n = (2k-1)/4) and as the index in the discrete velocity sequence v_n; renaming one of these would avoid confusion.
  4. [Section 4] The statement that absorption bands shift to lower energies at pitch angles below 90 degrees and to higher energies at pitch angles above 90 degrees is not derived; from Eq. (2), L_s increases on both sides of 90 degrees, so the direction of the shift needs clarification or a derivation.
  5. [Section 3, Figure 4] The axis labels and event numbers in Figure 4 are difficult to read in the manuscript version; please enlarge the fonts and clarify the units.
  6. [Section 2] The phrase 'mass-charge ratio' should be 'mass-to-charge ratio'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The reported reproduction of equally spaced absorption bands in the two headline events is partly circular: Δφ is solved from the measured δv via Eq. (6), then reused in Eq. (5) to 'predict' the same δv-spaced comb.

  1. self definitional [Section 3, paragraph applying Equations (5), (6), and (8) to the Io and Europa events, around Figure 3]
    "The δv values in these two events can be substituted into Equation (6) to derive the longitudinal differences, Δφ = 14.5◦ and 1.5◦, respectively, between Juno and the corresponding moons. These values can be further substituted into Equations (5) and (8) to derive the velocities and widths of the absorption bands in these two events, shown in Figures 3c1 and 3c2 as the gray areas. ... They appear to match the observations (Figures 3a1 and 3a2) quite well"

    Equation (6) defines δv = L_s(Ω_c − Ω_m)/(2Δφ). The observed δv from the discrete Fourier transform is inserted into Eq. (6) to solve for Δφ, and the same Δφ is then substituted into Eq. (5), v_n = n L_s(Ω_c − Ω_m)/Δφ, to 'derive' the absorption-band velocities. With the quantized values n = (2k−1)/4, this gives v_n = (2k−1)δv/2, i.e., a comb whose spacing is exactly the measured δv. The claimed agreement of the gray bands with the observed equally spaced bands is therefore forced by construction rather than being an independent test of Eq. (5). The width estimate in Eq. (8) also inherits the same fitted Δφ.

full rationale

The derivation leading to Eq. (5) is self-contained: the absorption geometry and the discrete condition ΔT/τ_b = (2k−1)/4 genuinely produce equally spaced velocity bands, and the paper gives an independent argument that the bounce-resonance alternative predicts a harmonic, not arithmetic, sequence. However, the detailed validation for the Io and Europa events is circular in the narrow but important sense that the measured band spacing δv is first used, via Eq. (6), to infer Δφ, and the same Δφ is then inserted into Eq. (5) to regenerate the band positions and spacing. Because Eq. (5) with n = (2k−1)/4 reduces algebraically to v_n = (2k−1)δv/2 once Δφ is eliminated, the 'match' in Figures 3c1 and 3c2 is not an independent test of the predicted spacing. The paper itself notes that the inferred Δφ values (14.5° and 1.5°) disagree strongly with field-line tracing (≈36° and ≈13°), and it responds by questioning the field model rather than the fitted parameter; the acknowledged sub-corotation near Io would make the inferred Δφ even smaller, so the discrepancy is not explained by that stated caveat. The 13-event comparison in Figure 4 is a genuine external anchor, but the two clearest events are the outliers, no quantitative uncertainty or scatter analysis is supplied, and the L_s estimate uses a dipole approximation while the field-line tracing uses JRM33+Con2020, adding an internal inconsistency. These issues are correctness risks; the circularity score is driven specifically by the fitted-input-called-prediction reduction in Eqs. (5)-(6). Because the model retains independent phase, width-growth, and statistical content, the partial-circularity level is 6 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's central fitted quantity is the longitudinal separation Delta_phi, inferred from the observed band spacing. The main physical assumptions are corotation drift dominance, mirror-point geometry at Juno, the Hamlin dipole bounce integral, and a kappa background. All are stated in the text, and the paper itself flags the corotation deviation as a concern. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Moon-spacecraft longitudinal separation Delta_phi = 14.5 deg for Io event, 1.5 deg for Europa event, other values in Table S1
    Inferred by inserting the observed band spacing delta_v into Equation (6). This is the key fitted quantity used to compare with field-line tracing in Figure 4.
  • Band spacing delta_v from DFT peak = ~540 km/s (Io protons), ~10,000 km/s (Europa electrons)
    Measured from the remnant flux via a discrete Fourier transform; used to derive Delta_phi.
  • Kappa distribution fit parameters for background flux = Not reported in text
    Used to define the remnant flux; the choice of background fit affects the periodic residual that is then Fourier analyzed.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Guiding-center approximation with separable drift and bounce motion
    Standard for magnetospheric particle dynamics; invoked implicitly in Section 3.
  • domain assumption Corotation drift dominates for M-shells below 15, with all particles at the same angular speed Omega_c = 0.633 rad/h
    Section 3, Equation (3). Violated by subcorotation near the Io torus and by MeV-energy gradient-curvature drift, as the paper itself notes.
  • domain assumption Juno is located at the mirror point of particles with 90 deg pitch angle at the spacecraft
    Section 3, used to derive the quarter-bounce condition in Equation (4).
  • domain assumption Bounce period follows tau_b = L_s / v with L_s from the Hamlin dipole approximation (Equation 2)
    Section 3; the dipole formula may be inaccurate in Jupiter's magnetodisc, affecting the predicted band spacing.
  • domain assumption Moon acts as a point absorber at the magnetic equator, with finite radius used only for band width
    Section 3, Equations (7)-(8); neglects the Alfven wing interaction region which could absorb particles over a larger area.
  • domain assumption Background flux follows a kappa distribution
    Section 2, used to define remnant flux; the interpretation of bands as gaps depends on this background choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisit of discrete energy bands in Galilean moon's footprint tails: remote signals of particle absorption." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3AVRZFX3

