Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Supporting AI/ML Security Workers through an Adversarial Techniques, Tools, and Common Knowledge (AI/ML ATT&CK) Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.05075 v1 pith:3CK6Q3WA submitted 2022-11-09 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords securityworkersadversarialcommonframeworkknowledgesupportingtechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper focuses on supporting AI/ML Security Workers -- professionals involved in the development and deployment of secure AI-enabled software systems. It presents AI/ML Adversarial Techniques, Tools, and Common Knowledge (AI/ML ATT&CK) framework to enable AI/ML Security Workers intuitively to explore offensive and defensive tactics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Understanding, Identifying, and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A PRISMA-based survey of 85 papers shows agentic LLM security research is attack-heavy and perception-focused, leaving action-layer and code-execution risks understudied.

Pith tools