Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Lossless Attention in Convolutional Networks for Facial Expression Recognition in the Wild

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.11869 v1 pith:3CFJQ62R submitted 2020-01-31 cs.CV

Lossless Attention in Convolutional Networks for Facial Expression Recognition in the Wild

classification cs.CV
keywords attentionaccuracyfaceswildcausedchallengeconvolutionalexpression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Unlike the constraint frontal face condition, faces in the wild have various unconstrained interference factors, such as complex illumination, changing perspective and various occlusions. Facial expressions recognition (FER) in the wild is a challenging task and existing methods can't perform well. However, for occluded faces (containing occlusion caused by other objects and self-occlusion caused by head posture changes), the attention mechanism has the ability to focus on the non-occluded regions automatically. In this paper, we propose a Lossless Attention Model (LLAM) for convolutional neural networks (CNN) to extract attention-aware features from faces. Our module avoids decay information in the process of generating attention maps by using the information of the previous layer and not reducing the dimensionality. Sequentially, we adaptively refine the feature responses by fusing the attention map with the feature map. We participate in the seven basic expression classification sub-challenges of FG-2020 Affective Behavior Analysis in-the-wild Challenge. And we validate our method on the Aff-Wild2 datasets released by the Challenge. The total accuracy (Accuracy) and the unweighted mean (F1) of our method on the validation set are 0.49 and 0.38 respectively, and the final result is 0.42 (0.67 F1-Score + 0.33 Accuracy).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.