@misc{pith2026241111905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisit of discrete energy bands in Galilean moon's footprint tails: remote signals of particle absorption},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3AVRZFX3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11905}
}
read the original abstract

Recent observations from the Juno spacecraft during its transit over flux tubes of the Galilean moons have identified sharp enhancements of particle fluxes at discrete energies. These banded structures have been suspected to originate from a bounce resonance between particles and standing Alfven waves generated by the moon-magnetospheric interaction. Here, we show that predictions from the above hypothesis are inconsistent with the observations, and propose an alternative interpretation that the banded structures are remote signals of particle absorption at the moons. In this scenario, whether a particle would encounter the moon before reaching Juno depends on the number of bounce cycles it experiences within a fixed section of drift motion determined by moon-spacecraft longitudinal separation. Therefore, the absorption bands are expected to appear at discrete, equally-spaced velocities consistent with the observations. This finding improves our understanding of moon-plasma interactions and provides a potential way to evaluate the Jovian magnetospheric models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11905 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Juno spacecraft observations of discrete energy bands in two typical events pre￾viously reported in Sarkango et al. (2024). (upper panels) An Io flux tube crossing event at 23:10:45, 2019 DOY 307. (a1-c1) The energy spectra of ion fluxes, with M/q of 1, 2-5, and >5, respectively. (d1) The energy spectrum of electron fluxes. (e1) The proton energy flux (j) as a function of proton speed, extracted from the observation… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of discrete energy bands formed by absorption of charged particles at Galilean moons. (a-e) The bounce and drift trajectories of particles at five different energies. These sample particles are chosen to experience multiple (1 to 5) quarters of bounce cycles as they drift from the moon-connecting flux tube to the Juno spacecraft. The absorption occurs in panels a, c, and e. The dashed arrows r… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The extraction of information, based on the hypothesis of absorption signals, from Juno observations during the Io and Europa crossing events. (a1) Remnant proton fluxes ob￾served by Juno during its Io flux tube crossing, a replica of Figure 1e1. (b1) A discrete Fourier transform of the remnant fluxes, which shows a distinct peak at the “frequency” of ∼ 540 km/s. An inverse Fourier transform of the peak “frequency” … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Statistics of ∆φ distributions based on the 13 banded events listed in Table S1. The x-axis of each data point represents the ∆φ value determined from field line tracing, and the y-axis represents the estimated ∆φ from inter-band velocity separation (based on Equation …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , Neubauer, F M

    acunaStandingAlfvenWave1981 APACrefauthors Acu \ n a, M H. , Neubauer, F M. \ Ness, N F. APACrefauthors \ 1981 . Standing Alfv \'e n Wave Current System at Io : Voyager 1 Observations Standing Alfv \'e n wave current system at Io : Voyager 1 observations . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 86 A10 8513--8521 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA086iA10p...

    doi:10.1029/ja086ia10p08513 1981

  2. [2]

    , Gladstone, G R

    allegriniFirstReportElectron2020 APACrefauthors Allegrini, F. , Gladstone, G R. , Hue, V. , Clark, G. , Szalay, J R. , Kurth, W S. Wilson, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . First Report of Electron Measurements During a Europa Footprint Tail Crossing by Juno First Report of Electron Measurements During a Europa Footprint Tail Crossing by Juno . Geophysical Res...

    work page doi:10.1029/2020gl089732 2020

  3. [3]

    , Saur, J

    allegriniElectronBeamsEuropa2024 APACrefauthors Allegrini, F. , Saur, J. , Szalay, J R. , Ebert, R W. , Kurth, W S. , Cervantes, S. Wilson, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Electron Beams at Europa Electron Beams at Europa . Geophysical Research Letters 51 13 e2024GL108422 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2024GL108422 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1029/2024gl108422 2024

  4. [4]

    \ Kivelson, M G

    barbosa.jovianefield1983 APACrefauthors Barbosa, D D. \ Kivelson, M G. APACrefauthors \ 1983 . Dawn-dusk electric field asymmetry of the Io plasma torus Dawn-dusk electric field asymmetry of the io plasma torus . Geophysical Research Letters 10 3 210-213 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/GL010i003p00210 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1029/gl010i003p00210 1983

  5. [5]

    APACrefauthors \ 1994

    Brown.massloading1994 APACrefauthors Brown, M E. APACrefauthors \ 1994 . Observation of mass loading in the Io plasma torus Observation of mass loading in the io plasma torus . Geophysical Research Letters 21 10 847-850 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00564 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1029/94gl00564 1994

  6. [6]

    , Mauk, B H

    clarkEnergeticProtonAcceleration2020 APACrefauthors Clark, G. , Mauk, B H. , Kollmann, P. , Szalay, J R. , Sulaiman, A H. , Gershman, D J. Westlake, J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Energetic Proton Acceleration Associated With Io 's Footprint Tail Energetic Proton Acceleration Associated With Io 's Footprint Tail . Geophysical Research Letters 47 24 e2020GL090...

    work page doi:10.1029/2020gl090839 2020

  7. [7]

    , Timmins, S

    connerneyJovianMagnetodiscModel2020 APACrefauthors Connerney, J E P. , Timmins, S. , Herceg, M. \ Joergensen, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . A Jovian Magnetodisc Model for the Juno Era A Jovian Magnetodisc Model for the Juno Era . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 125 10 e2020JA028138 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2020JA028138 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1029/2020ja028138 2020

  8. [8]

    , Timmins, S

    connerneyNewModelJupiter2022 APACrefauthors Connerney, J E P. , Timmins, S. , Oliversen, R J. , Espley, J R. , Joergensen, J L. , Kotsiaros, S. Levin, S M. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . A New Model of Jupiter 's Magnetic Field at the Completion of Juno 's Prime Mission A New Model of Jupiter 's Magnetic Field at the Completion of Juno 's Prime Mission . Journal...

    doi:10.1029/2021je007055 2022

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    , Garcia-Sage , K

    glocerModelingIonConic2024 APACrefauthors Glocer, A. , Garcia-Sage , K. , Sulaiman, A. , Clark, G. , Szalay, J R. , Sarkango, Y. \ Bell, J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Modeling Ion Conic Formation in Io 's Auroral Footprint Modeling Ion Conic Formation in Io 's Auroral Footprint ....

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    , Karplus , R

    hamlinBounceFrequency1961 APACrefauthors Hamlin , D A. , Karplus , R. , Vik , R C. \ Watson , K M. APACrefauthors \ 1961 . Mirror and Azimuthal Drift Frequencies for Geomagnetically Trapped Particles Mirror and Azimuthal Drift Frequencies for Geomagnetically Trapped Particles ...

    1961 doi

  3. [11]

    , Sun, Y X

    haoFormationSaturnJupiter2020 APACrefauthors Hao, Y X. , Sun, Y X. , Roussos, E. , Liu, Y. , Kollmann, P. , Yuan, C J. Zong, Q G. APACrefauthors \ 2020 12 . The Formation of Saturn 's and Jupiter 's Electron Radiation Belts by Magnetospheric Electric Fields The Formation of Sa...

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    , Roussos, E

    jonesEnceladusVaryingImprint2006 APACrefauthors Jones, G H. , Roussos, E. , Krupp, N. , Paranicas, C. , Woch, J. , Lagg, A. Dougherty, M K. APACrefauthors \ 2006 03 . Enceladus' Varying Imprint on the Magnetosphere of Saturn Enceladus' Varying Imprint on the Magnetosphere of S...

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    \ Nakagawa, T

    kimuraElectromagneticFullParticle2008 APACrefauthors Kimura, S. \ Nakagawa, T. APACrefauthors \ 2008 06 . Electromagnetic Full Particle Simulation of the Electric Field Structure around the Moon and the Lunar Wake Electromagnetic full particle simulation of the electric field ...

    2008 doi

  6. [14]

    , Alexander, N

    mccomasJovianAuroralDistributions2017a APACrefauthors McComas, D J. , Alexander, N. , Allegrini, F. , Bagenal, F. , Beebe, C. , Clark, G. White, D. APACrefauthors \ 2017 11 . The Jovian Auroral Distributions Experiment ( JADE ) on the Juno Mission to Jupiter The Jovian Auroral...

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    , Adriani, A

    muraJunoObservationsSpot2018 APACrefauthors Mura, A. , Adriani, A. , Connerney, J E P. , Bolton, S. , Altieri, F. , Bagenal, F. Turrini, D. APACrefauthors \ 2018 08 . Juno Observations of Spot Structures and a Split Tail in Io-induced Aurorae on Jupiter Juno observations of sp...

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    , Yoshioka, K

    murakami2016 APACrefauthors Murakami, G. , Yoshioka, K. , Yamazaki, A. , Tsuchiya, F. , Kimura, T. , Tao, C. Fujimoto, M. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Response of Jupiter's inner magnetosphere to the solar wind derived from extreme ultraviolet monitoring of the Io plasma torus Resp...

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    , Mauk, B

    paranicasIoEffectEnergetic2019 APACrefauthors Paranicas, C. , Mauk, B. , Haggerty, D. , Clark, G. , Kollmann, P. , Rymer, A. Bolton, S J. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Io's Effect on Energetic Charged Particles as Seen in Juno Data Io's Effect on Energetic Charged Particles as Seen ...

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    , Mauk, B H

    paranicasEnergeticChargedParticle2024 APACrefauthors Paranicas, C. , Mauk, B H. , Clark, G. , Kollmann, P. , N \'e non, Q. , Ebert, R W. Bolton, S. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Energetic Charged Particle Measurements During Juno 's Two Close Io Flybys Energetic Charged Particle Mea...

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    APACrefauthors \ 1995

    Pontius.massloading1995 APACrefauthors Pontius Jr., D H. APACrefauthors \ 1995 . Implications of variable mass loading in the Io torus: The Jovian flywheel Implications of variable mass loading in the io torus: The jovian flywheel . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physi...

    1995 doi

  12. [20]

    \ Hill, T W

    Pontius.SubCoro1982 APACrefauthors Pontius Jr., D H. \ Hill, T W. APACrefauthors \ 1982 . Departure from corotation of the Io plasma torus: Local plasma production Departure from corotation of the io plasma torus: Local plasma production . Geophysical Research Letters 9 12 132...

    1982 doi

  13. [21]

    , Hue, V

    rabiaEvidenceNonMonotonicBroadband2023 APACrefauthors Rabia, J. , Hue, V. , Szalay, J R. , Andr \'e , N. , N \'e non, Q. , Blanc, M. Sulaiman, A H. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Evidence for Non-Monotonic and Broadband Electron Distributions in the Europa Footprint Tail Revealed by ...

    2023

  14. [22]

    , Andriopoulou, M

    roussosNumericalSimulationEnergetic2013 APACrefauthors Roussos, E. , Andriopoulou, M. , Krupp, N. , Kotova, A. , Paranicas, C. , Krimigis, S. \ Mitchell, D. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Numerical Simulation of Energetic Electron Microsignature Drifts at Saturn : Methods and Applica...

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    , Jones, G H

    roussosElectronMicrodiffusionSaturnian2007 APACrefauthors Roussos, E. , Jones, G H. , Krupp, N. , Paranicas, C. , Mitchell, D G. , Lagg, A. Dougherty, M K. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Electron Microdiffusion in the Saturnian Radiation Belts: Cassini MIMI / LEMMS Observations of En...

    2007

  16. [24]

    , Krupp, N

    roussosEnergeticElectronMicrosignatures2010 APACrefauthors Roussos, E. , Krupp, N. , Paranicas, C P. , Mitchell, D G. , M \"u ller, A L. , Kollmann, P. Coates, A J. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Energetic Electron Microsignatures as Tracers of Radial Flows and Dynamics in Saturn 's ...

    2010 doi

  17. [25]

    , Szalay, J R

    sarkangoResonantPlasmaAcceleration2024 APACrefauthors Sarkango, Y. , Szalay, J R. , Sulaiman, A H. , Damiano, P A. , McComas, D J. , Rabia, J. Allegrini, F. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Resonant Plasma Acceleration at Jupiter Driven by Satellite-Magnetosphere Interactions Resonant ...

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    APACrefauthors \ 2021

    saurOverviewMoonMagnetosphere2021 APACrefauthors Saur, J. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Overview of Moon -- Magnetosphere Interactions Overview of Moon -- Magnetosphere Interactions . Magnetospheres in the Solar System Magnetospheres in the Solar System \ ( \ 575--593). American Geo...

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    , Neubauer, F M

    saurThreedimensionalPlasmaSimulation1999 APACrefauthors Saur, J. , Neubauer, F M. , Strobel, D F. \ Summers, M E. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . Three-Dimensional Plasma Simulation of Io 's Interaction with the Io Plasma Torus: Asymmetric Plasma Flow Three-dimensional plasma simulati...

    1999 doi

  20. [28]

    \ Saur, J

    schlegelAlternatingEmissionFeatures2022 APACrefauthors Schlegel, S. \ Saur, J. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Alternating Emission Features in Io 's Footprint Tail : Magnetohydrodynamical Simulations of Possible Causes Alternating Emission Features in Io 's Footprint Tail : Magnetohy...

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    \ Cohen, C M S

    selesnickChargeStatesEnergetic2009 APACrefauthors Selesnick, R S. \ Cohen, C M S. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Charge States of Energetic Ions in Jupiter 's Radiation Belt Inferred from Absorption Microsignatures of Io Charge states of energetic ions in Jupiter 's radiation belt in...

    2009 doi

  22. [30]

    \ Kivelson, M G

    southwoodChargedParticleBehavior1981 APACrefauthors Southwood, D J. \ Kivelson, M G. APACrefauthors \ 1981 . Charged Particle Behavior in Low-Frequency Geomagnetic Pulsations 1. Transverse Waves Charged particle behavior in low-frequency geomagnetic pulsations 1. Transverse wa...

    1981 doi

  23. [31]

    \ Kivelson, M G

    southwoodChargedParticleBehavior1982 APACrefauthors Southwood, D J. \ Kivelson, M G. APACrefauthors \ 1982 . Charged Particle Behavior in Low-Frequency Geomagnetic Pulsations, 2. Graphical Approach Charged particle behavior in low-frequency geomagnetic pulsations, 2. Graphical...

    1982 doi

  24. [32]

    , Kivelson, M G

    southwoodIo1980 APACrefauthors Southwood, D J. , Kivelson, M G. , Walker, R J. \ Slavin, J A. APACrefauthors \ 1980 . Io and its plasma environment Io and its plasma environment . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 85 5959-5968 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1...

    1980 doi

  25. [33]

    , Hospodarsky, G B

    sulaimanWaveParticleInteractionsAssociated2020 APACrefauthors Sulaiman, A H. , Hospodarsky, G B. , Elliott, S S. , Kurth, W S. , Gurnett, D A. , Imai, M. Bolton, S J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Wave- Particle Interactions Associated With Io 's Auroral Footprint : Evidence of Alfv...

    2020

  26. [34]

    , Allegrini, F

    szalayNewFrameworkExplain2020 APACrefauthors Szalay, J R. , Allegrini, F. , Bagenal, F. , Bolton, S J. , Bonfond, B. , Clark, G. Wilson, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . A New Framework to Explain Changes in Io 's Footprint Tail Electron Fluxes A New Framework to Explain Changes i...

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    , Bagenal, F

    szalayProtonAccelerationIo2020 APACrefauthors Szalay, J R. , Bagenal, F. , Allegrini, F. , Bonfond, B. , Clark, G. , Connerney, J E P. Levin, S M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Proton Acceleration by Io 's Alfv \'e nic Interaction Proton Acceleration by Io 's Alfv \'e nic Interactio...

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    , Saur, J

    SzalayIonPrecipitationIO2024 APACrefauthors Szalay, J R. , Saur, J. , Allegrini, F. , Ebert, R W. , Valek, P W. , Clark, G. Wilson, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Ion Precipitation Into Io's Poles Driven by a Strong Sub-Alfvénic Interaction Ion precipitation into io's poles driv...

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    , Khurana, K K

    zhangThreedimensionalLunarWake2014 APACrefauthors Zhang, H. , Khurana, K K. , Kivelson, M G. , Angelopoulos, V. , Wan, W X. , Liu, L B. Liu, W L. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Three-Dimensional Lunar Wake Reconstructed from ARTEMIS Data Three-dimensional lunar wake reconstructed fro...

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    , Khurana, K K

    zhangAlfvenWingsLunar2016 APACrefauthors Zhang, H. , Khurana, K K. , Kivelson, M G. , Fatemi, S. , Holmstr \"o m, M. , Angelopoulos, V. Liu, W L. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Alfv \'e n Wings in the Lunar Wake: The Role of Pressure Gradients Alfv \'e n wings in the lunar wake: The ...

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    apacite url apacite =6pt Acknowledgments. 6pt 1sp \@dates Received \@recvdate\@empty\@rcvaccrule \@recvdate \@revisedate\@empty ; revised \@revisedate; \@accptdate\@empty \@revisedate\@empty; accepted \@accptdate \@pubdate\@empty. ; published \@pubdate. -2pt \@authaddrs @list\...

    2001

  32. [40]

    gc" journal option for G-Cubed Nov 3, 2003 M Kelly, fixed noindent in subsubsubsection titles and for all sections in rog option Oct 2, 2003 M Kelly, added

    \@ifstar \@figbox \@figbox \@figbox#1#2#3 to !#1! #3 [#1][c] !#2!#3 \@tempdima#2 \@tempdima by2 \@tempdima by- \@tempdima by- \@height\@tempdima\@depth\@tempdima\@width @ to @ #3 Bib ??? ??? ??? =0 =0 = @figure=0 @table=0 #1 --#1 -24pt -2ex #1 0= #1 to 0 #1 I NDEX T ERMS: #1 #...

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.